First-generation linkage map of the warningly colored butterfly Heliconius erato

Heredity

Volumn 94, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 408-417

  Tobler, A ^a   Kapan, D ^a   Flanagan, N S ^a   Gonzalez, C ^a   Peterson, E ^a   Jiggins, C D ^b   Johntson, J S ^c   Heckel, D G ^d,e   McMillan, W O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO   (Puerto Rico)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^e MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR CHEMICAL ECOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adaptation; AFLP; Color pattern; Microsatellites; Mimicry; Single copy nuclear loci

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BUTTERFLY; CHROMOSOME MAP; FORELIMB; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETICS; PIGMENTATION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT;

ANIMALS; BUTTERFLIES; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; LINKAGE (GENETICS); PIGMENTATION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; WING;

CUBITUS; CUBITUS INTERRUPTUS; HELICONIUS ERATO; HELICONIUS HIMERA; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 17144390771     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800619     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Bates HW (1862). Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon valley. Lepidoptera: Heliconidae. Trans Linn Soc Lond 23: 495-566.
2. Beltrán M, Jiggins CD, Bull V, Linares M, Mallet J, McMillan WO et al (2002). Phylogenetic discordance at the species boundary: comparative gene genealogies among Heliconius butterflies. Mol Biol Evol 19: 2176-2190.
3. Bennett MD, Leitch IJ, Price HJ, Johnston JS (2003). Comparisons with Caenorhabditis (∼100 Mb) and Drosophila (∼175 Mb) using flow cytometry show genome size in Arabidopsis to be ∼157 Mb and thus ∼25% larger than the Arabidopsis initiative estimate of ∼125 Mb. Ann Botany 91: 547-557.
4. Brakefield PM, Gates J, Keys D, Kesbeke F, Wijngaarden PJ, Monteiro A et al (1996). Development, plasticity, and evolution of butterfly eyespot patterns. Nature 384: 236-242.
5. Brower AVZ (1994). Rapid morphological radiation and convergence among races of the butterfly Heliconius erato inferred from patterns of mitochondrial DNA evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 6491-6495.
6. Brower AVZ (1996). Parallel race formation and the evolution of mimicry in Heliconius butterflies: a phylogenetic hypothesis from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Evolution 50: 195-221.
7. Brower AVZ, Egan MG (1997). Cladistic analysis of Heliconius butterflies and relatives (Nymphalidae: Heliconiiti): a revised phylogenetic position for Eueides based on sequences from mtDNA and a nuclear gene. Proc Roy Soc Lond Ser B 264: 969-977.
8. Brown KS (1981). The biology of Heliconius and related genera. Annu Rev Entomol 26: 427-456.
9. Brown KS, Emmel TC, Eliazar PJ, Soumalainen E (1992). Evolutionary patterns in chromosome numbers of neotropical Lepidoptera. I. Chromosomes of the Heliconiini (family Nymphalidae: subfamily Nymphalinae). Hereditas 117: 109-125.
10. Brunetti CR, Selegue JE, Monteiro A, French V, Brakefield PM, Carroll SB (2001). The generation and diversification of butterfly eyespot color patterns. Curr Biol 11: 1578-1585.
11. Carroll SB, Gates J, Keys DN, Paddock SW, Panganiban GEF, Seleque JE et al (1994). Pattern formation and eyespot determination in butterfly wings. Science 265: 109-114.
12. Carroll SB, Grenier JK, Weatherbee SD (2001). From DNA to Diversity: Molecular Genetics and the Evolution of Animal Design. Blackwell Scientific: Malden.
13. Emsley MG (1964). The geographical distribution of the color-pattern components of Heliconius erato and Heliconius melpomene with genetical evidence for the systematic relationship between the two species. Zool NY 49: 245-286.
14. Flanagan N, Tobler A, Kapan D, Davison A, Pybus O, Planas S et al (2004). Historical demography of Mullerian mimicry in the Neo-tropical Heliconius butterflies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 9704-9709.
15. Flanagan NS, Blum MJ, Davison A, Alamo M, Albarrán R, Faulhaber K et al (2002). Characterization of microsatellite loci in neotropical Heliconius butterflies. Mol Ecol Notes 2: 398-401.
16. Gage LP (1974). The genome: analysis by DNA reassociation kinetics. Chromosoma 45: 27-42.
17. Galbraith DW, Harkins KR, Maddox JM, Ayres NM, Sharma DP, Firoosabady E et al (1983). Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science 220: 1049-1051.
18. Gilbert LE (2003). Adaptive novelty through introgression in Heliconius wing patterns: evidence for shared genetic 'toolbox' from synthetic hybrid zones and a theory of diversification. In: Boggs CL, Watt WB, Ehrlich PR (eds) Ecology and Evolution Taking Flight: Butterflies as Model Systems. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
19. Gilbert LE, Forrest HS, Schultz TD, Harvey DJ (1988). Correlations of ultrastructural and pigmentation suggest how genes control development of wing scales on Heliconius butterflies. J Res Lepidoptera 26: 141-160.
20. Harrison RG, Rand DM, Wheeler WC (1987). Mitochondrial DNA variation in field crickets across a narrow hybrid zone. Mol Biol Evol 4: 144-158.
21. Hawthorne DJ (2001). AFLP-based genetic linkage map of the Colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata: sex chromosomes and a pyrethroid-resistance candidate gene. Genetics 158: 695-700.
22. Hunt GJ, Page Jr RE (1995). Linkage map of the honey bee, Apis mellifera, based on RAPD markers. Genetics 139: 1371-1382.
23. Jiggins CD, McMillan WO (1997). The genetic basis of an adaptive radiation: warning colour in two Heliconius species. Proc Roy Soc Lond Ser B 246: 1167-1175.
24. Jiggins CD, McMillan WO, King P, Mallet J (1997). Gene flow and the maintenance of species differences across a Heliconius hybrid zone. Heredity 79: 495-505.
25. Jiggins CD, Naisbit RE, Coe RL, Mallet J (2001). Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature 411: 302-305.
26. Joron M, Wynne IR, Lamas G, Mallet J (1999 2001). Variable selection and the coexistence of multiple mimetic forms in Heliconius numata. Evol Ecol 13: 721-754.
27. Kapan DD (2001). Three-butterfly system provides a field test of Müllerian mimicry. Nature 409: 338-340.
28. Keys DN, Lewis DL, Selegue JE, Pearson BJ, Goodrich LV, Johnson RL et al (1999). Recruitment of a hedgehog regulatory circuit in butterfly eyespot evolution. Science 283: 532-534.
29. Lincoln SE, Daly MJ, Lander ES (1993). MAPMAKER/EXP. Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research: Boston.
30. Mallet J (1989). The genetics of warning colour in Peruvian hybrid zones of Heliconius erato and H. melpomene. Proc Roy Soc Lond Ser B 236: 163-185.
31. Mallet J, Barton NH, Lamus G, Santisteban J, Muedas M, Eeley H (1990). Estimates of selection and gene flow from measures of cline width and linkage disequilibrium in Heliconius hybrid zones. Genetics 124: 921-936.
32. Mallet J, Gilbert LE (1995). Why are there so many mimicry rings? Correlations between habitat, behaviour, and mimicry in Heliconius butterflies. Biol J Linn Soc 55: 159-180.
33. Mallet J, Joron M (1999). Evolution of diversity in warning color and mimicry: polymorphisms, shifting balance, and speciation. Annu Rev Ecol Evol 30: 201-233.
34. McMillan WO, Jiggins CD, Mallet J (1997). What initiates speciation in passion-vine butterflies? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 8628-8633.
35. McMillan WO, Monteiro A, Kapan DD (2002). Development and evolution on the wing. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 125-133.
36. Merriam J, Ashuburner M, Hartl DL, Kafatos FC (1991). Toward cloning and mapping the genome of Drosophila. Science 254: 221-225.
37. Müller F (1879). Ituna and Thyridia; a remarkable case of mimicry in butterflies. Trans Entomol Soc Lond 1879: 20-29.
38. Naisbit RE, Jiggins CD, Mallet J (2003). Mimicry: developmental genes that contribute to speciation. Evol Dev 5: 269-280.
39. Nijhout HF (1991). The Development and Evolution of Butterfly Wing Patterns. Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington.
40. Parsons YM, Shaw KL (2002). Mapping unexplored genomes: a genetic linkage map of the Hawaiian cricket Laupala. Genetics 162: 1275-1282.
41. Punnett RC (1915). Mimicry in Butterflies. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
42. Reed RD, Serfas MS (2004). Butterfly wing pattern evolution is associated with changes in a notch/distal-less temporal pattern formation process. Curr Biol 14: 1159-1166.
43. Sandal N, Krusell L, Radutoiu S, Olbryt M, Pedrosa A, Stracke S et al (2002). A genetic linkage map of the model legume Lotus japonicus and strategies for fast mapping of new loci. Genetics 161: 1673-1683.
44. Sheppard PM, Turner JRG, Brown KS, Benson WW, Singer MC (1985). Genetics and the evolution of Mullerian mimicry in Heliconius butterflies. Philos Trans Roy Soc Lond Ser B 308: 433-613.
45. Shi J, Heckel DG, Goldsmith MR (1995). A genetic linkage map for the domesticated silkworm, Bombyx mori, based on restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Genet Res Camb 66: 109-126.
46. Suomalainen E, Cook LM, Turner JRG (1973). Achiasmatic oogenesis in the heliconiine butterflies. Hereditas 74: 302-304.
47. Tan Y-D, Wan C, Zhu Y, Lu C, Xiang Z, Deng H-W et al (2001). An amplified fragment length polymorphism map of the silkworm. Genetics 157: 1277-1284.
48. Turner JRG (1976). Adaptive radiation and convergence in subdivisions of the butterfly genus Heliconius (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Biol J Linn Soc 58: 297-308.
49. Turner JRG (1983). Mimetic butterflies and punctuated equilibria: some old light on a new paradigm. Biol J Linn Soc 20: 277-300.
50. Turner JRG, Smiley J (1975). Absence of crossing-over in female butterflies (Heliconius). Heredity 34: 265-269.
51. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, Lee Tvd, Hornes M (1995). AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23: 4407-4414.
52. Yasukochi Y (1998). A dense genetic map of the silkworm, Bombyx mori, covering all chromosomes based on 1018 molecular markers. Genetics 150: 1513-1525.