The bidimensional impression management index (BIMI): Measuring agentic and communal forms of impression management

Journal of Personality Assessment

Volumn 96, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 523-531

  Blasberg, Sabrina A ^a   Rogers, Katherine H ^a   Paulhus, Delroy L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; PERCEPTION; PERSONALITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; PERSONALITY; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84906302921     PISSN: 00223891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2013.862252     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751-763.
2. Aube, J., & Koestner, R., Hodgins, H., & Craig, J. (1994). Masculine traits and reports of social functioning: Evidence for a positivity bias. Sex Roles, 31, 621-636.
3. Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion. Oxford, UK: Rand McNally.
4. Beyer, S., & Bowden, E. M. (1997). Gender differences in self-perceptions: Convergent evidence from three measures of accuracy and bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 157-172.
5. Buckels, E. E., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). Psychopaths' self-reports: Negative impression management or antisocial identity? Manuscript under review.
6. Campbell, W. K., & Foster, J. D. (2007). The narcissistic self: Background, an extended agency model, and ongoing controversies. In C. Sedikides & S. J. Spencer (Eds.), The self (pp.115-138). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
7. Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York, NY: Academic.
8. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
9. Cooper, W. H., & Withey, M. J. (2009). The strong situation hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 62-72.
10. Davis, C. G., Thake, J., & Vilhena, N. (2010). Social desirability biases in selfreported alcohol consumption and harms. Addictive Behaviors, 35, 302-311.
11. Davis, C. G., Thake, J., & Weekes, J. R. (2012). Impression managers: Nice guys or serious criminals? Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 25-31.
12. Dunnett, S., Koun, S., & Barber, P. J. (1981). Social desirability in the Eysenck Personality Inventory. British Journal of Psychology, 72, 19-26.
13. Edwards, A. E. (1953). The relationship between the judged desirability of a trait and the probability that the trait will be endorsed. Journal of Applied Psychology, 37, 90-93.
14. Edwards, A. E. (1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. Fort Worth, TX: Dryden.
15. Fiske, S. T. (2009). Social beings: Core motives in social psychology. NewYork, NY: Wiley.
16. Gebauer, J. E., Sedikides, C., Verplanken, B., & Maio, G. R. (2012). Communal narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 854-878.
17. Gifford, R., & O'Connor, B. (1987). The interpersonal circumplex as a behavior map. Journal of Research in Personality, 52, 1019-1026.
18. Goffin, R. D., & Boyd, A. C. (2009). Faking and personality assessment in personnel selection: Advancing models of faking. Canadian Psychology, 50, 151-160.
19. Ho, A. K., & Sidanius, J. (2010). Preserving positive identities: Public and private regard for one's ingroup and susceptibility to stereotype threat. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 55-67.
20. Holden, R. R. (1998). Detecting fakers on a personnel test: Response latencies versus a standard validity scale. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 13, 387-398.
21. Holden, R. R. (2008). Underestimating the effects of faking on the validity of self-report personality scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 311-321.
22. Holden, R. R., Book, A. S., Edwards, A. J., Wasylkiw, L., & Starzyk, K. B. (2003). Experimental faking in self-reported psychopathology: Unidimensional or multidimensional? Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1107-1117.
23. Holden, R. R., & Evoy, R. A. (2005). Personality inventory faking: A fourdimensional simulation of dissimulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1307-1318.
24. Holden, R. R., & Fekken, G. C. (1989). Three common social desirability scales: Friends, acquaintances, or strangers? Journal of Research in Personality, 23, 180-191.
25. Jackson, D. N., Peacock, A. C., & Holden, R. R. (1982). Professional interviewers' trait inferential structures for diverse occupational groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29, 1-20.
26. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102-138). New York, NY: Guilford.
27. Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2009). Machiavellianism. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 93-108). New York, NY: Guilford.
28. Kitching, S. & Paulhus, D. L. (2008, June). Why do psychopaths score lower on impression management scales? Poster presented at the Canadian Psychological Association annual meeting, Halifax, NS, Canada.
29. Kwan, V. S. Y., Bond, M. H., & Singelis, T. M. (1997). Pan cultural explanations for life satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1038-1051.
30. Li, A., & Bagger, J. (2006). Using the BIDR to distinguish the effects of impression management and self-deception on the criterion validity of personality measures: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 131-141.
31. McFarland, L. A., & Ryan, A. M. (2000). Variance in faking across noncognitive measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 812-821.
32. McFarland, L. A., & Ryan, A. M. (2006). Toward an integrated model of applicant faking behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 979-1016.
33. Moskowitz, D. S. (1994). Dominance and friendliness: On the interaction of gender and situation. Journal of Personality, 61, 387-409.
34. Neal, T. M. S., & Sellbom, M. (2012). Examining the factor structure of the Hare Self-Report Psychopathy scale. Journal of PersonalityAssessment, 94, 244-253.
35. Nguyen, N. T., Biderman, M. D., & McDaniel, M. A. (2005). Effects of response instruction on faking a situational judgment test. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13, 250-260.
36. Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
37. Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598-609.
38. Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias in questionnaires. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17-59). San Diego, CA: Academic.
39. Paulhus, D. L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In H. I. Braun, D. N. Jackson, & D. E. Wiley (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp. 49-69). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Paulhus, D. L., Bruce, M. N., & Trapnell, P. D. (1995). Effects of selfpresentation strategies on personality profiles and their structure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 100-108.
41. Paulhus, D. L., & John, O. P. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic bias in selfperception: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits andmotives. Journal of Personality, 66, 1025-1060.
42. Paulhus, D. L., & Jones, D. N. (in press). Measures of dark personalities. In G. J. Boyle, D. H. Saklofske, & G. Matthews (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological constructs. San Diego, CA: Academic.
43. Paulhus, D. L., Neumann, C. S., & Hare, R. D. (in press). Manual for the Self- Report Psychopathy scale. Toronto, ON, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
44. Paulhus, D. L., & Trapnell, P. D. (2008). Self-presentation: An agencycommunion framework. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 492-517). New York, NY: Guilford.
45. Paulhus, D. L., & Vazire, S. (2007). The self-report method. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 224-239). New York, NY: Guilford.
46. Paulhus, D. L., Westlake, B., Calvez, S., & Harms, P. D. (in press). Selfpresentation style in job interviews: The role of personality and culture. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
47. Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556-563.
48. Pauls, C. A., & Stemmler, G. (2003). Substance and bias in socially desirable responding. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 263-275.
49. Piedmont, R.L., McCrae, R.R., Riemann, R., & Angleitner, A. (2000). On the invalidity of validity scales: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 582-593.
50. Raskin, R., & Hall, C. S. (1979). A Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Psychological Reports, 45, 590.
51. Rogers, R., Gillis, J. R., & Bagby, R. M. (1990). The SIRS as a measure of malingering: Validation with a correctional sample. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 8, 85-92.
52. Rosenberg, S., & Sedlak, A. (1972). Structural representations of perceived personality trait relationships. In A. K. Romney, R. N. Shepard, & S. B. Nerlove (Eds.), Multidimensional scaling (pp.134-162). New York, NY: Seminar.
53. Roth, D. L., Snyder, C. R., & Pace, L. M. (1986). Dimensions of favorable self-presentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 867-874.
54. Sackeim, H.A., & Gur, R.C. (1978). Self-deception, other-deception and consciousness. In G.E. Schwartz & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and selfregulation: Advances in research (Vol. 2) pp. 139-197.New York, NY: Plenum.
55. Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1981). Questions and answers in attitude surveys. Experiments on form, wording, and context. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56. Trapnell, P. D., & Campbell, J. D. (1999). Private self-consciousness and the Five-factor model of personality: Distinguishing rumination from reflection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 284-304.
57. Trapnell, P. D., & Paulhus, D. L. (2012). Agentic and communal values: Their scope and measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 39-52.
58. Uziel, L. (2010). Look at me, I'm happy and creative: The effect of impression management on behavior in social presence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1592-1602.
59. Vecchione, M., & Alessandri, G. (2013). Alpha and beta traits and egoistic and moralistic self-enhancement: A point of convergence between two research traditions. Journal of Personality, 81, 39-48.
60. Wiggins, J. S. (1959). Interrelationships among MMPI measures of dissimulation under standard and social desirability instructions. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 23, 419-427.
61. Wiggins, J. S. (1964). Convergences among stylistic response measures from objective personality tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 24, 551-562.
62. Wiggins, J. S. (1991). Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior. In W. Grove & D. Cicchetti (Eds .), Thinking clearly about Psychology: Essays in honor of Paul Meehl (Vol. 2, pp. 89-113). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
63. Wiggins, J. S., & Holzmuller, A. (1981). Further evidence on androgyny and interpersonal flexibility. Journal of Research in Personality, 15, 67-80.
64. Wojciszke, B. (2005). Morality and competence in person- and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 155-188.
65. Ziegler, M., & Buehner, M. (2009). Modeling socially desirable responding and its effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 548-565.
66. Ziegler,M., MacCann, C., & Roberts, R. D. (2012). New perspectives on faking in personality assessment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
67. Ziegler,M., Schmidt-Atzert, L., Buhner, M., & Krumm, S. (2007). Fakability of different measurement methods for achievement motivation: Questionnaire, semi-projective, and objective. Psychology Science, 49, 291-307.