Social contexts, defensive pedagogies, and the (Mis)uses of educational technology

Educational Policy

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 589-613

  Garrison, Mark J ^a   Bromley, Hank ^b  

^a D'YOUVILLE COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

Educational technology; Social context

Indexed keywords

EID: 4344699148     PISSN: 08959048     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0895904804266643     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Bromley, H., & Shutkin, D. (Eds.). (1998). Social power, science & technology, and education [Special issue]. Educational Policy, 22(5).
2. Brown, M., & Edelson, D. C. (1998). Software in context: Designing for students, teachers and classroom enactment. Retrieved March 21, 2003, from http://www.letus.org/PDF/MB_DCE_ICLS_1998SoftInConte.pdf
3. Byrom, E. (1998). Review of the professional literature on the integration of technology into educational programs. Retrieved December 21, 2002, from http://www.serve.org/technology/litreview.html
4. Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Eckert, P. (1989). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in high school. New York: Teachers College Press.
6. Fordham, S., & Ogbu, J. U. (1986). Black students' school success: Coping with the "burden of 'acting White.'" Urban Review, 18(3), 176-206.
7. Garrison, M. J. (2003). Expanding the notion of social context in educational technology research: Notes from the field. Welsh Journal of Education, 72(1), 23-35.
8. Heafner, L. A., Zembal-Saul, C., & Averaamidou, L. (2002, April). Supporting prospective elementary teachers in developing scientific explanations using "Progress Portfolio." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Oileans, LA.
9. Kimble, C. (1999, May). The impact of technology on learning: Making sense of the research (Policy Brief). Aurora, CO: Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning.
10. Kohl, H. (1998). The discipline of hope: Learning from a lifetime of teaching. New York: Simon & Schuster.
11. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Loh, B., Radinsky, J., Russell, E., Gomez, L. M., Reiser, B. J., & Edelson, D. C. (1998). The progress portfolio: Designing reflective tools for a classroom context. In Proceedings of CHI 98 (pp. 627-634). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
13. McDermott, R. P., & Gospodinoff, K. (1979). Social contexts for ethnic borders and school failure. In A. Wolfgang (Ed.), Nonverbal behavior: Applications and cultural implications (pp. 175-195). New York: Academic Press.
14. McNeil, L. M. (1986). Contradictions of control: School structure and school knowledge. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
15. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Ogbu, J. (1987). Variability in minority school performance: A problem in search of an explanation. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 18(4), 312-334.
17. Songer, N. B.. Lee, H., & Kam, R. (2002). Technology-rich inquiry science in urban classrooms: What are the barriers to inquiry pedagogy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(2), 128-150.
18. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Thompson, J. K., Gersick, A., Kim, C., & Honey, M. (2003). Toward a sustainability framework: Lessons from the literature and the field. In N. Dickard (Ed.), The sustainability challenge: Taking edtech to the next level (pp. 27-46). Retrieved March 21, 2003, from http://www.benton.org/Library/sustainability/sus_challenge.pdf
20. Weis, L. (1990). Working class without work: High school students in a de-industrializing economy. New York: Routledge.
21. Weis, L., & Fine, M. (Eds.). (1993). Beyond silenced voices: Class, race and gender in United States schools. Albany: State University of New York.
22. Zembal-Saul, C., & Land, S. (2002, April). Scaffolding the construction of scientific arguments by prospective teachers using inquiry-empowering technologies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.