Context and teaching with technology in the digital age

Handbook of Research on Teacher Education in the Digital Age

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 440-465

  Rosenberg, Joshua M ^a,b   Koehler, Matthew J ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84957085827     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-8403-4.ch017     Document Type: Chapter

References (95)

1. Alexander, P. A., Murphy, P. K., & Greene, J. A. (2012). Projecting educational psychology's future from its past and present: A trend analysis. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook (pp. 1-31). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
2. An, H., & Shin, S. (2010). The impact of urban district field experiences on four elementary preservice teacher's learning regarding technology integration. Journal of Technology Integration in the Classroom, 2(3), 101-106. Retrieved from http://www.joti.us/
3. Anderman, L. H., & Anderman, E. M. (2000). Considering contexts in educational psychology: Introduction to the special issue. Educational Psychologist, 35(2), 67-68. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3502_1
4. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154-168. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006
5. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2013). Technology Mapping: An Approach for Developing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(2), 199-221. doi:10.2190/EC.48.2.e
6. Banister, S., & Reinhart, R. V. (2011). TPCK for impact: Classroom teaching practices that promote social justice and narrow the digital divide in an urban middle school. Computers in the Schools, 28(1), 5-26. doi:10.1080/07380569.2011.551086
7. Bell, R. L., Maeng, J. L., & Binns, I. C. (2013). Learning in context: Technology integration in a teacher preparation program informed by situated learning theory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 348-379. doi:10.1002/tea.21075
8. Bereiter, C. (2014). Principled practical knowledge: Not a bridge but a ladder. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(1), 4-17. doi:10.1080/10508406.2013.812533
9. Berliner, D. C. (2002). Comment: Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 18-20. doi:10.3102/0013189X031008018
10. Berliner, D. C. (2006). Educational psychology: Searching for essence throughout a century of influence. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 3-42). New York, NY: Routledge.
11. Birmingham, K. A., Pineda, B., & Greenwalt, K. A. (2013). Undoing the divide: Teachers and teacher educators as multicultural citizens. Teacher Education Quarterly, 40(1), 45-62. Retrieved from http://www.teqjournal.org/
12. Brantley-Dias, L., & Ertmer, P. A. (2013). Goldilocks and TPACK: Is the construct "just right?". Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(2), 103-128. doi:10.1080/15391523.2013.10782615
13. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1981). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. (2006). In R. M. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.), The bioecological model of human development (5th ed.; Vol. 1, pp. 793-828). Handbook of Child Psychology New York: Wiley.
15. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
16. Burke, P. (1999). Context in context. Common Knowledge, 8(1), 152-177. doi:10.1215/0961754X-8-1-152
17. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 31-51. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/
18. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13. doi:10.3102/0013189X032001009
19. Cole, M. (1998). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15-42. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1301_2
21. Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813-834.
22. Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2007). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. John Wiley & Sons.
23. Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 30(1), 5-8.
24. Dewey, J. (1938). Logic-The theory of inquiry. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.
25. Doering, A., Veletsianos, G., Scharber, C., & Miller, C. (2009). Using the technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge framework to design online learning environments and professional development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(3), 319-346. doi:10.2190/EC.41.3.d
26. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 256-284. doi:10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
27. Garrison, M. J. (2003). Expanding the notion of social context in educational technology research: Notes from the field. Welsh Journal of Education, 12(1), 26-39. Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/uwp/wjoe
28. Garrison, M. J., & Bromley, H. (2004). Social contexts, defensive pedagogies, and the (mis) uses of educational technology. Educational Policy, 18(4), 589-613. doi:10.1177/0895904804266643
29. Göncü, A., & Gauvain, M. (2012). Sociocultural approaches to educational psychology: Theory, research, and application. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA Educational Psychology Handbook (pp. 123-152). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
30. Harris, J. B., & Hofer, M. J. (2014). "TPACK Stories:" Schools and school districts repurposing a theoretical construct for technology-related professional development. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA.
31. Heine, S. J. (2011). Cultural psychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
32. Jang, S. J., & Tsai, M. F. (2013). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese secondary school science teachers using a new contextualized TPACK model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(4), 566-580.
33. Kagan, J. (2011). Three lessons learned. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(2), 107-113. doi:10.1177/1745691611400205
34. Kelly, M. A. (2007). Culturally sensitive teaching with technology: Implementing TPCK in culturally mixed contexts. In R. Carlsen et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & teacher Education International Conference 2007 (pp. 2199-2202). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
35. Kelly, M. A. (2008a). Bridging digital and cultural divides: TPCK for equity of access to technology. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Eds.), Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 30-60). New York, NY: Routledge.
36. Kelly, M. A. (2008b). Incorporating context into technological pedagogical content knowledgebased instructional designs. In K. McFerrin, R. Weber, R. Carlsen, & D. A. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Society Information Technology & teacher Education International Conference 2008 (pp. 5257-5262). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
37. Kelly, M. A. (2010). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): A Content analysis of 2006-2009 print journal articles. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (pp. 3880-3888). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
38. Koehler, M., Shin, T., & Mishra, P. (2011). How do we measure TPACK? Let me count the ways. In R. N. Ronau, C. R. Rakes, & M. L. Niess (Eds.), Educational Technology, Teacher Knowledge, and Classroom Impact: A Research Handbook On Frameworks and Approaches (pp. 16-31). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
39. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Technology and Innovation (Eds.), Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for Educators (pp. 3-29). New York, NY: Routledge.
40. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Ellen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of Research On Educational Communications and Technology (4th ed.; pp. 101-111). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9
41. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511815355
42. Lin, T. C., Tsai, C. C., Chai, C. S., & Lee, M. H. (2013). Identifying science teachers' perceptions of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(3), 325-336. doi:10.1007/s10956-012-9396-6
43. Ling Koh, J. H., Chai, C. S., & Tay, L. Y. (2014). TPACK-in-action: Unpacking the contextual influences of teachers' construction of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 78, 20-29. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.022
44. Liu, S. H. (2013). Exploring the instructional strategies of elementary school teachers when developing technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge via a collaborative professional development program. International Education Studies, 6(11), 58-68. doi:10.5539/ies.v6n11p58
45. Martinez, S. L., & Stager, G. S. (2013). Invent to learn: Making, tinkering, and engineering in the classroom. Torrance, CA: Constructing Modern Knowledge Press.
46. McCandliss, B. D., Kalchman, M., & Bryant, P. (2003). Design experiments and laboratory approaches to learning: Steps toward collaborative exchange. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 14-16. doi:10.3102/0013189X032001014
47. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
48. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2012). TPACK Diagram. Retrieved from http://www.tpack.org/
49. Mouza, C. (2011). Promoting urban teachers' understanding of technology, content, and pedagogy in the context of case development. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 44(1), 1-29. doi:10.1080/15391523.2011.10782577
50. National Governors Association. (2010). Common core state standards. Retrieved December 10, 2014 from http://www.corestandards.org/
51. Porras-Hernández, L. H., & Salinas-Amescua, B. (2013). Strengthening TPACK: A broader notion of context and the use of teacher's narratives to reveal knowledge construction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(2), 223-244. doi:10.2190/EC.48.2.f
52. Ratner, C. (2011). Macro cultural psychology: A political philosophy of mind). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:o so/9780195373547.001.0001
53. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
54. Ronau, R. N., & Rakes, C. R. (2011). A Comprehensive Framework for Teacher Knowledge (CFTK): Complexity of individual aspects and their interactions. In R. N. Ronau, C. R. Rakes, & M. L. Niess (Eds.), Educational Technology, Teacher Knowledge, and Classroom Impact: A Research Handbook on Frameworks and Approaches (pp. 59-102). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
55. Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (2011). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
56. Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice Teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149. doi:10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544
57. Sim, J., & Wright, C. C. (2005). The kappa statistic in reliability studies: Use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Physical Therapy, 85(3), 257-268. Retrieved from http://ptjournal.apta.org/ PMID:15733050
58. Spector, J. M., Merrill, M. D., Elen, J., & Bishop, M. J. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of Research On Educational Communications and Technology (4th ed.). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5
59. Tabak, I. (2004). Reconstructing context: Negotiating the tension between exogenous and endogenous educational design. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 225-233. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3904_4
60. Tabak, I. (2014). Lights, camera, learn: When the set is as important as the actors. In R. Luckin, S. Puntambekar, P. Goodyear, B. L. Granbowski, J. Underwood, & N. Winters (Eds.), Handbook of Design in Educational Technology (pp. 397-405). New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203075227.ch34
61. Thompson, P. (2013). The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning. Computers & Education, 65, 12-33. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.022
62. Turner, J. C., & Meyer, D. K. (2000). Studying and understanding the instructional contexts of classrooms: Using our past to forge our future. Educational Psychologist, 35(2), 69-85. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3502_2
63. U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). 2010 census. Retrieved December 10, 2014 from http://www.census.gov/2010census/
64. Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Roblin, N. P., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2012). Technological pedagogical content knowledge-a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109-121. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
65. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66. Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179-225. doi:10.3102/0091732X09349791
67. Wieman, C. E. (2014). The similarities between research in education and research in the hard sciences. Educational Researcher, 43(1), 12-14. doi:10.3102/0013189X13520294
68. Zeichner, K. (2006). Studying teacher education programs: enriching and enlarging the inquiry. In C. Conrad & R. C. Serlin (Eds.), The Sage Handbook For Research In Education: Engaging Ideas and Enriching Inquiry (pp. 79-94). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
69. Zeichner, K. (2008). Introduction: Settings for teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, & D. J. McIntyre (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (3rd ed.; pp. 263-268).
70. Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807-840. doi:10.3102/00028312040004807
71. Zygmunt-Fillwalk, E., Malaby, M., & Clausen, J. (2010). The imperative of contextual cognizance: Preservice teachers and community engagement in the schools and communities project. Teacher Education Quarterly, 2, 53-67. Retrieved from http://www.teqjournal.org/
72. Barab, S. A. (2006). A methodological toolkit for the learning sciences. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 153-170). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
73. Clancey, W. J. (1997). Situated cognition: On human knowledge and computer representations. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
74. Davidman, L., & Davidman, P. (1994). Teaching with a multicultural perspective. New York, NY: Longman University.
75. Giacquinta, J. B., Bauer, J. A., & Levin, J. E. (1993). Beyond technology's promise: An examination of children's educational computing at home. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
76. Kirschner, S. R., & Martin, J. (Eds.). (2010). The sociocultural turn in psychology: The contextual emergence of mind and self. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
77. Looker, E. D. (2010). Digital diversity: Youth, equity, and information technology. Waterloo, CA: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
78. Mouza, C. (2011). Promoting urban teachers' understanding of technology, content, and pedagogy in the context of case development. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 44(1), 1-29. doi:10.1080/15391523.2011.10782577
79. Mouza, C. (2012). Emerging technologies for the classroom: A learning sciences perspective. New York, NY: Springer.
80. Nardi, B., & O'Day, V. (2000). Digital ecologies: Using technology with heart. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
81. Nardi, B. A. (Ed.). (1996). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
82. NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
83. Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139164887
84. O'Donnell, A. M. (2004). A commentary on design research. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 255-260. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3904_7
85. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (1998). The role of context in teacher learning and teacher education. In W. M. Sherman (Ed.), Contextual Teaching and Learning: Preparing Teachers To Enhance Student Success In The Workplace And Beyond (pp. 35-75). Columbus, OH: Center on Education and Training for Employment.
86. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15. doi:10.3102/0013189X029001004
87. Reeve, R. (2008). Technological pedagogical content knowledge and the context: An integrated model. In K. McFerrin, R. Weber, R. Carlsen, & D. A. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2008 (pp. 5310-5312). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
88. Schwab, J. J. (1978). Science, curriculum, and liberal education: Selected essays (I. Westbury & N. J. Wilkof, Eds.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
89. Solomon, G., Allen, N. J., & Resta, P. (2003). Toward digital equity: Bridging the divide in education. Boston, MA: Pearson Education Group.
90. Sommers, S. (2011). Situations matter: Understanding how context transforms your world. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
91. The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). The Jasper project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
92. Thomas, D., & Brown, J. S. (2011). A new culture of learning: Cultivating the imagination for a world of constant change. Lexington, KY: CreateSpace.
93. Vosniadou, S. (2007). The cognitive-situative divide and the problem of conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 42(1), 1-32. doi:10.1080/00461520709336918
94. Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
95. Wertsch, J. V., del Río, P., & Alvarez, A. (Eds.). (1995). Sociocultural studies of mind). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139174299