Imitation in mediation: Effects of the duration of mimicry on reaching agreement

Social Behavior and Personality

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 189-195

  Fischer Lokou, Jacques ^a   Guéguen, Nicolas ^a   Lamy, Lubomir ^b   Martin, Angélique ^a   Bullock, Andrea ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BRETAGNE SUD   (France)

^b University Paris Descartes   (France)

Author keywords

Agreement; Imitation; Mediation; Mimicry; Negotiation; Similarity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897064541     PISSN: 03012212     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2224/sbp.2014.42.2.189     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Bailenson, J. N., & Yee, N. (2005). Digital chameleons: Automatic assimilation of nonverbal gestures in immersive virtual environments. Psychological Science, 16, 814-819. http://doi.org/fjkpp8
2. Burger, J. M., Messian, N., Patel, S., del Prado, A., & Anderson, C. (2004). What a coincidence! The effects of incidental similarity on compliance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 35-43. http://doi.org/ddktc9
3. Cantor, J. R., Alfonso, H. & Zillmann, D. (1976). The persuasive effectiveness of the peer appeal and a communicator's first-hand experience. Communication Research, 3, 293-310. http://doi.org/c6m3bj
4. Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893-910. http://doi.org/fbkx5m
5. Fischer-Lokou, J., & Guéguen, N. (2004). Influence non verbale dans le cadre de la médiation: Effets du toucher et du statut sur la prédisposition à atteindre un accord [Non-verbal influence in the field of mediation: Effects of touch and status on agreement]. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 61, 35-42.
6. Guéguen, N., & Martin, A. (2009). Incidental similarity facilitates behavioral mimicry. Social Psychology, 40, 88-92. http://doi.org/ccmmrz
7. Lakin, J. L., Jefferis, V. E., Cheng, C. M., & Chartrand, T. (2003). The chameleon effect as social glue: Evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicry. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 145-162. http://doi.org/dhq2ct
8. Maddux, W., Mullen, E., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Chameleons bake bigger pies and take bigger pieces: Strategic behavioral mimicry facilitates negotiation outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 461-468. http://doi.org/fq8vwx
9. Swaab, R., Maddux, W., & Sinaceur, M. (2011). Early words that work: When and how virtual linguistic mimicry facilitates negotiation outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 616-621. http://doi.org/chxz98
10. van Baaren, R. B., Holland, R. W., Kawakami, K., & van Knippenberg, A. (2004). Mimicry and prosocial behavior. Psychological Science, 15, 71-74. http://doi.org/c7kthh