Using equity audits to create equitable and excellent schools

Using Equity Audits to Create Equitable and Excellent Schools

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-133

  Skrla, Linda E ^a   McKenzie, Kathryn Bell ^a   Scheurich, James Joseph ^b,c  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949894784     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781452218953     Document Type: Book

References (129)

1. Anderson, G. L. (2001). Promoting educational equity in a period of growing social inequity: The silent contradictions of the Texas reform discourse. Education and Urban Society, 33 (3), 321-332. doi:10.1177/0013124501333007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013124501333007
2. Artiles, A. J. (1998). The dilemma of difference: Enriching the disproportionality discourse with theory and context. Journal of Special Education, 32 (1), 32-36. doi:10.1177/002246699803200105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002246699803200105
3. Ballou, D., Sanders, W., & Wright, P. (2004). Controlling for student background in value-added assessment of teachers. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29 (1), 37-65. doi:10.3102/10769986029001037 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/10769986029001037
4. Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1963). Social learning and personality development. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
5. Bell, L. I. (2003). Strategies that close the gap. Educational Leadership, 60 (4), 32-34.
6. Berliner, D. C. (2001). Learning about and learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 35 (5), 463-482. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00004-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355%2802%2900004-6
7. Black, W. R., & Valenzuela, A. (2003). Educational accountability for English language learners in Texas: A retreat from equity. In L.Skrla & J. J.Scheurich (Eds.), Educational equity and accountability: Policies, paradigms, and politics (pp. 215-234). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
8. Bock, R. D., & Wolfe, R. (1996). A review and analysis of the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System. Part I: Audit and review of the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS): Final report. Nashville, TN: Comptroller of the Treasury.
9. Boudett, K. P., Murnane, R. J., City, E., & Moody, L. (2005). Teaching educators how to use student assessment data to improve instruction. Phi Delta Kappan, 86 (9), 700-706.
10. Bowman, D. H. (2003). Report finds suspension disparities in KY. Education Week, 22 (25), 6.
11. Brunner, C. C., Hitchon, N. G., & Brown, R. (2002). Advancing social justice as a part of educational leadership development: The potential of imaging technologies. On the Horizon, 10 (3), 12-15. doi:10.1108/10748120210446424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10748120210446424
12. Cartledge, G., Tillman, L. C., & Talbert-Johnson, C. T. (2001). Professional ethics within the context of student discipline and diversity. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24 (1), 25-37. doi:10.1177/088840640102400105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/088840640102400105
13. Chellman, C., Weinstein, M., Stiefel, L., & Schwartz, A. (2005). Why do some schools succeed at closing the racial test score gap? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec.
14. Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record, 102 (2): 294-343. doi:10.1111/0161-4681.00057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00057
15. Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2001). Learning policy: When state education reform works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16. College Board. (2001). Access to excellence: A report of the commission on the future of the Advanced Placement Program. New York: Author.
17. Costa, A. L. (1993). Through the lens of a critical friend. Educational Leadership, 51 (2), 49-51.
18. Dantley, M. (2003). Critical spirituality: Enhancing transformative leadership through critical theory and African American prophetic spirituality. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 6 (1), 3-17. doi:10.1080/1360312022000069987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1360312022000069987
19. Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Learning.
20. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8 (1), Retrieved May 5, 2008, from http://www.epaa.asu.edu
21. Darling-Hammond, L. (2001). The challenge of staffing our schools. Educational Leadership, 58 (8), 12-17.
22. Denbo, S., Grant, C., & Jackson, S. (1994). Educate America: A call for equity in school reform. Chevy Chase, MD: National Coalition of Educational Equity Advocates.
23. Doran, H. C., & Fleischman, S. (2005). Challenges of value-added assessment. Educational Leadership, 63 (3), 85-87.
24. Edmonds, R. R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37 (1), 15, 18, 20-24.
25. Education Trust. (2006). Yes we can: Telling truths and dispelling myths about race and education in America. Washington, DC: Author.
26. Elmore, R. F. (2002). Testing trap. Harvard Magazine, 105 (1), 35.
27. English, F. W. (1988). Curriculum auditing. Lancaster, PA: Technomic.
28. Epp, J. R., & Watkinson, A. M. (1997). Systemic violence in education: Promise broken. Albany: State University of New York Press.
29. Ferguson, R. F. (1998). Teachers' perceptions and expectations and the Black-White test score gap. In C.Jencks & M.Phillips (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 318-375). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
30. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.
31. Ford, D. Y., & Harmon, D. A. (2001). Equity and excellence: Providing access to gifted education for culturally diverse students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11 (3), 141-148.
32. Fuller, E., & Berry, B. (2006). Texas teacher quality data: Prospects and problems. Hillsborough, NC: Center for Teaching Quality.
33. Gates, G. S., & Lichtenberg, K. (2005). Accountability data and decision making in Texas bilingual education programs. Journal of Latinos in Education, 4 (4), 271-282. doi:10.1207/s1532771xjle0404_5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532771xjle0404_5
34. Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
35. Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk, A. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and effect on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37 (2), 479-507.
36. Gonzalez, M. L., & Huerta-Macias, A. (1997). Mi casa es su casa. Educational Leadership, 55 (2), 52-55.
37. Gonzalez, N., Moll, L. C., Floyd-Tenery, M., Rivera, A., Gonzales, R., et al. (1993). Teacher research on funds of knowledge: Learning from households. Tucson, AZ: National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning.
38. Gregory, G. H. (2003). Differentiated instructional strategies in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. Gregory, J. F. (1995). The crime of punishment: Racial and gender disparities in the use of corporal punishment in U.S. schools. Journal of Negro Education, 64 (4), 454-463. doi:10.2307/2967267 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2967267
40. Haney, W. (2001). Response to Skrla et al. The illusion of educational equity in Texas: A commentary on "accountability for equity." International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4 (3), 2.
41. Haycock, K. (2001). Closing the achievement gap. Educational Leadership, 58 (6).
42. Heck, R. H. (2007). Examining the relationship between teacher quality as an organizational property of schools and students' achievement and growth rates. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43 (4), 399-432. doi:10.1177/0013161X07306452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013161X07306452
43. Hewson, P. W., Kahle, J. B., Scantlebury, K., & Davies, D. (2001). Equitable science education in urban middle schools: Do reform efforts make a difference? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38 (10), 1130-1144. doi:10.1002/tea.10006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.10006
44. Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42 (2), 371-406. doi:10.3102/00028312042002371 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312042002371
45. Hooks, B. (1992). Black looks: Race and representation. Cambridge, MA: South End.
46. Hunter, M. (1994). Mastery teaching. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
47. Ingersoll, R. M. (1999). The problem of underqualified teachers in American secondary schools. Educational Researcher, 28 (2), 26-37.
48. Institute for School-University Partnerships. (2001). Research finds that 25 percent of newly-hired teachers for 2000-2001 not fully certified. Bryan, TX: Author.
49. Kahle, J. (1998). Researching equity in systemic reform: How do we assess progress and problems?Madison, WI: National Institute for Science Teaching (ED 472 341).
50. Klein, S. (2001). Response to Skrla et al.: Is there a connection between educational equity and accountability? International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4 (3), 261-266.
51. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). But that's just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory Into Practice, 34 (3), 159-165. doi:10.1080/00405849509543675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405849509543675
52. Ladson-Billings, G. (1997). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Education Research Journal, 32 (3), 465-491.
53. Lam, Y., & Peake, R. (1997). Triad conference: Is it amore effective way of involving parents and students? McGill Journal of Education, 32 (3), 249-262.
54. Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24 (1), 37-62. doi:10.3102/01623737024001037 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/01623737024001037
55. Lee, J. J., & Hoadley, C. M. (2006). "Ugly in a world where you can choose to be beautiful": Teaching and learning about diversity via virtual worlds. In S. Barab, D. Hickey, & K. Hay (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 383-389).
56. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
57. Lopez, G. R. (2001). Redefining parental involvement: Lessons from high-performing migrant-impacted schools. American Educational Research Journal, 38 (2), 253-288. doi:10.3102/00028312038002253 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312038002253
58. Losen, D., & Orfield, G. (2002). Racial inequity in special education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Publishing Group.
59. Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & DiRanna, K. (2008). The data coach's guide. Acton, MA: Research for Better Teaching.
60. Lyman, L. L., & Villani, C. J. (2004). Best leadership practices for high-poverty schools. New York: Scarecrow.
61. MacMillan, D. L., & Reschy, D. J. (1998). Overrepresentation of minority students: The case for greater specificity or reconsideration of the variables examined. Journal of Special Education, 32 (1), 15-24. doi:10.1177/002246699803200103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002246699803200103
62. Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
63. McCaffrey, D. F., Lockwood, J. R., Koretz, D. M., & Hamilton, L. S. (2003). Evaluating value-added models for teacher accountability, MG-158-EDU. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
64. McCaffrey, D. F., Lockwood, J., Koretz, D. M., Louis, T. A., & Hamilton, L. (2004). Models for value-added modeling of teacher effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29 (1), 67-101. doi:10.3102/10769986029001067 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/10769986029001067
65. McDermott, R. P. (1997). Achieving school failure, 1972-1997. In G.Spindler, Education and cultural process. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
66. McKenzie, K. B. (2001). White teachers' perceptions about their students of color and themselves as white educators. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.
67. McKenzie, K. B. (2003). The unintended consequences of the Texas accountability system. In L.Skrla & J. J.Scheurich (Eds.), Educational equity and accountability: Policies, paradigms, and politics (pp. 235-250). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
68. McKenzie, K. B., & Lozano, R. (2008). Teachers'zone of self-efficacy: Which students get included, which students get excluded, and more importantly, why? The National Journal of Urban Education, 1 (4), 372-384.
69. McKenzie, K. B., & Scheurich, J. J. (2004). Equity traps: A useful construct for preparing principals to lead schools that are successful with racially diverse students. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40 (5), 601-632. doi:10.1177/0013161X04268839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013161X04268839
70. McKenzie, K. B., Skrla, L., & Scheurich, J. (2006). Preparing instructional leaders for social justice. Journal of School Leadership, 16 (2), 158-170.
71. Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
72. Mitchell, J. K., & Poston, W. K. (1992). The equity audit in school reform: Three case studies of educational disparity and incongruity. International Journal of Educational Reform, 1 (3), 242-247.
73. Moll, L. C. (1992). Bilingual classroom studies and community analysis: Some recent trends. Educational Researcher, 20 (2), 20-24.
74. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., & Gonzalez, N. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
75. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31 (2), 132-141. doi:10.1080/00405849209543534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534
76. New Zealand Department of Labor. (2006). Pay and employment equity unit. Retrieved May 5, 2008, from http://www.dol.govt.nz/services/PayAndEmploymentEquity/resources/assessment-tools.asp
77. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-100. Retrieved May 5, 2008, from http://www.ed.gov/legislation/ESEA02
78. Oakes, J. (1986). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
79. O'Day, J. A. (2002). Complexity, accountability, and school improvement. Harvard Educational Review, 72 (3), 293-329.
80. Parker, L. (2001). Statewide assessment triggers urban school reform: But how high the stakes for urban minorities? Education and Urban Society, 33 (3), 313-320. doi:10.1177/0013124501333006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013124501333006
81. Pollock, M. (2001). How the questions we ask most about race in education is the very question we most suppress. Educational Researcher, 30 (9), 2-12. doi:10.3102/0013189X030009002 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030009002
82. Poston, W. K. (1992). The equity audit in school reform: Building a theory for educational research. International Journal of Educational Reform, 1 (3), 235-241.
83. Prince, C. D. (2002). The challenge of attracting good teachers and principals to struggling schools. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
84. Raudenbush, S. W. (2004). What are value added models estimating and what does that imply for statistical practice? Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29 (1), 121-129. doi:10.3102/10769986029001121 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/10769986029001121
85. Resnick, L. B., & Hall, M. W. (2001). The principles of learning: Study tools for educators [CD-ROM, version 2.0]. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center, Institute for Learning (http://www.instituteforlearning.org).
86. Ricci, B. (2000). How about parent-teacher-student conferences? Principal, 79 (5), 53-54.
87. Rice, J. K. (2003). Teacher quality: Understanding the effectiveness of teacher attributes. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
88. Rivkin, S., Hanushek, E., & Kain, J. (2001). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. A working paper for the National Bureau of Economics Research.
89. Rockoff, J. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94 (2), 247-252. doi:10.1257/0002828041302244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/0002828041302244
90. Rorrer, A. K., & Skrla, L. (2005). Leaders as policy mediators. Theory Into Practice, 44 (1), 53-62. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4401_8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4401_8
91. Rorrer, A. K., Skrla, L., & Scheurich, J. J. (2008). Districts as institutional actors in educational reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44 (3), 307-357. doi:10.1177/0013161X08318962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08318962
92. Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R. J. (2002). What large-scale survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: Insights from the Prospects Study of Elementary Schools. Teachers College Record, 104, 1525-1567. doi:10.1111/1467-9620.00212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00212
93. Sanders, W. L., & Rivers, J. C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
94. Saphier, J., Haley-Speca, M. A., & Gower, R. (2008). The skillful teacher. Acton, MA: Research for Better Teaching.
95. Scheurich, J. J., & Skrla, L. (2003). Leadership for equity and excellence: Creating high-achievement classrooms, schools, and districts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
96. Scheurich, J. J., Skrla, L., & Johnson, J. F. (2000). Thinking carefully about equity and accountability. Phi Delta Kappan, 82 (4), 293-299.
97. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2002). Making mathematics work for all children: Issues of standards, testing, and equity. Educational Researcher, 3 (1), 13-25. doi:10.3102/0013189X031001013 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031001013
98. Sclafani, S. (2001). Using an aligned system to make real progress for Texas students. Education and Urban Society, 33 (3), 305-312. doi:10.1177/0013124501333005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013124501333005
99. Scott, B. (2001, March). Coming of age. IDRA Newsletter [On-line]. Retrieved May 7, 2008, from http://www.idra.org/IDRA_Newsletter/March_2001_Self_Renewing_Schools_Access_Equity_and_Excellence/Coming_of_Age
100. Singleton, G. E., & Linton, C. (2006). Courageous conversations about race: A field guide for achieving equity in schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
101. Sizer, T. (1997). Horace's hope: What works for the American high school. New York: Mariner Books.
102. Skiba, R., & Noam, G. (Eds.). (2001). Zero tolerance: Can suspension and expulsion keep schools safe. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
103. Skrla, L. (2001). Accountability, equity, and complexity. Educational Researcher, 30 (4), 15-21. doi:10.3102/0013189X030004015 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030004015
104. Skrla, L., & Scheurich, J. J. (2001). Displacing deficit thinking in school district leadership. Education and Urban Society, 33 (3), 235-259. doi:10.1177/0013124501333002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013124501333002
105. Skrla, L., Scheurich, J. J., & Johnson, J. F. (2000). Equity-driven, achievement focused school districts: A report on systemic school success in four Texas school districts serving diverse student populations. Austin, TX: The Charles A. Dana Center. Retrieved May 5, 2008, from http://utdirect.utexas.edu/txshop/item_details.WBX?cart_id=0MHDANACT&dept_prefix=MH&item_id=76&cat_seq_chosen=04&subcategory_seq_chosen=000&r_cust_service_urlhttp://www.utdanacenter.org/customerservice/index.html
106. Skrla, L., Scheurich, J. J., & Johnson, J. F. (2001). Toward a new consensus on high academic achievement for all children. Education and Urban Society, 33 (3), 227-234. doi:10.1177/0013124501333001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013124501333001
107. Skrla, L., Scheurich, J. J., Johnson, J. F., & Koschoreck, J. W. (2001a). Accountability for equity: Can state policy leverage social justice? International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4 (3), 237-260.
108. Skrla, L., Scheurich, J. J., Johnson, J. F., & Koschoreck, J. W. (2001b). Complex and contested constructions of accountability and educational equity. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4 (3), 277-283.
109. Sleeter, C. E. (1996). Multicultural education as social activism. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
110. Smith, M., & O'Day, J. (1990). Systemic school reform. In S.Fuhrman & B.Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing (pp. 233-267). New York: Routledge.
111. Smith, T. M., Desimone, L. M., & Ueno, K. (2005). "Highly qualified" to do what? The relationship between NCLB teacher quality mandates and the use of reform-oriented instruction in middle school mathematics. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29 (3), 169-199. doi:10.3102/0162373707306025 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0162373707306025
112. Steffy, B. (1993). The Kentucky education reform. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
113. Taylor, K., Marienau, C., & Fiddler, M. (2000). Developing adult learners. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
114. Tennessee Department of Education. (2002). Tennessee value-added assessment system. Retrieved May 5, 2008, from https://tvaas.sas.com/evaas/public_welcome.jsp
115. Texas Center for Educational Research. (2000). Strengthened assessment and accountability. Austin, TX: Author.
116. Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). Mapping a route toward differentiated instruction. Educational Leadership, 57 (1), 12-16.
117. Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., et al. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27 (2,3), 119-145.
118. Townsend, B. L. (2002). "Testing while Black": Standards-based school reform and African American learners. Remedial and Special Education, 23 (4), 222-231. doi:10.1177/07419325020230040501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/07419325020230040501
119. Trueba, H. (2001). Polar positions on the Texas Assessment of Academic Skills (TAAS): Pragmatism and the politics of neglect. Education and Urban Society, 33 (3), 333-344. doi:10.1177/0013124501333008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013124501333008
120. U.S. Department of Education Office of Civil Rights. (1999). Impact of civil rights laws. Washington, DC: Author.
121. Vacc, N. N., & Bright, G. W. (1999). Elementary preservice teachers' changing beliefs and instructional use of children's mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30 (1), 89-110. doi:10.2307/749631 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/749631
122. Valencia, R. R. (1997). The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. London: Falmer.
123. Valencia, R. R., Valenzuela, A., Sloan, K., & Foley, D. E. (2001). Let's treat the cause, not the symptoms: Equity and accountability in Texas revisited. Phi Delta Kappan, 83 (4), 318-321.
124. Wehlage, G. G., & Rutter, R. A. (1986). Dropping out: How much do schools contribute to the problem? Teachers College Record, 87 (3), 374-392.
125. Wheelock, A. (1993). Crossing the tracks. New York: John Muir Publications.
126. Williamson, P., Bondy, E., Langley, L., Mayne, D. (2005). Meeting the challenges of high-stakes testing while remaining child-centered: The representations of two urban teachers. Childhood Education, 81 (4), 190-195.
127. Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. (2008). Pupil nondiscrimination glossary of terms. Retrieved August 24, 2008, from http://165.189.80.100/sped/pndg-gloss.html
128. Wong, H. K., & Wong, R. T. (2004). The first days of school. Mountain View, CA: Harry K. Wong.
129. Yair, G. (2000). Not just about time: Instructional practices and productive time in school. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36 (4), 485-512. doi:10.1177/00131610021969083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00131610021969083