Shared representations between self and other: A social cognitive neuroscience view

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 7, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 527-533

  Decety, Jean ^a   Sommerville, Jessica A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; NEURAL NETWORKS; NEUROLOGY; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY;

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

BEHAVIOR; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; IDENTITY; MEMORY; MENTAL HEALTH; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NEUROSCIENCE; PARIETAL LOBE; PERCEPTION; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; REVIEW; SELF CONCEPT; SELF EVALUATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

EID: 0344825178     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Vygotsky L.S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. 1978;Harvard University Press.
2. Barsalou, L.W. et al. Social embodiment. In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 43) (Ross, B., ed.), pp. 43-92, Academic Press (in press).
3. Knoblich G., Flach R. Predicting the effects of actions: interactions of perception and action. Psychol. Sci. 12:2001;467-472.
4. Rizzolatti G., et al. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and the imitation of action. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2:2001;661-670.
5. Grèzes J., Decety J. Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: a meta-analysis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 12:2001;1-19.
6. Aron A., et al. Close relationships as including other in self. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 60:1991;241-253.
7. Neisser U. Two perceptually given aspects of the self and their development. Dev. Rev. 11:1991;197-209.
8. Rochat P., Hespos S.J. Differential rooting response by neonates: evidence for an early sense of self. Early Devel. Parent. 6:1997;105-112.
9. Meltzoff A.N., Brooks R. 'Like me' as a building block for understanding other minds: bodily acts, attention and intention. Malle B.F., et al. Intentions and Intentionality: Foundations for Social Cognition. 2001;171-192 MIT Press.
10. Woodward A.L., et al. How infants make sense of intentional action. Malle B.F., et al. Intentions and Intentionality: Foundations of Social Cognition. 2001;149-169 MIT Press.
11. Trevarthen C. Communication and cooperation in early infancy. Bullowa M. Before Speech: The Beginning of Human Communication. 1979;321-347 Cambridge University Press.
12. Lewis M., et al. Self-development and self-conscious emotions. Child Dev. 60:1989;146-156.
13. Gopnik A., Meltzoff A.N. Minds, bodies, and persons: young children's understanding of the self and others as reflected in imitation and theory of mind research. Parker S.T., et al. Self-Awareness in Animals and Humans: Developmental Perspectives. 1994;166-186 Cambridge University Press.
14. Frye D., et al. Theory of mind and rule-based reasoning. Cogn. Dev. 10:1995;483-527.
15. Alicke M.D., et al. Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 68:1995;804-825.
16. McConnell A.R., et al. Expectations of consistency about the self: consequences for self-concept formation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 38:2002;569-585.
17. Jones E.E., Nisbett R.E. The Actor and Observer: Divergent Perceptions of the Cases of Behavior. 1971;General Learning Press.
18. Knobe J., Malle B.F. Self and other in the explanation of behavior: 30 years later. Psychol. Belg. 42:2002;113-130.
19. Voraurer J.D., Ross M. Self-awareness and feeling transparent: failing to surpress one's self. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 35:1999;415-440.
20. Gilovich T., et al. The spotlight effect in social judgment: An egocentric bias I estimates of the salience of one's own actions and appearance. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 78:2000;211-222.
21. Gilovich T., et al. The spotlight effect revisited: overestimating the manifest variability of our actions and appearance. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 38:2002;93-99.
22. Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Hum. Relat. 7:1954;117-140.
23. Buckingham J.T., Alicke M.D. The influence of individual versus aggregate social comparison and the presence of others on self-evaluations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 83:2002;1117-1130.
24. Coats S., et al. Overlapping mental representations of self and in-group: reaction time evidence and its relationship with explicit measures of group identification. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 36:2000;304-315.
25. Hodges S.D., et al. It's different when I do it: feature matching in self-other comparisons. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 28:2002;40-53.
26. Breen N., et al. Mirrored-self misidentification: two cases of focal onset dementia. Neurocase. 7:2001;239-254.
27. Keenan J.P., et al. Self-recognition and the right hemisphere. Nature. 409:2001;305.
28. Daprati E., et al. Recognition of self-produced movement in a case of severe neglect. Neurocase. 6:2000;477-486.
29. Feinburg T.E. Altered Egos: How the Brain Creates the Self. 2001;Oxford University Press.
30. Levine B., et al. Episodic memory and the self in a case of isolated retrograde amnesia. Brain. 121:1998;1951-1973.
31. Miller B.L., et al. Neuroanatomy of the self: evidence from patients with frontotemporal dementia. Neurology. 57:2001;817-821.
32. Keenan J.P., et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging and event-related potentials suggest right prefrontal activation for self-related processing. Brain Cogn. 47:2001;87-91.
33. Fink G.R., et al. Cerebral representation of one's own past: neural networks involved in autobiographical memory. J. Neurosci. 16:1996;4275-4282.
34. Gallagher H.L., Frith C.D. Functional imaging of 'theory of mind'. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7:2003;77-83.
35. Happé F., et al. Acquired mind-blindness following stroke. Cognition. 70:1999;211-240.
36. Barresi J., Moore C. Intentional relations and social understanding. Behav. Brain Sci. 19:1996;107-154.
37. Farrer C., et al. Modulating the experience of agency: a positron emission tomography study. Neuroimage. 18:2003;324-333.
38. Ruby P., Decety J. Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: a PET investigation of agency. Nat. Neurosci. 4:2001;546-550.
39. Ruby P., Decety J. What you believe versus what you think they believe: a neuroimaging study of conceptual perspective taking. Eur. J. Neurosci. 17:2003;2475-2480.
40. Blanke O., et al. Stimulating illusory own-body perceptions. Nature. 419:2002;269-270.
41. Ramachandran V.S., Rogers-Ramachandran D. Denial of disabilities in anosognosia. Nature. 382:1996;501.
42. Humphrey N. The uses of consciousness. Brockman J. Speculations: The Reality Club. 1990;67-84 Prentice Hall.
43. Carlson S.M., Moses L.L. Individual differences in inhibory control and children's theory of mind. Child Dev. 72:2001;1032-1053.
44. Tamm L., et al. Maturation of brain function associated with response inhibition. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 41:2002;1231-1238.
45. Goel V., Dolan R.J. The functional anatomy of humor: segregating cognitive and affective components. Nat. Neurosci. 4:2001;237-238.
46. De Renzi E., et al. Imitation and utilization behaviour. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 61:1996;396-400.
47. Lhermitte F., et al. Human autonomy and the frontal lobes. Part I: imitation and utilization behavior: a neuropsychological study of 75 patients. Ann. Neurol. 19:1986;326-334.
48. Chiron C., et al. The right brain hemisphere is dominant in human infants. Brain. 120:1997;1057-1065.
49. Hobson R.P. On sharing experiences. Dev. Psychol. 1:1989;197-203.
50. Meltzoff A.N., Decety J. What imitation tells us about social cognition: rapprochements between developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 358:2003;491-500.
51. Neisser U. Five kinds of self-knowledge. Philos. Psychol. 1:1988;35-59.
52. Robins R.W., et al. Naturalizing the self. Pervin L.A., Oliver J.P. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. 2nd edn :2001;443-477 Guilford Press.
53. Lewis M. Ways of knowing: objective self-awareness or consciousness. Dev. Rev. 11:1991;231-243.
54. Perner J., Lang B. Development of theory of mind and executive control. Trends Cogn. Sci. 3:1999;337-344.
55. Brass M., et al. The inhibition of imitative response tendencies. Neuroimage. 14:2001;1416-1423.
56. Ferstl E.C., von Cramon D.Y. What does the frontomedian cortex contribute to language processing: coherence or theory of mind? Neuroimage. 17:2002;1599-1612.
57. Price B.H., et al. The compartmental learning disabilities of early frontal lobe damage. Brain. 113:1990;1383-1393.
58. Eslinger P.J. Neurological and neuropsychological bases of empathy. Eur. Neurol. 39:1998;193-199.
59. Anderson S.W., et al. Impairment of social and moral behavior related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2:1999;1032-1037.
60. Nadel J., Baudonnière P.M. The social function of reciprocal imitation in 2-years-old peers. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 5:1982;95-109.
61. Hobson R.P. The Cradle of Thoughts. 2003;Oxford University Press.
62. Rochat P. Early Social Cognition: Understanding Others in the First Months of Life. 1999;Erlbaum.
63. Decety J., et al. A PET exploration of the neural mechanisms involved in reciprocal imitation. Neuroimage. 15:2002;265-272.
64. Adolphs R. Cognitive neuroscience of human social behavior. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4:2003;165-178.
65. Chaminade T., Decety J. Leader or follower? Involvement of the inferior parietal lobule in agency. Neuroreport. 13:2002;1975-1978.
66. Blakemore S.J., et al. Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nat. Neurosci. 1:1998;635-640.
67. Craik F.I.M., et al. In search of self: a positron emission tomography study. Psychol. Sci. 10:1999;26-34.
68. Johnson S.C., et al. Neural correlates of self-reflection. Brain. 125:2002;1808-1814.
69. Kelley W.M., et al. Finding the self? An event-related fMRI study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 14:2002;785-794.
70. Keenan J.P., et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging and event-related potentials suggest right prefrontal activation for self-related processing. Brain Cogn. 47:2001;87-91.
71. Nakamura K., et al. Neural substrates for recognition of familiar voices: a PET study. Neuropsychologia. 39:2001;1047-1054.
72. Sugiura M., et al. Passive and active recognition of one's own face. Neuroimage. 11:2000;36-48.
73. Brunet E., et al. A PET investigation of the attribution of intentions with a nonverbal task. Neuroimage. 11:2000;157-166.
74. Castelli F., et al. Movement and mind: a functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement pattern. Neuroimage. 12:2000;314-325.
75. Farrer C., Frith C.D. Experiencing oneself vs. another person as being the cause of an action: the neural correlates of the experience of agency. Neuroimage. 15:2002;596-603.
76. Farrer C., et al. Modulating the experience of agency: a positron emission tomography study. Neuroimage. 18:2003;324-333.
77. Gallagher H.L., et al. Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of 'theory of mind' in verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia. 38:2000;11-21.
78. Goel V., et al. Modeling other minds. Neuroreport. 6:1995;1741-1746.
79. Miall R.C., Wolpert D.M. Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Netw. 9:1996;1265-1279.
80. Wolpert D.M., Kawato M. Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Netw. 11:1998;1317-1329.
81. Blakemore S.-J., et al. Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6:2002;237-242.
82. Blakemore S.-J., Decety J. From the perception of action to the understanding of intention. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2:2001;561-567.