Population genomics of parallel hybrid zones in the mimetic butterflies, H. melpomene and H. erato

Genome Research

Volumn 24, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1316-1333

  Nadeau, Nicola J ^a,b   Ruiz, Mayté ^c   Salazar, Patricio ^a,d   Counterman, Brian ^e   Medina, Jose Alejandro ^c   Ortiz Zuazaga, Humberto ^c   Morrison, Anna ^a   McMillan, W Owen ^f   Jiggins, Chris D ^a,f   Papa, Riccardo ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO   (Puerto Rico)

^d UNIVERSIDAD TECNOLÓGICA INDOAMÉRICA   (Ecuador)

^e MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f SMITHSONIAN TROPICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Panama)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTITUDE; ARTICLE; BUTTERFLY; DNA SEQUENCE; ECUADOR; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; HELICONIUS ERATO; HELICONIUS MELPOMENE; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HYBRID ZONE; INSECT GENOME; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PERU; PHENOTYPE; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION GENETICS; POPULATION STRUCTURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; CHROMOSOMAL MAPPING; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PIGMENTATION; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; WING;

ANIMALS; BUTTERFLIES; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC LOCI; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME, INSECT; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; PIGMENTATION; WINGS, ANIMAL;

EID: 84905666210     PISSN: 10889051     EISSN: 15495469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gr.169292.113     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215: 403-410.
2. Aulchenko YS, Ripke S, Isaacs A, van Duijn CM. 2007. GenABEL: an R library for genome-wide association analysis. Bioinformatics 23: 1294-1296. (Pubitemid 47050548)
3. Avidor-Reiss T, Maer AM, Koundakjian E, Polyanovsky A, Keil T, Subramaniam S, Zuker CS. 2004. Decoding cilia function: defining specialized genes required for compartmentalized cilia biogenesis. Cell 117: 527-539. (Pubitemid 38610237)
4. Baird NA, Etter PD, Atwood TS, Currey MC, Shiver AL, Lewis ZA, Selker EU, Cresko WA, Johnson EA. 2008. Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS ONE 3: e3376.
5. Barton NH, Hewitt GM. 1985. Analysis of hybrid zones. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16: 113-148.
6. Baxter SW, Papa R, Chamberlain N, Humphray SJ, Joron M, Morrison C, ffrench-Constant RH, McMillan WO, Jiggins CD. 2008. Convergent evolution in the genetic basis of Müllerian mimicry in heliconius butterflies. Genetics 180: 1567-1577.
7. Baxter SW, Johnston SE, Jiggins CD. 2009. Butterfly speciation and the distribution of gene effect sizes fixed during adaptation. Heredity (Edinb) 102: 57-65.
8. Baxter SW, Nadeau NJ, Maroja LS, Wilkinson P, Counterman BA, Dawson A, Beltran M, Perez-Espona S, Chamberlain N, Ferguson L, et al. 2010. Genomic hotspots for adaptation: the population genetics of Müllerian mimicry in the Heliconius melpomene Clade. PLoS Genet 6: e1000794.
9. Baxter SW, Davey JW, Johnston JS, Shelton AM, Heckel DG, Jiggins CD, Blaxter ML. 2011. Linkage mapping and comparative genomics using next-generation RAD sequencing of a non-model organism. PLoS ONE 6: e19315.
10. Beavis WD. 1997. QTL analyses: power, precision, and accuracy. In Molecular dissection of complex traits (ed. Paterson AH), pp. 145-162. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
11. Benson WW. 1972. Natural selection for Miillerian mimicry in Heliconius erato in Costa Rica. Science 176: 936-939.
12. Benson WW. 1982. Alternative models for infrageneric diversification in the humid tropics: tests with passion vine butterflies. In Biological Diversification in the Tropics (ed. Prance GT), pp. 608-640. Columbia University Press, New York.
13. Bierne N, Welch J, Loire E, Bonhomme F, David P. 2011. The coupling hypothesis: why genome scans may fail to map local adaptation genes. Mol Ecol 20: 2044-2072.
14. Briscoe AD, Macias-Muñoz A, Kozak KM, Walters JR, Yuan F, Jamie GA, Martin SH, Dasmahapatra KK, Ferguson LC, Mallet J, et al. 2013. Female behaviour drives expression and evolution of gustatory receptors in butterflies. PLoS Genet 9: e1003620.
15. Brower AV. 1996. Parallel race formation and the evolution of mimicry in Heliconius butterflies: a phylogenetic hypothesis from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Evolution 50: 195-221. (Pubitemid 126517935)
16. Catchen JM, Amores A, Hohenlohe P, Cresko W, Postlethwait JH. 2011. Stacks: building and genotyping loci de novo from short-read sequences. G3 (Bethesda) 1: 171-182.
17. Charlesworth B, Nordborg M, Charlesworth D. 1997. The effects of local selection, balanced polymorphism and background selection on equilibrium patterns of genetic diversity in subdivided populations. Genet Res 70: 155-174. (Pubitemid 28021578)
18. Counterman BA, Araujo-Perez F, Hines HM, Baxter SW, Morrison CM, Lindstrom DP, Papa R, Ferguson L, Joron M, ffrench-Constant RH, et al. 2010. Genomic hotspots for adaptation: the population genetics of Müllerian mimicry in Heliconius erato. PLoS Genet 6: e1000796.
19. Crawford JE, Nielsen R. 2013. Detecting adaptive trait loci in non-model systems: divergence or admixture mapping? Mol Ecol 22: 6131-6148.
20. Cuthill JH, Charleston M. 2012. Phylogenetic codivergence supports coevolution of mimetic Heliconius butterflies. PLoS ONE 7: e36464.
21. DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, Garimella KV, Maguire JR, Hartl C, Philippakis AA, del Angel G, Rivas MA, Hanna M, et al. 2011. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet 43: 491-498.
22. Feder JL, Gejji R, Yeaman S, Nosil P. 2012. Establishment of new mutations under divergence and genome hitchhiking. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 367: 461-474.
23. Ferguson L, Lee SF, Chamberlain N, Nadeau NJ, Joron M, Baxter S, Wilkinson P, Papanicolaou A, Kumar S, Kee TJ, et al. 2010. Characterization of a hotspot for mimicry: assembly of a butterfly wing transcriptome to genomic sequence at the HmYb/Sb locus. Mol Ecol 19: 240-254.
24. Flanagan NS, Tobler A, Davison A, Pybus OG, Kapan DD, Planas S, Linares M, Heckel D, McMillan WO. 2004. Historical demography of Müllerian mimicry in the neotropical Heliconius butterflies. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101: 9704-9709. (Pubitemid 38869300)
25. Foll M, Gaggiotti O. 2008. A genome-scan method to identify selected loci appropriate for both dominant and codominant markers: a Bayesian perspective. Genetics 180: 977-993.
26. Giraldo N, Salazar C, Jiggins CD, Bermingham E, Linares M. 2008. Two sisters in the same dress: Heliconius cryptic species. BMC Evol Biol 8: 324.
27. Gompert Z, Buerkle CA. 2011. A hierarchical Bayesian model for next-generation population genomics. Genetics 187: 903-917.
28. Gompert Z, Lucas LK, Nice CC, Fordyce JA, Forister ML, Buerkle AC. 2012. Genomic regions with a history of divergent selection affect fitness of hybrids between two butterfly species. Evolution 66: 2167-2181.
29. Guindon S, Gascuel O. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 52: 696-704. (Pubitemid 37365050)
30. Harrison RG. 1993. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
31. The Heliconius Genome Consortium. 2012. Butterfly genome reveals promiscuous exchange of mimicry adaptations among species. Nature 487: 94-98.
32. Hines HM, Counterman BA, Papa R, Albuquerque de Moura P, Cardoso MZ, Linares M, Mallet J, Reed RD, Jiggins CD, Kronforst MR, et al. 2011. Wing patterning gene redefines the mimetic history of Heliconius butterflies. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108: 19666-19671.
33. Jiggins CD. 2008. Ecological speciation inmimetic butterflies. Bioscience 58: 541-548.
34. Joron M, Papa R, Beltrán M, Chamberlain N, Mavárez J, Baxter S, Abanto M, Bermingham E, Humphray SJ, Rogers J, et al. 2006. A conserved supergene locus controls colour pattern diversity in Heliconius butterflies. PLoS Biol 4: e303.
35. Kapan DD. 2001. Three-butterfly system provides a field test of müllerian mimicry. Nature 409: 338-340. (Pubitemid 32151237)
36. Kawakami T, Butlin RK. 2001. Hybrid zones. In eLS. John Wiley, New York. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470015902.a0001752.pub2/abstract.
37. Keller I, Wagner CE, Greuter L, Mwaiko S, Selz OM, Sivasundar A, Wittwer S, Seehausen O. 2013. Population genomic signatures of divergent adaptation, gene flow and hybrid speciation in the rapid radiation of Lake Victoria cichlid fishes. Mol Ecol 22: 2848-2863.
38. Kocher TD, Sage RD. 1986. Further genetic analyses of a hybrid zone between leopard frogs (Rana pipiens complex) in Central Texas. Evolution 40: 21-33.
39. Kronforst MR, Hansen MEB, Crawford NG, Gallant JR, Zhang W, Kulathinal RJ, Kapan DD, Mullen SP. 2013. Hybridization reveals the evolving genomic architecture of speciation. Cell Rep 5: 666-677.
40. Lamas G. 1997. Comentarios taxonomicos y nomenclaturales sobre Heliconiini Neotropicales, con designacion de lectotipos y descripcion de cuatro subespecies nuevas (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Heliconiinae). Rev Per Ent 40: 111-125.
41. Langham GM. 2004. Specialized avian predators repeatedly attack novel color morphs of Heliconius butterflies. Evolution 58: 2783-2787. (Pubitemid 40078423)
42. Lexer C, Buerkle CA, Joseph JA, Heinze B, Fay MF. 2006. Admixture in European Populus hybrid zones makes feasible the mapping of loci that contribute to reproductive isolation and trait differences. Heredity 98: 74-84. (Pubitemid 46173896)
43. Lunter G, Goodson M. 2011. Stampy: a statistical algorithm for sensitive and fast mapping of Illumina sequence reads. Genome Res 21: 936-939.
44. Mallet J. 1989. The genetics of warning colour in Peruvian hybrid zones of Heliconius erato and H. melpomene. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 236: 163-185.
45. Mallet J. 1999. Causes and consequences of a lack of coevolution in Müllerian mimicry. Evol Ecol 13: 777-806. (Pubitemid 32382716)
46. Mallet J. 2010. Shift happens! Shifting balance and the evolution of diversity in warning colour and mimicry. Ecol Entomol 35: 90-104.
47. Mallet J, Barton N. 1989a. Strong natural selection in a warning-color hybrid zone. Evolution 43: 421-431. (Pubitemid 20417673)
48. Mallet J, Barton N. 1989b. Inference from clines stabilized by frequency-dependent selection. Genetics 122: 967-976.
49. Mallet J, Barton N, Lamas G, Santisteban J, Muedas M, Eeley H. 1990. Estimates of selection and gene flow from measures of cline width and linkage disequilibrium in Heliconius hybrid zones. Genetics 124: 921-936. (Pubitemid 20146069)
50. Martin A, Papa R, Nadeau NJ, Hill RI, Counterman BA, Halder G, Jiggins CD, Kronforst MR, Long AD, McMillan WO, et al. 2012. Diversification of complex butterfly wing patterns by repeated regulatory evolution of a Wnt ligand. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109: 12632-12637.
51. Martin SH, Dasmahapatra KK, Nadeau NJ, Salazar C, Walters JR, Simpson F, Blaxter M, Manica A, Mallet J, Jiggins CD. 2013. Genome-wide evidence for speciation with gene flow in Heliconius butterflies. Genome Res 23: 1817-1828.
52. Mérot C, Mavárez J, Evin A, Dasmahapatra KK, Mallet J, Lamas G, Joron M. 2013. Genetic differentiation without mimicry shift in a pair of hybridizing Heliconius species (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Biol J Linn Soc Lond 109: 830-847.
53. Merrill RM, Gompert Z, Dembeck LM, Kronforst MR, McMillan WO, Jiggins CD. 2011a. Mate preference across the speciation continuum in a clade of mimetic butterflies. Evolution 65: 1489-1500.
54. Merrill RM, Van Schooten B, Scott JA, Jiggins CD. 2011b. Pervasive genetic associations between traits causing reproductive isolation in Heliconius butterflies. Proc Biol Sci 278: 511-518.
55. Müller F. 1879. Ituna and Thyridia; a remarkable case of mimicry in butterflies. Trans Entomol Soc Lond 1879: xx-xxix.
56. Nadeau NJ, Jiggins CD. 2010. A golden age for evolutionary genetics? Genomic studies of adaptation in natural populations. Trends Genet 26: 484-492.
57. Nadeau NJ, Whibley A, Jones RT, Davey JW, Dasmahapatra KK, Baxter SW, Quail MA, Joron M, ffrench-Constant RH, Blaxter M, et al. 2012. Genomic islands of divergence in hybridizing Heliconius butterflies identified by large-scale targeted sequencing. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 367: 343-353.
58. Nadeau NJ, Martin SH, Kozak KM, Salazar C, Dasmahapatra KK, Davey JW, Baxter SW, Blaxter ML, Mallet J, Jiggins CD. 2013. Genome-wide patterns of divergence and gene flow across a butterfly radiation. Mol Ecol 22: 814-826.
59. Orr HA. 2005. The genetic theory of adaptation: a brief history. Nat Rev Genet 6: 119-127. (Pubitemid 40179534)
60. Papa R, Martin A, Reed RD. 2008a. Genomic hotspots of adaptation in butterfly wing pattern evolution. Curr Opin Genet Dev 18: 559-564.
61. Papa R, Morrison CM, Walters JR, Counterman BA, Chen R, Halder G, Ferguson L, Chamberlain N, ffrench-Constant R, Kapan DD, et al. 2008b. Highly conserved gene order and numerous novel repetitive elements in genomic regions linked to wing pattern variation in Heliconius butterflies. BMC Genomics 9: 345.
62. Papa R, Kapan DD, Counterman BA, Maldonado K, Lindstrom DP, Reed RD, Nijhout HF, Hrbek T, McMillan WO. 2013. Multi-allelic major effect genes interact with minor effect QTLs to control adaptive color pattern variation in Heliconius erato. PLoS ONE 8: e57033.
63. Pardo-Diaz C, Salazar C, Baxter SW, Merot C, Figueiredo-Ready W, Joron M, McMillan WO, Jiggins CD. 2012. Adaptive introgression across species boundaries in Heliconius butterflies. PLoS Genet 8: e1002752.
64. Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA, Reich D. 2006. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 38: 904-909. (Pubitemid 44141658)
65. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959. (Pubitemid 30397141)
66. Quek S-P, Counterman BA, Albuquerque de Moura P, Cardoso MZ, Marshall C, McMillan WO, Kronforst MR. 2010. Dissecting comimetic radiations in Heliconius reveals divergent histories of convergent butterflies. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107: 7365-7370.
67. R Development Core Team. 2011. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (version 2.14). R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
68. Reed RD, Papa R, Martin A, Hines HM, Counterman BA, Pardo-Diaz C, Jiggins CD, Chamberlain NL, Kronforst MR, Chen R, et al. 2011. optix drives the repeated convergent evolution of butterfly wing pattern mimicry. Science 333: 1137-1141.
69. Rieseberg L, Buerkle CA. 2002. Genetic mapping in hybrid zones. Am Nat 159: S36-S50. (Pubitemid 34172093)
70. Rosser N, Phillimore AB, Huertas B, Willmott KR, Mallet J. 2012. Testing historical explanations for gradients in species richness in heliconiine butterflies of tropical America. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 105: 479-497.
71. Salazar PA. 2012. "Hybridization and the genetics of wing colour-pattern diversity in Heliconius butterflies." PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, UK.
72. Sheppard PM, Turner JRG, Brown KS, Benson WW, Singer MC. 1985. Genetics and the evolution of Muellerian mimicry in Heliconius butterflies. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 308: 433-610.
73. Stewart CB, Schilling JW, Wilson AC. 1987. Adaptive evolution in the stomach lysozymes of foregut fermenters. Nature 330: 401-404.
74. Stinchcombe JR, Hoekstra HE. 2007. Combining population genomics and quantitative genetics: finding the genes underlying ecologically important traits. Heredity 100: 158-170. (Pubitemid 351156869)
75. Supple MA, Hines HM, Dasmahapatra KK, Lewis JJ, Nielsen DM, Lavoie C, Ray DA, Salazar C, McMillan WO, Counterman BA. 2013. Genomic architecture of adaptive color pattern divergence and convergence in Heliconius butterflies. Genome Res 23: 1248-1257.
76. Tobler A, Kapan D, Flanagan NS, Gonzalez C, Peterson E, Jiggins CD, Johntson JS, Heckel DG, McMillan WO. 2004. First-generation linkage map of the warningly colored butterfly Heliconius erato. Heredity 94: 408-417.
77. Turner JR, Johnson MS, Eanes WF. 1979. Contrasted modes of evolution in the same genome: allozymes and adaptive change in Heliconius. Proc Natl Acad Sci 76: 1924-1928. (Pubitemid 9207028)
78. Via S. 2012. Divergence hitchhiking and the spread of genomic isolation during ecological speciation-with-gene-flow. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 367: 451-460.
79. Visscher PM, Brown MA, McCarthy MI, Yang J. 2012. Five years of GWAS discovery. Am J Hum Genet 90: 7-24.
80. Wood TE, Burke TM, Rieseberg LH. 2005. Parallel genotypic adaptation: when evolution repeats itself. Genetica 123: 157-170. (Pubitemid 40466126)