Districts as institutional actors in educational reform

Educational Administration Quarterly

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 307-357

  Rorrer, Andrea K ^a,b   Skrla, Linda ^c,d   Scheurich, James Joseph ^d  

^a Department of Educational Leadership and Policy ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^c College of Education and Human Development ^*

^d TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

District reform; Educational equity; Improving achievement; Institutional actors; Systemic reform

Indexed keywords

EID: 47249101050     PISSN: 0013161X     EISSN: 15523519     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013161X08318962     Document Type: Article

References (144)

1. Alexander, N. (2005). Exploring the changing face of adequacy. Peabody Journal of Education, 79 (3). 81-103.
2. Allport, F. (1924). Social psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
3. Anderson, P. (1999). Complexity theory and organization science. Organization Science, 10 (3). 216-232.
4. Ball, S. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
5. Berman, P. (1986). From compliance to learning: Implementing legally-induced reform. In D. L. Kirp & D. N. Jensen (Eds.), School days, rule days: The legalization and regulation of education (pp. 46-62). Philadelphia: Falmer.
6. Berne, R., & Stiefel, L. (1994). Measuring equity at the school level. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16, 405-421.
7. Bjrk, L.G. (1993). Effective schools-effective superintendents: The emerging instructional leadership role. Journal of School Leadership, 3 (3). 246-259.
8. Blas, J., & Blas, J. (2000). Effective instructional leadership: Teachers' perspectives on how principals promote teaching and learning in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 38 (2). 130-141.
9. Boin, R.A. (with Christensen, T.). (2004, September). Reconsidering leadership and institutions in the public sector: A question of design? Study Group Public Sector Leadership, EGPA Annual Convention, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
10. Boyd, W.L. (2000). The "R's of school reform" and the politics of reforming or replacing public schools. Journal of Educational Change, 1 (1). 225-252.
11. Bredeson, P.V. (1996). Superintendent's roles in curriculum development and instructional leadership: Instructional visionaries, collaborators, supporters, and delegators. Journal of School Leadership, 6, 243-264.
12. Bridges, E. (1982). Research on the school administrator: The state of the art, 1967-1980. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18 (3). 12-34.
13. Bryk, A.S. (1999). Policy lessons from Chicago's experience with decentralization. In I. D. Ravitch (Ed.), Brookings papers on education policy 1999 (pp. 67-99). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
14. Cahn, M. (1995). The players: Institutional and noninstitutional actors in the policy process. In S. Z. Theodoulou & M. A. Cahn (Eds.), Public policy: The essential readings (pp. 201-211). New York: Prentice Hall.
15. Casti, J. (1994). Complexification. New York: HarperPerennial.
16. Cawelti, G. (2001). Six districts, one goal of excellence. Journal of Staff Development, 22 (4). 31-35.
17. Consortium for Policy Research in Education (CPRE). (1998). States and districts and comprehensive school reform (CPRE Policy Brief, RB-24-May). Philadelphia: CPRE, University of Pennsylvania.
18. Clune, W. (1994). The shift from equity to adequacy in school finance. Educational Policy, 8 (4). 376-394.
19. Coburn, C. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32 (6). 3-12.
20. Corcoran, T., Fuhrman, S.H., & Belcher, C.L. (2001). The district role in instructional improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 83 (1). 78-84.
21. Crowson, R.L., & Morris, V.C. (1985). Administrative control in large-city school systems: An investigation in Chicago. Educational Administration Quarterly, 21 (4). 51-70.
22. Cuban, L. (1984). Transforming the frog into a prince: Effective schools research, policy, and practice at the district level. Harvard Educational Review, 54 (2). 129-151.
23. Daft, R., & Weick, K. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9 (2). 284-295.
24. Daft, R., & Wiginton, J. (1979). Language and organization. Academy of Management Review, 4 (2). 179-191.
25. Daresh, J. (1991). Instructional leadership as a proactive administrative process. Theory Into Practice, 30 (2). 109-112.
26. Delgado-Bernal, D. (2002). Critical race theory, Latino critical theory and critical raced-gendered epistemologies: Recognizing students of color as holders and creators of knowledge. Qualitative Inquiry, 8 (1). 105-126.
27. Deming, E. (1986). Out of crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study.
28. Desimone, L., Porter, A.C., Birman, B.F., Garet, M.S., & Yoon, K.S. (2002). How do district management and implementation strategies relate to the quality of the professional development that districts provide to teachers ? Teachers College Record, 104 (7). 1265-1312.
29. DiMaggio, P.J. (1995). Comments on "What theory is not." Administrative Science Quarterly, 40 (3). 391-397.
30. Doyle, D.P., & Finn, C.E., Jr. (1984). American schools and the future of local control. The Public Interest, 77, 77-95.
31. Driscoll, D., Halcoussis, D., & Svorny, S. (2003). School district size and student performance. Economics of Education Review, 22, 193-201.
32. Dubin, R. (1976). Theory building in applied areas. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organisational psychology (pp. 17-39). New York: Wiley.
33. Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37 (1). 15-24.
34. Elmore, R. (1993). The role of local school districts in instructional improvement. In S. Fuhrman (Ed.), Designing coherent educational practice (pp. 96-124). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35. Elmore, R.F., & Burney, D. (1997). Investing in teacher learning: Staff development and instructional improvement in community school district #2, New York City. New York: National Commission on Teaching & America's Future and the Commission for Policy Research in Education.
36. Finn, C. (1991). We must take charge: Our schools and our future. New York: Free Press.
37. Firestone, W. (1989 a). Educational policy as an ecology of games. Educational Researcher, 18 (7). 18-24.
38. Firestone, W.A. (1989 b). Using reform: Conceptualizing district initiative. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11 (2). 151-164.
39. Floden, R.E., Porter, A.C., Alford, L.E., Freeman, D.J., Irwin, S., Schmidt, W.H., et al. (1988). Instructional leadership at the district level: A closer look at autonomy and control. Educational Administration Quarterly, 24 (2). 96-124.
40. Foster, W. (1989). The administrator as a transformative intellectual. Peabody Journal of Education, 66 (3). 5-18.
41. Fullan, M. (1985). Change progress and strategies at the local level. Elementary School Journal, 85 (3). 391-421.
42. Fullan, M. (1996). Turning systemic thinking on its head. Phi Delta Kappan, 77 (6). 420-423.
43. Fuller, E.J., & Johnson, J., Jr. (2004). Can state accountability systems drive improvements in school performance for children of color and children from low-income homes? In L. Skrla & J. J. Scheurich (Eds.), Educational equity and accountability. New York: Routledge.
44. Gilbody, S., Whitty, P., Grimshaw, J., & Thomas, R. (2003). Educational and organizational interventions to improve the management of depression in primary care. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289 (23). 3145-3151.
45. Greenfield, W. (1987). Moral imagination and interpersonal competence: Antecedents to instructional leadership. In W. D. Greenfield (Ed.), Instructional leadership: Concepts, issues and controversies (pp. 56-99). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
46. Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. (1993). Understanding strategic change: The contribution of archetypes. Academy of Management Journal, 36 (5). 1052-1081.
47. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R.H. (1996). Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32 (1). 5-44.
48. Hannaway, J., & Kimball, K. (1997). Reports on reform from the field (EA9405301). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
49. Hannaway, J., & Kimball, K. (1998). Big isn't always bad: School district size, poverty, and standards-based reform (Contract EA9405301). Washington, DC: Planning and Evaluation Service of the U.S. Department of Education.
50. Harris, J.J. (1988). A districtwide application of the effective schools research. Journal of Negro Education, 57 (3). 292-306.
51. Hernandez, C.F. (2003). Eliminating the achievement gap: The study of one Texas school district. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
52. Hoffman, M., & Riley, J. (2002). The science of political science: Linearity or complexity in designing social inquiry. New Political Science, 24 (2). 303-320.
53. Honig, M.I. (2003). Building policy from practice: District central office administrator's roles and capacity for implementing collaborative education policy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39 (3). 292-338.
54. Honig, M.I. (2004). Where's the "up" in bottom-up reform ? Educational Policy, 18 (4). 527-561.
55. Honig, M.I., & Hatch, T. (2004). Crafting coherence: How schools strategically manage multiple, external demands. Educational Researcher, 33 (8). 16-30.
56. Huang, G.G., & Yu, B. (2002). District fiscal policy and student achievement: Evidence from combined NAEP-CCD data. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10 (38). Retrieved March 2004 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n38/
57. Jacobson, S.L. (1986). Effective superintendents of small, rural districts. Journal of Rural and Small Schools, 2 (2). 17-21.
58. Jensen, L.A., & Allen, M.N. (1996). Metasynthesis of qualitative findings. Qualitative Health Research, 6, 553-560.
59. Joftus, S., Borders, D., Feldman, B., Kilpatrick, D., Rankin, J., & Cromer, J. (2000, May). Student achievement and reform trends in 13 urban districts. Washington, DC: The McKenzie Group, Inc.
60. King, R.A., Swanson, A.D., & Sweetland, S.R. (2005, February 21). Designing finance structures to satisfy equity and adequacy goals. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13 (15). Retrieved June 2007 from http://epaa.asu.edu/ epaa/v13n15/
61. Kirp, D.L., & Driver, C.E. (1995). The aspirations of systemic reform meet the realities of localism. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31 (4). 589-612.
62. Koschoreck, J.W. (2001). Accountability and educational equity in the transformation of an urban district. Education and Urban Society, 33 (3). 284-304.
63. Knapp, M. (1997). Between systemic reforms and mathematics and science classrooms: The dynamics of innovation, implementation, and professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 67 (2). 227-266.
64. Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate, W. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97 (1). 47-69.
65. Land, D. (2002). Local school boards under review: Their role and effectiveness in relation to students' academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 72 (2). 229-278.
66. Landford H., & Wyckoff, J. (1995). Where has the money gone? An analysis of school district spending in New York. Education Finance Research Consortium, 17 (2). 195-218.
67. Lewin, A., & Volberda, H.W. (1999). Prolegomena on coevolution: A framework for research on strategy and new organizational forms. Organization Science, 10 (5). 519-534.
68. Lezotte, L. (1991). Correlates of effective schools: The first and second generation. Okemos, MI: Effective Schools Products.
69. Linn, R.L., Baker, E.L., & Betebenner, D.W. (2002). Accountability systems: Implications of requirements of the "No Child Left Behind Act of 2001." Educational Researcher, 31 (6). 3-26.
70. Lpez, G. (2003). The (racially neutral) politics of education: A critical race theory perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39 (1). 68-94.
71. Lotto, L. (1983). Revisiting the role of organizational effectiveness in educational evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 5 (3). 367-378.
72. Lugg, C. (2003). Sissies, faggots, lezzies, and dykes: Gender, sexual orientation, and new politics of education. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39 (1). 95-134.
73. Massell, D. (2000). The district role in building capacity: Four roles (CPRE Policy Brief, RB-32-September). Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.
74. Marsh, J.A. (2000). Connecting districts to the policy dialogue: A review of literature on the relationship of districts with states, schools, and communities (W-00-1, pp. 1-25). Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
75. Mayo, C.R., & McIntyre, L.M. (2003, November 7-9). Superintendent time on task: High stake tests v. low stake tests. Paper presented at the University Council for Educational Administration, Portland, OR.
76. Mays, N., Pope, C., & Popay, J. (2005). Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 10 (1). 6-20.
77. McLaughlin, M. (1987). Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9 (2). 171-178.
78. McLaughlin, M. (1990). The Rand Change Agent Study revisited: Macro perspectives and micro realities. Educational Researcher, 19 (9). 11-16.
79. McLaughlin, M.W. (1992). How district communities do and do not foster teacher pride. Educational Leadership, 50, 33-35.
80. McLaughlin, M.W., & Talbert, J.E. (1993). How the world of students and teachers challenges policy coherence. In S. H. Fuhrman (Ed.), Designing coherent educational policy: Improving the system (pp. 220-249). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
81. McLaughlin, M.W., & Talbert, J. (2003). Reforming districts: How districts support school reform. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
82. Meyer, H.D. (2002). From "loose coupling" to "tight management"? Making sense of the changing landscape in management and organizational theory. Journal of Educational Administration, 40 (6). 515-520.
83. Mintzberg, H. (1979). An emerging strategy of "direct" research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24 (4). 582-589.
84. Morel, B., & Ramanujam, R. (1999). Through the looking glass of complexity: The dynamics of organizations as adaptive and evolving systems. Organization Science, 10 (3). 278-293.
85. Morgeson, F., & Hofmann, D. (1999). The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Academy of Management Review, 24 (2). 249-265.
86. Murphy, J. (1988). Methodological, measurement, and conceptual problems in the study of instructional leadership. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 10 (2). 117-139.
87. Murphy, J., & Hallinger, P. (1986). The superintendent as instructional leader: Findings from effective school districts. Journal of Educational Administration, 24 (2). 213-236.
88. Noblit, G.W., & Hare, R.D. (1988). Metaethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
89. Oakes, J. (1987). Improving inner-city schools: Current directions in urban district reform. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
90. Odden, A., & Clune, W. (1998). School finance systems: Aging structures in need of renovation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20 (3). 157-177.
91. Ogawa, R. (1994). The institutional sources of educational reform: The case of school-based management. American Educational Research Journal, 31 (3). 519-548.
92. Ogawa, R., & Scribner, S. (2002). Leadership: Spanning the technical and institutional dimensions of organizations. Journal of Educational Administration, 40 (6). 576-588.
93. Orton, J.D., & Weick, K. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15 (2). 203-223.
94. Pajak, E.F., & Glickman, C.D. (1989). Dimensions of school district improvement. Educational Leadership, 46 (8). 61-64.
95. Parker, L., & Lynn, M. (2002). What's race got to do with it? Critical race theory's conflicts with and connections to qualitative research methodology and epistemology. Qualitative Inquiry, 8, 7-22.
96. Peters, B.G. (1999). Institutional theory in political science: The new institutionalism. London: Pinter.
97. Peters, T., & Waterman, R. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from America's best run companies. New York: Harper & Row.
98. Petersen, G.J. (1999). Demonstrated actions of instructional leaders: An examination of five California superintendents. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7 (18). Retrieved March 2004 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v7n18.html
99. Peterson, K.D., Murphy, J., & Hallinger, P. (1987). Superintendents' perception of the control and coordination of the technical core in effective school districts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 23 (1). 79-95.
100. Picus, L.O. (1994). The local impact of school finance reform in four Texas school districts. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14 (4). 391-404.
101. Piehl, D. (1974). Nonlinearity and the study of organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 17 (4). 760-767.
102. Pitner, N., & Ogawa, R. (1981). Organizational leadership: The case of the school superintendent. Educational Administration Quarterly, 17 (2). 46-65.
103. Popay, J., Roberts, J., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., et al. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systemic reviews. London: Economic & Social Research Council Methods Programme.
104. Popay, J., Rogers, A., & Williams, G. (1998). Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qualitative Health Research, 8, 341-351.
105. Price, J., Ball, D., & Luks, S. (1995). Marshaling resources for reform: District administrators and the case of mathematics. Washington, DC: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning.
106. Purkey, S.C., & Smith, M.S. (1985). School reform: The district policy implications of the effective schools literature. Elementary School Journal, 85 (3). 353-389.
107. Quantz, R., Rogers, J., & Dantley, M. (2001). Rethinking transformative leadership: Toward democratic reform of schools. Journal of Education, 173 (3). 96-118.
108. Reavis, W. (1946). Responsibilities of the city superintendent for the direction of instruction. The School Review, 54 (9). 514-521.
109. Rodriguez, G. (2004). Vertical equity in school finance and the potential for increasing school responsiveness to student and staff needs. Peabody Journal of Education, 79 (3). 7-30.
110. Rorrer, A. (2001). Leadership and equity: From reproduction to reconstruction: An institutional analysis. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin. (UMI No. 3049260)
111. Rorrer, A. (2002). Educational leadership and institutional capacity for equity. UCEA Review, 43 (3). 1-5.
112. Rorrer, A. (2006, January/March). Eroding inequity: Straddling the margin of tolerance. Educational Policy, 20 (1). 225-248.
113. Rorrer, A. & Skrla, L. (2005). Leaders as policy mediators: The reconceptualization of accountability. Theory Into Practice, 44 (1). 53-62.
114. Roza, M., & Hill, P.T. (2004). How within-district spending inequities help some schools to fail. In D. Ravitch (Ed.), Brookings papers on education policy (pp. 201-227). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
115. Salisbury, R.H. (1984). Interest representation: The dominance of institutions. American Political Science Review, 78 (1). 64-76.
116. Sclafani, S. (2001). Using an aligned system to make real progress for Texas students. Education and Urban Society, 33 (3). 305-312.
117. Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
118. Schulman, P. (1975). Nonincremental policy making: Notes toward an alternative paradigm. American Political Science Review, 69, 1354-1370.
119. Scott, W.R. (1994). Institutions and organizations: Toward a theoretical synthesis. In W. R. Scott & J. W. Meyer (Eds.), Institutional environments and organizations: Structural complexity and individualism (pp. 55-80). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
120. Scott, W.R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
121. Scott, W.R., Ruef, M., Mendel, P., & Caronna, C. (2000). Institutional change and healthcare organizations. From professional dominance to managed care. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
122. Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. New York: Harper & Row.
123. Shields, P.M., & Knapp, M.S. (1997). The promises and limits of school-based reform. Phi Delta Kapan, 79 (4). 288-294.
124. Sipple, J., & Killeen, K. (2004). Context, capacity, and concern: A district-level analysis of the implementation of standards-based reform in New York State. Educational Policy, 18, 456-490.
125. Skrla, L., & Scheurich, J.J. (2001). Displacing deficit thinking in school district leadership. Education and Urban Society, 33 (3). 235-259.
126. Skrla, L., Scheurich, J., & Johnson, J. (2000). Equity-driven achievement-focused school districts: A report on systemic school success in four Texas school districts serving diverse student populations. Austin, TX: Charles A. Dana Center.
127. Smith, M.S., & O' Day, J. (1991). Systemic school reform. In S. H. Fuhrman & B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing: The 1990 yearbook of the Politics of Education Association (pp. 233-267). Bristol, PA: Falmer.
128. Snipes, J., Doolittle, F., & Herlihy, C. (2002). Foundations for success: Case studies of how urban school systems improve student achievement. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
129. Spillane, J.P. (1996). School districts matter: Local educational authorities and state instructional policy. Educational Policy, 10 (1). 63-87.
130. Spillane, J. (2000). Cognition and policy implementation: District policymakers and the reform of mathematics education. Cognition and Instruction, 18 (2). 141-179.
131. Spillane, J.P., & Thompson, C.L. (1997). Reconstructing conceptions of local capacity: The local education agency's capacity for ambitious instructional reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19 (2). 185-203.
132. Thorngate, W. (1976). Possible limits on a science of social behavior. In J. H. Strickland, F. E. Aboud, & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), Social psychology in transition (pp. 121-139). New York: Plenum.
133. Timar, T. (1997). The institutional role of state education departments: A historical perspective. American Journal of Education, 105 (3). 231-260.
134. Togneri, W., & Anderson, S. (2003). Beyond islands of excellence: What districts can do to improve instructional achievement in all schools. Washington, DC: Learning First Alliance.
135. Van de Ven, A., & Poole, M. (2005). Alternative approaches for studying organizational change. Organization Studies, 26 (9). 1377-1404.
136. Villalpando, O. (2003). Self-segregation or self-preservation? A critical race theory and Latina/o critical theory analysis of a study of chicana/o students. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16 (5). 619-646.
137. Weick, K. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21 (1). 1-19.
138. Weick, K. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
139. Weick, K. (1995). What theory is not, theorizing is. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40 (3). 385-390.
140. Weick, K.E. (2001). Making sense of the organization. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
141. Weiner, L. (2003, August 7). Research of "cheerleading"? Scholarship on Community School District 2, New York City Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11 (27). Retrieved July 2005 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/ v11n27.
142. Wenglinsky, H. (1997). How money matters: The effects of school district spending on academic achievement. Sociology of Education, 70, 221-237.
143. Whetten, D. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution ? Academy of Management Review, 14 (4). 490-495.
144. Wong, K., & Jain, P. (1999). Newspapers as policy actors in urban school systems. Urban Affairs Review, 35 (2). 210-246.