Factors Within University-Based Teacher Education Relating to Preservice Teachers’ Professional Vision

Vocations and Learning

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 35-54

  Stürmer, Kathleen ^a   Könings, Karen D ^b   Seidel, Tina ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Formal and informal learning; Professional vision; Teacher education; Teacher expertise

Indexed keywords

EID: 84939880019     PISSN: 1874785X     EISSN: 18747868     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12186-014-9122-z     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Bauer, J., & Prenzel, M. (2012). European teacher training reforms. Science, 336(6089), 1642–1643. doi:10.1126/science.1218387.
2. Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., & Yi-Miau, T. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student Progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180.
3. Bennware, C., & Deci, E. (1984). Quality of learning with an active versus passive motivational set. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 755–765.
4. Berk, D., & Hiebert, J. (2009). Improving the mathematics preparation of elementary teachers, one lesson at time. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(3), 337–356.
5. Berliner, D. C. (1991). Perceptions of student behavior as a function of expertise. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 26(1), 1–8.
6. Berliner, D. C. (2001). Learning about and learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 463–482.
7. Berliner, D. C., Stein, P., Sabers, D. S., Clarridge, P. B., Cushing, K. S., & Pinnegar, S. (1988). Imlication of research on pedagogical expertise and experience in mathematics teaching. In D. A. Grouws & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Perspectives on research on effective mathematics teaching (pp. 67–95). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
8. Blomberg, G., Stürmer, K., & Seidel, T. (2011). How pre-service teachers observe teaching on video: effects of viewers’ teaching subjects and the subject of the video. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 1131–1140.
9. Blömeke, S., Felbrich, A., & Müller, C. (2008). Erziehungswissenschaftliches wissen am ende der lehrerausbildung. [Peadogogical knowledge at the end of teacher education]. In S. Blömeke, G. Kaiser, & R. Lehmann (Eds.), Professionelle kompetenzen angehender lehrerinnen und lehrer. Wissen, überzeugungen und lerngelegenheiten deutscher mathematik-studierender und -referendare - erste ergebnisse zur wirksamkeit (pp. 195–217). Münster: Waxman.
10. Blömeke, S., Suhl, U., Kaiser, G., & Döhrmann, M. (2012). Family background, entry selectivity and opportunities to learn: What matters in primary teacher education? An international comparison of fifteen countries. Teacher and Teacher Education, 28, 44–55. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.08.006
11. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. doi:10.3102/0013189x033008003.
12. Borko, H., & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 473–498. doi:10.3102/00028312026004473.
13. Borko, H., Jacobs, J. K., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 417–436. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.012.
14. Brouwer, N. (2010). Determining long term effects of teacher education. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (pp. 503–510). Oxford: Elsevier.
15. Brouwer, N., & Korthagen, F. (2005). Can teacher education make a difference? Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association.
16. Burton, N. W., & Ramist, L. (2001). Predicting success in college: SAT studies of classes graduating since 1980.
17. Carter, K., Sabers, D., Cushing, K., Pinnegar, P., & Berliner, D. C. (1987). Processing and using information about students: a study of expert, novice and postulant teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 147–157.
18. Cochran-Smith, M. (2003). Assessing assessment in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(3), 187–191.
19. Cochran-Smith, M., & Fries, K. (2005). The AERA panel on research and teacher education: Context and goals. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education (pp. 37–68). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. M. (Eds.). (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Co-operation, Organisation for Economic, & Development. (2005). PISA 2003 technical report. Paris: OECD.
22. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Assessing teacher education: the usefulness of multiple measures for assessing program outcomes. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(2), 120–138. doi:10.1177/0022487105283796.
23. Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teacher education and the American future. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 35–47. doi:10.1177/0022487109348024.
24. Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. D. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25. Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Boston: Riverside Press.
26. Drechsel, B. (2001). Subjektive Lernbegriffe und Interesse am Thema Lernen bei angehenden Lehrpersonen. [Future teachers subjective terms of learning and interest in the topic of learning]. Münster: Waxman.
27. Eccles, J. S. (1984). Sex differences in achievement patterns. In T. Sonderegger (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 97–132). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
28. Elliot, A. J., & Murayama, K. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 613–628.
29. Eraut, M. (2004). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2), 247–273. doi:10.1080/158037042000225245.
30. Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406.
31. Feiman-Nemser, S. (1990). Teacher preparation: Structural and conceptual alternatives. In W. Houston (Ed.), Handbook on research on teacher education (pp. 212–233). New York, NY: Macmillan.
32. Fenollar, P., Romàn, S., & Cuestas, P. J. (2007). University students’ academic performance: an integrative conceptual framework and empirical analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 873–981. doi:10.1348/000709907X189118.
33. Floden, R. E., & Meiketti, M. (2005). Research on the effects of coursework in the arts and science an in the foundations of education. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Fraser, B. J., Walberg, H. J., Welch, W. W., & Hattie, J. A. (1987). Syntheses of educational productivity research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 145–252.
35. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633. doi:10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100.
36. Gröschner, A., Schmitt, C., & Seidel, T. (2013). Veränderung subjektiver Kompetenzeinschätzungen von Lehramtsstudierenden im Praxissemester. [Changes in preservice teachers subjective estimation on competencies during a school internship]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 27 (1). doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000090
37. Grossman, P. (1990). The making of a teacher. Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
38. Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184–205. doi:10.3102/0002831207312906.
39. Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. W. (2009). Teaching practice: a cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100.
40. Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., & Shulman, L. S. (2002). Toward expert thinking: how curriculum case writing prompts the development of theory-based professional knowledge in student teachers. Teaching Education, 13(2), 219–243.
41. Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, B., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Trauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 105–122.
42. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analysis relating to achievment. New York: Routledge.
43. Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: a critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70, 151–179.
44. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111–127.
45. Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406. doi:10.3102/00028312042002371.
46. Hulin, C. L., Henry, R. A., & Noons, S. L. (1990). Adding a dimension: time as a factor in the generalizability of predictive relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 328–340.
47. Jahn, G., Prenzel, M., Stürmer, K., & Seidel, T. (2011). Varianten einer computergestützten Erhebung von Lehrerkompetenzen. [Variation in computer-based assessments of teacher competencies. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 39(2), 136–153.
48. Jahn, G., Stürmer, K., Seidel, T., & Prenzel, M. (2014). Professionelle Unterrichtswahrnehmung von Lehramtsstudierenden. Eine Scaling-up Studie des Observe-Projekts [Preservice teachers’ professional sision. A Scaling-up of the Observe project]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Padagogische Psychologie.
49. Kersting, N., Givvin, K. B., Sotelo, F. L., & Stigler, J. W. (2010). Teachers’ analyses of classroom video predict student learning of mathematics: further explorations of a novel measure of teacher knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 172–181. doi:10.1177/0022487109347875.
50. Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2012). Teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: The role of structural differences in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 1–17. doi:10.1177/0022487112460398
51. Kunina-Habenicht, O., Schulze-Stocker, F., Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Leutner, D., Förster, D., & Terhart, E. (2013). Die Bedeutung der Lerngelegenheiten im Lehramtsstudium und deren individuelle Nutzung für den Aufbau des bildungswissenschaftlichen Wissens. [The meaning of opportunities to learn within university-based teacher education for the development of generic peadagogical knowledge]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 59(1), 1–23.
52. Loewenberg Ball, D., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners - Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
53. Lortie, D. (1975). School teacher: A socialogical study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54. Munby, H., Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2001). Teachers’ knowledge and how it develops. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 877–904). Washington, D.C: American Educational Research Association.
55. Noell, G. H., & Burns, J. L. (2006). Value-added assessment of teacher preparation - An illustration of emerging technology. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(1), 37–50. doi:10.1177/0022487105284466.
56. OECD. (2005). Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers - Final report: Teachers matter. Paris: OECD.
57. Palmeri, T. J., Wong, A. C. N., & Gauthier, I. (2004). Computational approaches to the development of perceptual expertise. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(8), 378–386. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.06.001.
58. Pohlmann, B., & Möller, J. (2010). Motivation für die Wahl des Lehramtsstudiums. Entwicklung eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung der Motivation für die Wahl des Lehramtstudiums (FEMOLA). [Motivation for choosing teacher profession. Development of an instrument. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 24, 73–84. doi:10.1024/1010-0652.a000005.
59. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.
60. Ruban, L. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2005). Gender differences in explaining grades using structural equation modelling. Review of Higher Education, 28, 475–502.
61. Sansone, C., & Thoman, D. B. (2005). Interest as the missing motivator in self-regulation. European Psychologist, 10, 175–186.
62. Santagata, R., & Guarino, J. (2010). Using video to teach future teachers to learn from teaching. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education. doi:10.1007/s11858-010-0292-3.
63. Schiefele, H., Krapp, A., Wild, K. P., & Winteler, A. (1993). Der “Fragebogen zum Studieninteresse” (FSI). [The questionnaire assessing study interest]. Diagnostica, 4, 335–351.
64. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
65. Seidel, T. (2012). Implementing competence assessment in university education. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 4(1), 91–94.
66. Seidel, T., & Prenzel, M. (2007). Wie Lehrpersonen Unterricht wahrnehmen und einschätzen – Erfassung pädagogisch-psychologischer Kompetenzen bei Lehrpersonen mit Hilfe von Videosequenzen. [How teachers observe and interpret classroom situations]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, Sonderheft, 8, 201–218.
67. Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: the role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 454–499. doi:10.3102/0034654307310317.
68. Seidel, T., & Stürmer, K. (2014). Modeling and measuring the structure of professional vision in pre-service teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 51(4), 739–771. doi:10.3102/0002831214531321.
69. Seidel, T., Stürmer, K., & Blomberg, G. (Producer). (2010). Observer: Video-based tool to diagnose teachers’ professional vision.
70. Seidel, T., Blomberg, G., & Renkel, A. (2013). Instructional strategies for using video in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 56–65. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.03.004.
71. Sherin, M. G. (2001). Developing a professional vision of classroom events. In T. Wood, B. S. Nelson, & J. Warfield (Eds.), Beyond classical pedagogy: Teaching elementary school mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
72. Sherin, M. G. (2002). When teaching becomes learning. Cognition and Instruction, 20(2), 119–150. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI2002_1.
73. Sherin, M. G. (2007). The development of teachers’ professional vision in video clubs. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 383–395). Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum.
74. Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 20–37. doi:10.1177/0022487108328155.
75. Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., & Philipp, R. A. (Eds.). (2011). Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes. New York: Routledge.
76. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
77. Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323–332.
78. Star, J. R., & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2), 107–125. doi:10.1007/s10857-007-9063-7.
79. Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2003). The psychology of abilities, competencies, and expertise. New York: Cambridge University Press.
80. Strenze, T. (2007). Intelligence and socioeconomic sucess: a meta-analytic review of longitudinal research. Intelligence, 35, 401–426. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2006.09.004.
81. Stürmer, K., Könings, K. D., & Seidel, T. (2012). Declarative knowledge and professional vision in teacher education: effect of courses in teaching and learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 467–483. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02075.x.
82. Stürmer, K., Seidel, T., & Schäfer, S. (2013). Changes in professional vision in the context of practice. Preservice teachers’ professional vision changes following practical experience: a video-based approach in university-based teacher education. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung, 44, 339–355. doi:10.1007/s11612-013-0216-0.
83. van Es, E., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571–596.
84. van Es, E., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244–276. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.005.
85. Vermunt, J. D., & Endedijk, M. D. (2011). Patterns in teacher learning in different phases of the professional career. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(3), 294–302. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.019.
86. Voss, T., Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2011). Assessing teacher candidates’ general pedagogical and psychological knowledge: test construction and validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 952–969. doi:10.1037/a0025125.
87. Wayne, A. J., & Youngs, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: a review. Review of Educational Research, 73(1), 89–122. doi:10.3102/00346543073001089.
88. Wiens, P. D., Hessberg, K., LoCasale, J., & DeCoster, J. (2013). Using standarized video-based assessment in a university teacher education program to examine preservice teachers knowledge related to effective teaching. Teacher and Teacher Education, 33, 24–33. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.01.010.
89. Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interst: definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Develoment Review, 30, 1–35. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2009.12.001.
90. Willingham, W. W., Lewis, C., Morgan, R., & Ramist, L. (1990). Predicting college grades: an analysis of institutional trends over two decades. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
91. Wu, M. L., Adams, R. J., & Wilson, M. R. (1997). ConQuest: Multi-aspect test software. Camberwell: Australian Council for Education Research.
92. Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., & Hooymayers, H. P. (1992). Do teacher ideals distort the self-reports of their interpersonal behavior. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8(1), 47–58.