Genetic differentiation without mimicry shift in a pair of hybridizing Heliconius species (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 109, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 830-847

  Mérot, Claire ^a   Mavárez, Jesús ^b,c   Evin, Allowen ^a,d   Dasmahapatra, Kanchon K ^e,f   Mallet, James ^f,g   Lamas, Gerardo ^h   Joron, Mathieu ^a  

^a MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

^b UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^c SMITHSONIAN TROPICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Panama)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^g HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL MAYOR DE SAN MARCOS   (Peru)

Author keywords

Geometric morphometrics; Hybridization; Multilocus genotype; Reproductive isolation; Speciation; Wing shape

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ALTITUDE; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; BUTTERFLY; COEXISTENCE; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENOTYPE; MIMICRY; MORPHOMETRY; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; POPULATION MODELING; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SPECIMEN BANK; WING;

HELICONIUS; LEPIDOPTERA; NYMPHALIDAE; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 84880333880     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: 10958312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bij.12091     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Anderson EC, Thompson A. 2002. A model-based method for identifying species hybrids using multilocus genetic data. Genetics 160: 1217-1229.
2. Andersson J, Borg-Karlson AK, Vongvanich N, Wiklund C. 2007. Male sex pheromone release and female mate choice in a butterfly. Journal of Experimental Biology 210: 964-970.
3. Baylac M. 2012. Rmorph: a R geometric and multivariate morphometrics library. Available from the author: baylacatmnhn.fr.
4. Baylac M, Friess M. 2005. Fourier descriptors, procrustes superimposition, and data dimensionality: an example of cranial shape analysis in modern human populations. In: Slice DE, ed. Modern morphometrics in physical anthropology, part 1 theory and methods. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 142-165.
5. Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufatse N, Bonhomme F. 1996-2004. GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5171, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier.
6. Beltran M. 2004. The speciation history of Heliconius: inferences from multilocus sequence data. PhD Thesis, University College London, London.
7. Beltran M, Jiggins CD, Brower AVZ, Bermingham E. 2007. Do pollen-feeding, pupal-mating and larval gregariousness have a single origin in Heliconius butterflies? Inferences from multilocus DNA sequence data. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 92: 221-239.
8. Beltran M, Jiggins CD, Bull V, Linares M, Mallet J, McMillan WO, Bermingham E. 2002. Phylogenetic discordance at the species boundary: comparative gene genealogies among rapidly radiating Heliconius butterflies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19: 2176-2190.
9. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 57: 289-300.
10. Bookstein F, ed. 1991. Morphometrics tools for landmark data: geometry and biology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
11. Bookstein F. 1996. Biometrics, biomathematics and the morphometric synthesis. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 58: 313-365.
12. Brower AVZ. 1996. A new mimetic species of Heliconius (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), from southeastern Colombia, revealed by cladistic analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequences. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 116: 317-322.
13. Brower AVZ, Egan MG. 1997. Cladistic analysis of Heliconius butterflies and relatives (Nymphalidae: Heliconiiti): a revised phylogenetic position for Eueides based on sequences from mtDNA and a nuclear gene. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 264: 969-977.
14. Brown KS. 1979. Ecologia geografica e evoluçao nas florestas neotropicals. Livre de Docencia. Campinas: Universidad Estadual de Campinas.
15. Brown KS. 1981. The biology of Heliconius and related genera. Annual Reviews of Entomology 26: 427-456.
16. Bull V, Beltran M, Jiggins CD, McMillan WO, Bermingham E, Mallet J. 2006. Polyphyly and gene flow between non-sibling Heliconius species. BMC Biology 4: 11.
17. Chamberlain NL, Hill RI, Kapan DD, Gilbert LE, Kronforst MR. 2009. Polymorphic butterfly reveals the missing link in ecological speciation. Science 326: 847-850.
18. Chessel D, Dufour AB, Thioulouse J. 2004. The ade4 package-I: one-table methods. Rnews 4: 5-10.
19. Dasmahapatra KK, Lamas G, Simpson F, Mallet J. 2010. The anatomy of a 'suture zone' in Amazonian butterflies: a coalescent-based test for vicariant geographic divergence and speciation. Molecular Ecology 19: 4283-4301.
20. Drummond A, Rambaut A. 2007. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7: 214.
21. Dryden I, Mardia K. 1998. Statistical shape analysis. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
22. Elias M, Joron M, Wilmott K, Silva-Brandao L, Kaiser V, Arias CF, Piñerez LMG, Uribe S, Brower AVZ, Freitas AVL, Jiggins CD. 2009. Out of the Andes: patterns of diversification in clearwing butterflies. Molecular Ecology 18: 1716-1729.
23. Estrada C, Jiggins CD. 2002. Patterns of pollen feeding and habitat preference among Heliconius species. Ecological Entomology 27: 448-456.
24. Estrada C, Jiggins CD. 2008. Interspecific sexual attraction because of convergence in warning coloration: is there a conflict between natural and sexual selection in mimetic species? Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21: 749-760.
25. Flanagan NS, Blum MJ, Davidson A, Alamo M, Albarran R, Faulhaber K, Peterson E, McMillan WO. 2002. Characterization of microsatellite loci in neotropical Heliconius butterflies. Molecular Ecology Notes 2: 398-401.
26. Giraldo N, Salazar C, Jiggins CD, Birmingham E, Linares M. 2008. Two sisters in the same dress: Heliconius cryptic species. BMC Evolutionary Biology 8: 324.
27. Goodall CR, ed. 1995. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape revisited. In: Mardia KV, Gill CA, eds. Current issues in statistical shape analysis. Leeds: University of Leeds Press, 18-33.
28. Goudet J. 2001. FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Available at: http://www2.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/fstat.htm, updated from Goudet (1995).
29. Heliconius Genome Consortium. 2012. Butterfly genome reveals promiscuous exchange of mimicry adaptations among species. Nature 487: 94-98.
30. Hodkinson ID. 2005. Terrestrial insects along elevation gradients: species and community responses to altitude. Biological Reviews 80: 489-513.
31. Holzinger H, Holzinger R, eds. 1994. Heliconius and related genera. In: Heliconius and related genera: Lepidoptera Nymphalidae; the genera Eueides, Neruda and Heliconius. Venette, France, Sciences Nat. 328 pp., 51 pls.
32. Jiggins CD, Estrada C, Rodrigues A. 2004. Mimicry and the evolution of premating isolation in Heliconius melpomene Linnaeus. Journal of Evolutionary Ecology 17: 680-691.
33. Jiggins CD, McMillan WO, Neukirchen W, Mallet J. 1996. What can hybrid zone tell us about speciation? The case of Heliconius erato and H.himera (Lepidoptera: Nymplalidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 59: 221-242.
34. Jiggins CD, Naisbit RE, Coe RL, Mallet J. 2001. Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature 411: 302-305.
35. Jones R, Le Poul Y, Whibley A, Mérot C, FFrench-Constant R, Joron M. 2013. Wing shape variation associated with mimicry in butterflies. Evolution (in press).
36. Kapan DD. 2001. Three-butterfly system provides a field test of müllerian mimicry. Nature 409: 338-340.
37. Kronforst MR. 2008. Gene flow persists millions of years after speciation in Heliconius butterflies. BMC Evolutionary Biology 8: 98.
38. Kronforst MR, Toung LG, Kapan DD, McNeely C, O'Neill RJ, Gilbert LE. 2006. Linkage of butterfly mate preference and wing color preference cue at the genomic location of wingless. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103: 6575-6580.
39. Lamas G. 1997. Comentarios taxonomicos y nomenclaturales sobre Heliconiini neotropicales, con designacion de lectotipos y descripcion de cuatro subespecies nuevas (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Heliconiinae). Rev. Per. Ent. 40: 111-125.
40. Langham GM. 2004. Specialized avian predators repeatedly attack novel color morphs of Heliconius butterflies. Evolution 58: 2783-2787.
41. Mallet J. 1989. The genetics of warning colour in Peruvian hybrid zones of Heliconius erato and H.melpomene. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 236: 163-185.
42. Mallet J. 2007. Hybrid speciation. Nature 446: 279-283.
43. Mallet J. 2009. Rapid speciation, hybridization and adaptative radiation in the Heliconius melpomene group. In: Butlin RK, Bridle JR, Schluter D, eds. Speciation and patterns of diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 177-194.
44. Mallet J, Barton NH. 1989. Strong natural-selection in a warning-color hybrid zone. Evolution 43: 421-431.
45. Mallet J, Jiggins CD, McMillan WO, eds. 1998. Mimicry and warning color at the boundary between races and species. In: Howard DJ, Berlocher SH, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. New York: Oxford University Press, 390-403.
46. Mavarez J, Gonzalez J. 2006. A set of microsatellite markers for Heliconius melpomene and closely related species. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 20-23.
47. Mavarez J, Salazar CA, Bermingham E, Salcedo C, Jiggins CD, Linares M. 2006. Speciation by hybridization in Heliconius butterflies. Nature 441: 868-871.
48. McMillan WO, Jiggins CD, Mallet J. 1997. What initiates speciation in passion-vine butterflies? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94: 8628-8633.
49. Merrill RM, Gompert Z, Dembeck LM, Kronforst MR, McMillan WO, Jiggins CD. 2011. Mate preference across the speciation continuum in a clade of mimetic butterflies. Evolution 65: 1489-1500.
50. Merrill RM, Schooten BV, Scott JA, Jiggins CD. 2010. Pervasive genetic associations between traits causing reproductive isolation in Heliconius butterflies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 278: 511-518.
51. Monteiro LR. 1999. Multivariate regression models and geometric morphometrics: the search for causal factors in the analysis of shape. Systematic Biology 48: 192-199.
52. Nadeau NJ, Martin SH, Kozak KM, Salazar C, Dasmahapatra KK, Davey JW, Baxter SW, Blaxter LM, Mallet J, Jiggins CD. 2013. Genome-wide patterns of divergence and gene flow across a butterfly radiation. Molecular Ecology 22: 814-826.
53. Nadeau NJ, Whibley A, Jones RT, Davey JW, Dasmahapatra KK, Baxter SW, Quail MA, Joron M, Ffrench-Constant RH, Blaxter ML, Mallet J, Jiggins CD. 2012. Genomic islands of divergence in hybridizing Heliconius butterflies identified by large-scale targeted sequencing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367: 343-353.
54. Naisbit RE, Jiggins CD, Linares M, Salazar C, Mallet J. 2002. Hybrid sterility, Haldane's rule and speciation in H.cydno and H.melpomene. Genetics 161: 1517-1526.
55. Naisbit RE, Jiggins CD, Mallet J. 2001. Disruptive sexual selection against hybrids contributes to speciation between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 268: 1849-1854.
56. Nieberding CM, de Vos H, Schneider MV, Lassance JM, Estramil N, Andersson J, Bang J, Hedenstrom E, Lofstedt C, Brakefield PM. 2008. The male sex pheromone of the butterfly Bicyclus anynana: towards an evolutionary analysis. PLoS ONE 3: 12.
57. Nielsen EE, Bach LA, Kotlicki P. 2006. HYBRIDLAB (version 1.0): a program for generating simulated hybrids from population samples. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 971-973.
58. Nosil P, Feder JL. 2012. Genomic divergence during speciation: causes and consequences Introduction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367: 332-342.
59. Nosil P, Funk DJ, Ortiz-Barrientos D. 2009. Divergent selection and heterogeneous genomic divergence. Molecular Ecology 18: 375-402.
60. Papke RS, Darrell JK, Rutowski RL. 2007. Multimodal signalling: structural ultraviolet reflectance predicts male mating success better than pheromones in the butterfly Colias eurytheme L. (Pieridae). Animal Behaviour 73: 47-54.
61. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K. 2004. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20: 289-290.
62. Pardo-Diaz C, Salazar C, Baxter S, Mérot C, Figueiredo W, Joron M, McMillan O, Jiggins CD. 2012. Adaptive introgression across species boundary in Heliconius butterflies. PLoS Genetics 8: 13.
63. Pinheiro CEG. 2003. Does Mullerian mimicry work in nature? Experiments with butterflies and birds (Tyrannidae). Biotropica 35: 356-364.
64. Posada D. 2008. jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25: 1253-1256.
65. Pritchard JK, Stevens M, Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
66. R Development Core Team. 2011. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available at: http://www.R-project.org/
67. Rohlf F. 2010. TPSDig 2.16. Stony Brook, NY: Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
68. Rohlf FJ, Slice D. 1990. Extensions of the procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Zoology 39: 40-59.
69. Rosser N. 2012. Speciation and biogeography of heliconiine butterflies. PhD Thesis, University College London, London.
70. Rosser N, Phillimore AB, Huertas B, Willmott KR, Mallet J. 2012. Testing historical explanations for gradients in species richness in heliconiine butterflies of tropical America. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 105: 479-497.
71. Rousset F. 2008. GENEPOP'007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Molecular Ecology Resources 8: 103-106.
72. Salazar CA, Jiggins CD, Arias CF, Tobler A, Bermingham E, Linares M. 2005. Hybrid incompatibility is consistent with a hybrid origin of Heliconius heurippa Hewitson from its close relatives, Heliconius cydno Doubleday and Heliconius melpomene Linnaeus. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18: 247-256.
73. Schoville SD, Roderick GK, Kavanaugh DH. 2012. Testing the 'Pleistocene species pump' in alpine habitats: lineage diversification of flightless ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Nebria) in relation to altitudinal zonation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 107: 95-111.
74. Sheppard PM, Turner JRG, Brown KS, Benson WW, Singer MC. 1985. Genetics and the evolution of muellerian mimicry in Heliconius butterflies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London Series B 308: 433-613.
75. Srygley RB. 1999. Locomotor mimicry in Heliconius butterflies: contrast analyses of flight morphology and kinematics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 354: 203-214.
76. Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. 2008. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web-servers. Systematic Biology 75: 758-771.
77. Weir BS, Cockerham CC. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358-1370.
78. Willmott KR, Freitas AVL. 2006. Higher-level phylogeny of the Ithomiinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): classification, patterns of larval hostplant colonization and diversification. Cladistics 22: 297-368.
79. Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets HD, Fink WL, eds. 2004. Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a primer. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.