When teaching becomes learning

Cognition and Instruction

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 119-150

  Sherin, Miriam Gamoran ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037648752     PISSN: 07370008     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S1532690XCI2002_1     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Ball, D. L. (1991). Research on teaching mathematics: Making subject-matter knowledge part of the equation. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 1-48). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
2. Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 93, 373-397.
3. Borko, H., Eisenhart, M., Brown, C. A., Underhill, R. G., Jones, D., & Agard, P. C. (1992). Learning to teach hard mathematics: Do novice teachers and their instructors give up too easily? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 194-222.
4. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., & Carey, D. A. (1988). Teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of students: Problem solving in elementary arithmetic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 385-401.
5. Chazan, D., & Ball, D. L. (1999). Beyond being told not to tell. For the Learning of Mathematics. 19(2), 2-10.
6. Cohen, D. K. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 311-329.
7. Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L. (1990). Policy and practice: An overview. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 233-239.
8. Even, R. (1993). Subject-matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: Prospective secondary teachers and the function concept. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 94-116.
9. Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1992). Teachers' knowledge and its impact. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 147-164). New York: Macmillan.
10. Franke, M. L., Fennema, E., & Carpenter, T. (1997). Teachers creating change: Examining evolving beliefs and classroom practices. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 255-282). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
11. Frederiksen, J. R. (1992, April). Scoring video portfolios. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
12. Frederiksen, J. R., Sipusic, M., Sherin, M. G., & Wolfe, E. (1998). Video portfolio assessment: Creating a framework for viewing the functions of teaching. Educational Assessment, 5, 225-297.
13. Gamoran, M. (1994, April). Informing researchers and teachers through video clubs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
14. Hammer, D. (1997). Discovery learning and discovery teaching. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 485-529.
15. Heaton, R. M. (2000). Teaching mathematics to the new standards. New York: Teachers College.
16. Herscovics, N., & Kieran, C. (1980). Constructing meaning for the concept of equation. Mathematics Teacher, 73, 572-580.
17. Kaput, J. J. (1987). Representation systems and mathematics. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 19-26). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
18. Kennedy, M. M., Ball, D. L., McDiarmid, G. W., & Schmidt, W. (1993). A study package for examining and tracking changes in teachers' knowledge (Report No. NCRTL-TS-93-1). East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning.
19. Kieran, C. (1992). The learning and teaching of school algebra. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 390-419). New York: Macmillan.
20. Labinowicz, E., (1980). The Piaget primer. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
21. Leinhardt, G., & Greeno, J. G. (1986). The cognitive skill of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 75-95.
22. Leinhardt, G., Putnam, R. T., Stein, M. K., & Baxter, J. (1991). Where subject knowledge matters. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 87-113). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
23. Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein, M. K. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60, 1-64.
24. Lobato, J. (1996). Transfer reconceived: How "sameness" is produced in mathematical activity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
25. Lobato, J., Gamoran, M., & Magidson, S. (1993). Linear functions, technology, and the real world: An Algebra 1 replacement unit. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.
26. Lobato, J., & Thanheiser, E. (1999). Re-thinking slope from quantitative and phenomenological perspectives. In F. Hitt & M. Santos (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-first Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 291-297). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
27. Magidson, S. (1992). From the laboratory to the classroom: A technology-intensive curriculum for functions and graphs. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 11, 361-376.
28. Morine-Dershimer, G. (1978-1979). Planning in classroom reality: An in-depth look. Education Research Quarterly, 3(4), 83-89.
29. Moschkovich, J. (1992). Making sense of graphs and equations: An analysis of students' conceptions and language use. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
30. Moschkovich, J., Schoenfeld, A. H., & Arcavi, A. (1993). What does it mean to understand a domain? A study of multiple perspectives and representations of linear functions, and the connections among them. In T. A. Romberg, E. Fennema, & T. P. Carpenter (Eds.), Integrating research on the graphical representation of function (pp. 69-100). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
31. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
32. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
33. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
34. Noelting, G. (1980). The development of proportional reasoning and the ratio concept: Part I. The differentiation of stages. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11, 217-253.
35. Peterson, P. L. (1990). Doing more in the same amount of time: The case of Cathy Swift. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 261-280.
36. Putnam, R. T. (1987). Structuring and adjusting content for students: A study of live and simulated tutoring of addition. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 13-48.
37. Putnam, R. T. (1992). Teaching the "hows" of mathematics for everyday life: A case study of a fifth-grade teacher. Elementary School Journal, 93, 163-177.
38. Remillard, J. T. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers' learning? Two fourth-grade teachers' use of a new mathematics text. Elementary School Journal, 100, 331-350.
39. Schifter, D. (1996). What's happening in math class? New York: Teachers College.
40. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching-in-context. Issues in Education, 4, 1-94.
41. Schoenfeld, A. H., Gamoran, M., Kessel, C., Leonard, M., Orbach, R., & Arcavi, A. (1992). Toward a comprehensive model of human tutoring in complex subject matter domains. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 11, 293-319.
42. Schoenfeld, A. H., Smith, J. P., & Arcavi, A. (1993). Learning: The microgenetic analysis of one student's evolving understanding of a complex subject matter domain. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 55-175). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
43. Sfard, A. (1992) Operational origins of mathematical objects and quandary of reification - The case of function. In G. Harel & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy (pp. 59-84). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
44. Sherin, M. G. (1996a). The nature and dynamics of teachers' content knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
45. Sherin, M. G. (1996b, April). Novel student behavior as a trigger for change in teachers' context knowledge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
46. Sherin, M. G., Sherin, B. L., & Madanes, R. (2000). Exploring diverse accounts of teacher knowledge. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18, 357-375.
47. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
48. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
49. Simon, M. A. (1997). Developing new models of mathematics teaching: An imperative for research on mathematics teacher development. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 55-86). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
50. Simon, M. A., & Blume, G. W. (1994). Mathematical modeling as a component of understanding ratio-as-measure: A study of prospective elementary teachers. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 13, 183-197.
51. Stein, M. K., Baxter, J. A., & Leinhardt, G. (1990). Subject-matter knowledge and elementary instruction: A case from functions and graphing. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 639-663.
52. Wilson, M. R. (1994). One preservice secondary teacher's understanding of function: The impact of a course integrating mathematical content and pedagogy. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 346-370.
53. Wilson, S. M., Shulman, L. S., & Richert, A. E. (1987). 150 different ways of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers' thinking (pp. 104-124). London: Cassell.
54. Wood, T., Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1991). Change in teaching mathematics: A case study. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 587-616.