Phylogenetic codivergence supports coevolution of mimetic Heliconius butterflies

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2012, Pages

  Hoyal Cuthill, Jennifer ^a   Charleston, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BASE PAIRING; BAYES THEOREM; BUTTERFLY; CALIBRATION; CLADISTICS; EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE; EVOLUTION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GEOGRAPHY; HELICONIUS ERATO; HELICONIUS MELPOMENE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION GENETICS;

HELICONIUS; HELICONIUS ERATO; HELICONIUS MELPOMENE; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 84860628141     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036464     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Lamas G, ed (2004) Atlas of Neotropical Lepidoptera. Checklist Part 4A Hesperiodea-Papilionoidea. Gainesville: Scientific Publishers.
2. Brown JKS, (1981) The biology of Heliconius and related genera. Ann Rev Entomol 26: 427-456.
3. Sheppard PM, Brown KS, Benson WW, Singer MC, (1985) Genetics and the evolution of Müllerian mimicry in Heliconius butterflies. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond 308: 433-613.
4. Engler H, Spencer KC, Gilbert LE, (2000) Preventing cyanide release from leaves. Nature 406: 144-145.
5. Kapan DD, (2001) Three-butterfly system provides a field test of Müllerian mimicry. Nature 409: 338-340.
6. Müller F, (1879) Ituna and Thyridia; a remarkable case of mimicry in butterflies. Trans Entomol Soc Lond 1879: xx- xxix.
7. Bates HW, (1862) Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon valley (Lepidoptera: Heliconidae). Trans Linnean Soc 23: 495-556.
8. Reed RD, Papa R, Martin A, Hines HM, Counterman BA, et al. (2011) optix drives the repeated convergent evolution of butterfly wing pattern mimicry. Science 333 DOI:10.1126/science.1208227.
9. Benson WW, (1972) Natural selection for Müllerian mimicry in Heliconius erato in Costa Rica. Science 176: 936-939.
10. Thompson JN, (1994) The coevolutionary process. Chicago University of Chicago Press.
11. Joron M, Mallet JL, (1998) Diversity in mimicry: paradox or paradigm? Trends Ecol Evol 13: 461-466.
12. Janzen DH, (1980) When is it coevolution? Evolution 34: 611-612.
13. Thompson JN, (1989) Concepts of coevolution. Trends Ecol Evol 4: 179-183.
14. Gilbert LE, (1983) Coevolution and mimicry. Futuyma DM, Slatkin M, eds Coevolution. Sunderland Sinauer Associates Inc pp. 263-281.
15. Brower AVZ, (1996) Parallel race formation and the evolution of mimicry in Heliconius butterflies: a phylogenetic hypothesis from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Evolution 50: 195-221.
16. Mallet J, (1999) Causes and consequences of a lack of coevolution in Müllerian mimicry. Evol Ecol 13: 777-806.
17. Chai P, (1986) Field observations and feeding experiments on the responses of rufous-tailed jacamars (Galbula ruficauda) to free-flying butterflies in a tropical rainforest. Biol J Linn Soc 29: 161-189.
18. Pinheiro CEG, (2003) Does Müllerian mimicry work in nature? Experiments with butterflies and birds (Tyrannidae). Biotropica 35: 356-364.
19. Brown KS, Sheppard PM, Turner JRG, (1974) Quaternary refugia in tropical America: evidence from race formation in Heliconius butterflies. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 187: 369-378.
20. Beltrán M, Jiggins CD, Brower AVZ, Bermingham E, Mallet J, (2007) Do pollen feeding, pupal-mating and larval gregariousness have a single origin in Heliconius butterflies? Inferences from multilocus DNA sequence data. Biol J Linn Soc 92: 221-239.
21. Counterman BA, Araujo-Perez F, Hines HM, Baxter SW, Morrison CM, et al. (2010) Genomic hotspots for adaptation: the population genetics of Müllerian mimicry in Heliconius erato. PLoS Genet 6 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000796.
22. Hines HM, Counterman BA, Papa R, de Moura PA, Cardoso MZ, et al. (2011) Wing patterning gene redefines the mimetic history of Heliconius butterflies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 49: 19666-19671.
23. Kronforst MR, Young LG, Kapan DD, McNeely C, ONeill RJ, et al. (2006) Linkage of butterfly mate preference and wing color preference cue at the genomic location of wingless. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 6575-6580.
24. Arias CF, Muñoz AG, Jiggins CD, Mavárez J, Bermingham E, et al. (2008) A hybrid zone provides evidence for incipient ecological speciation in Heliconius butterflies. Mol Ecol 17: 4699-4712.
25. Page, RDM, (2003) Introduction. Page RDM, ed Tangled trees Phylogeny, cospeciation, and coevolution. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press pp. 1-21.
26. Futyma DJ, Slatkin M, (1983) Introduction. Coevolution Sunderland Sinauer Associates Inc pp. 1-13.
27. Mallet J, Jiggins CD, McMillan WO, (1996) Mimicry meets the mitochodrian. Curr Biol 6: 937-940.
28. Knapp S, Mallet J, (2003) Refuting refugia? Science 300: 71-72.
29. Flanagan NS, Tobler A, Davison A, Pybus OG, Kapan DD, et al. (2004) Historical demography of Müllerian mimicry in the neotropical Heliconius butterflies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 9704-9709.
30. Quek S-P, Counterman BA, de Moura PA, Cardoso MZ, Marshall CR, et al. (2010) Dissecting comimetic radiations in Heliconius reveals divergent histories of convergent butterflies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 7365-7370.
31. Ceccarelli FS, Crozier RH, (2007) Dynamics of the evolution of Batesian mimicry: moelcular phylogenetic analysis of ant-mimicking Myrmarachne (Aranae: Salticidae) species and their ant models. J Evolution Biol 20: 286-295.
32. Maddison WP, (1997) Gene trees in species trees. Syst Biol 46: 523-536.
33. Heled J, Drummond AJ, (2010) Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Mol Biol Evol 27: 570-580.
34. Brower AVZ, (1994) Rapid morphological radiation and convergence among races of the butterfly Heliconius erato inferred from patterns of mitochondrial DNA evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 6491-6495.
35. Simonsen TJ, Zakharov EV, Djernaes M, Cotton AM, Vane-Wright RI, et al. (2011) Phylogenetics and divergence times of Papiloninae (Lepidoptera) with special reference to the enigmatic genera Teinopalpus and Meandrusa. Cladistics 27: 113-137.
36. Heikkilä M, Kaila L, Mutanen M, Peña C, Wahlberg N, (2011) Cretaceous origin and repeated Tertiary diversification of the redefined butterflies. Proc Roy Soc Lond B DOI:10.1098/rspb.2011.1430.
37. Rosenberg NA, Nordborg M, (2002) Genealogical trees, coalescent theory and the analysis of genetic polymorphisms. Nat Rev Genet 3: 380-390.
38. Maddison WP, Knowles LL, (2006) Inferring phylogeny despite incomplete lineage sorting. Syst Biol 55: 21-30.
39. Eckert AJ, Carstens BC, (2008) Does gene flow destroy phylogenetic signal? The performance of three methods for estimating species phylogenies in the presence of gene flow. Mol Phylogenet Evol 49: 832-842.
40. Zhang C, Zhang D-X, Zhu T, Yang Z, (2011) Evaluation of a Bayesian coalescent method of species delimitation. Syst Biol 60: 747-761.
41. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M, (1999) Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol Biol Evol 16: 1114-1116.
42. Beltrán M, Jiggins CD, Bull V, Linares M, Mallet J, et al. (2002) Phylogenetic discordance at the species boundary: comparative gene genealogies among rapidly radiating Heliconius butterflies. Mol Biol Evol 19: 2176-2190.
43. Edgar RC, (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 1792-1797.
44. Jobb G, Haeseler AV, Strimmer K, (2004) TREEFINDER: a powerful graphical analysis environment for molecular phylogenetics. BMC Evol Biol 4: 18.
45. Posada D, (2008) jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol Biol Evol 25: 1253-1256.
46. Akaike H, (1974) A new look at statistical model identification. IEEE T Automat Contr 19: 716-723.
47. Hey J, Wakely J, (1997) A coalescent estimator of the population recombination rate. Genetics 145: 833-846.
48. Watterson GA, (1975) On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor Popul Biol 7: 256-276.
49. Wakely J, Hey J, (1997) Estimating ancestral population parameters. Genetics 145: 847-855.
50. Swofford DL, (2003) PAUP* Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods) version 4. Sunderland Sinauer Associates.
51. Maddison WP, Maddison DR, (2010) Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis version 2.73.http://mesquiteproject.org.
52. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A, (2007) BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol 7: 214.
53. Yang Z, Rannala B, (2010) Bayesian species delimitation using multilocus sequence data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 9264-9269.
54. McCormack JE, Heled J, Delaney KS, Townsend Peterson A, Lacey Knowles L, (2010) Calibrating divergence times on species trees versus gene trees: implications for speciation history of Aphelocoma jays. Evolution 65: 184-202.
55. Charleston MA, Robertson DL, (2002) Preferential host switching by primate lentiviruses can account for phylogenetic similarity with the primate phylogeny. Syst Biol 51: 528-535.
56. Conow C, Fielder D, Ovadia Y, Libeskind-Hadas R, (2010) Jane: a new tool for the cophylogeny reconstruction problem. Algorithm Mol Biol 5: 16.
57. Charleston MA, (1998) Jungles: a new solution to the host/parasite phylogeny reconciliation problem. Math Biosci 149: 191-223.
58. Eltringham H, (1916) On specific and mimetic relationships in the genus Heliconius. Trans Ent Soc Lond 1916 101-148 pp. 101-148.
59. Wright S, (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97-159.
60. Frankham R, (1996) Relationship of genetic variation to population size in wildlife. Conserv Biol 10: 1500-1508.
61. Charlesworth B, (2009) Effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation. Nat Rev Genet 10: 195-205.
62. Kronforst MR, Gilbert LE, (2008) The population genetics of mimetic diversity in Heliconius butterflies. P Roy Soc B 275: 493-500.
63. Baxter SW, Nadeau NJ, Maroja LS, Wilkinson P, Counterman BA, et al. (2010) Genomic hotspots for adaptation: the population genetics of Müllerian mimicry in the Heliconius melpomene clade. PLoS Genet 6: 1-12.
64. Gandon S, Michalakis Y, (2002) Local adaptation, evolutionary potential and host-parasite coevolution: interactions between migration, mutation, population size and generation time. J Evol Biol 15: 451-462.
65. Turner JRG, (1987) The evolutionary dynamics of Batesian and Muellerian mimicry: similarities and differences. Ecol Entomol 12: 81-95.
66. Gilbert LE, (1984) The biology of butterfly communities. Vane-Wright R, Ackery P, eds The biology of butterflies. New York Academic Press pp. 41-54.
67. Futuyma DJ, (1986) Evolutionary biology: Second edition. Sunderland Sinauer Associates Inc.
68. Wilson EB, (1927) Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. J Am Stat Assoc 22: 209-212.