The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework

Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology: Fourth Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 101-111

  Koehler, Matthew J ^a   Mishra, Punya ^a   Kereluik, Kristen ^a   Shin, Tae Seob ^b   Graham, Charles R ^c  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Hanyang University   (South Korea)

^c BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Professional development; Teacher knowledge; Technology integration; TPACK

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009102305     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9     Document Type: Chapter

References (65)

1. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2005). Pre-service elementary teachers as information and communication technology designers: An instructional systems design model based on an expanded view of pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21 (4), 292-302.
2. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers and Education, 52, 154-168.
3. Archambault, L., & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among k-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9 (1), 71-88.
4. Becker, H. J. (2000). Findings from the teaching, learning and computing survey: Is Larry Cuban right? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8 (51), 2-32.
5. Bruce, B. C. (1997). Literary technologies: What stance should we take? Journal of Literacy Research, 29 (2), 289-309.
6. Brush, T., & Saye, J. W. (2009). Strategies for preparing pre-service social studies teachers to integrate technology effectively: Models and practices. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9 (1), 46-59.
7. Bull, G., Hammond, T., & Ferster, B. (2008). Developing web 2.0 tools for support of historical inquiry in social studies. Computers in the Schools, 25 (3-4), 275-287.
8. Cochran, K. F., Deruiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44 (1), 263-272.
9. Cox, S., & Graham, C. R. (2009). Diagramming TPACK in practice:Using an elaborated model of the TPACK framework to analyze and depict teacher knowledge.
10. Curaoglu, O., Bu, L., Dickey, L., Kim, H., & Cakir, R. (2010, March 29-April 2). A case study of investigating pre-service mathematics teachers'initial use of the next-generation TI-Nspire graphing calculators with regard to TPACK. Paper presented at Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education. San Diego, CA.
11. Dawson, K. (1998). Factors in fl uencing elementary teachers' instructional use of computers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
12. Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. F. (1949). Knowing and the known. Boston, MA: Beacon.
13. Doering, A., & Veletsianos, G. (2007). An investigation of the use of real-time, authentic geospatial data in the k-12 classroom. Journal of Geography, 106 (6), 217-225.
14. Doering, A., Veletsianos, G., Scharber, C., & Miller, C. (2009). Using the technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge framework to design online learning environments and professional development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41 (3), 319-346. doi: 10.2190/EC.41.3.d.
15. Franklin, C. (2004). Teacher preparation as a critical factor in elementary teachers: Use of computers. In R. Carlsen, N. Davis, J. Price., R. Weber, & Dl Willis (Eds.), Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education Annual, 2004 (pp. 4994-4999). Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
16. Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers and Education, 57 (2011), 1953-1969.
17. Graham, C. R., Borup, J., & Smith, N. B. (2012). Using TPACK as a framework to understand teacher candidates' technology integration decisions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28 (6), 530-546. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00472.x.
18. Graham, C. R., Tripp, T., & Wentworth, N. (2009). Assessing and improving technology integration skills for pre-service teachers using the teacher work sample. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41 (1), 39-62.
19. Guzey, S. S., & Roehrig, G. H. (2009). Teaching science with technology:Case studies of science teachers' development of technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Science Teacher Education, 9 (1). Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol9/iss1/science/article1.cfm.
20. Harris, J., Grandgenett, N., & Hofer, M. (2010). Testing a TPACKbased technology integration assessment rubric. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (pp. 3833-3840). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
21. Harris, J., & Hofer, M. (2009). Instructional planning activity types as vehicles for curriculum-based TPACK development. In C. D. Maddux (Ed.), Research highlights in technology and teacher education 2009 (pp. 99-108). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
22. Harris, J. B., & Hofer, M. J. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers' curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43 (3), 211-229.
23. Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2009). Teachers technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types:Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41 (4), 393-416.
24. Hofer, M., & Swan, K. O. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge in action: A case study of a middle school digital documentary project. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41 (2), 179-200.
25. Holmes, K. (2009). Planning to teach with digital tools: Introducing the interactive whiteboard to pre-service secondary mathematics teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25 (3), 351-365.
26. Irving, K. (2006). The impact of technology on the 21st century classroom. In J. Rhonton & P. Shane (Eds.), Teaching science in the 21st century (pp. 3-19). Arlington, VA: NSTA.
27. Kelly, M. (2010). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A content analysis of 2006-2009 print journal articles. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (pp. 3880-3888). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
28. Kereluik, K., Casperson, G., & Akcaoglu, M. (2010). Coding pre-service teacher lesson plans for TPACK. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (pp. 3889-3891). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
29. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005a). Teachers learning technology by design. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 21 (3), 94-102.
30. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005b). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32 (2), 131-152.
31. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPACK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation & Technology (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge for educators (pp. 3-29). New York, NY: Routledge.
32. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Bouch, E., DeSchryver, M., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., et al. (2011). Deep-play: Developing TPACK for 21st century teachers. International Journal of Learning Technology, 6 (2), 146-163.
33. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Wolf, L. G., Zellner, A., & Kereluik, K. (2012). Thematic considerations in integrating TPACK in a graduate program. In D. Polly, C. Mims & K. Persichitte (Eds.), Creating technology-rich teacher education programs: Key issues (pp. 1-12). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
34. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers and Education, 49 (3), 740-762.
35. Koehler, M. J., Shin, T. S., & Mishra, P. (2012). How do we measure TPACK? Let me count the ways. In R. N. Ronau, C. R. Rakes, & M. L. Niess (Eds.), Educational technology, teacher knowledge, and classroom impact: A research handbook on frameworks and approaches (pp. 16-31). Hersey, PA: IGI Global.
36. Lambert, J., & Sanchez, T. (2007). Integration of cultural diversity and technology: Learning by design. Meridian Middle School Computer Technologies Journal, 10 (1).
37. Lee, E., & Luft, J. (2008). Experienced secondary science teachers representation of pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30 (10), 1343-1363.
38. Lee, M. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Exploring teachers' perceived self efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge with respect to educational use of the World Wide Web. Instructional Science, 38 (1), 1-21.
39. Margerum-Lays, J., & Marx, R. W. (2003). Teacher knowledge of educational technology: A case study of student/mentor teacher pairs. In Y. Zhao (Ed.), What should teachers know about technology? Perspectives and practices (pp. 123-159). Greenwich, CO:Information Age.
40. McCormick, R., & Scrimshaw, P. (2001). Information and communications technology, knowledge and pedagogy. Education, Communication and Information, 1 (1), 39-57.
41. McCrory, R. (2008). Science, technology, and teaching: The topicspecific challenges of TPCK in science. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for Educators (pp. 193-206). Routledge.
42. McCrory, R., Putnam, R., & Jansen, A. (2008). Interaction in online courses for teacher education: Subject matter and pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16 (2), 155-180.
43. Mishra, P., & Kereluik, K. (2011). What 21st century learning? A review and a synthesis. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (pp. 3301-3312). Chesapeake, VA:AACE.
44. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108 (6), 1017-1054.
45. Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Henriksen, D. (2011). The seven transdisciplinary habits of mind: Extending the TPACK framework towards 21st century learning. Educational Technology, 11 (2), 22-28.
46. Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Kereluik, K. (2009). The song remains the same: Looking back to the future of educational technology. TechTrends, 53 (5), 48-53.
47. Mouza, C., & Wong, W. (2009). Studying classroom practice: Case development for professional learning in technology integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17 (2), 175-202.
48. Niess, M. L. (2008). Guiding pre-service teachers in developing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 223-250). Routledge.
49. Niess, M. L., van Zee, E. H., & Gillow-Wiles, H. (2010). Knowledge growth in teaching mathematics/science with spreadsheets: Moving PCK to TPACK through online professional development. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27 (2), 42-53.
50. Norman, D. (2010). Why design education must change. http://www. core77.com/blog/columns/whydesigneducationmustchange17993.asp.
51. Ozgun-Koca, S. A. (2009). The views of preservice teachers about the strengths and limitations of the use of graphing calculators in mathematics instruction. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17, 203-227.
52. Rhonton, J., & Shane, P. (Eds.). (2006). Teaching science in the 21st century. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
53. Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of literary work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
54. Sahin, I. (2011). Development of survey of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10 (1), 97-105.
55. Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for pre-service teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42 (2), 123-149.
56. Shulman, L. E. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Research, 15 (2), 4-14.
57. Slough, S., & Connell, M. (2006). Defining technology and its natural corollary, technological content knowledge (TCK). In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2006 (pp. 1053-1059). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
58. So, H.-J., & Kim, B. (2009). Learning about problem based learning:Student teachers integrating technology, pedagogy and content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25 (1), 101-116.
59. Suharwoto, G. (2006). Developing and implementing a technology pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for teaching mathematics with technology. In C. Crawford, D. Willis, R. Carlsen, I. Gibson, K. McFerrin, J. Price, & R. Weber (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2006 (pp. 3824-3828). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
60. Swan, K., & Locascio, D. (2008). Evaluating alignment of technology and primary source use within a history classroom. In G. L. Bull & L. Bell (Eds.), Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 8 (2), 175-186.
61. Toth, E. E. (2009). "Virtual inquiry" in the science classroom: What is the role of technological pedagogical content knowledge? International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 5 (4), 78-87.
62. Trautmann, N. M., & MaKinster, J. G. (2010). Flexibly adaptive professional development in support of teaching science with geospatial technology. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21 (3), 351-370.
63. U.S. Department of Education (2010). Transforming American education: Learning powered by technology; National educational technology plan 2010. Washington DC: Office of Educational Technology, U.S. Department of Education.
64. Valanides, N., & Angeli, C. (2008). Professional development for computer- enhanced learning: A case study with science teachers. Research in Science and Technological Education, 26 (1), 3-12.
65. van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35 (6), 673-695.