The diversification of Heliconius butterflies: What have we learned in 150 years?

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 28, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 1417-1438

  Merrill, R M ^a,b   Dasmahapatra, K K ^c   Davey, J W ^a   Dell'Aglio, D D ^a   Hanly, J J ^a   Huber, B ^c,d   Jiggins, C D ^a,b   Joron, M ^b,d,e   Kozak, K M ^a   Llaurens, V ^d   Martin, S H ^a   Montgomery, S H ^f   Morris, J ^c   Nadeau, N J ^a,g   Pinharanda, A L ^a   Rosser, N ^c   Thompson, M J ^a,h   Vanjari, S ^a   Wallbank, R W R ^a   Yu, Q ^a,i  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b SMITHSONIAN TROPICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Panama)

^c UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^d SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^e UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

^f UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^h DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ CHONGQING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Ecological genomics; Gene flow; Magic traits; Mimicry; Nymphalidae; Porous species; Reproductive isolation; Sensory ecology; Speciation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; BUTTERFLY; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENE FLOW; GENOMICS; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; HOMOLOGY; MIMICRY; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPECIES DIVERSITY; TAXONOMY;

HELICONIUS; NYMPHALIDAE; PAPILIONOIDEA;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; BUTTERFLY; EVOLUTION; GENE FLOW; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; WING;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; BUTTERFLIES; GENE FLOW; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SELECTION, GENETIC; WINGS, ANIMAL;

EID: 84938974830     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12672     Document Type: Article

References (239)

1. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Arendt, J. & Reznick, D. 2008. Convergence and parallelism reconsidered: what have we learned about the genetics of adaptation? Trends Ecol. Evol. 23: 26-32.
3. Arias, C.F., Muñoz, A.G., Jiggins, C.D., Mavárez, J., Bermingham, E. & Linates, M. 2008. A hybrid zone provides evidence for incipient ecological speciation in Heliconius butterflies. Mol. Ecol. 17: 4699-4712.
4. Barrett, R.D.H. & Hoekstra, H.E. 2011. Molecular spandrels: tests of adaptation at the genetic level. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12: 767-780.
5. Barton, N.H., Briggs, D.E.G. & Eisen, J.A. 2007. Evolution. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, U.S., Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
6. Bates, H.W. 1862. Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon valley. Lepidoptera: Heliconidae. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. 23: 495-566.
7. Baxter, S.W., Papa, R., Chamberlain, N., Humphray, S.J., Joron, M., Morrison, C. et al. 2008. Convergent evolution in the genetic basis of Müllerian mimicry in Heliconius butterflies. Genetics 180: 1567-1577.
8. Beebe, W. 1955. Polymorphism in reared broods of Heliconius butterflies from Suriname and Trinidad. Zoologica 40: 139-143.
9. Beltran, M., Jiggins, C.D., Bull, V., Linares, M., Mallet, J., McMillan, W.O. et al. 2002. Phylogenetic discordance at the species boundary: comparative gene genealogies among rapidly radiating Heliconius butterflies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19: 2176-2190.
10. Beltran, M., Jiggins, C.D., Brower, A.V.Z., Bermingham, E. & Mallet, J. 2007. Do pollen feeding, pupal-mating and larval gregariousness have a single origin in Heliconius butterflies? Inferences from multilocus DNA sequence data. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 92: 221-239.
11. Benson, W.W. 1972. Natural selection for Mullerian Mimicry in Heliconius erato in Costa-Rica. Science 176: 936-939.
12. Boggs, C.L. 1981. Selection pressures affecting male nutrient investment at mating in heliconiine butterflies. Evolution 35: 931-940.
13. Boggs, C.F. 1990. A general-model of the role of male-donated nutrients in female insects reproduction. Am. Nat. 136: 598-617.
14. Boggs, C. & Gilbert, L.E. 1979. Male contribution to egg production in butterflies: evidence for transfer of nutrients at mating. Science 206: 83-84.
15. Briscoe, A.D., Bybee, S.M., Bernard, G.D., Yuan, F., Sison-Mangus, M.P., Reed, R.D. et al. 2010. Positive selection of a duplicated UV-sensitive visual pigment coincides with wing pigment evolution in Heliconius butterflies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107: 3628-3633.
16. Briscoe, A.D., Macias-Muñoz, A., Kozak, K.M., Walters, J.R., Yuan, F., Jamie, G.A. et al. 2013. Female behavior drives expression and evolution of gustatory receptors in butterflies. PLoS Genet. 9: e1003620.
17. Brower, A.V.Z. 1994. Phylogeny of Heliconius butterflies inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 3: 159-174.
18. Brower, A.V.Z. & Egan, M.G. 1997. Cladistic analysis of Heliconius butterflies and relatives (Nymphalidae: Heliconiiti): a revised phylogenetic position for Eueides based on sequences from mtDNA and a nuclear gene. Proc. R. Soc. B 264: 969-977.
19. Brower, L.P., Brower, J.V.Z. & Collins, C.T. 1963. Experimental studies of mimicry. 7. Relative palatability and Müllerian mimicry among Neotropical butterflies of the subfamily Heliconiinae. Zoologica 48: 65-84.
20. Brown, K.S. 1976. Geographical patterns of evolution in Neotropical Lepidoptera. Systematics and derivation of known and new Heliconiini (Nymphalidae: Nymphalinae). J. Entomol. 44: 201-242.
21. Brown, K.S. 1979. Ecologia Geográfica e Evoluçâo nas Florestas Neotropicais. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
22. Brown, K.S. 1981. The biology of Heliconius and related genera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 26: 427-456.
23. Brown, K.S. & Benson, W.W. 1974. Adaptive polymorphism associated with multiple Müllerian mimicry in Heliconius numata (Lepid.: Nymph.). Biotropica 6: 205-228.
24. Bull, V., Beltran, M., Jiggins, C.D., McMillan, W.O., Bermingham, E. & Mallet, J. 2006. Polyphyly and gene flow between non-sibling Heliconius species. BMC Biol. 4: 11.
25. Bybee, S.M., Yuan, F., Ramstetter, M.D., Llorente-Bousquets, J., Reed, R.D., Osorio, D. et al. 2012. UV photoreceptors and UV-yellow wing pigments in Heliconius butterflies allow a color signal to serve both mimicry and intraspecific communication. Am. Nat. 179: 38-51.
26. Cardoso, M.Z. & Gilbert, L.E. 2007. A male gift to its partner? Cyanogenic glycosides in the spermatophore of longwing butterflies (Heliconius). Naturwissenschaften 94: 39-42.
27. Cardoso, M.Z. & Gilbert, L.E. 2013. Pollen feeding, resource allocation and the evolution of chemical defence in passion vine butterflies. J. Evol. Biol. 26: 1254-1260.
28. Chai, P. 1986. Field observations and feeding experiments on the responses of rufous- tailed jacamars (Galbula ruficauda) to free-flying butterflies in a tropical rainforest. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 29: 166-189.
29. Chai, P. 1988. Wing coloration of free-flying Neotropical butterflies as a signal learned by a specialized avian predator. Biotropica 20: 20-30.
30. Chai, P. & Srygley, R.B. 1990. Predation and the flight, morphology, and temperature of neotropical rain-forest butterflies. Am. Nat. 135: 748-765.
31. Chamberlain, N.L., Hill, R.I., Kapan, D.D., Gilbert, L.E. & Kronforst, M.R. 2009. Polymorphic butterfly reveals the missing link in ecological speciation. Science 326: 847-850.
32. Chamberlain, N.L., Hill, R.I., Baxter, S.W., Jiggins, C.D. & Kronforst, M.R. 2011. Comparative population genetics of a mimicry locus among hybridizing Heliconius butterfly species. Heredity 107: 200-204.
33. Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. 1975. Theoretical genetics of Batesian mimicry II. Evolution of supergenes. J. Theor. Biol. 55: 305-324.
34. Chauhan, R., Jones, R., Wilkinson, P., Pauchet, Y. & Ffrench-Constant, R.H. 2013. Cytochrome P450-encoding genes from the Heliconius genome as candidates for cyanogenesis. Insect Mol. Biol. 22: 532-540.
35. Chittka, L. & Menzel, R. 1992. The evolutionary adaptation of flower colours and the insect pollinators' colour vision. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 171: 171-181.
36. Chouteau, M. & Angers, B. 2012. Wright's shifting balance theory and the diversification of aposematic signals. PLoS ONE 7: e34028.
37. Condon, M.A. & Gilbert, L.E. 1988. Sex expression of Gurania and Psiguria (Cucurbitaceae): neotropical vines that change sex. Am. J. Bot. 75: 875-884.
38. Corrêa, C.A., Irgang, B.E. & Moreira, G.R.P. 2001. Estrutura floral das angiospermas usadas por Heliconius erato phyllis (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) no Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Iheringia. Série Zoologia 90: 71-84.
39. Counterman, B.A., Arajuo-Perez, F., Hine, H.M., Baxter, S.W., Morrison, C.M., Lindstrom, D.P. et al. 2010. Genomic hotspots for adaptation: population genetics of Mullerian mimicry in Heliconius erato. PLoS Genet. 6: e1000796.
40. Coyle, S.M., Huntingford, F.A. & Peichel, C.L. 2007. Parallel evolution of Pitx1 underlies pelvic reduction in Scottish threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). J. Hered. 98: 581-586.
41. Coyne, J.A. & Orr, H.A. 2004. Speciation, 1st edn. Sinauer Associates Inc, Sunderland, MA.
42. Crane, J. 1954. Spectral reflectance characteristics of butterflies (Lepidoptera) from Trinidad. Zoologica 39: 85-115.
43. Crane, J. 1955. Imaginal behaviour of a Trinidad butterfly, Heliconius erato hydara Hewitson, with special reference to the social use of color. Zoologica 40: 167-196.
44. Cruickshank, T.E. & Hahn, M.W. 2014. Reanalysis suggests that genomic islands of speciation are due to reduced diversity, not reduced gene flow. Mol. Ecol. 23: 3133-3157.
45. Cuthill, J. & Charleston, M. 2012. Phylogenetic co-divergence supports coevolution of mimetic Heliconius butterflies. PLoS ONE 7: e36464.
46. Dambroski, H.R. & Feder, J.L. 2007. Host plant and latitude-related diapause variation in Rhagoletis pomonella: a test for multifaceted life history adaptation on different stages of diapause development. J. Evol. Biol. 20: 2101-2112.
47. Darwin, C. 1859. The Origin of Species. John Murray, London.
48. Dasmahapatra, K.K., Lamas, G., Simpson, F. & Mallet, J. 2010. The anatomy of a "suture zone" in Amazonian butterflies: a coalescent-based test for vicariant geographic divergence and speciation. Mol. Ecol. 19: 4283-4301.
49. Deinert, E.I., Longino, J.T. & Gilbert, L.E. 1994. Mate competition in butterflies. Nature 370: 23-24.
50. Dukas, R. 2013. Effects of learning on evolution: robustness, innovation and speciation. Anim. Behav. 85: 1023-1030.
51. Dunlap-Pianka, H.L., Boggs, C.L. & Gilbert, L.E. 1977. Ovarian dynamics in heliconiine butterflies: programmed senescence versus eternal youth. Science 197: 487-490.
52. Ellegren, H., Smeds, L., Burri, R., Olason, P.I., Backström, N., Kawakami, T. et al. 2012. The genomic landscape of species divergence in Ficedula flycatchers. Nature 491: 756-760.
53. Emsley, M.G. 1964. The geographical distribution of the color-pattern components of Heliconius erato and Heliconius melpomene with genetical evidence for the systematic relationship between the two species. Zoologica 49: 245-286.
54. Engler, H.S., Spencer, K.C. & Gilbert, L.E. 2000. Preventing cyanide release from leaves. Nature 406: 144-145.
55. Engler-Chaouat, H.S. & Gilbert, L.E. 2007. De novo synthesis vs. sequestration: negatively correlated metabolic traits and the evolution of host plant specialization in cyanogenic butterflies. J. Chem. Ecol. 33: 25-42.
56. Estrada, C. & Jiggins, C.D. 2002. Patterns of pollen feeding and habitat preference among Heliconius species. Ecol. Entomol. 27: 448-456.
57. Estrada, C. & Jiggins, C.D. 2008. Interspecific sexual attraction because of convergence in warning colouration: is there a conflict between natural and sexual selection in mimetic species? J. Evol. Biol. 21: 749-760.
58. Estrada, C., Schulz, S., Yildizhan, S. & Gilbert, L.E. 2011. Sexual selection drives the evolution of antiaphrodisiac pheromones in butterflies. Evolution 65: 2843-2854.
59. Farris, S.M. 2005. Evolution of insect mushroom bodies: old clues, new insights. Arthropod. Struct. Dev. 34: 211-234.
60. Farris, S.M. & Schulmeister, S. 2011. Parasitoidism, not sociality, is associated with the evolution of elaborate mushroom bodies in the brains of hymenopteran insects. Proc. R. Soc. B 278: 940-951.
61. Feder, J.L. & Nosil, P. 2012. Genomic divergence during speciation: causes and consequences. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 367: 332-342.
62. Feder, J.L., Egan, S.P. & Nosil, P. 2012a. The genomics of speciation-with-gene-flow. Trends Genet. 28: 342-350.
63. Feder, J.L., Gejji, R., Yeaman, S. & Nosil, P. 2012b. Establishment of new mutations under divergence and genome hitchhiking. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 367: 461-474.
64. Felsenstein, J. 1981. Skepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals? Evolution 35: 124-138.
65. Ferguson, L., Lee, S.F., Chamberlain, N., Nadeau, N., Joron, M., Baxter, S. et al. 2010. Characterization of a hotspot for mimicry: assembly of a butterfly wing transcriptome to genomic sequence at the HmYb/Sb locus. Mol. Ecol. 19: 240-254.
66. Finkbeiner, S.D., Briscoe, A.D. & Reed, R.D. 2012. The benefit of being a social butterfly: communal roosting deters predation. Proc. Biol. Sci. B 279: 2769-2776.
67. Finkbeiner, S.D., Briscoe, A.D. & Reed, R.D. 2014. Warning signals are seductive: relative contributions of color and pattern to predator avoidance and mate attraction in Heliconius butterflies. Evolution 68: 3410-3420.
68. Fisher, R.A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
69. Flanagan, N.S., Tobler, A., Davison, A., Pybus, O.G., Kapan, D.D., Planas, S. et al. 2004. Historical demography of Mullerian mimicry in the neotropical Heliconius butterflies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 9704-9709.
70. Forsberg, J. & Wiklund, C. 1989. Mating in the afternoon: time-saving in courtship and remating by females of a polyandrous butterfly Pieris napi L. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 25: 349-356.
71. Gallant, J.R., Imhoff, V.E., Martin, A., Savage, W.K., Chamberlain, N.L., Pote, B.L. et al. 2014. Ancient homology underlies adaptive mimetic diversity across butterflies. Nat. Commun. 5: 4817.
72. Gavrilets, S. 2004. Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
73. Gilbert, L.E. 1971. Butterfly-plant coevolution: has Passiflora adenopoda won the selectional race with heliconiine butterflies? Science 172: 585-586.
74. Gilbert, L.E. 1972. Pollen feeding and reproductive biology of Heliconius butterflies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 69: 1403-1407.
75. Gilbert, L.E. 1975. Ecological consequences of a coevolved mutualism between butterflies and plants. In: Coevolution of Animals and Plants (L.E. Gilbert & P.R. Raven, eds), pp. 210-240. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.
76. Gilbert, L.E. 1976. Postmating female odor in Heliconius Butterflies - male-contributed anti-aphrodisiac. Science 193: 419-420.
77. Gilbert, L.E. 1982. The coevolution of a butterfly and a vine. Sci. Am. 247: 110-121.
78. Gilbert, L.E. 2003. Adaptive novelty through introgression in Heliconius wing patterns: evidence for shared genetic "tool box" from synthetic hybrid zones and a theory of diversification. In: Ecology and Evolution Taking Flight: Butterflies as Model Systems (C.L. Boggs, W.B. Watt & P.R. Ehrlich, eds), pp. 281-318. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
79. Gilbert, L.E., Forrest, H.S., Schultz, T.D. & Harvey, D.J. 1988. Correlations of ultrastructure and pigmentation suggest how genes control development of wing scales of Heliconius butterflies. J. Res. Lepid. 26: 141-160.
80. Giraldo, N., Salazar, C., Jiggins, C., Bermingham, E. & Linares, M. 2008. Two sisters in the same dress: Heliconius cryptic species. BMC Evol. Biol. 8: 324.
81. Gonda, A., Herczeg, G. & Merilä, J. 2009. Adaptive brain size divergence in nine-spined sticklebacks (Pungitius pungitius)? J. Evol. Biol. 22: 1721-1726.
82. Hahn, M.W., White, B.J., Muir, C.D. & Besansky, N.J. 2012. No evidence for biased co-transmission of speciation islands in Anopheles gambiae. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 367: 374-384.
83. Hammer, M. & Menzel, R. 1998. Multiple sites of associative odor learning as revealed by local brain microinjections of octopamine in honeybees. Learn. Mem. 5: 146-156.
84. Hay-Roe, M.M. & Nation, J. 2007. Spectrum of cyanide toxicity and allocation in Heliconius erato and Passiflora host plants. J. Chem. Ecol. 33: 319-329.
85. Hines, H.M., Counterman, B.A., Papa, R., Albuquerque de Moura, P., Cardoso, M.Z., Linares, M. et al. 2011. Wing patterning gene redefines the mimetic history of Heliconius butterflies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108: 19666-19671.
86. Hoekstra, H.E. & Coyne, J.A. 2007. The locus of evolution: evo devo and the genetics of adaptation. Evolution 61: 995-1016.
87. Hohenlohe, P.A., Bassham, S., Etter, P.D., Stiffler, N., Johnson, E.A. & Cresko, W.A. 2010. Population genomics of parallel adaptation in Threespine Stickleback using sequenced RAD tags. PLoS Genet. 6: e1000862.
88. Huber, B., Whibley, A., Le Poul, Y., Navarro, N., Martin, A., Baxter, S. et al. 2015. Conservatism and novelty in the genetic architecture of adaptation in Heliconius butterflies. Heredity, 114: 515-524.
89. Janssen, J.M., Monteiro, A. & Brakefield, P.M. 2001. Correlations between scale structure and pigmentation in butterfly wings. Evol. Dev. 3: 415-423.
90. Jiggins, C.D. & McMillan, W.O. 1997. The genetic basis of an adaptive radiation: warning colour in two Heliconius species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 264: 1167-1175.
91. Jiggins, C.D., McMillan, W.O., Neukirchen, W. & Mallet, J. 1996. What can hybrid zones tell us about speciation? The case of Heliconius erato and H. himera (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 59: 221-242.
92. Jiggins, C.D., McMillan, W.O. & Mallet, J. 1997. Host plant adaptation has not played a role in the recent speciation of Heliconius himera and Heliconius erato. Ecol. Entomol. 22: 361-365.
93. Jiggins, C.D., Naisbit, R.E., Coe, R.L. & Mallet, J. 2001a. Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature 411: 302-305.
94. Jiggins, C.D., Linares, M., Naisbit, R.E., Salazar, C., Yang, Z.H. & Mallet, J. 2001b. Sex-linked hybrid sterility in a butterfly. Evolution 55: 1631-1638.
95. Jiggins, C.D., Estrada, C. & Rodrigues, A. 2004. Mimicry and the evolution of premating isolation in Heliconius melpomene Linnaeus. J. Evol. Biol. 17: 680-691.
96. Jiggins, C.D., Mavarez, J., Beltrán, M., McMillan, W.O., Johnston, J.S. & Bermingham, E. 2005. A genetic linkage map of the mimetic butterfly Heliconius melpomene. Genetics 171: 557-570.
97. Jones, F.C., Grabherr, M.G., Chan, Y.F., Russell, P., Mauceli, E., Johnson, J. et al. 2012. The genomic basis of adaptive evolution in threespine sticklebacks. Nature 484: 55-61.
98. Jones, R.T., Poul, Y.L., Whibley, A.C., Mérot, C., Ffrench-Constant, R.H. & Joron, M. 2013. Wing shape variation associated with mimicry in butterflies. Evolution 67: 2323-2334.
99. Joron, M. & Iwasa, Y. 2005. The evolution of a Müllerian mimic in a spatially distributed community. J. Theor. Biol. 237: 87-103.
100. Joron, M., Wynne, I.R., Lamas, G. & Mallet, J. 2001. Variable selection and the coexistence of multiple mimetic forms of the butterfly Heliconius numata. Evol. Ecol. 13: 721-754.
101. Joron, M., Papa, R., Beltran, M., Chamberlain, N., Mavarez, J., Baxter, S. et al. 2006. A conserved supergene locus controls colour pattern diversity in Heliconius butterflies. PLoS Biol. 4: 1831-1840.
102. Joron, M., Frezal, L., Jones, R.T., Chamberlain, N.L., Lee, S.F., Haag, C.R. et al. 2011. Chromosomal rearrangements maintain a polymorphic supergene controlling butterfly mimicry. Nature 477: 203-206.
103. Kapan, D.D. 1998. Divergent natural selection and Müllerian mimicry in polymorphic Heliconius cydno (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia.
104. Kapan, D.D. 2001. Three-butterfly system provides a field test of Müllerian mimicry. Nature 409: 338-340.
105. Kapan, D.D., Flanagan, N.S., Tobler, A., Papa, R., Reed, R.D., Gonzalez, J.A. et al. 2006. Localization of Müllerian mimicry genes on a dense linkage map of Heliconius erato. Genetics 173: 735-757.
106. Kerpel, S.M. & Moreira, G.R.P. 2005. Absence of learning and local specialization on host plant selection by Heliconius erato. J. Insect Behav. 18: 433-452.
107. Klein, A.L. & de Araújo, A.M. 2010. Courtship behavior of Heliconius erato phyllis (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) towards virgin and mated females: conflict between attraction and repulsion signals? J. Ethol. 28: 409-420.
108. Kozak, K.M., Wahlberg, N., Neild, A., Dasmahapatra, K.K., Mallet, J. & Jiggins, C.D. 2015. Multilocus species trees show the recent adaptive radiation of the mimetic Heliconius butterflies. Syst. Biol. 64: 505-524.
109. Kronforst, M.R., Young, L.G., Blume, L.M. & Gilbert, L.E. 2006a. Multilocus analyses of admixture and introgression among hybridizing Heliconius butterflies. Evolution 60: 1254-1268.
110. Kronforst, M.R., Kapan, D.D. & Gilbert, L.E. 2006b. Parallel genetic architecture of parallel adaptive radiations in mimetic Heliconius butterflies. Genetics 174: 535-539.
111. Kronforst, M.R., Young, L.G., Kapan, D.D., McNeely, C., O'Neill, R.J. & Gilbert, L.E. 2006c. Linkage of butterfly mate preference and wing color preference cue at the genomic location of wingless. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 6575-6580.
112. Kronforst, M., Young, L.G. & Gilbert, L.E. 2007. Reinforcement of mate preference among hybridizing Heliconius butterflies. J. Evol. Biol. 20: 278-285.
113. Kronforst, M.R., Hansen, M.E.B., Crawford, N.G., Gallant, J.R., Zhang, W., Kulathinal, R.J. et al. 2013. Hybridization reveals the evolving genomic architecture of speciation. Cell Rep. 5: 666-677.
114. Langham, G.M. 2004. Specialized avian predators repeatedly attack novel color morphs of Heliconius butterflies. Evolution 58: 2783-2787.
115. Lawniczak, M.K.N., Emrich, S.J., Holloway, A.K., Regier, A.P., Olson, M., White, B. et al. 2010. Widespread divergence between incipient Anopheles gambiae species revealed by whole genome sequences. Science 330: 512-514.
116. Le Poul, Y., Whibley, A., Chouteau, M., Prunier, F., Llaurens, V. & Joron, M. 2014. Evolution of dominance mechanisms at a mimicry supergene. Nat. Commun. 5: 5644.
117. Lee, C.S., Mccool, B.A., Moore, J.L., Hillis, D.M. & Gilbert, L.E. 1992. Phylogenetic study of Heliconiine butterflies based on morphology and restriction analysis of ribosomal-Rna genes. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 106: 17-31.
118. Linares, M. 1996. The genetics of the mimetic coloration in the butterfly Heliconius cydno weymeri. J. Hered. 87: 142-149.
119. Linares, M. 1997. The ghost of mimicry past: laboratory reconstitution of an extinct butterfly "race". Heredity 78: 628-635.
120. Lister, A.M. 2013. The role of behaviour in adaptive morphological evolution of African proboscideans. Nature 500: 331-334.
121. Llaurens, V., Joron, M. & Thery, M. 2014. Cryptic differences in colour among Mullerian mimics: how can the visual capacities of predators and prey shape the evolution of wing colours. J. Evol. Biol. 27: 531-540.
122. Longino, J.T. 1984. Shoots, parasitoids and ants as forces in the population dynamics of Heliconius hewitsoni in Costa Rica. PhD Thesis, University of Texas at Austin.
123. Mallet, J. 1986. Gregarious roosting and home range in Heliconius butterflies. Natl. Geogr. Res. 2: 198-215.
124. Mallet, J. 1989. The genetics of warning color in Peruvian hybrid zones of Heliconius erato and Heliconius melpomene. Proc. R. Soc. B 236: 163-185.
125. Mallet, J. 1993. Speciation, raciation, and color pattern evolution in Heliconius butterflies: evidence from hybrid zones. In: Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process (R.G. Harrison, ed.), pp. 226-260. Oxford University Press, New York.
126. Mallet, J. 1995. A species definition for the modern synthesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 294-299.
127. Mallet, J. 2010. Shift happens! Shifting balance and the evolution of diversity in warning colour and mimicry. Ecol. Entomol. 35: 90-104.
128. Mallet, J. & Barton, N.H. 1989. Strong natural selection in a warning color hybrid zone. Evolution 43: 421-431.
129. Mallet, J. & Gilbert, L.E. 1995. Why are there so many mimicry rings - correlations between habitat, behavior and mimicry in Heliconius butterflies. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 55: 159-180.
130. Mallet, J. & Joron, M. 1999. Evolution of diversity in warning color and mimicry: polymorphisms, shifting balance, and speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30: 201-233.
131. Mallet, J., Barton, N., Lamas, G., Santisteban, J., Muedas, M. & Eeley, H. 1990. Estimates of selection and gene flow from measures of cline width and linkage disequilibrium in Heliconius hybrid zones. Genetics 124: 921-936.
132. Mallet, J., McMillan, W.O. & Jiggins, C.D. 1998a. Mimicry and warning colour at the boundary between races and species. In: Endless Forms: Species and Speciation (D.J. Howard & S.H. Berlocher, eds), pp. 390-403. Oxford University Press, New York.
133. Mallet, J., McMillan, W.O. & Jiggins, C.D. 1998b. Estimating the mating behavior of a pair of hybridizing Heliconius species in the wild. Evolution 52: 503-510.
134. Mallet, J., Beltran, M., Neukirchen, W. & Linares, M. 2007. Natural hybridization in heliconiine butterflies: the species boundary as a continuum. BMC Evol. Biol. 7: 28.
135. Martin, A. & Orgogozo, V. 2013. The loci of repeated evolution: a catalog of genetic hotspots of phenotypic variation. Evolution 67: 1235-1250.
136. Martin, A., Papa, R., Nadeau, N.J., Hill, R.I., Counterman, B.A., Halder, G. et al. 2012. Diversification of complex butterfly wing patterns by repeated regulatory evolution of a Wnt ligand. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109: 12632-12637.
137. Martin, S.H., Dasmahapatra, K.K., Nadeau, N.J., Salazar, C., Walters, J.R., Simpson, F. et al. 2013. Genome-wide evidence for speciation with gene flow in Heliconius butterflies. Genome Res. 23: 1817-1828.
138. Martin, A., McCulloch, K.J., Patel, N.H., Briscoe, A.D., Gilbert, L.E. & Reed, R.D. 2014. Multiple recent co-options of Optix associated with novel traits in adaptive butterfly wing radiations. Evodevo 5: 1-14.
139. Mavárez, J., Salazar, C.A., Bermingham, E., Salcedo, C., Jiggins, C.D. & Linares, M. 2006. Speciation by hybridization in Heliconius butterflies. Nature 441: 868-871.
140. Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the Origin of Species, from the Viewpoint of a Zoologist. Columbia University Press, New York.
141. McGregor, A.P., Orgogozo, V., Delon, I., Zanet, J., Srinivasan, D.G., Payre, F. et al. 2007. Morphological evolution through multiple cis-regulatory mutations at a single gene. Nature 448: 587-590.
142. McMillan, W.O., Jiggins, C.D. & Mallet, J. 1997. What initiates speciation in passion-vine butterflies? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 8628-8633.
143. Melo, M.C., Salazar, C., Jiggins, C.D. & Linares, M. 2009. Assortative mating preferences among hybrids offers a route to hybrid speciation. Evolution 63: 1660-1665.
144. Mérot, C., Mavárez, J., Evin, A., Dasmahapatra, K.K., Mallet, J., Lamas, G. et al. 2013. Genetic differentiation without mimicry shift in a pair of hybridizing Heliconius species (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 109: 830-847.
145. Merrill, R.M., Gompert, Z., Dembeck, L.M., Kronforst, M.R., McMillan, W.O. & Jiggins, C.D. 2011a. Mate preference across the speciation continuum in a clade of mimetic butterflies. Evolution 65: 1489-1500.
146. Merrill, R.M., Van Schooten, B., Scott, J.A. & Jiggins, C.D. 2011b. Pervasive genetic associations between traits causing reproductive isolation in Heliconius butterflies. Proc. Biol. Sci. B 278: 511-518.
147. Merrill, R.M., Wallbank, R.W.R., Bull, V., Salazar, P.C.A., Mallet, J., Stevens, M. et al. 2012. Disruptive ecological selection on a mating cue. Proc. R. Soc. B 279: 4907-4913.
148. Merrill, R.M., Naisbit, R.E., Mallet, J. & Jiggins, C.D. 2013. Ecological and genetic factors influencing the transition between host-use strategies in sympatric Heliconius butterflies. J. Evol. Biol. 26: 1959-1967.
149. Merrill, R.M., Chia, A. & Nadeau, N.J. 2014. Divergent warning patterns contribute to assortative mating between incipient Heliconius species. Ecol. Evol. 4: 911-917.
150. Michel, A.P., Sim, S., Powell, T.H.Q., Taylor, M.S., Nosil, P. & Feder, J.L. 2010. Widespread genomic divergence during sympatric speciation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107: 9724-9729.
151. Montgomery, S.H. & Ott, S.R. 2015. Brain composition in Godyris zavaleta, a diurnal butterfly, reflects an increased reliance on olfactory information. J. Comp. Neurol. 523: 869-891.
152. Montgomery, S.H., Merrill, R.M. & Ott, S.R. 2015. Brain composition in Heliconius butterflies, post-eclosion growth and experience dependent neuropil plasticity. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/017913.
153. Müller, F. 1879. Ituna and Thyridia; a remarkable case of mimicry in butterflies. Trans. Ent. Soc. Lond. 1879: xx-xxix.
154. Mundy, N.I. 2005. A window on the genetics of evolution: MC1R and plumage colouration in birds. Proc. R. Soc. B 272: 1633-1640.
155. Muñoz, A.G., Salazar, C., Castaño, J., Jiggins, C.D. & Linares, M. 2010. Multiple sources of reproductive isolation in a bimodal butterfly hybrid zone. J. Evol. Biol. 23: 1312-1320.
156. Murawski, D.A. & Gilbert, L.E. 1986. Pollen flow in Psiguria-Warscewiczii - a comparison of Heliconius butterflies and hummingbirds. Oecologia 68: 161-167.
157. Nadeau, N.J. & Jiggins, C.D. 2010. A golden age for evolutionary genetics? Genomic studies of adaptation in natural populations. Trends Genet. 26: 484-492.
158. Nadeau, N.J., Whibley, A., Jones, R.T., Davey, J.W., Dasmahapatra, K.K., Baxter, S.W. et al. 2012. Genomic islands of divergence in hybridizing Heliconius butterflies identified by large-scale targeted sequencing. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 367: 343-353.
159. Nadeau, N.J., Martin, S., Kozak, K.M., Salazar, C., Dasmahapatra, K.K., Davey, J.W. et al. 2013. Genome-wide patterns of divergence and gene flow across a butterfly radiation. Mol. Ecol. 22: 814-826.
160. Nadeau, N., Ruiz, M., Salazar, P., Counterman, B., Medina, J.A., Ortiz-Zuazaga, H. et al. 2014. Population genomics of parallel hybrid zones in the mimetic butterflies, H. melpomene and H. erato. Genome Res. 24: 1316-1333.
161. Naisbit, R.E., Jiggins, C.D. & Mallet, J. 2001. Disruptive sexual selection against hybrids contributes to speciation between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene. Proc. R. Soc. B 268: 1849-1854.
162. Naisbit, R.E., Jiggins, C.D., Linares, M., Salazar, C. & Mallet, J. 2002. Hybrid sterility, Haldane's rule and speciation in Heliconius cydno and H. melpomene. Genetics 161: 1517-1526.
163. Naisbit, R.E., Jiggins, C.D. & Mallet, J. 2003. Mimicry: developmental genes that contribute to speciation. Evol. Dev. 5: 269-280.
164. Nelson, B.W., Ferreira, C.A.C., da Silva, M.F. & Kawasaki, M.L. 1990. Endemism centres, refugia and botanical collection density in Brazilian Amazonia. Nature 345: 714-716.
165. Nicholson, A.J. 1927. A new theory of mimicry. Aust. Zool. 5: 10-104.
166. Nijhout, H.F. 1991. The Development and Evolution of Butterfly Wing Patterns. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
167. Nijhout, H.F., Wray, G.A. & Gilbert, L.E. 1990. An analysis of the phenotypic effects of certain colour pattern genes in Heliconius (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 40: 357-372.
168. Nosil, P. 2012. Ecological Speciation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.
169. Nosil, P. & Sandoval, C.P. 2008. Ecological niche dimensionality and the evolutionary diversification of stick insects. PLoS ONE 3: e1907.
170. Nosil, P., Harmon, L.J. & Seehausen, O. 2009. Ecological explanations for (incomplete) speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24: 145-156.
171. Nylin, S., Slove, J. & Janz, N. 2014. Host plant utilization, host range oscillations and diversification in Nymphalid butterflies: a phylogenetic investigation. Evolution 68: 105-124.
172. O'Brien, D.M., Boggs, C.L. & Fogel, M.L. 2003. Pollen feeding in the butterfly Heliconius charitonia: isotopic evidence for essential amino acid transfer from pollen to eggs. Proc. Biol. Sci. 270: 2631-2636.
173. Papa, R., Martin, A. & Reed, R.D. 2008. Genomic hotspots of adaptation in butterfly wing pattern evolution. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 18: 559-564.
174. Papa, R., Kapan, D.D., Counterman, B.A., Maldonado, K., Lindstrom, D.P., Reed, R.D. et al. 2013. Multi-allelic major effect genes interact with minor effect QTLs to control adaptive color pattern variation in Heliconius erato. PLoS ONE 8: e57033.
175. Pardo-Diaz, C., Salazar, C., Baxter, S.W., Merot, C., Figueiredo-Ready, W., Joron, M. et al. 2012. Adaptive introgression across species boundaries in Heliconius butterflies. PLoS Genet. 8: e1002752.
176. Paulk, A.C., Dacks, A.M., Phillips-Portillo, J., Fellous, J.-M. & Gronenberg, W. 2009. Visual processing in the central bee brain. J. Neurosci. 29: 9987-9999.
177. Penz, C.M. 1999. Higher level phylogeny for the passion-vine butterflies (Nymphalidae, Heliconiinae) based on early stage and adult morphology. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 127: 277-344.
178. Pfennig, D.W., Wund, M.A., Snell-Rood, E.C., Cruickshank, T., Schlichting, C.D. & Moczek, A.P. 2010. Phenotypic plasticity's impacts on diversification and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25: 459-467.
179. Pinheiro, C.E.G. 1996. Palatability and escaping ability in Neotropical butterflies: tests with wild kingbirds (Tyrannus melancholicus, Tyrannidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 59: 351-365.
180. Poelstra, J.W., Vijay, N., Bossu, C.M., Lantz, H., Ryll, B., Muller, I. et al. 2014. The genomic landscape underlying phenotypic integrity in the face of gene flow in crows. Science 444: 1410-1414.
181. Poulton, E.B. 1913. Mimicry, mutation and Mendelism. Bedrock 2: 42-56.
182. Quek, S.-P., Counterman, B.A., Albuquerque de Moura, P., Cardoso, M.Z., Marshall, C.R., McMillan, W.O. et al. 2010. Dissecting co-mimetic radiations in Heliconius reveals divergent histories of convergent butterflies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107: 7365-7370.
183. Reed, R.D., Papa, R., Martin, A., Hines, H.M., Counterman, B.A., Pardo-Diaz, C. et al. 2011. optix drives the repeated convergent evolution of butterfly wing pattern mimicry. Science 333: 1137-1141.
184. Rice, W.R. & Hostert, E.E. 1993. Laboratory experiments on speciation: what have we learned in 40 years? Evolution 47: 1637-1653.
185. Rosser, N., Phillimore, A.B., Huertas, B., Willmott, K.R. & Mallet, J. 2012. Testing historical explanations for gradients in species richness in heliconiine butterflies of tropical America. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 105: 479-497.
186. Rosser, N., Dasmahapatra, K.K. & Mallet, J. 2014. Stable Heliconius butterfly hybrid zones are correlated with a local rainfall peak at the edge of the Amazon basin. Evolution 68: 3470-3484.
187. Rowe, C. & Halpin, C.G. 2013. Why are warning displays multimodal? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 67(9): 1425-1439.
188. Salazar, C.A., Jiggins, C.D., Arias, C.F., Tobler, A., Bermingham, E. & Linares, M. 2005. Hybrid incompatibility is consistent with a hybrid origin of Heliconius heurippa Hewitson from its close relatives, Heliconius cydno Doubleday and Heliconius melpomene Linnaeus. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 247-256.
189. Salcedo, C. 2010. Environmental elements involved in communal roosting in Heliconius butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Environ. Entomol. 39: 907-911.
190. Salcedo, C. 2011. Pollen preference for Psychotria sp. is not learned in the passion flower butterfly, Heliconius erato. J. Insect Sci. 11: 25.
191. Schulz, S., Estrada, C., Yildizhan, S., Boppre, M. & Gilbert, L.E. 2008. An antiaphrodisiac in Heliconius melpomene butterflies. J. Chem. Ecol. 34: 82-93.
192. Seimiya, M. & Gehring, W.J. 2000. The Drosophila homeobox gene optix is capable of inducing ectopic eyes by an eyeless-independent mechanism. Development 127: 1879-1886.
193. Servedio, M.R., Doorn, G.S.V., Kopp, M., Frame, A.M. & Nosil, P. 2011. Magic traits in speciation: "magic" but not rare? Trends Ecol. Evol. 26: 389-397.
194. Sheppard, P.M., Turner, J.R.G., Brown, K.S., Benson, W.W. & Singer, M.C. 1985. Genetics and the evolution of Muellerian mimicry in Heliconius Butterflies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 308: 433-610.
195. Sherratt, T.N. 2006. Spatial mosaic formation through frequency-dependent selection in Mullerian mimicry complexes. J. Theor. Biol. 240: 165-174.
196. Sherratt, T.N. & Beatty, C.D. 2003. The evolution of warning signals as reliable indicators of prey defense. Am. Nat. 162: 377-389.
197. Sivinski, J. 1989. Mushroom body development in nymphalid butterflies: a correlate of learning. J. Insect Behav. 2: 277.
198. Smiley, J.T. 1985. Heliconius caterpillar mortality during establishment on Plants with and without attending ants. Ecology 66: 845-849.
199. Smiley, J. 1986. Ant constancy at Passiflora extrafloral nectaries: effects on caterpillar survival. Ecology 67: 516-521.
200. Snell-Rood, E.C. 2013. An overview of the evolutionary causes and consequences of behavioural plasticity. Anim. Behav. 85: 1004-1011.
201. Snell-Rood, E.C. & Papaj, D.R. 2009. Patterns of phenotypic plasticity in common and rare environments: a study of host use and color learning in the cabbage white butterfly Pieris rapae. Am. Nat. 173: 615-631.
202. Snell-Rood, E.C., Papaj, D.R. & Gronenberg, W. 2009. Brain size: a global or induced cost of learning? Brain Behav. Evol. 73: 111-128.
203. Sol, D., Bacher, S., Reader, S.M. & Lefebvre, L. 2008. Brain size predicts the success of mammal species introduced into novel environments. Am. Nat. 172: S63-S71.
204. Spencer, K.C. 1988. Chemical mediation of coevolution in the Passiflora - Heliconius interaction. In: Chemical Mediation of Coevolution (K.C. Spencer, ed.), pp. 167-240. Academic Press, San Diego.
205. Srygley, R.B. 1999. Locomotor mimicry in Heliconius butterflies: contrast analyses of flight morphology and kinematics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 354: 203-214.
206. Srygley, R.B. 2004. The aerodynamic costs of warning signals in palatable mimetic butterflies and their distasteful models. Proc. R. Soc. B 271: 589-594.
207. Srygley, R.B. 2007. Evolution of the wave: aerodynamic and aposematic functions of butterfly wing motion. Proc. R. Soc. B 274: 913-917.
208. Stern, D.L. & Orgogozo, V. 2009. Is genetic evolution predictable? Science 323: 746-751.
209. Stevens, M. 2013. Sensory Ecology, Behaviour, and Evolution. OUP Oxford, Oxford, UK.
210. Supple, M.A., Hines, H.M., Dasmahapatra, K.K., Lewis, J.J., Nielsen, D.M., Lavoie, C. et al. 2013. Genomic architecture of adaptive color pattern divergence and convergence in Heliconius butterflies. Genome Res. 23: 1248-1257.
211. Svensson, E.I., Eroukhmanoff, F., Karlsson, K., Runemark, A. & Brodin, A. 2010. A role for learning in population divergence of mate preferences. Evolution 64: 3101-3113.
212. Sweeney, A., Jiggins, C.D. & Johnsen, S. 2002. Bio-optics and visual ecology of Heliconius color patterns. Integr. Comp. Biol. 42: 1321-1321.
213. Sweeney, A., Jiggins, C.D. & Johnsen, S. 2003. Polarized light as a butterfly mating signal. Nature 423: 31-32.
214. Swihart, S.L. 1972. Neural basis of color-vision in a butterfly, Heliconius erato. J. Insect Physiol. 18: 1015-1025.
215. Swihart, C.A. & Swihart, S.L. 1970. Colour selection and learned feeding preferences in the butterfly, Heliconius charitonius Linn. Anim. Behav. 18: 60-64.
216. The Heliconius Genome Consortium. 2012. Butterfly genome reveals promiscuous exchange of mimicry adaptations among species. Nature 487: 94-98.
217. Thompson, M.J. & Jiggins, C.D. 2014. Supergenes and their role in evolution. Heredity 113: 1-8.
218. Tobler, A., Kapan, D., Flanagan, N.S., Gonzalez, C., Peterson, E., Jiggins, C.D. et al. 2004. First-generation linkage map of the warningly colored butterfly Heliconius erato. Heredity 94: 408-417.
219. Turner, J.R.G. 1965. Evolution of complex polymorphism and mimicry in distasteful South American butterflies. Proc. XII Int. Cong. Entomol. London 1964: 267.
220. Turner, J.R.G. 1972. The genetics of some polymorphic forms of the butterflies Heliconius melpomene (Linnaeus) and Heliconius erato (Linnaeus). II. The hybridization of subspecies of H. melpomene from Surinam and Trinidad. Zoologica 56: 125-157.
221. Turner, J.R.G. 1977. Butterfly mimicry - genetical evolution of an adaptation. In: Evolutionary Biology (M.K. Hecht, W.C. Steere & B. Wallace, eds), pp. 163-206. Plenum Press, New York.
222. Turner, J.R.G. 1984. Mimicry: the palatability spectrum and its consequences. In: The Biology of Butterflies (R.I. Vane-Wright & P.R. Ackery, eds), pp. 141-161. Academic Press, London.
223. Turner, J.R.G. & Crane, J. 1962. The genetics of some polymorphic forms of the butterflies Heliconius melpomene Linnaeus and Heliconius erato Linnaeus. I. Major genes. Zoologica 47: 141-152.
224. Turner, J.R.G. & Mallet, J.L.B. 1996. Did forest islands drive the diversity of warningly coloured butterflies? Biotic drift and the shifting balance. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 351: 835-845.
225. Van't Hof, A.E., Nguyen, P., Dalíková, M., Edmonds, N., Marec, F. & Saccheri, I.J. 2013. Linkage map of the peppered moth, Biston betularia (Lepidoptera, Geometridae): a model of industrial melanism. Heredity 110: 283-295.
226. Via, S. 2012. Divergence hitchhiking and the spread of genomic isolation during ecological speciation-with-gene-flow. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 367: 451-460.
227. Via, S. & West, J. 2008. The genetic mosaic suggests a new role for hitchhiking in ecological speciation. Mol. Ecol. 17: 4334-4345.
228. Wahlberg, N., Leneveu, J., Kodandaramaiah, U., Peña, C., Nylin, S., Freitas, A.V.L. et al. 2009. Nymphalid butterflies diversify following near demise at the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary. Proc. R. Soc. B 276: 4295-4302.
229. Walters, J.R., Stafford, C., Hardcastle, T.J. & Jiggins, C.D. 2012. Evaluating female remating rates in light of spermatophore degradation in Heliconius butterflies: pupal-mating monandry versus adult-mating polyandry. Ecol. Entomol. 37: 257-268.
230. Weissing, F.J., Edelaar, P. & van Doorn, G.S. 2011. Adaptive speciation theory: a conceptual review. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65: 461-480.
231. West-Eberhard, M.J. 2003. Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York.
232. Westerman, E.L., Hodgins-Davis, A., Dinwiddie, A. & Monteiro, A. 2012. Biased learning affects mate choice in a butterfly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109: 10948-10953.
233. Whinnett, A., Zimmermann, M., Willmott, K.R., Herrera, N., Mallarino, R., Simpson, F. et al. 2005. Strikingly variable divergence times inferred across an Amazonian butterfly "suture zone". Proc. R. Soc. B 272: 2525-2533.
234. Williams, K.S. & Gilbert, L.E. 1981. Insects as selective agents on plant vegetative morphology: egg mimicry reduces egg laying by butterflies. Science 212: 467-469.
235. Withers, G.S., Fahrbach, S.E. & Robinson, G.E. 1993. Selective neuroanatomical plasticity and division of labour in the honeybee. Nature 364: 238-240.
236. Wu, C.-I. 2001. The genic view of the process of speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 851-865.
237. Yuan, F., Bernard, G.D., Le, J. & Briscoe, A.D. 2010. Contrasting modes of evolution of the visual pigments in Heliconius butterflies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27: 2392-2405.
238. Zaccardi, G., Kelber, A., Sison-Mangus, M.P. & Briscoe, A.D. 2006. Opsin expression in the eyes of Heliconius erato. Perception 35: 142-143.
239. Zars, T. 2000. Behavioral functions of the insect mushroom bodies. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 10: 790-795.