Detecting digital chameleons

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 66-87

  Bailenson, Jeremy N ^a   Yee, Nick ^a   Patel, Kayur ^b   Beall, Andrew C ^c  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Stanford University   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Embodied agents; Social interaction; Turing test; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

HUMAN ENGINEERING; INTELLIGENT AGENTS; SET THEORY; VIRTUAL REALITY;

EMBODIED AGENTS; SOCIAL INTERACTION;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 34548462878     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.015     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Avouris N.M., Dimitracopoulou A., and Komis V. On analysis of collaborative problem solving: an object-oriented approach. Computers in Human Behavior 19 2 (2003) 147-167
2. Bailenson J.N., and Beall A.C. Transformed social interaction: Exploring the digital plasticity of avatars. In: Schroeder R., and Axelsson's A. (Eds). Avatars at work and play: Collaboration and interaction in shared virtual environments (2006), Springer-Verlag 1-16
3. Bailenson J.N., Beall A.C., Loomis J., Blascovich J., and Turk M. Transformed social interaction: decoupling representation from behavior and form in collaborative virtual environments. PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 13 4 (2004) 428-441
4. Bailenson J.N., and Yee N. Digital chameleons: automatic assimilation of nonverbal gestures in immersive virtual environments. Psychological Science 16 (2005) 814-819
5. Blascovich J., Loomis J., Beall A., Swinth K., Hoyt C., and Bailenson J.N. Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry 13 (2002) 103-124
6. Bourhis R.Y., Giles H., and Lambert W.E. Social consequences of accommodating one's style of speech: a cross-national investigation. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 6 5 (1975) 5-71
7. Buller D.B., and Burgoon J.K. Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory 6 (1996) 203-242
8. Burgoon J.K., Bonito J.A., Bengtsson B., Cederberg C., Lundberg M., and Allspach L. Interactivity in human-computer interaction: a study of credibility, understanding, and influence. Computers in Human Behaviour 16 (2000) 553-574
9. Cappella J., and Panalp A. Talk and silence sequences in informal conversations. Interspeaker influence. Human Communication Research 7 (1981) 117-132
10. Cassell J. Representation and Intelligence in Embodied Conversational Agents. AI Magazine 22 3 (2001) 67-83
11. Chartrand T.L., and Bargh J.A. The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76 (1999) 893-910
12. Cohen E., and Cooper R. Language and tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 13 (1986) 533-563
13. Dovidio J.F., Kawakami K., and Beach K.R. Implicit and explicit attitudes: examination of the relationship between measures of intergroup bias. In: Brown R., and Gaertner S.L. (Eds). Blackwell handbook of social psychology. Intergroup relations Vol. 4 (2001), Blackwell, Oxford, UK 175-197
14. French R.M. Peeking behind the screen: the unsuspected power of the standard Turing test. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 12 (2000) 331-340
15. Fussell S.R., Setlock L.D., Yang J., Ou J., Mauer E.M., and Kramer A. Gestures over video streams to support remote collaboration on physical tasks. Human-Computer Interaction 19 (2004) 273-309
16. Giles H. Accommodation theory: some new directions. In: de Silva S. (Ed). Aspects of linguistic behavior (1980), University of York, New York
17. Giles H., Coupland J., and Coupland N. Accommodation theory: communication, context, and consequence. In: Giles H., Coupland J., and Coupland N. (Eds). Contexts of accommodation. Developments in applied sociolinguistics (1991), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
18. Giles H. Communicative effectiveness as a function of accented speech. Speech Monographs 40 (1973) 330-331
19. Graesser A.C., Jackson G.T., Mathews E.C., Mitchell H.H., Olney A., Ventura M., et al. Why/autotutor: a test of learning gains from a physics tutor with natural language dialog. In: Hirsh D., and Alterman R. (Eds). Proceedings of the 25rd annual conference of the cognitive science society (2003), Cognitive Science Society, Boston, MA 1-5
20. Graf P., and Schacter D.L. Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic patients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 11 (1985) 501-518
21. Grice H.P. Logic and conversation. In: Cole P., and Morgan J. (Eds). Syntax and semantics: Speech acts Vol. 3 (1975), Academic, New York
22. Guadagno R.E., and Cialdini R.B. Online persuasion: an examination of gender differences in computer-mediated interpersonal influence. Group Dynamics: Theory Research and Practice. Special Issue on Internet Research 6 (2002) 38-51
23. Guadagno, R., Bailenson, J. N., Beall, A. C., Dimov, A., & Blascovich, J. (2005). Transformed social interaction and the cyranoid: the impact of non-verbal behavior on persuasion in an immersive virtual environment. In Presentation to the conference on group processes in computer-supported interaction, Miami, OH.
24. Hu, C., Chang, Y., Feris, R. & Turk, M. (2004). Manifold based analysis of facial expression. In IEEE workshop on face processing in video, Washington, DC.
25. Johnston L. Behavioral mimicry and stigmatization. Social Cognition 20 (2002) 18-34
26. Kahneman D., and Tversky A. On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review 80 (1973) 237-251
27. Kendon A. Movement coordination in social interaction: some examples described. Acta Psychologica 32 2 (1970) 101-125
28. Kiesler S., Siegel J., and McGuire T. Social psychological effects of computer mediated communication. American Psychologist 39 (1984) 1123-1134
29. Kiousis S. Interactivity: a concept explication. New Media & Society 4 3 (2002) 355-383
30. Konijn E.A., and Hoorn J.F. Reality-based genre preferences do not direct personal involvement. Discourse Processes 38 2 (2004) 219-246
31. Kuiken D., Phillips L., Gregus M., Miall D.S., Verbitsky M., and Tonkonogy A. Locating self-modifying feelings within literary reading. Discourse Processes 38 2 (2004) 267-286
32. LaFrance M. Nonverbal synchrony and rapport: analysis by the cross-lag panel technique. Social Psychology Quarterly 42 (1979) 66-70
33. Levelt W.J.M., and Kelter S. Surface form and memory in question answering. Cognitive Psychology 14 (1982) 78-106
34. Loftus E. Eyewitness testimony (1996), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
35. Monk A.F., and Gale C. A look is worth a thousand words: full gaze awareness in video-mediated conversation. Discourse Processes 33 (2002) 257-278
36. Moon, Y., & Nass, C. I. (1996). Adaptive agents and personality change: complementarity versus similarity as forms of adaptation. In Bilger, R., Guest, S., Tauber, M.J. (Hrsg.), Human factors in computing systems: Chi'96 electronic conference proceedings.
37. Morley I., and Stephenson G. Interpersonal and interparty exchange. A laboratory simulation of an industrial negotiation at the plant level. British Journal of Psychology 60 (1969) 543-545
38. Natale M. Convergence of mean vocal intensity in dyadic communications as a function of social desirability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32 (1975) 790-804
39. Neumann R., and Strack F. Mood contagion: the automatic transfer of mood between persons. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 79 (2000) 211-223
40. Pew Internet and American Life Project, P. I. A. L. (2004). 53 Million in US Use IM, from .
41. Provine R. Contagious laughter: laughter is sufficient stimulus for laughs and smiles. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 30 1-4 (1992)
42. Rafaeli S. Interactivity: from new media to communication. In: Hawkins R.P., Wiemann J.M., and Pingree S. (Eds). Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal processes (1988), Sage, Beverly Hills, CA 110-134
43. Reeves B., and Nass C. The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places (1996), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA
44. Saygin A.P., Cicekli I., and Akman V. Turing Test: 50 years later. Minds and Machines 10 4 (2000) 463-518
45. Shamp S.A. Mechanomorphism in perception of computer communication partners. Computers in Human Behavior 7 (1991) 147-161
46. Short J., Williams E., and Christie B. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications (1976), Wiley Press, London
47. Steuer J. Defining virtual reality: factors determining telepresence. Journal of Communication 42 4 (1992) 73-93
48. Suzuki N., Takeuchi Y., Ishii K., and Okada M. Effects of echoic mimicry using hummed sounds on human-computer interaction. Speech Communication 40 (2003) 559-573
49. Turing A.M. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59 (1950) 433-460
50. Welkowitz J., Feldstein S., Finkelstein M., and Aylesworth L. Changes in vocal intensity as a function of interspeaker influence. Perceptual and Motor Skills 35 (1972) 715-718
51. Wiener M., and Mehrabian A. Language within language: Immediacy, a channel in verbal communication (1968), Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York
52. Whittaker S. Theories and methods in mediated communication. In: Graesser A., Gernsbacher M., and Goldman S. (Eds). The handbook of discourse processes (2002), Erlbaum, NJ 243-286
53. Wu G. Perceived interactivity and attitude toward website. In: Roberts M.S. (Ed). Proceedings from the 1999 American Academy of Advertising (1999), University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
54. Van Baaren R.B., Holland R.W., Steenaert B., and van Knippenberg A. Mimicry for money: behavioral consequences of imitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 39 4 (2003) 393-398
55. Van Baaren R.B., Holland R.W., Kawakami K., and van Knippenberg A. Mimicry and pro-social behavior. Psychological Science 15 (2004) 71-74
56. Yee N. The psychology of MMORPGs: Emotional investment, motivations, relationship formation, and problematic usage. In: Schroeder R., and Axelsson A. (Eds). Avatars at work and play: Collaboration and interaction in shared virtual environments (2006), Springer-Verlag, London 187-207
57. Zuckerman M., DePaulo B.M., and Rosenthal R. Verbal and non-verbal communication of deception. In: Berkowitz L. (Ed). Advances in experimental and social psychology Vol. 14 (1981), Academic Press, New York 1-59