Cognitive mechanisms for responding to mimicry from others

Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

Volumn 63, Issue , 2016, Pages 106-123

  Hale, Joanna ^a   Hamilton, Antonia F de C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Imitation; Mimicry; Neurocognitive models; Nonverbal behaviour

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE; CONSCIOUSNESS; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; IMITATION; MENTAL TASK; MIMICRY; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NEUROIMAGING; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MODEL; REVIEW; SOCIAL INTERACTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRUST; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; COGNITION; HUMAN RELATION; PHYSIOLOGY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

BRAIN; COGNITION; HUMANS; IMITATIVE BEHAVIOR; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84958164830     PISSN: 01497634     EISSN: 18737528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.02.006     Document Type: Review

References (196)

1. Agnetta B., Rochat P. Imitative games by 9-14-and 18-month-old infants. Infancy 2004, 6(1):1-36.
2. Aharon I., Etcoff N., Ariely D., Chabris C.F., O'Connor E., Breiter H.C. Beautiful faces have variable reward value: fMRI and behavioral evidence?. Neuron 2001, 32(3):537-551.
3. Aron A., Aron E.N., Smollan D. Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1992, 63(4):596-612. 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596.
4. Arzi A., Shedlesky L., Secundo L., Sobel N. Mirror sniffing: humans mimic olfactory sampling behavior. Chem. Senses 2014, 39(4):277-281. 10.1093/chemse/bjt113.
5. Ashton-James C.E., Chartrand T.L. Social cues for creativity: the impact of behavioral mimicry on convergent and divergent thinking. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2009, 45(4):1036-1040. 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.030.
6. Ashton-James C.E., van Baaren R.B., Chartrand T.L., Decety J., Karremans J. Mimicry and me: the impact of mimicry on self-construal. Soc. Cogn. 2007, 25(4):518-535. 10.1521/soco.2007.25.4.518.
7. Bailenson J.N., Beall A.C., Loomis J., Blascovich J., Turk M. Transformed social interaction: decoupling representation from behavior and form in collaborative virtual environments. Presence Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 2004, 13(4):428-441. 10.1162/1054746041944803.
8. Bailenson J.N., Blascovich J., Beall A.C., Loomis J.M. Equilibrium theory revisited: mutual gaze and personal space in virtual environments. Presence Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 2001, 10(6):583-598. 10.1162/105474601753272844.
9. Bailenson J.N., Yee N. Digital chameleons automatic assimilation of nonverbal gestures in immersive virtual environments. Psychol. Sci. 2005, 16(10):814-819. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01619.x.
10. Bailenson J.N., Yee N., Patel K., Beall A.C. Detecting digital chameleons. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2008, 24(1):66-87. 10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.015.
11. Banakou D., Groten R., Slater M. Illusory ownership of a virtual child body causes overestimation of object sizes and implicit attitude changes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2013, 110(31):12846-12851. 10.1073/pnas.1306779110.
12. Bavelas J.B., Black A., Lemery C.R., Mullett J. I show how you feel: motor mimicry as a communicative act. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1986, 50(2):322-329. 10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.322.
13. Bavelas J.B., Black A., Lemery C.R., Mullett J. Motor mimicry as primitive empathy. Empathy and Its Development 1987, 317-338. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, US. N. Eisenberg, J. Strayer (Eds.).
14. Bekkering H., Wohlschlager A., Gattis M. Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. Sect. A 2000, 53(1):153-164. 10.1080/713755872.
15. Ben-Ner A., Halldorsson F. Trusting and trustworthiness: what are they, how to measure them, and what affects them. J. Econ. Psychol. 2010, 31(1):64-79. 10.1016/j.joep.2009.10.001.
16. Bernieri F.J. Coordinated movement and rapport in teacher-student interactions. J. Nonverbal Behav. 1988, 12(2):120-138. 10.1007/BF00986930.
17. Bernieri F.J., Rosenthal R. Interpersonal coordination: behavior matching and interactional synchrony. Fundamentals of Nonverbal Behavior 1991, 401-432. Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme, Paris, France. R.S. Feldman, B. Rim (Eds.).
18. Bhanji J.P., Delgado M.R. The social brain and reward: social information processing in the human striatum. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci. 2014, 5(1):61-73. 10.1002/wcs.1266.
19. Bigelow A.E. Infants' sensitivity to familiar imperfect contigencies in social interaction. Infant Behav. Dev. 1998, 21(1):149-162. 10.1016/S0163-6383(98)90060-1.
20. Bigelow A.E. Discovering self through other: Infants' preference for social contingency. Bull. Menn. Clin. 2001, 65(3):335-346. 10.1521/bumc.65.3.335.19852.
21. Bird G., Viding E. The self to other model of empathy: providing a new framework for understanding empathy impairments in psychopathy, autism, and alexithymia. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2014, 47:520-532. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.021.
22. Bourgeois P., Hess U. The impact of social context on mimicry. Biol. Psychol. 2008, 77(3):343-352. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.008.
23. Brass M., Derrfuss J., von Cramon D.Y. The inhibition of imitative and overlearned responses: a functional double dissociation. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43(1):89-98. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.06.018.
24. Brass M., Ruby P., Spengler S. Inhibition of imitative behaviour and social cognition. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2009, 364(1528):2359-2367. 10.1098/rstb.2009.0066.
25. Brown E.C., Brüne M. The role of prediction in social neuroscience. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2012, 6. 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00147.
26. Bubic A., von Cramon D.Y., Schubotz R.I. Prediction, cognition and the brain. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2010, 4. 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00025.
27. Cacioppo S., Zhou H., Monteleone G., Majka E.A., Quinn K.A., Ball A.B., Norman G.J., Semin G.R., Cacioppo J.T. You are in sync with me: neural correlates of interpersonal synchrony with a partner. Neuroscience 2014, 277:842-858. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.07.051.
28. Cappella J.N., Planalp S. Talk and silence sequences in informal conversations III: interspeaker influence. Hum. Commun. Res. 1981, 7(2):117-132. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1981.tb00564.x.
29. Carpenter M., Uebel J., Tomasello M. Being mimicked increases prosocial behavior in 18-month-old infants. Child Dev. 2013, 84(5):1511-1518. 10.1111/cdev.12083.
30. Caspers S., Zilles K., Laird A.R., Eickhoff S.B. ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain. NeuroImage 2010, 50(3):1148-1167. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.112.
31. Catmur C., Gillmeister H., Bird G., Liepelt R., Brass M., Heyes C. Through the looking glass: counter-mirror activation following incompatible sensorimotor learning. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28(6):1208-1215. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06419.x.
32. Catmur C., Heyes C. Is It what you do, or when you do it? The roles of contingency and similarity in pro-social effects of imitation. Cogn. Sci. 2013, 37(8):1541-1552. 10.1111/cogs.12071.
33. Catmur C., Walsh V., Heyes C. Sensorimotor learning configures the human mirror system. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17(17):1527-1531. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.006.
34. Chartrand T.L., Bargh J.A. The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1999, 76(6):893-910. 10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893.
35. Chartrand T.L., Dalton A.N. Mimicry: its ubiquity, importance, and functionality. Oxford Handbook of Human Action 2009, 458-483. Oxford University Press. E. Morsella, J.A. Bargh, P.M. Gollwitzer (Eds.).
36. Chartrand T.L., Lakin J.L. The antecedents and consequences of human behavioral mimicry. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2013, 64(1):285-308. 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143754.
37. Chartrand T.L., Maddux W.W., Lakin J.L. Beyond the perception-behavior link: the ubiquitous utility and motivational moderators of nonconscious mimicry. The New Unconscious 2005, 334-361. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, US. R.R. Hassin, J.S. Uleman, J.A. Bargh (Eds.).
38. Chartrand T.L., van Baaren R. Human mimicry. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 2009, vol. 41:219-274. Academic Press, (Chapter 5). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S006526010800405X.
39. Chase L.J., Chase R.B. A statistical power analysis of applied psychological research. J. Appl. Psychol. 1976, 61(2):234-237. 10.1037/0021-9010.61.2.234.
40. Cheng C.M., Chartrand T.L. Self-monitoring without awareness: using mimicry as a nonconscious affiliation strategy. J. Pers. 2003, 85(6):1170-1179.
41. Clark A. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behav. Brain Sci. 2013, 36(03):181-204. 10.1017/S0140525X12000477.
42. Cohen J. The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: a review. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 1962, 65(3):145-153. 10.1037/h0045186.
43. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 1992, 1(3):98-101.
44. Cook J., Bird G. Social attitudes differentially modulate imitation in adolescents and adults. Exp. Brain Res. 2011, 211(3-4):601-612. 10.1007/s00221-011-2584-4.
45. Cook R., Press C., Dickinson A., Heyes C. Acquisition of automatic imitation is sensitive to sensorimotor contingency. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2010, 36(4):840-852. 10.1037/a0019256.
46. Craig A.D. Forebrain emotional asymmetry: a neuroanatomical basis?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2005, 9(12):566-571. (Bud). 10.1016/j.tics.2005.10.005.
47. Cross K.A., Torrisi S., Reynolds Losin E.A., Iacoboni M. Controlling automatic imitative tendencies: interactions between mirror neuron and cognitive control systems. NeuroImage 2013, 83:493-504. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.060.
48. Dabbs J.M. Similarity of gestures and interpersonal influence. Proc. Annu. Conv. Am. Psychol. Assoc. 1969, 4(Pt. 1):337-338.
49. Dalton A.N., Chartrand T.L., Finkel E.J. The schema-driven chameleon: how mimicry affects executive and self-regulatory resources. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2010, 98(4):605-617. 10.1037/a0017629.
50. David N., Bewernick B., Cohen M., Newen A., Lux S., Fink G., Shah N.J., Vogeley K. Neural representations of self versus other: visual-spatial perspective taking and agency in a virtual ball-tossing game. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2006, 18(6):898-910. 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.6.898.
51. Decety J., Chaminade T., Grèzes J., Meltzoff A.N. A PET exploration of the neural mechanisms involved in reciprocal imitation. NeuroImage 2002, 15(1):265-272. 10.1006/nimg.2001.0938.
52. Decety J., Jackson P.L. A social-neuroscience perspective on empathy. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2006, 15(2):54-58. 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00406.x.
53. Decety J., Sommerville J.A. Shared representations between self and other: a social cognitive neuroscience view. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2003, 7(12):527-533. 10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.004.
54. Denny B.T., Kober H., Wager T.D., Ochsner K.N. A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies of self- and other judgments reveals a spatial gradient for mentalizing in medial prefrontal cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2012, 24(8):1742-1752. 10.1162/jocn_a_00233.
55. Dijksterhuis A. Why we are social animals: the high road to imitation as social glue. Perspect. Imitation Neurosci. Soc. Sci. 2005, 2:207-220.
56. Dimberg U., Thunberg M., Elmehed K. Unconscious facial reactions to emotional facial expressions. Psychol. Sci. 2000, 11(1):86-89.
57. Donath J. Virtually trustworthy. Science 2007, 317(5834):53-54. 10.1126/science.1142770.
58. Doyen S., Klein O., Pichon C.-L., Cleeremans A. Behavioral priming: it's all in the mind, but whose mind?. PLoS One 2012, 7(1):e29081. 10.1371/journal.pone.0029081.
59. Drury, M., van Swol, L.M., 2005. Are people who mimic others perceived as more friendly, likeable, persuasive, and knowledgeable? Retrieved from http://aran.library.nuigalway.ie/xmlui/handle/10379/1398.
60. Duffy K.A., Chartrand T.L. Mimicry: causes and consequences. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 2015, 3:112-116. 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.03.002.
61. Dunham P., Dunham F., Hurshman A., Alexander T. Social contingency effects on subsequent perceptual-cognitive tasks in young infants. Child Dev. 1989, 60(6):1486-1496. 10.2307/1130937.
62. Eckerman C.O., Stein M.R. How imitation begets imitation and toddlers' generation of games. Dev. Psychol. 1990, 26(3):370-378. 10.1037/0012-1649.26.3.370.
63. Farrer C., Frith C.D. Experiencing oneself vs another person as being the cause of an action: the neural correlates of the experience of agency. NeuroImage 2002, 15(3):596-603. 10.1006/nimg.2001.1009.
64. Fischer-Lokou J., Guéguen N., Lamy L., Martin A., Bullock A. Imitation in mediation: effects of the duration of mimicry on reaching agreement. Soc. Behav. Pers. Int. J. 2014, 42(2):189-195. 10.2224/sbp.2014.42.2.189.
65. Fischer-Lokou J., Martin A., Guéguen N., Lamy L. Mimicry and propagation of prosocial behavior in a natural setting. Psychol. Rep. 2011, 108(2):599-605.
66. Fliessbach K., Weber B., Trautner P., Dohmen T., Sunde U., Elger C.E., Falk A. Social comparison affects reward-related brain activity in the human ventral striatum. Science 2007, 318(5854):1305-1308. 10.1126/science.1145876.
67. Fox J., Arena D., Bailenson J.N. Virtual reality: a survival guide for the social scientist. J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl. 2009, 21(3):95-113. 10.1027/1864-1105.21.3.95.
68. Friston K., Mattout J., Kilner J. Action understanding and active inference. Biol. Cybern. 2011, 104(1-2):137-160. 10.1007/s00422-011-0424-z.
69. Galinsky A.D., Ku G., Wang C.S. Perspective-taking and self-other overlap: fostering social bonds and facilitating social coordination. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 2005, 8(2):109-124. 10.1177/1368430205051060.
70. Garau M., Slater M., Pertaub D.-P., Razzaque S. The responses of people to virtual humans in an immersive virtual environment. Presence Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 2005, 14(1):104-116. 10.1162/1054746053890242.
71. Georgieff N., Jeannerod M. Beyond consciousness of external reality: a who system for consciousness of action and self-consciousness. Conscious. Cogn. 1998, 7(3):465-477. 10.1006/ccog.1998.0367.
72. Giles H., Powesland P.F. Speech Style and Social Evaluation 1975, vol. viii. Academic Press, Oxford, England.
73. Glaeser E.L., Laibson D.I., Scheinkman J.A., Soutter C.L. Measuring trust. Q. J. Econ. 2000, 115(3):811-846. 10.1162/003355300554926.
74. Guadagno R.E., Cialdini R.B. Online persuasion: an examination of gender differences in computer-mediated interpersonal influence. Group Dyn.: Theory Res. Pract. 2002, 6(1):38.
75. Guéguen N. Mimicry and honesty: people give more honest responses to their mimicker. Int. J. Psychol. Res. 2013, 6(1):53-57.
76. Guéguen N., Martin A., Meineri S. Mimicry and helping behavior: an evaluation of mimicry on explicit helping request. J. Soc. Psychol. 2011, 151(1):1-4. 10.1080/00224540903366701.
77. Guéguen N., Martin A., Meineri S., Simon J. Using mimicry to elicit answers to intimate questions in survey research. Field Methods 2013, 25(1):47-57. 10.1177/1525822X12449710.
78. Guionnet S., Nadel J., Bertasi E., Sperduti M., Delaveau P., Fossati P. Reciprocal imitation: Toward a neural basis of social interaction. Cereb. Cortex 2012, 22(4):971-978.
79. Grèzes J., Decety J. Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: a meta-analysis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2001, 12(1):1-19. http://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0193(200101)12:11::AID-HBM103.0.CO;2-V.
80. Hamilton A.F.de C. Emulation and mimicry for social interaction: a theoretical approach to imitation in autism. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2014, 61(1):101-115. 10.1080/17470210701508798.
81. Harakeh Z., Engels R.C.M.E., Van Baaren R.B., Scholte R.H.J. Imitation of cigarette smoking: an experimental study on smoking in a naturalistic setting. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007, 86(2-3):199-206.
82. Hasler B.S., Hirschberger G., Shani-Sherman T., Friedman D.A. Virtual peacemakers: mimicry increases empathy in simulated contact with virtual outgroup members. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2014, 10.1089/cyber.2014.0213.
83. Heatherton T.F., Wyland C.L., Macrae C.N., Demos K.E., Denny B.T., Kelley W.M. Medial prefrontal activity differentiates self from close others. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2006, 1(1):18-25. 10.1093/scan/nsl001.
84. Heerey E.A., Crossley H.M. Predictive and reactive mechanisms in smile reciprocity. Psychol. Sci. 2013, 0956797612472203. 10.1177/0956797612472203.
85. Heerey E.A., Kring A.M. Interpersonal consequences of social anxiety. Miscellaneous article. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 2007, 116(February (1)):125-134. 10.1037/0021-843X.116.1.125.
86. Hermans R.C.J., Lichtwarck-Aschoff A., Bevelander K.E., Herman C.P., Larsen J.K., Engels R.C.M.E. Mimicry of food intake: the dynamic interplay between eating companions. PLoS One 2012, 7(2). http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84856446069&partnerID=40&md5=9653d199a0c16ab383b3a9b6c007e5e3.
87. Herrmann A., Rossberg N., Huber F., Landwehr J.R., Henkel S. The impact of mimicry on sales-evidence from field and lab experiments. J. Econ. Psychol. 2011, 32(3):502-514. 10.1016/j.joep.2011.03.017.
88. Heyes C. Causes and consequences of imitation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2001, 5(6):253-261. 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01661-2.
89. Heyes C. Automatic imitation. Psychol. Bull. 2011, 137(3):463-483. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0022288.
90. Hofman D., Bos P.A., Schutter D.J.L.G., Honk J.van Fairness modulates non-conscious facial mimicry in women. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2012, 279:3535-3539. http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0694.
91. Hogeveen J., Chartrand T.L., Obhi S.S. Social mimicry enhances mu-suppression during action observation. Cereb. Cortex 2014, 10.1093/cercor/bhu016.
92. Hove M.J., Risen J.L. It's all in the timing: interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Soc. Cogn. 2009, 27(6):949-960. 10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.949.
93. Hsee C.K., Hatfield E., Carlson J.G., Chemtob C. The effect of power on susceptibility to emotional contagion. Cogn. Emot. 1990, 4(4):327-340. 10.1080/02699939008408081.
94. Iacoboni M., Woods R.P., Brass M., Bekkering H., Mazziotta J.C., Rizzolatti G. Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science 1999, 286(5449):2526-2528. 10.1126/science.286.5449.2526.
95. Inzlicht M., Gutsell J.N., Legault L. Mimicry reduces racial prejudice. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2012, 48(1):361-365. 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.007.
96. Irani F., Platek S.M., Bunce S., Ruocco A.C., Chute D. Functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS): an emerging neuroimaging technology with important applications for the study of brain disorders. Clin. Neuropsychol. 2007, 21(1):9-37. 10.1080/13854040600910018.
97. Izuma K., Saito D.N., Sadato N. Processing of social and monetary rewards in the human striatum. Neuron 2008, 58(2):284-294. 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.03.020.
98. Jacob C., Guéguen N., Martin A., Boulbry G. Retail salespeople's mimicry of customers: effects on consumer behavior. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2011, 18(5):381-388. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2010.11.006.
99. Johnston L. Behavioral mimicry and stigmatization. Soc. Cogn. 2002, 20(1):18-35. 10.1521/soco.20.1.18.20944.
100. Karremans J.C., Verwijmeren T. Mimicking attractive opposite-sex others: the role of romantic relationship status. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2008, 34(7):939-950. http://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208316693.
101. Kilner J.M. More than one pathway to action understanding. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2011, 15(8):352-357. 10.1016/j.tics.2011.06.005.
102. Kilner J.M., Friston K.J., Frith C.D. Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system. Cogn. Process. 2007, 8(3):159-166. 10.1007/s10339-007-0170-2.
103. Kinsbourne M., Helt M. Entrainment, mimicry and interpersonal synchrony. The Neuropsychology of Autism 2011, OUP, USA. D. Fein (Ed.).
104. Klein O., Doyen S., Leys C., Magalhães de Saldanha da Gama P.A., Miller S., Questienne L., Cleeremans A. Low hopes, high expectations expectancy effects and the replicability of behavioral experiments. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2012, 7(6):572-584. 10.1177/1745691612463704.
105. Knoblich G., Sebanz N. Evolving intentions for social interaction: from entrainment to joint action. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2008, 363(1499):2021-2031. 10.1098/rstb.2008.0006.
106. Kokal I., Engel A., Kirschner S., Keysers C. Synchronized drumming enhances activity in the caudate and facilitates prosocial commitment-if the rhythm comes easily. PLoS One 2011, 6(11). http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-81155128181&partnerID=40&md5=524839ae0aad3ad77a93c6e55619d9bd.
107. Kouzakova M., Karremans J.C., van Baaren R.B., van Knippenberg A. A stranger's cold shoulder makes the heart grow fonder: why not being mimicked by a stranger enhances longstanding relationship evaluations. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 2010, 1(1):87-93.
108. Kouzakova M., van Baaren R., van Knippenberg A. Lack of behavioral imitation in human interactions enhances salivary cortisol levels. Horm. Behav. 2010, 57(4-5):421-426.
109. Kuhn M.H., McPartland T.S. An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1954, 19:68-76. 10.2307/2088175.
110. Kühn S., Müller B.C.N., van Baaren R.B., Wietzker A., Dijksterhuis A., Brass M. Why do I like you when you behave like me? Neural mechanisms mediating positive consequences of observing someone being imitated. Soc. Neurosci. 2010, 5(4):384-392. 10.1080/17470911003633750.
111. Kulesza W., Szypowska Z., Jarman M.S., Dolinski D. Attractive chameleons sell: the mimicry-attractiveness link. Psychol. Mark. 2014, 31(7):549-561. 10.1002/mar.20716.
112. LaFrance M. Nonverbal synchrony and rapport: analysis by the cross-lag panel technique. Soc. Psychol. Q. 1979, 42(1):66. 10.2307/3033875.
113. LaFrance M., Broadbent M. Group rapport: posture sharing as a nonverbal indicator. Group Organ. Manag. 1976, 1(3):328-333. 10.1177/105960117600100307.
114. Lakin J.L., Chartrand T.L. Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychol. Sci. 2003, 14(4):334-339. 10.1111/1467-9280.14481.
115. Lakin J.L., Chartrand T.L., Arkin R.M. I am too just like you: nonconscious mimicry as an automatic behavioral response to social exclusion. Psychol. Sci. (Wiley-Blackwell) 2008, 19(8):816-822. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02162.x.
116. Lakin J.L., Jefferis V.E., Cheng C.M., Chartrand T.L. The chameleon effect as social glue: evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicry. J. Nonverbal Behav. 2003, 27(3):145-162. 10.1023/A:1025389814290.
117. Lambdin C., Shaffer V.A. Are within-subjects designs transparent?. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 2009, 4(7):554-566.
118. Lamm C., Batson C., Decety J. The neural substrate of human empathy: effects of perspective-taking and cognitive appraisal. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2007, 19(1):42-58. 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.1.42.
119. Leander N.P., Chartrand T.L., Bargh J.A. You give me the chills embodied reactions to inappropriate amounts of behavioral mimicry. Psychol. Sci. 2012, 23(7):772-779. 10.1177/0956797611434535.
120. Leander N.P., Chartrand T.L., Wood W. Mind your mannerisms: behavioral mimicry elicits stereotype conformity. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2011, 47(1):195-201. 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.09.002.
121. Leighton J., Bird G., Orsini C., Heyes C. Social attitudes modulate automatic imitation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2010, 46(6):905-910. 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.07.001.
122. Likowski K.U., Mühlberger A., Seibt B., Pauli P., Weyers P. Modulation of facial mimicry by attitudes. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2008, 44(4):1065-1072.
123. Lönnqvist, J.-E., Verkasalo, M., Walkowitz, G., Wichardt, P.C., 2014. Measuring individual risk attitudes in the lab: Task or ask? An empirical comparison (No. 1905). Kiel Working Paper. Retrieved from http://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/93074.
124. Maddux W.W., Mullen E., Galinsky A.D. Chameleons bake bigger pies and take bigger pieces: strategic behavioral mimicry facilitates negotiation outcomes. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2008, 44(2):461-468. 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.02.003.
125. Markus H.R., Kitayama S. Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol. Rev. 1991, 98(2):224-253. 10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224.
126. Maurer R.E., Tindall J.H. Effect of postural congruence on client's perception of counselor empathy. J. Couns. Psychol. 1983, 30(2):158-163. 10.1037/0022-0167.30.2.158.
127. Meltzoff A.N. Like me: a foundation for social cognition. Dev. Sci. 2007, 10(1):126-134. 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00574.x.
128. Meltzoff A.N. The like me framework for recognizing and becoming an intentional agent. Acta Psychol. 2007, 124(1):26-43. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.09.005.
129. Meltzoff A.N. Social cognition and the origins of imitation, empathy, and theory of mind. The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development 2010, 49-75. Wiley-Blackwell, Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781444325485.ch2/summary. U. Goswami (Ed.).
130. Miles L.K., Griffiths J.L., Richardson M.J., Macrae C.N. Too late to coordinate: contextual influences on behavioral synchrony. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 2010, 40(1):52-60.
131. Miles L.K., Nind L.K., Macrae C.N. The rhythm of rapport: interpersonal synchrony and social perception. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2009, 45(3):585-589. 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.002.
132. Millar W.S. Smiling, vocal, and attentive behavior during social contingency learning in seven- and ten-month-old infants. Merrill-Palmer Q. 1988, 34(3):301-325.
133. Molden D.C. Understanding priming effects in social psychology: what is social priming and how does it occur?. Soc. Cogn. 2014, 32(Suppl):1-11. 10.1521/soco.2014.32.
134. Molenberghs P., Cunnington R., Mattingley J.B. Is the mirror neuron system involved in imitation? A short review and meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2009, 33(7):975-980. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.03.010.
135. Nadel-Brulfert J., Baudonniere P.M. The social function of reciprocal imitation in 2-year-old peers. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 1982, 5(1):95-109. 10.1177/016502548200500105.
136. Nadel J. How Imitation Boosts Development: In Infancy and Autism Spectrum Disorder 2014, OUP, Oxford.
137. Navarre D.D. Posture sharing in dyadic interaction. Am. J. Danc. Ther. 1982, 5(1):28-42. 10.1007/BF02579539.
138. Neumann R., Strack F. Mood contagion: the automatic transfer of mood between persons. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2000, 79(2):211-223.
139. Noah J.A., Ono Y., Nomoto Y., Shimada S., Tachibana A., Zhang X., Bronner S., Hirsch J. fMRI validation of fNIRS measurements during a naturalistic task. J. Vis. Exp. 2015, (100). 10.3791/52116.
140. O'Doherty J., Winston J., Critchley H., Perrett D., Burt D.M., Dolan R.J. Beauty in a smile: the role of medial orbitofrontal cortex in facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41(2):147-155.
141. Osimo S.A., Pizarro R., Spanlang B., Slater M. Conversations between self and self as sigmund freud-virtual body ownership paradigm for self counselling. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5. 10.1038/srep13899.
142. Over H., Carpenter M. Priming third-party ostracism increases affiliative imitation in children. Dev. Sci. 2009, 12(3):F1-F8. 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00820.x.
143. Over H., Carpenter M. The social side of imitation. Child Dev. Perspect. 2013, 7(1):6-11. http://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12006.
144. Pentland A. Honest Signals 2010, MIT Press, (Sandy).
145. Prinz W. Open Minds: The Social Making of Agency and Intentionality 2012, MIT Press.
146. Quigley B.M., Collins R.L. The modeling of alcohol consumption: a meta-analytic review. J. Stud. Alcohol 1999, 60(1):90-98.
147. Reddish P., Fischer R., Bulbulia J. Let's dance together: synchrony, shared intentionality and cooperation. PLoS One 2013, 8(8). http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84881343680&partnerID=40&md5=7624c9c4db847b738ccae7a5ee6fb8ee.
148. Redeker M., Stel M., Mastop J. Does mimicking others change your self-view?. J. Soc. Psychol. 2011, 151(4):387-390.
149. Reeves B., Nass C.I. The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places 1996, vol. xiv. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, US.
150. Rizzolatti G., Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2004, 27:169-192. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230.
151. Ruby P., Decety J. Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: a PET investigation of agency. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4(5):546-550. 10.1038/87510.
152. Sanchez-Burks J., Bartel C.A., Blount S. Performance in intercultural interactions at work: cross-cultural differences in response to behavioral mirroring. J. Appl. Psychol. 2009, 94(1):216-223. 10.1037/a0012829.
153. Sanfey A.G., Rilling J.K., Aronson J.A., Nystrom L.E., Cohen J.D. The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2003, 300(5626):1755-1758. 10.1126/science.1082976.
154. Scheflen A.E. The significance of posture in communication systems. Psychiatry J. Study Interpers. Process. 1964, 27(4):316-331.
155. Scheflen, A.E., 1972. Body Language and the Social Order; Communication as Behavioral Control. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/%3Fid=ED077060.
156. Sparenberg P., Topolinski S., Springer A., Prinz W. Minimal mimicry: mere effector matching induces preference. Brain Cogn. 2012, 80(3):291-300. 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.08.004.
157. Spengler S., von Cramon D.Y., Brass M. Control of shared representations relies on key processes involved in mental state attribution. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2009, 30(11):3704-3718. 10.1002/hbm.20800.
158. Spengler S., von Cramon D.Y., Brass M. Resisting motor mimicry: control of imitation involves processes central to social cognition in patients with frontal and temporo-parietal lesions. Soc. Neurosci. 2010, 5(4):401-416.
159. Spengler S., Brass M., Kühn S., Schütz-Bosbach S. Minimizing motor mimicry by myself: self-focus enhances online action-control mechanisms during motor contagion. Conscious. Cognit. 2010, 19(1):98-106.
160. Stel M., Blascovich J., McCall C., Mastop J., van Baaren R.B., Vonk R. Mimicking disliked others: effects of a priori liking on the mimicry-liking link. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 2010, 40(5):867-880. 10.1002/ejsp.655.
161. Stel M., van den Bos K., Bal M. On mimicry and the psychology of the belief in a just world: imitating the behaviors of others reduces the blaming of innocent victims. Soc. Justice Res. 2012, 25(1):14-24. 10.1007/s11211-012-0150-2.
162. Stel M., van Dijk E., Olivier E. You want to know the truth? Then don't mimic!. Psychol. Sci. 2009, 20(6):693-699. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02350.x.
163. Stel M., Harinck F. Being mimicked makes you a prosocial voter. Exp. Psychol. 2011, 58(1):79-84. 10.1027/1618-3169/a000070.
164. Stel M., Rispens S., Leliveld M., Lokhorst A.M. The consequences of mimicry for prosocials and proselfs: effects of social value orientation on the mimicry-liking link. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 2011, 41(3):269-274. 10.1002/ejsp.790.
165. Stel M., van Baaren R.B., Vonk R. Effects of mimicking: acting prosocially by being emotionally moved. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 2008, 38(6):965-976. 10.1002/ejsp.472.
166. Stel M., van den Bos K., Sim S., Rispens S. Mimicry and just world beliefs: mimicking makes men view the world as more personally just. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 2013, 52(3):397-411. 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02084.x.
167. Stel M., van den Heuvel C., Smeets R.C. Facial feedback mechanisms in autistic spectrum disorders. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2008, 38(7):1250-1258. 10.1007/s10803-007-0505-y.
168. Stel M., Vonk R. Mimicry in social interaction: benefits for mimickers, mimickees, and their interaction. Br. J. Psychol. 2010, 101(2):311-323. 10.1348/000712609X465424.
169. Tanner R.J., Ferraro R., Chartrand T.L., Bettman J.R., Baaren R.V. Of chameleons and consumption: the impact of mimicry on choice and preferences. J. Consum. Res. 2008, 34(6):754-766. 10.1086/522097.
170. Tressoldi P.E. Replication unreliability in psychology: elusive phenomena or elusive statistical power?. Front. Psychol. 2012, 3. 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00218.
171. Uddin L.Q. Salience processing and insular cortical function and dysfunction. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2015, 16(1):55-61. 10.1038/nrn3857.
172. Uddin L.Q., Molnar-Szakacs I., Zaidel E., Iacoboni M. rTMS to the right inferior parietal lobule disrupts self-other discrimination. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2006, 1(1):65-71. 10.1093/scan/nsl003.
173. Valdesolo P., DeSteno D. Synchrony and the social tuning of compassion. Emotion 2011, 11(2):262-266.
174. Valdesolo P., Ouyang J., DeSteno D. The rhythm of joint action: synchrony promotes cooperative ability. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2010, 46(4):693-695. 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.004.
175. Van Baaren, R.B., Chartrand, T.L., 2005. Nonconscious imitation has consequences that go beyond the dyad. Retrieved from , pp. 128-132. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url%3Feid=2-s2.0-84858838776%26partnerID=40%26md5=594cff6949e9b3c3a9f00be123b0148e.
176. van Baaren R.B., Decety J., Dijksterhuis A., van der Leij A., van Leeuwen M.L. Being imitated: consequences of nonconsciously showing empathy. The Social Neuroscience of Empathy 2009, 31-42. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA,US. J. Decety, W. Ickes (Eds.).
177. van Baaren R.B., Holland R.W., Kawakami K., van Knippenberg A. Mimicry and prosocial behavior. Psychol. Sci. 2004, 15(1):71-74. 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01501012.x.
178. van Baaren R.B., Janssen L., Chartrand T.L., Dijksterhuis A. Where is the love? The social aspects of mimicry. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2009, 364(1528):2381-2389. 10.1098/rstb.2009.0057.
179. van Baaren R.B., Maddux W.W., Chartrand T.L., de Bouter C., van Knippenberg A. It takes two to mimic: behavioral consequences of self-construals. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2003, 84(5):1093-1102. 10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1093.
180. van Leeuwen M.L., van Baaren R.B., Martin D., Dijksterhuis A., Bekkering H. Executive functioning and imitation: increasing working memory load facilitates behavioural imitation. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:3265-3270. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.06.005.
181. van Swol L.M. The effects of nonverbal mirroring on perceived persuasiveness, agreement with an imitator, and reciprocity in a group discussion. Commun. Res. 2003, 30(4):461-480. 10.1177/0093650203253318.
182. Verberne F.M.F., Ham J., Ponnada A., Midden C.J.H. Trusting digital chameleons: the effect of mimicry by a virtual social agent on user trust. Persuasive Technology 2013, 234-245. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. S. Berkovsky, J. Freyne (Eds.).
183. Vrijsen J.N., Lange W.-G., Becker E.S., Rinck M. Socially anxious individuals lack unintentional mimicry. Behav. Res. Ther. 2010, 48(6):561-564. 10.1016/j.brat.2010.02.004.
184. Vrijsen J.N., Lange W.-G., Dotsch R., Wigboldus D.H.J., Rinck M. How do socially anxious women evaluate mimicry? A virtual reality study. Cogn. Emot. 2010, 24(5):840-847. 10.1080/13854040902833652.
185. Wallbott H.G. Congruence, contagion, and motor mimicry: mutualities in nonverbal exchange. Mutualities in Dialogue 1995, 82-98. Cambridge University Press. I. Markova, C.F. Graumann, K. Foppa (Eds.).
186. Wang Y., Hamilton A.F.de C. Social top-down response modulation (STORM): a model of the control of mimicry in social interaction. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2012, 6. http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00153.
187. Wang Y., Hamilton A.F.de C. Understanding the role of the "Self" in the social priming of mimicry. PLoS One 2013, 8(4):e60249. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060249.
188. Wang Y., Newport R., de C.Hamilton A.F. Eye contact enhances mimicry of intransitive hand movements. Biol. Lett. 2011, 7(1):7-10. 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0279.
189. Watson J.S., Ramey C.T. Reactions to response-contingent stimulation in early infancy. Merrill-Palmer Q. Behav. Dev. 1972, 18(3):219-227.
190. Webb O.J., Eves F.F., Smith L. Investigating behavioural mimicry in the context of stair/escalator choice. Br. J. Health Psychol. 2011, 16(2):373-385. 10.1348/135910710X510395.
191. Whiten A., McGuigan N., Marshall-Pescini S., Hopper L.M. Emulation, imitation, over-imitation and the scope of culture for child and chimpanzee. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2009, 364(1528):2417-2428. 10.1098/rstb.2009.0069.
192. Wiltermuth S.S., Heath C. Synchrony and cooperation. Psychol. Sci. 2009, 20(1):1-5.
193. Yabar Y., Johnston L., Miles L., Peace V. Implicit behavioral mimicry: investigating the impact of group membership. J. Nonverbal Behav. 2006, 30(3):97-113.
194. Yamaoka F., Kanda T., Ishiguro H., Hagita N. How contingent should a communication robot be?. Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-robot Interaction 2006, 313-320. 10.1145/1121241.1121294.
195. Yamaoka F., Kanda T., Ishiguro H., Hagita N. How contingent should a lifelike robot be? The relationship between contingency and complexity. Connect. Sci. 2007, 19(2):143-162. 10.1080/09540090701371519.
196. Zaitsev M., Dold C., Sakas G., Hennig J., Speck O. Magnetic resonance imaging of freely moving objects: prospective real-time motion correction using an external optical motion tracking system. NeuroImage 2006, 31(3):1038-1050. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.039.