The challenge our schools

Educational Leadership

Volumn 58, Issue 8, 2001, Pages 12-17

  Darling Hammond, Linda ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040971835     PISSN: 00131784     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. American Association for Employment in Education. (1997). Teacher supply and demand in the United States: 1997 Report. Evanston, IL: Author.
2. Andrew, M. (1990). The differences between graduates of four-year and five-year teacher preparation programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 45-51.
3. Andrew, M., & Schwab, R. L. (1995). Has reform in teacher education influenced teacher performance? Action in Teacher Education, 17, 43-53.
4. Baker, T. (1993). A survey of four-year and five-year program graduates and their principals. Southeastern Regional Association of Teacher Educators 2(2), 28-33.
5. Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in teacher quality. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
6. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Solving the dilemmas of teacher supply and quality. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
7. Darling-Hammond, L., Hudson, L., & Kirby, S. N. (1989). Redesigning teacher education: Opening the door for new recruits to science and mathematics teaching. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
8. Demon, J. J., & Peters, W. H. (1998). Program assessment report: Curriculum evaluation of a nontraditional program for certifying teachers. Unpublished report, Texas A&M University, College Station.
9. Feiman-Nemser, S., & Parker, M. B. (1990). Making subject matter part of the conversation or helping beginning teachers learn to teach. East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
10. Ferrechio, S., & Grotto, J. (2001, January 3). Florida teacher shortage rings schools' alarm bells. Miami Herald, p. 1B.
11. Gomez, D., & Grobe, P. (1990). Three years of alternative certification in Dallas: Where are we? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.
12. Grossman, P. (1989). Learning to teach without teacher education. Teachers College Record, 91(2), 191-208.
13. Jelmberg, J. R. (1996). College-based teacher education versus state-sponsored alternative programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 47(1), 60-66.
14. Lenk, H. A. (1989). A case study: The induction of two alternate-route social studies teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.
15. Mitchell, N. (1987). Interim evaluation report of the alternative certification program. Dallas, TX: Department of Planning, Evaluation, and Testing.
16. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York: Author.
17. New Visions for Public Education. (1999). [Survey of New York City beginning teachers]. Unpublished raw data.
18. Recruiting New Teachers. (1998). The essential profession: A national survey of public attitudes toward teaching, educational opportunity, and school reform. Belmont, MA: Author.
19. Schorr, J. (1993, December). Class action: What Clinton's National Service Program could learn from Teach for America. Phi Delta Kappan, 25(4), 315-318.
20. Shin, H. (1994, April). Estimating future teacher supply: An application of survival analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
21. Wilson, S., Darling-Hammond, L, & Berry, B. (2001). A case of successful teaching policy: Connecticut's long-term efforts to improve teaching and learning. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.