Introducing TPCK

Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 3-29

  Koehler, Matthew J ^a   Mishra, Punya ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85076002473     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Editorial

References (103)

1. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2005). Preservice elementary teachers as information and communi-cation technology designers: an instructional systems design model based on an expanded view of pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(4), 292-302.
2. Birch, H. G. (1945). The relation of previous experience to insightful problem-solving. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 38, 367-383.
3. Bloom, A. (1987). The closing of the American mind: How higher education has failed democracy and impoverished the souls of today's students. New York: Simon & Schuster.
4. Bromley, H. (1998). Introduction: Data-driven democracy? Social assessment of educational computing. In H. Bromley & M. Apple (eds), Education, technology, power (pp. 1-28). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
5. Bruce, B. C. (1993). Innovation and social change. In B. C. Bruce, J. K. Peyton, & T. Batson (eds), Network-based classrooms (pp. 9-32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Bruce, B. C. (1997). Literacy technologies: What stance should we take? Journal of Literacy Research, 29(2), 289-309.
7. Bruce, B. C., & Hogan, M. C. (1998). The disappearance of technology: Toward an ecological model of literacy. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (eds), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 269-281). Hills-dale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Byrne, D. (2003). Envisioning emotional epistemological information. Distributed Art Pub Inc.
9. Casement, W. (1997). The great canon controversy: The battle of the books in higher education. Somerset, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
10. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1992). Teacher as curriculum maker. In P. Jackson (ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 363-401). New York: Macmillan.
11. Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (ed.), Hand-book of research on teaching (3rd edn) (pp. 255-296). New York: Macmillan.
12. Davis, P. J., & Hersh, R. (1981). The mathematical experience. Boston: Mariner.
13. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Perigree.
14. Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. F. (1949). Knowing and the known. Boston: Beacon.
15. Digital Divide. org (2006). Digital Divide. org. Retrieved July 12, 2006 from http://www.digitaldi-vide.org.
16. Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39.
17. Feltovich, P. J., Coulson, R. L., Spiro, R. J., & Dawson-Saunders, B. K. (1992). Knowledge appli-cation and transfer for complex tasks in ill-structured domains: Implications for instruc-tion and testing in biomedicine. In D. Evans & V. Patel (eds), Advanced models of cognition for medical training and practice (pp. 213-244). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
18. Feltovich, P., Spiro, R., Coulson, R., & Myers-Kelson, A. (1995). The reductive bias and the crisis of text in the law. Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 6(1), 187-212.
19. Franklin, C. (2004). Teacher preparation as a critical factor in elementary teachers: Use of com-puters. Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, 2004(1), 4994-4999.
20. Frederiksen, N. (1986). Toward a broader conception of human intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg & R. K. Wagner (eds), Practical intelligence: Nature and origins of competence in the everyday world (pp. 84-116). New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. German, T. P., & Barrett, H. C. (2005). Functional fixedness in a technologically sparse culture. Psychological Science, 16(1), 1-5.
22. Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. E. Shaw & J. Bransford (eds), Perceiving, acting, and knowing (pp. 67-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
24. Glaser, R. (1984). Education and thinking: The role of knowledge. American Psychology, 39(2), 93-104.
25. Glass, A. L., Holyoak, K. J., & Santa, J. L. (1979). Cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
26. Gunter, G., & Baumbach, D. (2004). Curriculum integration. In Kovalchick, A., & Dawson, K. (eds), Education and technology: An encyclopedia. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, Inc.
27. Guzdial, M., Turns, J., Rappin, N., & Carlson, D. (1995). Collaborative support for learning in complex domains. In J. L. Schnase & E. L. Cunnius (eds), Computer support for collabora-tive learning (CSCL '95) (pp. 157-160). Bloomington, IN: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (eds), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Heeter, C., Chu, C., Maniar, A., Winn, B., Mishra, P., Egidio, R., & Portwood-Stacer, L. (2003). Comparing 14 plus 2 forms of fun (and learning and gender issues) in commercial versus educational space exploration digital games. Proceedings of the International Digital Games Research Conference. University of Utrecht: Netherlands.
30. Hillocks, G. (1986). The writer's knowledge: Theory, research, and implications for practice. In A. Petrosky & D. Bartholomae (eds), The teaching of writing. Eighty-fifth yearbook of the national society for the study of education, part II (pp. 71-94). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Hughes, J. (2004). Technology learning principles for preservice and in-service teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 4(3), 345-362.
32. Irving, K. E. (2006). The impact of technology on the 21st century classroom. In J. Rhoton & P. Shane (eds), Teaching science in the 21st century (pp. 3-20). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
33. Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in the classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
34. Jones, R. A., & Spiro, R. (1992). Imagined conversations: The relevance of hypertext, pragmatism, and cognitive flexibility theory to the interpretation of "classic texts" in intellectual history. In D. Lucarella, J. Nanard, M. Nanard, & P. Paolini (eds), Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Hypertext (pp. 141-147). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
35. Kay, A. (1984). Computer software. Scientific American, 251(3), 53-59.
36. Keating, T., & Evans, E. (2001). Three computers in the back of the classroom: Pre-service teachers' conceptions of technology integration. Paper presented at the 2001 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
37. Kelly, A. E. (2003). Special issue on the role of design in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8.
38. Klein, G. (1999). Sources of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005a). Teachers learning technology by design. Journal of Comput-ing in Teacher Education, 21(3), 94-102.
40. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005b). What happens when teachers design educational techno-logy? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educa-tional Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152.
41. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy, & technology. Computers and Education, 49(3), 740-762.
42. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Hershey, K., & Peruski, L. (2004). With a little help from your stu-dents: A new model for faculty development and online course design. Journal of Techno-logy and Teacher Education, 12(1), 25-55.
43. Kuhn, T. (1977). The essential tension. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
44. Lagemann, E. C. (2002). Usable knowledge in education: A memorandum for the Spencer Founda-tion board of directors [Memorandum]. Chicago: Spencer Foundation. Retrieved July 15, 2006 from http://www.spencer.org/publications/annual_reports/ar_2002.pdf
45. Lawrence, J. A. (1988). Expertise on the bench: Modeling magistrates/judicial decision-making. In M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. J. Farr (eds), The nature of expertise (pp. 229-259). Hills-dale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46. Leinhardt, G., & Greeno, J. G. (1986). The cognitive skill of teaching. Journal of Educational Psy-chology, 78(2), 75-95.
47. Lesgold, A. M., Feltovich, P. J., Glaser, R., & Wang, Y. (1981). The acquisition of perceptual diag-nostic skill in radiology. Technical report no. PDS-1. University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh.
48. Levine, L. W. (1996). The opening of the American mind: Canons, culture, and history. Boston: Beacon Press.
49. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1962). The savage mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
50. Margerum-Leys, J., & Marx, R. (2002). Teacher knowledge of educational technology: A study of student teacher/mentor teacher pairs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(4), 427-462.
51. McCrory, R. (2004). A framework for understanding teaching with the Internet. American Educa-tional Research Journal, 41(2), 447-488.
52. Mishra, P. (1998). Flexible learning in the periodic system with multiple representations: The design of a hypertext for learning complex concepts in chemistry (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign). Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(11), 4057. (AAT 9912322.)
53. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2003). Not "what" but "how": Becoming design-wise about educa-tional technology. In Y. Zhao (ed.), What teachers should know about technology: Perspec-tives and practices (pp. 99-122). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
54. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
55. Mishra, P., & Yadav, A. (2006). Using hypermedia for learning complex concepts in chemistry: A qualitative study on the relationship between prior knowledge, beliefs and motivation. Education and Information Technologies, 11(1), 33-69.
56. Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., Hershey, K., & Peruski, L. (2002). With a little help from your stu-dents: A new model for faculty development and online course design. Proceedings from the Annual Meeting of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, March 2002, Nashville, TN. Virginia: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
57. Mishra, P., Spiro, R. J., & Feltovich, P. (1996). Technology, representation and cognition. In H. von Oostendorp (ed.), Cognitive aspects of electronic text processing (pp. 287-306). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
58. National Research Council (1999). Being fluent with information technology literacy. Computer science and telecommunications board commission on physical sciences, mathematics, and applications. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
59. National Research Council (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Wash-ington, DC: National Academy Press.
60. National Research Council (2002). Scientific research in education. R. K. Shavelson & L. Towne (eds), Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
61. Nickerson, R. (1994). The teaching of thinking and problem solving. In R. Sternberg (ed.), Thinking and problem solving (2nd edn, pp. 215-234). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
62. Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509-523.
63. Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
64. Ong, W. J. (1982). The technologizing of the word. London: Methuen.
65. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.
66. Pennock, R. (2001). Intelligent design creationism and its critics: Philosophical, theological and scientific perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
67. Perkins, D. N. (1986). Knowledge as design. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
68. Peruski, L., & Mishra, P. (2004). Webs of activity in online course design and teaching. ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology, 12(1), 37-49.
69. Petroski, H. (1985). To engineer is human: the role of failure in successful design (1st edn). New York: St. Martin's Press.
70. Petroski, H. (1994). Design paradigms: case histories of error and judgment in engineering. New York: Cambridge University Press.
71. Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (2000). Bibliography: Student's alternative frameworks and science education (5th edn). Kiel, Germany: University of Kiel.
72. Pierson, M. E. (1999). Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise (Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(03), 711. (AAT 9924200.)
73. Pierson, M. E. (2001). Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 413-429.
74. Pople, H. E. (1982). Heuristic methods for imposing structure on ill-structured problems: The structuring of medical diagnostics. In P. Szolovits (ed.), Artificial intelligence in medicine (pp. 119-189). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
75. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
76. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
77. Reitman, W. R. (1964). Heuristic decision procedures, open constraints, and the structure of ill-defined problems. In M. W. Shelly & G. L. Bryan (eds), Human judgments and optimality (pp. 282-315). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
78. Reitman, W. R. (1965). Cognition and thought. New York: Wiley.
79. Resnick, L. B. (1988). Treating mathematics as an ill-structured discipline. In R. I. Charles & E. A. Silver (eds), The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving (pp. 32-60). Hills-dale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
80. Rittel. H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-169.
81. Roberts, P. (1994). The place of design in technology education. In D. Layton (ed.), Innovations in science and technology education, vol. V (pp. 171-179). Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
82. Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of literary work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
83. Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. London: Temple Smith.
84. Schon, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
85. Schon, D. (1996). Reflective conversation with materials. In T. Winograd, J. Bennett, L. DeYoung, & B. Hartfield (eds), Bringing design to software (pp. 171-184). New York: Addison-Wesley.
86. Schwab, J. J. (1983). The Practical 4: Something for curriculum professors to do. Curriculum Inquiry, 13(3), 239-265.
87. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
88. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educa-tional Review, 57(1), 1-22.
89. Simon, H. (1969). Sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
90. Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man-social and rational. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
91. Slough, S., & Connell, M. (2006). Defining technology and its natural corollary, technological content knowledge (TCK). In C. Crawford, D. Willis, R. Carlsen, I. Gibson, K. McFerrin, J. Price, & R. Weber, (eds), Proceedings of society for information technology and teacher education international conference 2006 (pp. 1053-1059). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
92. Snow, C. P. (1959). The two cultures and the scientific revolution. New York: Cambridge Univer-sity Press.
93. Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., Feltovich, P. J., & Anderson, D. K. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In V. Patel (ed.), Tenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 375-383). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
94. Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1991). Cognitive flexibility, con-structivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisi-tion in ill-structured domains. Educational Technology, May, 24-33.
95. Spiro, R. J., & Jehng, J.-Ch. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (eds), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 163-204). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
96. Thompson, A. (2006). Technology pedagogical content knowledge: Framing teacher knowledge about technology. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 22(6), 46-48.
97. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schus-ter.
98. Turkle, S., & Papert, S. (1992). Epistemological pluralism: Styles and choices within the computer culture. Signs, 16(1), 128-157.
99. Wikipedia (2006). Technology (Wikipedia entry). Retrieved on July 12, 2006 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology.
100. Williams, S. M. (1992). Putting case-based instruction into context: Examples from legal and medical education. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 2(4), 367-427.
101. Zhao, Y. (2003). What teachers should know about technology: Perspectives and practices. Green-wich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
102. Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology inno-vations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482-515.
103. Zimmerman, J. (2002). Whose America? Culture wars in the public schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.