Within-individual increases in innovative behavior and creative, persuasion, and change self-efficacy over time: A social-cognitive theory perspective

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 101, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 14-34

  Ng, Thomas W H ^a   Lucianetti, Lorenzo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Innovative behavior; Respect; Self efficacy; Social cognitive theory; Trust

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CREATIVITY; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; PSYCHOLOGY; SELF CONCEPT; TRUST; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; CREATIVITY; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SELF EFFICACY; TRUST; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84955194237     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/apl0000029     Document Type: Article

References (137)

1. Adcock, C., Hua, X., Mazouz, K., & Yin, S. (2014). Does the stock market reward innovation? European stock index reaction to negative news during global financial crisis. Journal of International Money and Finance, 49, 470-491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2014.06.004
2. Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 367-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.367
3. Anderson, C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
4. Astakhova, M. N., Doty, D. H., & Hang, H. (2014). Understanding the antecedents of perceived fit at work in the United States, Russia, and China. European Management Journal, 32, 879-890. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2014.03.005
5. Axtell, C. M., Holman, D. J., Unsworth, K. L., Wall, T. D., Waterson, P. E., & Harrington, E. (2000). Shop floor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 265-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317900167029
6. Baer, M. (2012). Putting creativity to work: The implementation of creative ideas in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1102-1119. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0470
7. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
8. Bandura, A. (1995). Exercise of personal control and collective efficacy in changing societies. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 1-45). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527692.003
9. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Y. H. Freeman.
10. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
11. Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 164-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x
12. Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38, 9-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410606
13. Bartel, C. A., Wrzesniewski, A., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (2012). Knowing where you stand: Physical isolation, perceived respect, and organizational identification among virtual employees. Organization Science, 23, 743-757. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0661
14. Beck, J. W., & Schmidt, A. M. (2012). Taken out of context? Cross-level effects of between-person self-efficacy and difficulty on the withinperson relationship of self-efficacy with resource allocation and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119, 195-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.06.009
15. Bednar, R. L., & Parker, C. A. (1969). Client susceptibility to persuasion and counseling outcome. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 16, 415-420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0028000
16. Bentein, K., Vandenberghe, C., Vandenberg, R., & Stinglhamber, F. (2005). The role of change in the relationship between commitment and turnover: A latent growth modeling approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 468-482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.468
17. Beutler, L. E., Johnson, D. T., Neville, C. W., Jr., Elkins, D., & Jobe, A. M. (1975). Attitude similarity and therapist credibility as predictors of attitude change and improvement in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 90-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0076326
18. Binnewies, C., Ohly, S., & Sonnentag, S. (2007). Taking personal initiative and communicating about ideas: What is important for the creative process and for idea creativity? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16, 432-455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13594320701514728
19. Blasberg, S. A., Rogers, K. H., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). The Bidimensional Impression Management Index (BIMI): Measuring agentic and communal forms of impression management. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 523-531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.862252
20. Boezeman, E. J., & Ellemers, N. (2007). Volunteering for charity: Pride, respect, and the commitment of volunteers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 771-785. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.771
21. Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2006). Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0471746096
22. Brewer, M. B., & Chen, Y. R. (2007). Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. Psychological Review, 114, 133-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.133
23. Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of crosscultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 389-444). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
24. Chaiken, S., & Eagly, A. H. (1983). Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 241-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.241
25. Chan, D. (1998). The conceptualization and analysis of change over time: An integrative approach incorporating longitudinal mean and covariance structures analysis (LMACS) and multiple indicator latent growth modeling (MLGM). Organizational Research Methods, 1, 421-483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109442819814004
26. Chan, D., Ramey, S., Ramey, C., & Schmitt, N. (2000). Modeling intraindividual changes in children's social skills at home and at school: A multivariate latent growth approach to understanding between-settings differences in children's social skill development. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 365-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3503_04
27. Chan, D., & Schmitt, N. (2000). Interindividual differences in intraindividual changes in proactivity during organizational entry: A latent growth modeling approach to understanding newcomer adaptation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 190-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.190
28. Chiou, W. B., & Wan, C. S. (2007). The dynamic change of self-efficacy in information searching on the Internet: Influence of valence of experience and prior self-efficacy. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 141, 589-603. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.141.6.589-604
29. Clugston, M., Howell, J. P., & Dorfman, P. W. (2000). Does cultural socialization predict multiple bases and foci of commitment? Journal of Management, 26, 5-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(99)00034-3
30. Coeurderoy, R., Guilmot, N., & Vas, A. (2014). Explaining factors affecting technological change adoption. Management Decision, 52, 1082-1100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2013-0540
31. Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 909-927. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.909.
32. Cozza, C., Malerba, F., Mancusi, M. L., Perani, G., & Vezzulli, A. (2012). Innovation, profitability and growth in medium and high-tech manufacturing industries: Evidence from Italy. Applied Economics, 44, 1963-1976. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.556594.
33. Cranford, J. A., Shrout, P. E., Iida, M., Rafaeli, E., Yip, T., & Bolger, N. (2006). A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: Can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 917-929. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167206287721.
34. Cunningham, C. E., Woodward, C. A., Shannon, H. S., MacIntosh, J., Lendrum, B., Rosenbloom, D., & Brown, J. (2002). Readiness for organizational change: A longitudinal study of workplace, psychological and behavioral correlates. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 377-392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317902321119637
35. Daniels, K., Wimalasiri, V., Cheyne, A., & Story, V. (2011). Linking the demands-control-support model to innovation: The moderating role of personal initiative on the generation and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84, 581-598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317910X494269
36. De Jong, J., & den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behavior. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19, 23-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x
37. Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50, 869-884. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279183
38. Dierdorff, E. C., Bell, S. T., & Belohlav, J. A. (2011). The power of "we": Effects of psychological collectivism on team performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 247-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020929
39. Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12, 450-467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.450.10640
40. Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., & Strycker, L. A. (2006). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Earley, P. C. (1989). Social loafing and collectivism: A comparison of United States and the People's Republic of China. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 565-581. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393567
42. Earley, P. C. (1993). East meets West meets Mideast: Further explorations of collectivistic and individualistic work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 319-348. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256525
43. Earley, P. C. (1994). Self or group? Cultural effects of training on selfefficacy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 89-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393495
44. Earley, P. C., & Gibson, C. B. (1998). Taking stock in our progress on individualism-collectivism: 100 years of solidarity and community. Journal of Management, 24, 265-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920639802400302.
45. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2666999
46. Eisenberg, J. (1999). How individualism-collectivism moderates the effects of rewards on creativity and innovation: A comparative review of practices in Japan and the US. Creativity and Innovation Management, 8, 251-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8691.00144.
47. Ettlie, J. E., & O'Keefe, R. D. (1982). Innovative attitudes, values, and intentions in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 19, 163-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1982.tb00066.x
48. Fugate, M., Prussia, G. E., & Kinicki, A. J. (2012). Managing employee withdrawal during organizational change: The role of threat appraisal. Journal of Management, 38, 890-914. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352881
49. Fuller, J. B., Hester, K., Barnett, T., Frey, L., Relyea, C., & Beu, D. (2006). Perceived external prestige and internal respect: New insights into the organizational identification process. Human Relations, 59, 815-846. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018726706067148
50. Gest, S. D., Rulison, K. L., Davidson, A. J., & Welsh, J. A. (2008). A reputation for success (or failure): The association of peer academic reputations with academic self-concept, effort, and performance across the upper elementary grades. Developmental Psychology, 44, 625-636. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.3.625
51. Gist, M. E. (1987). Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. The Academy of Management Review, 12, 472-485.
52. Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. The Academy of Management Review, 17, 183-211.
53. Goncalo, J. A., & Staw, B. M. (2006). Individualism-collectivism and group creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 96-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.11.003
54. Gong, Y., Huang, J., & Farh, L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 765-778. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.43670890
55. Greenwald, A. G. (1965). Behavior change following a persuasive communication. Journal of Personality, 33, 370-391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1965.tb01392.x
56. Greve, H. R., & Taylor, A. (2000). Innovations as catalysts for organizational change: Shifts in organizational cognition and search. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 54-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2666979
57. Han, J. K., Kim, N., & Srivastava, R. K. (1998). Market orientation and organizational performance: Is innovation a missing link? Journal of Marketing, 62, 30-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1252285
58. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
59. Herold, D. M., Fedor, D. B., & Caldwell, S. D. (2007). Beyond change management: A multilevel investigation of contextual and personal influences on employees' commitment to change. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 942-951. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.942
60. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
61. Holman, D., Totterdell, P., Axtell, C., Stride, C., Port, R., Svensson, R., & Zibarras, L. (2012). Job design and the employee innovation process: The mediating role of learning strategies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27, 177-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9242-5
62. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leader-ship, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to unparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
64. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoffcriterion for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alterna- tives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
65. Hughes, A., Galbraith, D., & White, D. (2011). Perceived competence: A common core for self-efficacy and self-concept? Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 278-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.559390
66. Hui, C. H., Cheng, K., & Gan, Y. (2003). Psychological collectivism as a moderator of the impact of supervisor-subordinate personality similarity on employees' service quality. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 52, 175-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00130
67. Jaccard, J. (1981). Toward theories of persuasion and belief change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 260-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.40.2.260
68. Jackson, C. L., Colquitt, J. A., Wesson, M. J., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2006). Psychological collectivism: A measurement validation and linkage to group member performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 884-899.
69. James, L. R., Mulaik, S. S., & Brett, J. M. (1982). Causal analysis: Assumptions, models, and data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
70. Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038
71. Janssen, O. (2001). Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the curvilinear relationships between job demands, and job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1039-1050. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3069447
72. Janssen, O. (2004). How fairness perceptions make innovative behavior more or less stressful. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 201-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.238
73. Jennings, D. F., & Young, D. M. (1990). An empirical comparison between objective and subjective measures of the product innovation domain of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15, 53-66.
74. Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Pucik, V., & Welbourne, T. M. (1999). Managerial coping with organizational change: A dispositional perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 107-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.107
75. Kavanagh, D. J., & Bower, G. H. (1985). Mood and self-efficacy: Impact of job and sadness on perceived capabilities. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 9, 507-525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01173005
76. Lam, S. S. K., Chen, X., & Schaubroeck, J. (2002). Participative decision making and employee performance in different cultures: The moderating effects of allocentrism/idiocentrism and efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 905-914. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3069321
77. Lam, S. S. K., Schaubroeck, J., & Aryee, S. (2002). Relationship between organizational justice and employee work outcomes: A cross-national study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.131
78. Lance, C. E., Vandenberg, R. J., & Self, R. M. (2000). Latent growth models of individual change: The case of newcomer adjustment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 107-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2904
79. LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 853-868. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.853
80. Lewicki, R. J., McAllister, D. J., & Bies, R. J. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. The Academy of Management Review, 23, 438-458.
81. Liao, H., Liu, D., & Loi, R. (2010). Looking at both sides of the social exchange coin: A social cognitive perspective on the joint effects of relationship quality and differentiation on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1090-1109. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.54533207
82. Lodigiani, R., & Pesenti, L. (2014). Public resources retrenchment and social welfare innovation in Italy: Welfare cultures and the subsidiarity principle in times of crisis. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 22, 157-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2014.903833
83. Love, M. S., & Dustin, S. L. (2014). An investigation of coworker relationships and psychological collectivism on employee propensity to take charge. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25, 1208-1226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.826712
84. Mallard, A. G. C., & Lance, C. E. (1998). Development and evaluation of a parent-employee interrole conflict scale. Social Indicators Research, 45, 343-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006914418251
85. Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 123-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.123
86. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.
87. McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256727
88. Milliken, F. J., Morrison, E. W., & Hewlin, P. F. (2003). An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don't communicate upward and why. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1453-1476. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00387
89. Minsky, B. D., & Marin, D. B. (1999). Why faculty members use e-mail: The role of individual differences in channel choice. Journal of Business Communication, 36, 194-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002194369903600204
90. Mortazavi, S., Pedhiwala, N., Shafiro, M., & Hammer, L. (2009). Workfamily conflict related to culture and gender. Community, Work & Family, 12, 251-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13668800902779023
91. Neves, P. (2009). Readiness for change: Contributions for employee's level of individual change and turnover intentions. Journal of Change Management, 9, 215-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14697010902879178
92. Ng, T. W. H., Feldman, D. C., & Lam, S. S. K. (2010). Psychological contract breaches, organizational commitment, and innovation-related behaviors: A latent growth modeling approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 744-751. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018804
93. Oh, I., Guay, R., Kim, K., Harold, C. M., Lee, J., Heo, C., & Shin, K.-H. (2014). Fit happens globally: A meta-analytic comparison of the relationships of person-environment fit dimensions with work attitudes and performance across East Asia, Europe, and North America. Personnel Psychology, 67, 99-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/peps.12026
94. Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72.
95. Paglis, L. L., & Green, S. G. (2002). Leadership self-efficacy and managers' motivation for leading change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 215-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.137
96. Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 636-652.
97. Pentz, M. A., & Chou, C. P. (1994). Measurement invariance in longitudinal clinical research assuming change from development and intervention. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 450-462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.62.3.450
98. Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., & Tormala, Z. L. (2002). Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: The self-validation hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 722-741. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.722
99. Pirson, M., & Malhotra, D. (2011). Foundations of organizational trust: What matters to different stakeholders? Organization Science, 22, 1087-1104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0581
100. Pitariu, A. H., & Ployhart, R. E. (2010). Explaining change: Theorizing and testing dynamic mediated longitudinal relationships. Journal of Management, 36, 405-429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206308331096
101. Ployhart, R. E., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2010). Longitudinal research: The theory, design, and analysis of change. Journal of Management, 36, 94-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352110
102. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
103. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316
104. Ramesh, A., & Gelfand, M. J. (2010). Will they stay or will they go? The role of job embeddedness in predicting turnover in individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 807-823. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019464
105. Robinson, S. L., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 245-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.4030150306
106. Rosenberg, M. (1989). Society and the adolescent self-image. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
107. Roth, P. L., & BeVier, C. A. (1998). Response rates in HRM/OB survey research: Norms and correlates, 1990-1994. Journal of Management, 24, 97-117.
108. Sadri, G., & Robertson, I. (1993). Self-efficacy and work-related behavior: A review and meta-analysis. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 42, 139-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1993.tb00728.x
109. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580-607. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256701
110. Shalley, C. E., Gilson, L. L., & Blum, T. C. (2009). Interactive effects of growth need strength, work context, and job complexity on self-reported creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 489-505. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.41330806
111. Shavelson, R. J., Webb, N. M., & Rowley, G. L. (1989). Generalizability theory. American Psychologist, 44, 922-932. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.6.922
112. Sherry, S. B., Mackinnon, S. P., Macneil, M. A., & Fitzpatrick, S. (2013). Discrepancies confer vulnerability to depressive symptoms: A threewave longitudinal study. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60, 112-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030439
113. Smith, H. J., & Tyler, T. R. (1997). Choosing the right pond: The impact of group membership on self-esteem and group-oriented behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 146-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1996.1318
114. Staub, E. (1972). Effects of persuasion and modeling on delay of gratification. Developmental Psychology, 6, 166-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0032212
115. Sternberg, R. J. (2001). What is the common thread of creativity? Its dialectical relation to intelligence and wisdom. American Psychologist, 56, 360-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.360
116. Sullivan, D., Landau, M. J., Kay, A. C., & Rothschild, Z. K. (2012). Collectivism and the meaning of suffering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 1023-1039. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030382
117. Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1137-1148. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3069429
118. Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 277-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020952
119. van Beuningen, J., De Ruyter, K., & Wetzels, M. (2011). The power of self-efficacy change during service provision: Making your customers feel better about themselves pays off. Journal of Service Research, 14, 108-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094670510379037
120. van Dam, K., Oreg, S., & Schyns, B. (2008). Daily work contexts and resistance to organizational change: The role of leader-member exchange, developmental climate, and change process characteristics. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57, 313-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00311.x
121. Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002
122. van Quaquebeke, N., Zenker, S., & Eckloff, T. (2009). Find out how much it means to me! The importance of interpersonal respect in work values compared to perceived organizational practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 423-431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-0008-6
123. van Vienen, A. E. M. (1999). Managerial self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, and work-role salience as determinants of ambition for a managerial position. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 639-665. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb01406.x
124. Vardaman, J. M., Amis, J. M., Dyson, B. P., Wright, P. M., & Van de GraaffRandolph, R. (2012). Interpreting change as controllable: The role of network centrality and self-efficacy. Human Relations, 65, 835-859. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018726712441642
125. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York, NY: Wiley.
126. Wales, W. J., Patel, P. C., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2013). In pursuit of greatness: CEO narcissism, entrepreneurial orientation, and firm performance variance. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 1041-1069. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joms.12034
127. Wanberg, C. R., & Banas, J. T. (2000). Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 132-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.132
128. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
129. Welbourne, T. M., Johnson, D. E., & Erez, A. (1998). The role-based performance scale: Validity analysis of a theory-based measure. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 540-555. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256941
130. Wennberg, K., Pathak, S., & Autio, E. (2013). How culture moulds the effects of self-efficacy and fear of failure on entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 25, 756-780. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2013.862975
131. Wheeler, L., Reis, H. T., & Bond, M. H. (1989). Collectivismindividualism in everyday social life: The middle kingdom and the melting pot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 79-86.
132. Winkler, J. D., Kanouse, D. E., & Ware, J. E. (1982). Controlling for acquiescence response set in scale development. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 555-561. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.67.5.555
133. Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 323-342. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.49388995
134. Yukl, G., Kim, H., & Chavez, C. (1999). Task importance, feasibility, and agent influence behavior as determinants of target commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 137-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.137
135. Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 107-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.48037118
136. Zhang, X., & Zhou, J. (2014). Empowering leadership, uncertainty avoidance, trust, and employee creativity: Interaction effects and a mediating mechanism. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124, 150-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.02.002
137. Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 682-696. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3069410