Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations

Academy of Management Journal

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 323-342

  Yuan, Feirong ^a   Woodman, Richard W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951759507     PISSN: 00014273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2010.49388995     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Abrahamson, E. 1991. Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection of innovations. Academy of Management Review, 16: 586-612.
2. Aiken, M., Bacharach, S. B., & French, J. L. 1980. Organizational structure, work process, and proposal making in administrative bureaucracies. Academy of Management Journal, 23: 631-652.
3. Allen, D. G., Mahto, R. V., & Otondo, R. F. 2007. Webbased recruitment: Effects of information, organizational brand, and attitudes toward a web site on applicant attraction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 1696-1708.
4. Amabile, T. M. 1988. A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol.10: 123-167. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
5. Amabile, T. M. 1996. Creativity in context: Update to "The social psychology of creativity." Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
6. Anderson, N., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. 2004. The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25: 147-173.
7. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103: 411-423.
8. Arkin, R. M. 1981. Self-presentation styles. In J. T. Tedeschi (Ed.), Impression management theory and social psychological research: 311-333. New York: Academic Press.
9. Arndt, M., & Bigelow, B. 2000. Presenting structural innovation in an institutional environment: Hospitals' use of impression management. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 494-522.
10. Ashford, S. J. 1986. Feedback seeking in individual adaptation: A resource perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 29: 465-487.
11. Ashford, S. J., & Northcraft, G. B. 1992. Conveying more (or less) than we realize: The role of impression-management in feedback-seeking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53: 310-334.
12. Ashford, S. J., Rothbard, N. P., Piderit, S. K., & Dutton, J. E. 1998. Out on a limb: The role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 23-57.
13. Bliese, P. D., & Hanges, P. J. 2004. Being both too liberal and too conservative: The perils of treating grouped data as though they were independent. Organizational Research Methods, 7: 400-417.
14. Bunce, D., & West, M. A. 1995. Self perceptions and perceptions of group climate as predictors of individual innovation at work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 44: 199-215.
15. Chatman, J. A. 1991. Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 459-484.
16. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. 1983. Applied multiple regression/ correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Craig, C. C. 1936. On the frequency function of xy. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 7: 1-15.
18. Daft, R. L. 1978. A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 21: 193-210.
19. Dean, J. W., Jr. 1987. Building the future: The justification process for new technology. In J. M. Pennings & A. Buitendam (Eds.), New technology as organizational innovation: The development and diffusion of microelectronics: 35-58. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
20. Dyer, W. G., & Page, R. A., Jr. 1988. The politics of innovation. Knowledge in the Society: An International Journal of Knowledge Transfer, 1(2): 23-41.
21. Farr, J. L., & Ford, C. M. 1990. Individual innovation. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies: 63-80. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
22. Gilbert, D. T. 1998. Ordinary personology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed.) vol.2: 89-150. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
23. Graen, G. B. 1976. Role making processes within complex organizations. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology: 1201-1245. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
24. Graen, G. B., Novak, M. A., & Sommerkamp, P. 1982. The effects of leader-member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30: 109-131.
25. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. 1995. Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leadermember exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6: 219-247.
26. Green, S. G., & Mitchell, T. R. 1979. Attributional process of leaders in leader-member interactions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23: 429-458.
27. Harrison, J. R., & Carroll, G. R. 1991. Keeping the faith: A model of cultural transmission in formal organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 552-582.
28. Horst, P. 1941. The role of prediction variables which are independent of the criterion. In P. Horst (Ed.), The prediction of personal adjustment. Social Research Bulletin, 48: 431-436.
29. House, R. J., & Dessler, G. 1974. The path goal theory of leadership: Some post hoc and a priori tests. In J. Hunt & L. Larson (Eds.), Contingency approaches to leadership: 29-55. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
30. James, L., Hartman, E., Stebbins, M., & Jones, A. 1977. An examination of the relationship between psychological climate and a VIE model for work motivation. Personnel Psychology, 30: 229-254.
31. James, L., Mulaik, S., & Brett, J. 1982. Causal analysis: Assumptions, models, and data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
32. Janssen, O. 2000. Job demands, perceptions of effortreward fairness and innovation work behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73: 287-302.
33. Janssen, O. 2003. Innovative behavior and job involvement at the price of conflict and less satisfactory relations with co-workers. Journal of Organizational and Occupational Psychology, 76: 347-364.
34. Janssen, O., Van de Vliert, E., & West, M. 2004. The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: A special issue introduction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25: 129-145.
35. Janssen, O., & Van Yperen, N. W. 2004. Employees' goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 368-384.
36. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. 1996a. LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
37. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. 1996b. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
38. Judge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. 1993. Social context of performance evaluation decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 80-105.
39. Kanter, R. M. 1983. The change masters. New York: Simon & Schuster.
40. Kanter, R. M. 1988. When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for in- novation in organization. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol.10: 169-211. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
41. Kenny, D. 1979. Correlation and causality. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
42. Kimberly, J. R. 1981. Managerial innovation. In P. C. Nystrom & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design, vol.1: 84-104. New York: Oxford University Press.
43. Kimberly, J. R., & Evanisko. M. 1981. Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24: 689-713.
44. Landy, F. L., & Farr, J. 1980. Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin, 87: 72-102.
45. Lant, T. K., & Mezias, S. J. 1992. An organizational learning model of convergence and reorientation. Organization Science, 3: 47-71.
46. Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. 1990. Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107: 34-47.
47. Maassen, G. H., & Bakker, A. B. 2001. Suppressor variables in path models: Definitions and interpretations. Sociological Methods & Research, 30: 241-270.
48. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C., & Hoffman, J. 1998. A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT.
49. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. 2002. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7: 83-104.
50. Markus, H., & Zajonc, R. B. 1985. The cognitive perspective in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed.), vol.1: 137-230. New York: Random House.
51. Mount, M. K., Judge, T. A., Scullen, S. E., Sytsma, M. R., & Hezlett, S. A. 1998. Trait, rater and level effects in 360-degree performance ratings. Personnel Psychology, 51: 557-576.
52. Mumford, M., & Gustafson, S. 1988. Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 130: 27-43.
53. Munton, A. G., & West, M. A. 1995. Innovations and personal change: Patterns of adjustment to relocation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16: 363-375.
54. Netemeyer, R., Johnston, M., & Burton, S. 1990. Analysis of role conflict and role ambiguity in a structural modeling framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 148-157.
55. Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. 1996. Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 607-634.
56. Ostroff, C., & Schmitt, N. 1993. Configurations of organizational effectiveness and efficiency. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 1345-1361.
57. Pedhazur, E. J. 1997. Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt.
58. Pennings, P. S., & Goodman, J. M. 1977. Toward a workable framework. In P. S. Pennings & J. M. Goodman (Eds.), New perspectives on organizational effectiveness: 146-184. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
59. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 879-903.
60. Regan, D. T., & Totten, J. 1975. Empathy and attribution: Turning observers into actors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32: 850-856.
61. Rioux, S. M., & Penner, L. A. 2001. The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: A motivational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 1306-1314.
62. Rogers, E. M. 1983. Diffusion of innovation (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.
63. Schlenker, B. R. 1980. Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
64. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. 1994. Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 580-607.
65. Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. 2004. The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30: 933-958.
66. Shrauger, J. S., & Shoeneman, T. J. 1979. Symbolic interactionist view of self-concept: Through the looking glass darkly. Psychological Bulletin, 86: 549-573.
67. Siegel, S. M., & Kaemmerer, W. F. 1978. Measuring the perceived support for innovation in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63: 553-562.
68. Sörbom, D., & Jöreskog, K. G. 1982. The use of structural equation models in evaluation research. In C. Fornell (Ed.), A second generation of multivariate analysis, vol.2: 381-418. New York: Praeger.
69. Spector, P. E. 2006. Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9: 221-232.
70. Steele, C. M. 1988. The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol.21: 261-302. New York: Academic Press.
71. Sutton, R. I., & Hargadon, A. 1996. Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 685-718.
72. Tedeschi, J. T., & Riess, M. 1981. Identities, the phenomenal self, and laboratory research. In J. T. Tedeschi (Ed.), Impression management theory and social psychological research: 3-22. New York: Academic Press.
73. Tetlock, P. E., & Manstead, A. S. R. 1985. Impression management versus intrapsychic explanations in social psychology: A useful dichotomy? Psychological Review, 92: 59-77.
74. Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. 1999. An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52: 591-620.
75. Tolber, P. S., & Zucker, L. 1983. Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 22-39.
76. Tushman M. L., & Romanelli, E. 1985. Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol.7: 171-222. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
77. Van de Ven, A. H. 1986. Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32: 590-607.
78. Vroom, V. H. 1964. Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
79. Wayne, S. J., & Liden, R. C. 1995. Effects of impression management on performance ratings: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 232-260.
80. West, M. A. 1989. Innovation amongst health care professionals. Social Behavior, 4: 173-184.
81. West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. 1989. Innovation at work: Psychological perspectives. Social Behavior, 4: 15-30.
82. West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (Eds.). 1990a. Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
83. West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. 1990b. Innovation at work. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies: 3-13. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
84. West, M. A., & Wallace, M. 1991. Innovation in health care teams. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21: 303-315.
85. Westphal, J. D., Gulati, R., & Shortell, S. M. 1997. Customization or conformity? An institutional and network perspective on the content and consequences of TQM adoption. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 366-394.
86. Williams, L., & Hazer, J. 1986. Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment in turnover models: A reanalysis using latent variable structural equation methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 219-231.
87. Wolfe, R. A. 1994. Organizational innovation: Review, critique and suggested research directions. Journal of Management Studies, 31: 405-431.
88. Wolfe, R., Lennox, R., & Cutler, B. L. 1986. Getting along and getting ahead: Empirical support for a theory of protective and acquisitive self-presentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50: 356-361.
89. Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. 1993. Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18: 293-321.
90. Zelditch, M., Jr. 2001. Theories of legitimacy. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations: 33-53. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
91. Zhou, J. 2003. When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: Role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 413-422.
92. Zhou, J., & Woodman, R. W. 2003. Manager's recognition of employees' creative ideas: A social-cognitive model. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The international handbook on innovation: 631-640. Oxford, U.K.: Elsevier Science.