Wright's shifting balance theory and the diversification of aposematic signals

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Chouteau, Mathieu ^a   Angers, Bernard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APOSEMATIC SIGNAL; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; FROG; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC SELECTION; HABITAT; NATURAL SELECTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; POPULATION GENETICS; PREDATION; RANITOMAYA IMITATOR; SIGNAL DETECTION; SPECIES DIVERSITY; THEORY; WRIGHT SHIFTING BALANCE THEORY; ANIMAL; ANURA; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; HAPLOTYPE; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PHENOTYPE;

DENDROBATIDAE;

ANIMALS; ANURA; HAPLOTYPES; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHENOTYPE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84859058194     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034028     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Fisher RA, (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection Oxford Oxford University Press.
2. Wright S, (1932) The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. Proc 6th Int Cong Genet 1: 356-366.
3. Wright S, (1978) Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. Variability Between and Among Natural Populations Chicago University Chicago Press.
4. Coyne JA, Barton NH, Turelli M, (1997) Perspective: A critique of Sewall Wright's shifting balance theory of evolution. Evolution 51: 643-671.
5. Wade MJ, Goodnight CJ, (1998) Perspective: The theories of Fisher and Wright in the context of metapopulations: When nature does many small experiments. Evolution 52: 1537-1553.
6. Coyne JA, Barton NH, Turelli M, (2000) Is Wright's shifting balance process important in evolution? Evolution 54: 306-317.
7. Wade MJ, Goodnight CJ, (1991) Wright shifting balance theory: an experimental study. Science 253: 1015-1018.
8. Barton NH, (1992) On the spread of new gene combinations in the third phase of wright's shifting-balance. Evolution 46: 551-557.
9. Ruxton GD, Sherratt TN, Speed MP, (2004) Avoiding Attack: The Evolutionary Ecology of Crypsis, Aposematism, and Mimicry Oxford U.K. Oxford University Press.
10. Sherratt TN, (2008) The evolution of Müllerian mimicry. Naturwissenschaften 95: 681-695.
11. Bocak L, Yagi T, (2009) Evolution of mimicry patterns in Metriorrhynchus (Coleoptera: Lycidae): the history of dispersal and speciation in Southeast Asia. Evolution 64: 39-52.
12. Jiggins CD, McMillan WO, King P, Mallet J, (1997) The maintenance of species differences across a Heliconius hybrid zone. Heredity 79: 495-505.
13. Marek PE, Bond JE, (2009) A Müllerian mimicry ring in Appalachian millipedes. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 106: 9755-9760.
14. Noonan BP, Gaucher P, (2006) Refugial isolation and secondary contact in the dyeing poison frog Dendrobates tinctorius. Mol Ecol 15: 4425-4435.
15. Symula R, Schulte R, Summers K, (2001) Molecular phylogenetic evidence for a mimetic radiation in Peruvian poison frogs supports a Müllerian mimicry hypothesis. Proc R Soc Lond B 268: 2415-2421.
16. Turner JRG, (1971) Studies of Müllerian mimicry and its evolution in burneth moths and heliconid butterflies. In: Creed ER, editors. Ecological Genetics and Evolution Oxford Blackwell pp. 224-260.
17. Wang IJ, Shaffer HB, (2008) Rapide color evolution in an aposematic species: a phylogenetic analysis of color variation in the strikingly polymorphic strawberry poison-dart frog. Evolution 62: 2742-2759.
18. Balogh ACV, Leimar O, (2005) Müllerian mimicry: an examination of Fisher's theory of gradual evolutionary change. Proc R Soc Lond B 272: 2269-2275.
19. Mallet J, (2010) Shift happens! Shifting balance and the evolution of diversity in warning colour and mimicry. Ecol Ent 35: 90-104.
20. Mallet J, Joron M, (1999) Evolution of diversity in warning color and mimicry: Polymorphisms, shifting balance, and speciation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30: 201-233.
21. Mallet J, Singer MC, (1987) Individual selection, kin selection, and the shifting balance in the evolution of warning colors: the evidence from butterflies. Biol J Linn Soc 32: 337-350.
22. Rudh A, Rogell B, Hoglund J, (2007) Non-gradual variation in colour morphs of the strawberry poison frog Dendrobates pumilio: genetic and geographical isolation suggest a role for selection in maintaining polymorphism. Mol Ecol 16: 4284-4294.
23. Benson WW, (1982) Alternative models for infrageneric diversification in the humid tropics: tests with passion vine butterflies. In: Prance GT, editors. Biological Diversification in the Tropics New York Columbia University Press pp. 608-640.
24. Brown KS, Sheppard PM, Turner JRG, (1974) Quaternary refugia in tropical America: evidence from race formation in Heliconius butterflies. Proc R Soc Lond B 187: 369-378.
25. Endler JA, (1982) Pleistocene forest refuges: fact or fancy? In: Prince GT, editors. Biological Diversification in the Tropics New York Columbia University Press pp. 641-657.
26. Sheppard PM, Turner JRG, Brown KS, Benson WW, Singer MC, (1985) Genetics and the evolution of muellerian mimicry in Heliconius butterflies. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 308: 433-613.
27. Brown JL, Twomey E, Pepper M, Rodriguez MS, (2008) Revision of the Ranitomeya fantastica species complex with description of two new species from Central Peru (Anura: Dendrobatidae). Zootaxa 1823: 1-24.
28. Roberts JL, Brown JL, von May R, Arizabal W, Presar A, et al. (2006) Phylogenetic relationships among poison frogs of the genus Dendrobates (Dendrobatidae): A molecular perspective from increased taxon sampling. Herpetol J 16: 377-385.
29. Schulte R, (1999) Die Pfeilgiftfrösche Vol. II Artenteil; INIBICO, editor Waiblingen INIBICO.
30. Symula R, Schulte R, Summers K, (2003) Molecular systematics and phylogeography of Amazonian poison frogs of the genus Dendrobates. Mol Phylogenet Evol 26: 452-475.
31. Chouteau M, Summers K, Morales V, Angers B, (2011) Advergence in Müllerian mimicry: the case of the poison-dart frogs of Northern Peru revisited. Biol Lett 7: 796-800.
32. Chouteau M, Angers B, (2011) The role of predators in maintaining the geographic organization of aposematic signals. Am Nat 178: 810-817.
33. Benson WW, (1972) Natural selection for Müllerian mimicry in Heliconius erato in Costa Rica. Science 1976: 936-939.
34. Mallet J, Barton NH, (1989) Strong natural selection in a warning color hybrid zone. Evolution 43: 421-431.
35. Kapan DD, (2001) Three-butterfly system provides a field test of Müllerian mimicry. Nature 409: 338-340.
36. Pinheiro CEG, (2003) Does Müllerian mimicry work in nature? Experiments with butterflies and birds (Tyrannidae). Biotropica 35: 356-364.
37. Manica A, Amos W, Balloux F, Hanihara T, (2007) The effect of ancient population bottleneck on human phenotypic variation. Nature 448: 346-349.
38. Joron M, Mallet JLB, (1998) Diversity in mimicry: paradox or paradigm? Trends Ecol Evol 13: 461-466.
39. Mallet J, (1986) Hybrid zones of Heliconius butterflies in Panama and the stability and movement of warning color clines. Heredity 56: 191-202.
40. Merchan HA, Jiggins CD, Linares M, (2005) A narrow Heliconius cydno (Nymphalidae; Heliconiini) hybrid zone with differences in morph sex ratios. Biotropica 37: 119-128.
41. Hardy OJ, Charbonnel N, Freville H, Heuertz M, (2003) Microsatellite allele sizes: A simple test to assess their significance on genetic differentiation. Genetics 163: 1467-1482.
42. Rousset F, (1997) Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-Statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics 145: 1219-1228.
43. Wright S, (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics 28: 114-138.
44. Langham GM, (2004) Specialized avian predators repeatedly attack novel color morphs of Heliconius butterflies. Evolution 58: 2783-2787.
45. Mallet J, Barton N, Lamas G, Santisteban J, Muedas M, et al. (1990) Estimates of selection and gene flow from measures of cline width and linkage disequilibrium in Heliconius hybrid zones. Genetics 124: 921-936.
46. Noonan BP, Comeault AA, (2009) The role of predator selection on polymorphic aposematic poison frogs. Biol Lett 5: 51-54.
47. Brown J, Morales V, Summers K, (2008) Home range size and location in relation to reproductive resources in poison frogs: a Monte Carlo approach using GIS data. Anim Beh 77: 547-554.
48. Bryant EH, Meffert LM, (1996) Nonadditive genetic structuring of morphometric variation in relation to a population bottleneck. Heredity 77: 168-176.
49. Bryant EH, Meffert LM, (1996) Morphometric differentiation in serially bottlenecked populations of the housefly. Evolution 50: 935-940.
50. Pray LA, Goodnight CJ, (1997) The effect of inbreeding on phenotypic variance in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Evolution 51: 308-313.
51. Pray LA, Goodnight CJ, (1995) Genetic variation in inbreeding depression in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Evolution 49: 176-188.
52. Whitlock MC, (1995) Two-locus drift with sex chromosomes: the partitioning and conservation of variance in subdivided populations. Theor Pop Biol 48: 44-64.
53. Weber JL, Wong C, (1993) Mutation of human short tandem repeats. Hum Mol Genet 2: 1123-1128.
54. Li W-H, (1997) Molecular evolution Massachusetts Sinauer Associates.
55. Borer M, van Noort T, Rahier M, Naisbit RE, (2010) Positive frequency-dependent selection on warning color in alpine leaf beetles. Evolution 64: 3269-3633.
56. Sherratt TN, (2006) Spatial mosaic formation through frequency-dependent selection in Müllerian mimicry complexes. J Theor Biol 240: 165-174.
57. Mallet J, (2001) Causes and consequences of a lack of coevolution in müllerian mimicry. Evol Ecol 13: 777-806.
58. Robertson JM, Robertson AD, (2008) Spatial and temporal patterns of phenotypic variation in a Neotropical frog. J Biogeogr 35: 830-843.
59. Abramoff MD, Magelhaes PJ, Ram SJ, (2004) Image Processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International 11: 36-42.
60. Brown JL, Chouteau M, Glenn T, Summers K, (2009) The development and analysis of twenty-one microsatellite loci for three species of Amazonian poison frogs. Conser Genet Resour 1: 149-151.
61. Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F, (1996-2004) GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5171, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier (France).
62. Cornuet JM, Luikart G, (1996) Description and power analysis ot two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144: 2001-2014.
63. Raymond R, Rousset F, (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): a population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Heredity 83: 248-249.
64. Hardy OJ, Vekemans X, (2002) SPAGEDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol Ecol Notes 2: 618-620.
65. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P, (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
66. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J, (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14: 2611-2620.
67. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, et al. (2007) ClustalW and ClustalX version 2. Bioinformatics 23: 2947-2948.
68. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S, (2005) Arlequin ver. 3.0: An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online 1: 47-50.