Hybridization Reveals the Evolving Genomic Architecture of Speciation

Cell Reports

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 666-677

  Kronforst, Marcus R ^a   Hansen, Matthew E B ^b   Crawford, Nicholas G ^c   Gallant, Jason R ^c   Zhang, Wei ^a   Kulathinal, Rob J ^b   Kapan, Durrell D ^d,e   Mullen, Sean P ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b Temple University   (United States)

^c Boston University   (United States)

^d CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DYNEIN ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE;

ALLOPATRY; ARTICLE; BUTTERFLY; CHROMOSOME 13; CYTOARCHITECTURE; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE FLOW; GENE MAPPING; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HELICONIUS CYDNO; HELICONIUS MELPOMENE; HELICONIUS PACHINUS; HYBRIDIZATION; INTROGRESSION; MOLECULAR MIMICRY; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; ANIMAL; FORELIMB; GENETICS; INSECT GENOME; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

HELICONIUS; PAPILIONOIDEA;

ANIMALS; BUTTERFLIES; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENOME, INSECT; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; WING;

EID: 84887616256     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22111247     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.09.042     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Baxter S.W., Nadeau N.J., Maroja L.S., Wilkinson P., Counterman B.A., Dawson A., Beltran M., Perez-Espona S., Chamberlain N., Ferguson L., et al. Genomic hotspots for adaptation: the population genetics of Müllerian mimicry in the Heliconius melpomene clade. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1000794.
2. Beltrán M., Jiggins C.D., Bull V., Linares M., Mallet J., McMillan W.O., Bermingham E. Phylogenetic discordance at the species boundary: comparative gene genealogies among rapidly radiating Heliconius butterflies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2002, 19:2176-2190.
3. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J.R. Stat. Soc., B 1995, 57:289-300.
4. Benson W.W. Resource partitioning in passion vine butterflies. Evolution 1978, 32:493-518.
5. Brown K.S. The biology of Heliconius and related genera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1981, 26:427-456.
6. Browning S.R., Browning B.L. Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2007, 81:1084-1097.
7. Bull V., Beltrán M., Jiggins C.D., McMillan W.O., Bermingham E., Mallet J. Polyphyly and gene flow between non-sibling Heliconius species. BMC Biol. 2006, 4:11.
8. Chamberlain N.L., Hill R.I., Kapan D.D., Gilbert L.E., Kronforst M.R. Polymorphic butterfly reveals the missing link in ecological speciation. Science 2009, 326:847-850.
9. Chamberlain N.L., Hill R.I., Baxter S.W., Jiggins C.D., Kronforst M.R. Comparative population genetics of a mimicry locus among hybridizing Heliconius butterfly species. Heredity (Edinb). 2011, 107:200-204.
10. Danecek P., Auton A., Abecasis G., Albers C.A., Banks E., DePristo M.A., Handsaker R.E., Lunter G., Marth G.T., Sherry S.T., et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:2156-2158. 1000 Genomes Project Analysis Group.
11. Dasmahapatra K.K., Silva-Vásquez A., Chung J.W., Mallet J. Genetic analysis of a wild-caught hybrid between non-sister Heliconius butterfly species. Biol. Lett. 2007, 3:660-663.
12. DePristo M.A., Banks E., Poplin R., Garimella K.V., Maguire J.R., Hartl C., Philippakis A.A., del Angel G., Rivas M.A., Hanna M., et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43:491-498.
13. Durand E.Y., Patterson N., Reich D., Slatkin M. Testing for ancient admixture between closely related populations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28:2239-2252.
14. Ellegren H., Smeds L., Burri R., Olason P.I., Backström N., Kawakami T., Künstner A., Mäkinen H., Nadachowska-Brzyska K., Qvarnström A., et al. The genomic landscape of species divergence in Ficedula flycatchers. Nature 2012, 491:756-760.
15. Estrada C., Jiggins C.D. Patterns of pollen feeding and habitat preference among Heliconius species. Ecol. Entomol. 2002, 27:448-456.
16. Excoffier L., Lischer H.E.L. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2010, 10:564-567.
17. Excoffier L., Smouse P.E., Quattro J.M. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 1992, 131:479-491.
18. Feder J.L., Nosil P. The efficacy of divergence hitchhiking in generating genomic islands during ecological speciation. Evolution 2010, 64:1729-1747.
19. Feder J.L., Egan S.P., Nosil P. The genomics of speciation-with-gene-flow. Trends Genet. 2012, 28:342-350.
20. Feder J.L., Gejji R., Yeaman S., Nosil P. Establishment of new mutations under divergence and genome hitchhiking. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2012, 367:461-474.
21. Flaxman S.M., Feder J.L., Nosil P. Genetic hitchhiking and the dynamic buildup of genomic divergence during speciation with gene flow. Evolution 2013, 67:2577-2591.
22. Gilbert L.E. Adaptive novelty through introgression in Heliconius wing patterns: evidence for shared genetic "tool box" from synthetic hybrid zones and a theory of diversification. Ecology and Evolution Taking Flight: Butterflies as Model Systems 2003, 281-318. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. C.L. Boggs, W.B. Watt, P.R. Ehrlich (Eds.).
23. Haddrill P.R., Charlesworth B., Halligan D.L., Andolfatto P. Patterns of intron sequence evolution in Drosophila are dependent upon length and GC content. Genome Biol. 2005, 6:R67.
24. Halligan D.L., Keightley P.D. Ubiquitous selective constraints in the Drosophila genome revealed by a genome-wide interspecies comparison. Genome Res. 2006, 16:875-884.
25. Butterfly genome reveals promiscuous exchange of mimicry adaptations among species. Nature 2012, 487:94-98. Heliconius Genome Consortium.
26. Hendry A.P., Bolnick D.I., Berner D., Peichel C.L. Along the speciation continuum in sticklebacks. J.Fish Biol. 2009, 75:2000-2036.
27. Hey J. Isolation with migration models for more than two populations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27:905-920.
28. Hudson R.R. Generating samples under a Wright-Fisher neutral model of genetic variation. Bioinformatics 2002, 18:337-338.
29. Jiggins C.D., Naisbit R.E., Coe R.L., Mallet J. Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature 2001, 411:302-305.
30. Jiggins C.D., Salazar C., Linares M., Mavarez J. Review. Hybrid trait speciation and Heliconius butterflies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2008, 363:3047-3054.
31. Joron M., Jiggins C.D., Papanicolaou A., McMillan W.O. Heliconius wing patterns: an evo-devo model for understanding phenotypic diversity. Heredity (Edinb). 2006, 97:157-167.
32. Joron M., Papa R., Beltrán M., Chamberlain N., Mavárez J., Baxter S., Abanto M., Bermingham E., Humphray S.J., Rogers J., et al. A conserved supergene locus controls colour pattern diversity in Heliconius butterflies. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:e303.
33. Kapan D.D. Three-butterfly system provides a field test of müllerian mimicry. Nature 2001, 409:338-340.
34. Kitano J., Ross J.A., Mori S., Kume M., Jones F.C., Chan Y.F., Absher D.M., Grimwood J., Schmutz J., Myers R.M., et al. A role for a neo-sex chromosome in stickleback speciation. Nature 2009, 461:1079-1083.
35. Kronforst M.R. Gene flow persists millions of years after speciation in Heliconius butterflies. BMC Evol. Biol. 2008, 8:98.
36. Kronforst M.R., Gilbert L.E. The population genetics of mimetic diversity in Heliconius butterflies. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2008, 275:493-500.
37. Kronforst M.R., Kapan D.D., Gilbert L.E. Parallel genetic architecture of parallel adaptive radiations in mimetic Heliconius butterflies. Genetics 2006, 174:535-539.
38. Kronforst M.R., Young L.G., Blume L.M., Gilbert L.E. Multilocus analyses of admixture and introgression among hybridizing Heliconius butterflies. Evolution 2006, 60:1254-1268.
39. Kronforst M.R., Young L.G., Kapan D.D., McNeely C., O'Neill R.J., Gilbert L.E. Linkage of butterfly mate preference and wing color preference cue at the genomic location of wingless. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103:6575-6580.
40. Kronforst M.R., Salazar C., Linares M., Gilbert L.E. No genomic mosaicism in a putative hybrid butterfly species. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2007, 274:1255-1264.
41. Kronforst M.R., Young L.G., Gilbert L.E. Reinforcement of mate preference among hybridizing Heliconius butterflies. J.Evol. Biol. 2007, 20:278-285.
42. Kulathinal R.J., Stevison L.S., Noor M.A. The genomics of speciation in Drosophila: diversity, divergence, and introgression estimated using low-coverage genome sequencing. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000550.
43. Lawniczak M.K., Emrich S.J., Holloway A.K., Regier A.P., Olson M., White B., Redmond S., Fulton L., Appelbaum E., Godfrey J., et al. Widespread divergence between incipient Anopheles gambiae species revealed by whole genome sequences. Science 2010, 330:512-514.
44. Lunter G., Goodson M. Stampy: a statistical algorithm for sensitive and fast mapping of Illumina sequence reads. Genome Res. 2011, 21:936-939.
45. Mallet J. Hybridization as an invasion of the genome. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2005, 20:229-237.
46. Mallet J., Barton N.H. Strong natural selection in a warning-color hybrid zone. Evolution 1989, 43:421-431.
47. Mallet J., Gilbert L.E. Why are there so many mimicry rings: correlations between habitat, behavior and mimicry in Heliconius butterflies. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 1995, 55:159-180.
48. Mallet J., Barton N., Lamas G., Santisteban J., Muedas M., Eeley H. Estimates of selection and gene flow from measures of cline width and linkage disequilibrium in heliconius hybrid zones. Genetics 1990, 124:921-936.
49. Mallet J., McMillan W.O., Jiggins C.D. Mimicry and warning color at the boundary between races and species. Endless Forms: Species and Speciation 1998, 390-403. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. D.J. Howard, S.H. Berlocher (Eds.).
50. Mallet J., Beltrán M., Neukirchen W., Linares M. Natural hybridization in heliconiine butterflies: the species boundary as a continuum. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7:28.
51. Marais G., Nouvellet P., Keightley P.D., Charlesworth B. Intron size and exon evolution in Drosophila. Genetics 2005, 170:481-485.
52. Martin A., Papa R., Nadeau N.J., Hill R.I., Counterman B.A., Halder G., Jiggins C.D., Kronforst M.R., Long A.D., McMillan W.O., Reed R.D. Diversification of complex butterfly wing patterns by repeated regulatory evolution of a Wnt ligand. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109:12632-12637.
53. Martin S., Dasmahapatra K., Nadeau N.J., Salazar C., Walters J.R., Simpson F., Blaxter M., Manica A., Mallet J., Jiggins C.D. Genome-wide evidence for speciation with gene flow in Heliconius butterflies. Genome Res. 2013, Published online October 3, 2013. 10.1101/gr.159426.113.
54. Matute D.R., Butler I.A., Turissini D.A., Coyne J.A. A test of the snowball theory for the rate of evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Science 2010, 329:1518-1521.
55. Mavárez J., Salazar C.A., Bermingham E., Salcedo C., Jiggins C.D., Linares M. Speciation by hybridization in Heliconius butterflies. Nature 2006, 441:868-871.
56. Mayr E. Animal Species and Evolution 1963, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
57. McKenna A., Hanna M., Banks E., Sivachenko A., Cibulskis K., Kernytsky A., Garimella K., Altshuler D., Gabriel S., Daly M., DePristo M.A. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010, 20:1297-1303.
58. McKinnon J.S., Rundle H.D. Speciation in nature: the threespine stickleback model systems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002, 17:480-488.
59. Merrill R.M., Gompert Z., Dembeck L.M., Kronforst M.R., McMillan W.O., Jiggins C.D. Mate preference across the speciation continuum in a clade of mimetic butterflies. Evolution 2011, 65:1489-1500.
60. Merrill R.M., Wallbank R.W., Bull V., Salazar P.C., Mallet J., Stevens M., Jiggins C.D. Disruptive ecological selection on a mating cue. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2012, 279:4907-4913.
61. Michel A.P., Sim S., Powell T.H., Taylor M.S., Nosil P., Feder J.L. Widespread genomic divergence during sympatric speciation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107:9724-9729.
62. Moyle L.C., Nakazato T. Hybrid incompatibility "snowballs" between Solanum species. Science 2010, 329:1521-1523.
63. Nadeau N.J., Whibley A., Jones R.T., Davey J.W., Dasmahapatra K.K., Baxter S.W., Quail M.A., Joron M., ffrench-Constant R.H., Blaxter M.L., et al. Genomic islands of divergence in hybridizing Heliconius butterflies identified by large-scale targeted sequencing. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2012, 367:343-353.
64. Nadeau N.J., Martin S.H., Kozak K.M., Salazar C., Dasmahapatra K.K., Davey J.W., Baxter S.W., Blaxter M.L., Mallet J., Jiggins C.D. Genome-wide patterns of divergence and gene flow across a butterfly radiation. Mol. Ecol. 2013, 22:814-826.
65. Naisbit R.E., Jiggins C.D., Mallet J. Disruptive sexual selection against hybrids contributes to speciation between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2001, 268:1849-1854.
66. Naisbit R.E., Jiggins C.D., Linares M., Salazar C., Mallet J. Hybrid sterility, Haldane's rule and speciation in Heliconius cydno and H.melpomene. Genetics 2002, 161:1517-1526.
67. Neafsey D.E., Lawniczak M.K., Park D.J., Redmond S.N., Coulibaly M.B., Traoré S.F., Sagnon N., Costantini C., Johnson C., Wiegand R.C., et al. SNP genotyping defines complex gene-flow boundaries among African malaria vector mosquitoes. Science 2010, 330:514-517.
68. Nielsen R., Wakeley J. Distinguishing migration from isolation: a Markov chain Monte Carlo approach. Genetics 2001, 158:885-896.
69. Nosil P., Funk D.J., Ortiz-Barrientos D. Divergent selection and heterogeneous genomic divergence. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18:375-402.
70. Nosil P., Gompert Z., Farkas T.E., Comeault A.A., Feder J.L., Buerkle C.A., Parchman T.L. Genomic consequences of multiple speciation processes in a stick insect. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2012, 279:5058-5065.
71. Nosil P., Parchman T.L., Feder J.L., Gompert Z. Do highly divergent loci reside in genomic regions affecting reproductive isolation? A test using next-generation sequence data in Timema stick insects. BMC Evol. Biol. 2012, 12:164.
72. Papa R., Martin A., Reed R.D. Genomic hotspots of adaptation in butterfly wing pattern evolution. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2008, 18:559-564.
73. Pardo-Diaz C., Salazar C., Baxter S.W., Merot C., Figueiredo-Ready W., Joron M., McMillan W.O., Jiggins C.D. Adaptive introgression across species boundaries in Heliconius butterflies. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8:e1002752.
74. Parsch J. Selective constraints on intron evolution in Drosophila. Genetics 2003, 165:1843-1851.
75. Rambaut A., Grassly N.C. Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1997, 13:235-238.
76. Reed R.D., Papa R., Martin A., Hines H.M., Counterman B.A., Pardo-Diaz C., Jiggins C.D., Chamberlain N.L., Kronforst M.R., Chen R., et al. optix drives the repeated convergent evolution of butterfly wing pattern mimicry. Science 2011, 333:1137-1141.
77. Rogers A.R., Huff C. Linkage disequilibrium between loci with unknown phase. Genetics 2009, 182:839-844.
78. Salazar C., Baxter S.W., Pardo-Diaz C., Wu G., Surridge A., Linares M., Bermingham E., Jiggins C.D. Genetic evidence for hybrid trait speciation in heliconius butterflies. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1000930.
79. Seehausen O. Hybridization and adaptive radiation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19:198-207.
80. Sheppard P.M., Turner J.R.G., Brown K.S., Benson W.W., Singer M.C. Genetics and the evolution of Muellerian mimicry in Heliconius butterflies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1985, 308:433.
81. Smiley J. Plant chemistry and the evolution of host specificity: new evidence from heliconius and passiflora. Science 1978, 201:745-747.
82. Smith J., Kronforst M.R. Do Heliconius butterfly species exchange mimicry alleles?. Biol. Lett. 2013, 9:20130503.
83. Staubach F., Lorenc A., Messer P.W., Tang K., Petrov D.A., Tautz D. Genome patterns of selection and introgression of haplotypes in natural populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus). PLoS Genet. 2012, 8:e1002891.
84. Turner T.L., Hahn M.W., Nuzhdin S.V. Genomic islands of speciation in Anopheles gambiae. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3:e285.
85. Via S. Natural selection in action during speciation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106(Suppl 1):9939-9946.
86. Woerner A.E., Cox M.P., Hammer M.F. Recombination-filtered genomic datasets by information maximization. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:1851-1853.