Assortative mating preferences among hybrids offers a route to hybrid speciation

Evolution

Volumn 63, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1660-1665

  Melo, Maria C ^a   Salazar, Camilo ^b   Jiggins, Chris D ^c   Linares, Mauricio ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES   (Colombia)

^b SMITHSONIAN TROPICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Panama)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Homoploid speciation; Introgression; Mating preference; Pleiotropy; Transgressive segregation

Indexed keywords

ASSORTATIVE MATING; BUTTERFLY; CHROMOSOME; HYBRIDIZATION; INTROGRESSION; PLEIOTROPY; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANIMALIA; HELICONIUS; HELICONIUS CYDNO; HELICONIUS HEURIPPA; HELICONIUS MELPOMENE; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 66249135991     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00633.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Boughman, J. W. 2001. Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature 411 : 944 948.
2. Buerkle, C. A., R. J. Morris, M. A. Asmussen, and L. H. Rieseberg. 2000. The likelihood of homoploid hybrid speciation. Heredity 84 : 441 451.
3. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
4. Crane, J. 1955. Imaginal behaviour of a Trinidad butterfly, Heliconius erato hydara Hewitson, with special reference to the social use of color. Zool., N. Y. 40 : 167 196.
5. Edwards, A. W. F. 1972. Likelihood. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
6. Estrada, C., and C. D. Jiggins. 2002. Patterns of pollen feeding and habitat preference among Heliconius species. Ecol. Entomol. 27 : 448 456.
7. Gavrilets, S. 2004. Fitness landscapes and the origin of species: monographs in population biology vol. 41. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
8. Gavrilets, S., A. Vose, M. Barluenga, W. Salzburger, and A. Meyer. 2007. Case studies and mathematical models of ecological speciation. 1. Cichlids in a crater lake. Mol. Ecol. 16 : 2893 2909.
9. Gilbert, L. E. 2003. Adaptive novelty through introgression in Heliconius wing patterns: evidence for shared genetic "tool box" from synthetic hybrid zones and a theory of diversification. Pp. 281 318 in C. L. Boggs, W. B. Watt and P. R. Ehrlich, eds. Ecology and evolution taking flight: butterflies as model systems. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
10. Jiggins, C. D., R. E. Naisbit, R. L. Coe, and J. Mallet. 2001. Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature 411 : 302 305.
11. Jiggins, C. D., C. Estrada, and A. Rodrigues. 2004. Mimicry and the evolution of pre-mating isolation in Heliconius melpomene. J. Evol. Biol. 17 : 680 691.
12. Jiggins, C. D., C. Salazar, M. Linares, and J. Mavárez. 2008. Hybrid speciation in Heliconius butterflies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 363 : 3047 3054.
13. Kronforst, M. R., L. G. Young, D. D. Kapan, C. McNeely, J. R. O'Neill, and L. E. Gilbert. 2006. Linkage of butterfly mate preference and wing color preference cue at the genomic location of wingless. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103 : 6575 6580.
14. Linares, M. 1989. Adaptive microevolution through hybridization and biotic destruction in the neotropics. Univ. of Texas, Austin.
15. Mallet, J. 1999. Causes and consequences of a lack of coevolution in Müllerian mimicry. Evol. Ecol. 13 : 777 806.
16. Mallet, J. 2007. Hybrid speciation. Nature 446 : 279 283.
17. Mallet, J., M. Beltrán, W. Neukirchen, and M. Linares. 2007. Natural hybridization in Heliconiine butterflies: the species boundary is a continuum. BMC Evol. Biol. 7 : 28.
18. Mavárez, J., and M. Linares. 2008. Homoploid hybrid speciation in animals. Mol. Ecol. 17 : 4181 4185.
19. Mavárez, J., C. Salazar, E. Bermingham, C. Salcedo, C. D. Jiggins, and M. Linares. 2006. Speciation by hybridization in Heliconius butterflies. Nature 441 : 868 871.
20. Naisbit, R. E., C. D. Jiggins, and J. Mallet. 2001. Disruptive sexual selection against hybrids contributes to speciation between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268 : 1849 1854.
21. Naisbit, R. E., C. D. Jiggins, and J. Mallet. 2003. Mimicry: developmental genes that contribute to speciation. Evol. Dev. 5 : 269 280.
22. Podos, J. 2001. Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin's finches. Nature 409 : 185 188.
23. Puebla, O., E. Bermingham, F. Guichard, and E. Whiteman. 2007. Colour pattern as a single trait driving speciation in Hypoplectrus coral reef fishes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 274 : 1265 1271.
24. Ramsey, J., and D. W. Schemske. 2002. Neopolyploidy in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33 : 589 639.
25. Rieseberg, L. H., O. Raymond, D. M. Rosenthal, Z. Lai, K. Living-stone, T. Nakazato, J. L. Durphy, A. E. Schwatzbach, L. A. Donovan, and C. Lexer. 2003. Major ecological transitions in wild sunflowers facilitated by hybridization. Science 301 : 1211 1216.
26. Rutowski, R. L. 1991. The evolution of mate-locating behavior in butterflies. Am. Nat. 138 : 1121 1139.
27. Schwander, T., S. S. Suni, S. Helms Cahan, and L. Keller. 2008. Mechanisms of reproductive isolation between an ant species of hybrid origin and one of its parents. Evolution 62 : 1635 1643.
28. Ungerer, M. C., S. J. E. Baird, J. Pan, and L. H. Rieseberg. 1998. Rapid hybrid speciation in wild sunflowers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95 : 11757 11762.
29. Vane-Wright, R. I., and M. Boppré. 1993. Visual and chemical signalling in butterflies: functional and phylogenetic perspectives. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 340 : 197 205.