Mimicry and the evolution of premating isolation in Heliconlus melpomene Linnaeus

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 680-691

  Jiggins, C D ^a,b   Estrada, C ^c   Rodrigues, A ^a  

^a SMITHSONIAN TROPICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Panama)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Lepidoptera; Mate recognition; Sensory bias; Sexual selection; Speciation

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; COLOR MORPH; DIVERGENCE; EVOLUTION; MATE CHOICE; MIMICRY; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BUTTERFLY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS BREEDING; ECUADOR; EVOLUTION; FORELIMB; FRENCH GUIANA; GENETICS; LEARNING; MALE; PANAMA; PHYSIOLOGY; PIGMENTATION; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; BUTTERFLIES; CROSSES, GENETIC; ECUADOR; EVOLUTION; FRENCH GUIANA; LEARNING; MALE; PANAMA; PIGMENTATION; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; WING;

ANIMALIA; HELICONIUS; HELICONIUS MELPOMENE; LEPIDOPTERA; NYMPHALIDAE; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 2342465622     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00675.x     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Arnqvist, G., Edvardsson, M., Friberg, U. & Nilsson, T. 2000. Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97: 10460-10464.
2. Bates, H.W. 1862. Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon valley. Lepidoptera: Heliconidae. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. 23: 495-566.
3. Benson, W.W. 1972. Natural selection for Müllerian mimicry in Heliconius erato in Costa Rica. Science 176: 936-939.
4. Boughman, J.W. 2001. Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature 411: 944-948.
5. Brower, L.P. 1959. Speciation in butterflies of the Papilio glaucus group. H. Ecological relationships and interspecific sexual behavior. Evolution 13: 212-228.
6. Brower, A.V.Z. 1996. Parallel race formation and the evolution of mimicry in Heliconius butterflies: a phylogenetic hypothesis from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Evolution 50: 195-221.
7. Brower, L.P. & Brower, J.V.Z. 1962. The relative abundance of model and mimic butterflies in natural populations of the Battus philenor mimicry complex. Ecology 43: 154-158.
8. Brower, L.P., Alcock, J. & Brower, J.V.Z. 1971. Avian feeding behaviour and the selective advantage of incipient mimicry. In: Ecological Genetics and Evolution (R. Creed, ed.), pp. 261-274. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.
9. Brown, K.S. 1979. Ecologia Geográfica e Evoluçâo nas Florestas Neotropicais. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
10. Brown, K.S. 1981. The biology of Heliconius and related genera. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 26: 427-456.
11. Butlin, R. 1987. Speciation by reinforcement. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2: 8-12.
12. Cain, M.L., Andreasen, V. & Howard, D.L. 1999. Reinforcing selection is effective under a relatively broad set of conditions in a mosaic hybrid zone. Evolution 53: 1343-1353.
13. Chai, P. & Srygley, R.B. 1990. Predation and the flight, morphology, and temperature of neotropical rain-forest butterflies. Am. Nat. 135: 748-765.
14. Crane, J. 1955. Imaginai behaviour of a Trinidad butterfly, Heliconius erato hydara Hewitson, with special reference to the social use of color. Zoologica, N.Y. 40: 167-196.
15. Dobzhansky, T. 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.
16. Dres, M. & Mallet, J. 2002. Host races in plant feeding insects and their importance in sympatric speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 357: 471-492.
17. Edwards, A.W.F. 1972. Likelihood. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
18. Emelianov, I., Dres, M., Baltensweiler, W. & Mallet, J. 2001. Host-induced assortative mating in host races of the larch budmoth. Evolution 55: 2002-2010.
19. Emsley, M.G. 1970. An observation on the use of colour for species-recognition in Heliconius besckei (Nymphalidae). J. Lepid. Soc. 24: 25.
20. Endler, J.A. 1992. Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am. Nat. 139: S125-S153.
21. Estrada, C. & Jiggins, C.D. 2002. Patterns of pollen feeding and habitat preference among Heliconius species. Ecol. Entomol. 27: 448-456.
22. Feder, J.L., Opp, S.B., Wlazlo, B., Reynolds, K., Go, W. & Spisak, S. 1994. Host fidelity is an effective premating barrier between sympatric races of the apple maggot fly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91: 7990-7994.
23. Fordyce, J.A., Nice, C.C., Forister, M.L. & Shapiro, A.M. 2002. The significance of wing pattern diversity in the Lycaenidae: mate discrimination by two recently diverged species. J. Evol. Biol. 15: 871-879.
24. Fuller, R.C. 2002. Lighting environment predicts the relative abundance of male colour morphs in the bluefin kilifish (Lucania goodei) populations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 269: 1457-1465.
25. Futuyma, D.J. & Mayer, G.G. 1980. Non-allopatric speciation in animals. Syst. Zool. 29: 254-271.
26. Gage, M.J.G., Parker, G.A., Nylin, S. & Wiklund, C. 2002. Sexual selection and speciation in mammals, butterflies and spiders. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 269: 2309-2316.
27. Gavrilets, S. 2000. Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict. Nature 403: 886-889.
28. Gavrilets, S., Arnqvist, G. & Friberg, U. 2001. The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 268: 531-539.
29. Gray, D.A. & Cade, W.H. 2000. Sexual selection and speciation in field crickets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97: 14449-14454.
30. Higashi, M., Takimoto, G. & Yamamura, N. 1999. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Nature 402: 523-526.
31. Howard, D.J., Gregory, P.G., Chu, J. & Cain, M.L. 1998. Conspecific sperm precedence is an effective barrier to hybridization between closely related species. Evolution 52: 511-516.
32. Iwasa, Y. & Pomiankowski, A. 1995. Continual change in mate preferences. Nature 377: 420-422.
33. Jiggins, C.D. & Mallet, J. 2000. Bimodal hybrid zones and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 250-255.
34. Jiggins, C.D., Linares, M., Nasbit, R.E., Salazar, C., Yang, Z.H. & Mallet, J. 2001a. Sex-linked hybrid sterility in a butterfly. Evolution 55: 1631-1638.
35. Jiggins, C.D., Naisbit, R.B., Coe, R.L. & Mallet, J. 2001b. Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature. 411: 302-305.
36. Joron, M., Wynne, I.R., Lamas, G. & Mallet, J. 1999. Variable selection and the coexistence of multiple mimetic forms of the butterfly Heliconius numata. Evol. Ecol. 13: 721-754.
37. Kapan, D.D. 2001. Three-butterfly system provides a field test of Müllerian mimicry. Nature 409: 338-340.
38. Liou, L.W. & Price, T.D. 1994. Speciation by reinforcement of premating isolation. Evolution 48: 1451-1459.
39. McMillan, W.O., Jiggins, C.D. & Mallet, J. 1997. What initiates speciation in passion vine butterflies? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94: 8628-8633.
40. Mallet, J. 1986. Hybrid zones in Heliconius butterflies in Panama, and the stability and movement of warning colour clines. Heredity. 56: 191-202.
41. Mallet, J. 1993. Speciation, raciation, and color pattern evolution in Heliconius butterflies: evidence from hybrid zones. In: Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process (R. G. Harrison, ed.), pp. 226-260. Oxford University Press, New York.
42. Mallet, J. 1999. Causes and consequences of a lack of coevolution in Mullerian mimicry. Evol. Ecol. 13: 777-806.
43. Mallet, J. & Barton, N.H. 1989. Strong natural selection in a warning color hybrid zone. Evolution 43: 421-431.
44. Mallet, J. & Singer, M.C. 1987. Individual selection, kin selection, and the shifting balance in the evolution of warning colours: the evidence from butterflies. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 32: 337-350.
45. Mallet, J.L.B. & Turner, J.R.G. 1998. Biotic drift or the shifting balance - did forest islands drive the diversity of warningly coloured butterflies? In: Evolution on Islands (P. R. Grant, ed.), pp. 262-280. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
46. Mallet, J., McMillan, W.O. & Jiggins, C.D. 1998. Mimicry and warning colour at the boundary between races and species. In: Endless Forms: Species and Speciation (D. J. Howard & S. H. Berlocher, eds), pp. 390-403. Oxford University Press, New York.
47. Maynard Smith, J. 1966. Sympatric speciation. Am. Nat. 100: 637-650.
48. Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.
49. Naisbit, R., Jiggins, C.D., Linares, M., Salazar, C. & Mallet, J. 2002. Hybrid sterility, Haldane's rule and speciation in Heliconius cydno and H. melpomene. Genetics 161: 1517-1526.
50. Nijhout, H.F. 1991. The Development and Evolution of Butterfly Wing Patterns. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
51. Noor, M.A.F. 1999. Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. Heredity 83: 505-508.
52. Parker, G.A. & Partridge, L. 1998. Sexual conflict and speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 353: 261-274.
53. Passmore, N.I. 1985. Sibling species, the acoustic environment and the anuran specific-mate recognition system. In: Species and Speciation. Transvaal Museum Monograph (E. S. Vrba, ed.), pp. 125-127. Transvaal Museum, Pretoria.
54. Paterson, H.E.H. 1985. The recognition concept of species. In: Species and Speciation. Transvaal Museum Monograph (E. S. Vrba, ed.), pp. 21-29. Transvaal Museum, Pretoria.
55. Payne, R.J.H. & Krakauer, D.C. 1997. Sexual selection, space and speciation. Evolution 51: 1-9.
56. Rice, W.R. 1996. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381: 232-234.
57. Rutowski, R.L. 1991. The evolution of mate-locating behavior in butterflies. Am. Nat. 138: 1121-1139.
58. Rutowski, R.L. & Kimball, M.B. 2000. Seeing the world through butterfly eyes. Am. Butterflies 8: 18-25.
59. Schluter, D. 1994. Experimental evidence that competition promotes divergence in adaptive radiation. Science 266: 798-801.
60. Schluter, D. 1998. Ecological speciation in postglacial fishes. In: Evolution on Islands (P. R. Grant, ed.), Oxford University Press, New York.
61. Schluter, D. 2000. The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation. Oxford University Press, New York.
62. Seehausen, O. & Alphen, J.J.M. 1998. The effect of male coloration on female mate choice in closely related Lake Victoria cichlids (Haplochromus nyererei complex). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 42: 1-8.
63. Seehausen, O., van Alphen, J.J.M. & Lande, R. 1999. Color polymorphism and sex ratio distortion in a cichlid fish as an incipient stage in sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Ecol. Lett. 2: 367-378.
64. Servedio, M.R. 2001. Beyond Reinforcement: the evolution of premating isolation by direct selection on preferences and postmating and prezygotic incompatibilities. Evolution 55: 1909-1920.
65. Stride, G.O. 1957. Investigations into the courtship behaviour of the male of Hypolimnas misippus L. (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) with special reference to the role of visual stimuli. Br. J. Anim. Behav. 5: 153-167.
66. Stride, G.O. 1958. Further studies on the courtship behaviour of African mimetic butterflies. Anim. Behav. 6: 224-230.
67. Turner, J.R.G. 1971. Two thousand generations of hybridization in a Heliconius butterfly. Evolution 29: 471-482.
68. Turner, J.R.G. 1976. Adaptive radiation and convergence in subdivisions of the butterfly genus Heliconius (Lepidoptera: Nymphalldae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 58: 297-308.
69. Vane-Wright, R.I. 1978. Ecological and behavioural origins of diversity in butterflies. In: Diversity of Insect Faunas (L. A. Mound & N. Waloff, eds), pp. 56-70. Symp. Roy. Ent. Soc. Lond. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.
70. Vane-Wright, R.I. & Boppré, M. 1993. Visual and chemical signalling in butterflies: functional and phylogenetic perspectives. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 340: 197-205.
71. Wiley, R.H. 1991. Associations of song properties with habitats for territorial oscine birds of eastern North America. Am. Nat. 138: 973-993.