Erratum: Biased learning affects mate choice in a butterfly (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of Americ (2012) 109, 27 (10948-10953) DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1118378109);Biased learning affects mate choice in a butterfly

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 27, 2012, Pages 10948-10953

  Westerman, Erica L ^a   Hodgins Davis, Andrea ^a   Dinwiddie, April ^a   Monteiro, Antónia ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Female choice; Nymphalid; Oblique imprinting; Reproductive isolation; Sexual imprinting

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; BICYCLUS ANYNANA; BUTTERFLY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FORELIMB; GENETIC TRAIT; LEARNING; MALE; MATE CHOICE; MOLECULAR IMPRINTING; NONHUMAN; ORNAMENTAL SPECIES; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANIMALIA; BICYCLUS ANYNANA; NYMPHALIDAE;

EID: 84863576220     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1210670109     Document Type: Erratum

References (56)

1. Andersson M (1994) Sexual Selection (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, NJ), p 559.
2. Morris MR (1998) Further examination of female preference for vertical bars in swordtails: Preference for 'no bars' in a species without bars. J Fish Biol, 53: (sA):56-63.
3. Kimball RT, Braun EL, Ligon JD, Lucchini V, Randi E (2001) A molecular phylogeny of the peacock-pheasants (Galliformes: Polyplectron spp.) indicates loss and reduction of ornamental traits and display behaviours. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 73(2):187-198. (Pubitemid 32704224)
4. Wiens JJ (2001) Widespread loss of sexually selected traits: How the peacock lost its spots. Trends Ecol Evol 16:517-523.
5. Verzijden MN, Lachlan RF, Servedio MR (2005) Female mate-choice behavior and sympatric speciation. Evolution 59:2097-2108. (Pubitemid 41552985)
6. Irwin DE, Price T (1999) Sexual imprinting, learning and speciation. Heredity (Edinb) 82:347-354. (Pubitemid 29267020)
7. Laland KN (1994) On the evolutionary consequences of sexual imprinting. Evolution 48:477-489.
8. ten Cate C, Vos DR (1999) Sexual imprinting and evolutionary processes in birds: A reassessment. Adv Stud Behav 28:1-31.
9. Grant PR, Grant BR (1997) Hybridization, sexual imprinting, and mate choice. Am Nat 149(1):1-28.
10. Dukas R (2006) Learning in the context of sexual behaviour in insects. Animal Biology 56(2):125-141.
11. Beckers OM, Wagner WE (2011) Mate sampling strategy in a field cricket: Evidence for a fixed threshold strategy with last chance option. Anim Behav 81:519-527.
12. Hebets EA, Vink CJ (2007) Experience leads to preference: Experienced females prefer brush-legged males in a population of syntopic wolf spiders. Behav Ecol 18(6): 1010-1020. (Pubitemid 350060466)
13. Hebets EA (2003) Subadult experience influences adult mate choice in an arthropod: Exposed female wolf spiders prefer males of a familiar phenotype. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:13390-13395.
14. Svensson EI, Eroukhmanoff F, Karlsson K, Runemark A, Brodin A (2010) A role for learning in population divergence of mate preferences. Evolution 64:3101-3113.
15. Bailey NW, Zuk M (2009) Field crickets change mating preferences using remembered social information. Biol Lett 5:449-451.
16. Robertson KA, Monteiro A (2005) Female Bicyclus anynana butterflies choose males on the basis of their dorsal UV-reflective eyespot pupils. Proc Biol Sci 272:1541-1546. (Pubitemid 41414686)
17. Prudic KL, Jeon C, Cao H, Monteiro A (2011) Developmental plasticity in sexual roles of butterfly species drives mutual sexual ornamentation. Science 331:73-75.
18. Oliver JC, Robertson KA, Monteiro A (2009) Accommodating natural and sexual selection in butterfly wing pattern evolution. Proc Biol Sci 276:2369-2375.
19. Brakefield PM, French V (1993) Butterfly wing patterns: Developmental mechanisms and evolutionary change. Acta Biotheor 41:447-468.
20. Ritchie MG (2007) Sexual selection and speciation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 38:79-102.
21. Dukas R (2004) Male fruit flies learn to avoid interspecific courtship. Behav Ecol 15: 695-698.
22. Dukas R (2005) Learning affects mate choice in female fruit flies. Behav Ecol 16: 800-804.
23. Miller MN, Fincke OM (1999) Cues for mate recognition and effect of prior experience on mate recognition in Enallagma damselflies. J Insect Behav 12:801-814. (Pubitemid 30343124)
24. Walling CA, Royle NJ, Lindstrom J, Metcalfe NB (2008) Experience-induced preference for short-sworded males in the green swordtail, Xiphophorus helleri. Anim Behav 76: 271-276.
25. Melo MC, Salazar C, Jiggins CD, Linares M (2009) Assortative mating preferences among hybrids offers a route to hybrid speciation. Evolution 63:1660-1665.
26. Jiggins CD, Estrada C, Rodrigues A (2004) Mimicry and the evolution of premating isolation in Heliconius melpomene Linnaeus. J Evol Biol 17:680-691. (Pubitemid 38571962)
27. Kronforst MR, et al. (2006) Linkage of butterfly mate preference and wing color preference cue at the genomic location of wingless. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 6575-6580.
28. Chamberlain NL, Hill RI, Kapan DD, Gilbert LE, Kronforst MR (2009) Polymorphic butterfly reveals the missing link in ecological speciation. Science 326:847-850.
29. Tramm NA, Servedio MR (2008) Evolution of mate-choice imprinting: Competing strategies. Evolution 62:1991-2003. (Pubitemid 352033257)
30. Lynn SK (2006) Cognition and evolution: Learning and the evolution of sex traits. Curr Biol 16:R421-R423.
31. Endler JA, Westcott DA, Madden JR, Robson T (2005) Animal visual systems and the evolution of color patterns: Sensory processing illuminates signal evolution. Evolution 59:1795-1818.
32. ten Cate C, Rowe C (2007) Biases in signal evolution: Learning makes a difference. Trends Ecol Evol 22:380-387.
33. Dugatkin LA (1992) Sexual selection and imitation: Females copy the mate choice of others. Am Nat 139:1384-1389.
34. Costanzo K, Monteiro A (2007) The use of chemical and visual cues in female choice in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Proc Biol Sci 274:845-851. (Pubitemid 47056765)
35. Nieberding CM, et al. (2008) The male sex pheromone of the butterfly Bicyclus anynana: Towards an evolutionary analysis. PLoS ONE 3:e2751.
36. Nieberding CM, et al. (2012) Cracking the olfactory code of a butterfly: The scent of ageing. Ecol Lett 15:415-424.
37. Wilgers DJ, Hebets EA (2011) Complex courtship displays facilitate male reproductive success and plasticity in signaling across variable environments. Current Zoology 57: 175-186.
38. Griffith LC, Ejima A (2009) Multimodal sensory integration of courtship stimulating cues in Drosophila melanogaster. Ann NY Acad Sci 1170:394-398.
39. Marler P, Peters S (1977) Selective vocal learning in a sparrow. Science 198:519-521. (Pubitemid 8188140)
40. Marler P (1997) Three models of song learning: Evidence from behavior. J Neurobiol 33:501-516.
41. Lachlan RF, Feldman MW (2003) Evolution of cultural communication systems: The coevolution of cultural signals and genes encoding learning preferences. J Evol Biol 16:1084-1095. (Pubitemid 37379276)
42. Marler P, Peters S (1988) The role of song phenology and syntax in vocal learning preferences in the song sparrow, Melospiza melodia. Ethology 77:125-149.
43. Marler P (1970) Birdsong and speech development: Could there be parallels? Am Sci 58:669-673.
44. Dukas R (2008) Learning decreases heterospecific courtship and mating in fruit flies. Biol Lett 4:645-647.
45. Condamin M (1973) Monographie du genre Bicyclus (Lepidoptera Satyridae) [Monograph of the genus Bicyclus (Lepidoptera Satyridae)] (Ifan-Dakar, Senegal), Vol 88, pp 1-324. French.
46. Stephens DW (1991) Change, regularity, and value in the evolution of animal learning. Behav Ecol 2(1):77-89.
47. Kozak GM, Head ML, Boughman JW (2011) Sexual imprinting on ecologically divergent traits leads to sexual isolation in sticklebacks. Proc Biol Sci 278:2604-2610.
48. Sorenson MD, Hauber ME, Derrickson SR (2010) Sexual imprinting misguides species recognition in a facultative interspecific brood parasite. Proc Biol Sci 277:3079-3085.
49. Verzijden MN, ten Cate C (2007) Early learning influences species assortative mating preferences in Lake Victoria cichlid fish. Biol Lett 3:134-136. (Pubitemid 351878146)
50. Oliver JC, Monteiro A (2011) On the origins of sexual dimorphism in butterflies. Proc Biol Sci 278:1981-1988.
51. Fordyce JA, Nice CC, Forister ML, Shapiro AM (2002) The significance of wing pattern diversity in the Lycaenidae: Mate discrimination by two recently diverged species. J Evol Biol 15:871-879. (Pubitemid 35008369)
52. Brower AVZ (1994) Rapid morphological radiation and convergence among races of the butterfly Heliconius erato inferred from patterns of mitochondrial DNA evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:6491-6495.
53. Lynch A (1996) The population memetics of bird song. Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds, eds Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (Comstock Publishing, Ithaca, London), pp 181-197.
54. Brakefield PM, Larsen T (1984) The evolutionary significance of dry and wet season forms in some tropical butterflies. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 22(1):1-12.
55. Brakefield PM, Reistma N (1991) Phenotypic plasticity, seasonal climate and the population biology of Bicyclus butterflies (Satyridae) in Malawi. Ecol Entomol 16: 291-303.
56. Joron M, Brakefield PM (2003) Captivity masks inbreeding effects on male mating success in butterflies. Nature 424:191-194. (Pubitemid 36858685)