Mate preference across the speciation continuum in a clade of mimetic butterflies

Evolution

Volumn 65, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1489-1500

  Merrill, Richard M ^a   Gompert, Zachariah ^b   Dembeck, Lauren M ^c   Kronforst, Marcus R ^d   Mcmillan, W Owen ^e   Jiggins, Chris D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

^c NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e SMITHSONIAN TROPICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Panama)

Author keywords

Assortative mating; Heliconius; Mate choice; Reproductive isolation; Speciation

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ASSORTATIVE MATING; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; BUTTERFLY; COLOR MORPH; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MATE CHOICE; MATE RECOGNITION; MIMICRY; PHYLOGENETICS; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BUTTERFLY; CENTRAL AMERICA; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; ECUADOR; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENE; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETICS; MALE; MATE CHOICE; PERU; PHYSIOLOGY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; BUTTERFLIES; CENTRAL AMERICA; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; ECUADOR; FEMALE; GENES, INSECT; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; PERU; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

HELICONIUS; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 79955128029     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01216.x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Arnold, S. J., P. A. Verrell, and S. G. Tilley 1996. The evolution of asymmetry in sexual isolation: a model and a test case. Evolution 50:1024-1033.
2. Bates, H. W. 1881. Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon valley (Lepidoptera: Heliconidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 16:41-54.
3. Baxter, S. W., N. J. Nadeau, L. S. Maroja, P. Wilkinson, B. A. Counterman, A. Dawson, M. Beltran, S. Perez-Espona, N. Chamberlain, L. Ferguson, et al. 2010. Genomic hotspots for adaptation: the population genetics of Müllerian mimicry in the Heliconius melpomene clade. PLoS Genet. 6:e1000794.
4. Beltrán, M., C. D. Jiggins, V. Bull, M. Linares, J. Mallet, W. O. McMillan, and E. Bermingham 2002. Phylogenetic discordance at the species boundary: comparative gene genealogies among rapidly radiating Heliconius butterflies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:2176-2190.
5. Beltrán, M., C. D. Jiggins, A. V. Z. Brower, E. Bermingham, and J. Mallet 2007. Do pollen feeding, pupal-mating and larval gregariousness have a single origin in Heliconius butterflies? Inferences from multilocus DNA sequence data. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 92:221-239.
6. Berner, D., A. Grandchamp, and A. P. Hendry 2009. Variable progress toward ecological speciation in parapatry: stickleback across eight lake-stream transitions. Evolution 63:1740-1753.
7. Bull, V., M. Beltrán, C. D. Jiggins, W. O. McMillan, E. Bermingham, and J. Mallet 2006. Polyphyly and gene flow between non-sibling Heliconius species. BMC Biol. 4:11.
8. Brown M. B., and A. B. Forsythe 1974 Robust tests for equality of variances. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 69:364-367.
9. Chamberlain, N. L., R. I. Hill, D. D. Kapan, L. E. Gilbert, and M. R. Kronforst 2009. Polymorphic butterfly reveals the missing link in ecological speciation. Science 326:847-850.
10. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr 1989. Patterns of speciation in drosophila. Evolution 43:362-381.
11. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr 1997. "Patterns of speciation in drosophila" revisited. Evolution 51:295-303.
12. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA
13. Dobzhansky, T. 1937. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York
14. Edwards, A. W. F. 1972. Likelihood. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK
15. Egan, S. P., and D. J. Funk 2009. Ecologically dependent postmating isolation between sympatric host forms of Neochlamisus bebbianae leaf beetles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106:19426-19431.
16. Estrada, C., and C. D. Jiggins 2002. Patterns of pollen feeding and habitat preference among Heliconius species. Ecol. Entomol 27:448-456.
17. Felsenstein, J. 1981. Skepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals? Evolution 35:124-138.
18. Fisher, R. 1958. The genetical theory of natural selection. Dover, New York
19. Flanagan, N. S., A. Tobler, A. Davison, O. G. Pybus, D. D. Kapan, S. Planas, M. Linares, D. Heckel, and W. O. McMillan 2004. Historical demography of Mullerian mimicry in the neotropical Heliconius butterflies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:9704-9709.
20. Gelman, A., J. B. Carlin, H. S. Stern, and D. B. Rubin 2003. Bayesian data analysis Second Edition. Chapman and Hall/CRC, London
21. Giraldo, N., C. Salazar, C. D. Jiggins, E. Bermingham, and M. Linares 2008. Two sisters in the same dress: Heliconius cryptic species. BMC Evol. Biol. 8:324.
22. Hatfield, Todd, and Dolph Schluter 1999. Ecological speciation in sticklebacks: environment-dependent hybrid fitness. Evolution 53:866-873.
23. Hendry, A. P., D. I. Bolnick, D. Berner, and C. L. Peichel 2009. Along the speciation continuum in sticklebacks. J. Fish Biol. 75:2000-2036.
24. Jiggins, C. D., R. E. Naisbit, R. L. Coe, and J. Mallet 2001. Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature 411:302-305.
25. Jiggins, C. D., C. Estrada, and A. Rodrigues 2004. Mimicry and the evolution of premating isolation in Heliconius melpomene Linnaeus. J. Evol. Biol. 17:680-691.
26. Kaneshiro, Kenneth Y. 1980. Sexual isolation, speciation and the direction of evolution. Evolution 34:437-444.
27. Kapan, D. D. 2001. Three-butterfly system provides a field test of Müllerian mimicry. Nature 409:338-340.
28. Kronforst, M. R., L. G. Young, L. M. Blume, and L. E. Gilbert 2006a. Multilocus analyses of admixture and introgression among hybridizing Heliconius butterflies. Evolution 60:1254-1268.
29. Kronforst, M. R., L. G. Young, D. D. Kapan, C. McNeely, R. J. O'Neill, and L. E. Gilbert 2006b. Linkage of butterfly mate preference and wing color preference cue at the genomic location of wingless. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:6575-6580.
30. Kronforst, M. R., L. G. Young, and L. E. Gilbert 2007. Reinforcement of mate preference among hybridizing Heliconius butterflies. J. Evol. Biol. 20:278-285.
31. Langerhans, R. B., M. E. Gifford, and E. O. Joseph 2007. Ecological speciation in Gambusia fishes. Evolution 61:2056-2074.
32. Librado, P., and J. Rozas 2009. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25:1451-1452.
33. Lunn, D. J., A. Thomas, N. Best, and D. Spiegelhalter 2000. WinBUGS-A Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Stat. Comput. 10:325-337.
34. Mallet, J. 2008. Hybridization, ecological races and the nature of species: empirical evidence for the ease of speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B 363:2971-2986.
35. Mallet, J., and N. H. Barton 1989. Strong natural selection in a warning-color hybrid zone. Evolution 43:421-431.
36. Mallet, J., W. O. McMillan, and C. J. Jiggins 1998. Mimicry and warning color at the boundary between races and species. Pp. 390-403 in Endless forms, species and speciation. Howard, D. J. and Berlocher, S. H. eds. Oxford University Press, New York
37. Mallet, J., M. Beltrán, W. Neukirchen, and M. Linares 2007. Natural hybridization in heliconiine butterflies: the species boundary as a continuum. BMC Evol. Biol. 7:28.
38. Mavárez, J., C. A. Salazar, E. Bermingham, C. Salcedo, C. D. Jiggins, and M. Linares 2006. Speciation by hybridization in Heliconius butterflies. Nature 441:868-871.
39. McMillan, W. O., C. D. Jiggins, and J. Mallet 1997. What initiates speciation in passion-vine butterflies? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:8628-8633.
40. Mendelson, T. C. 2003. Sexual isolation evolves faster than hybrid inviability in a diverse and sexually dimorphic genus of fish (Percidae: Etheostoma). Evolution 57:317-327.
41. Merrill, R. M., B. Van Schooten, J. A. Scott, and C. D. Jiggins 2010. Pervasive genetic associations between traits causing reproductive isolation in Heliconius butterflies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. doi:.
42. Muñoz, A. G., C. Salazar, J. Castaño, C. D. Jiggins, and M. Linares 2010. Multiple sources of reproductive isolation in a bimodal butterfly hybrid zone. J. Evol. Biol 23:1312-1320.
43. Naisbit, C., D. Jiggins, and J. Mallet 2001. Disruptive sexual selection against hybrids contributes to speciation between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene. Pp. 1849-1854 in Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. Vol. 268. The Royal Society, London
44. Naisbit, R. E., C. D. Jiggins, M. Linares, C. Salazar, and J. Mallet 2002. Hybrid sterility, Haldane's rule and speciation in Heliconius cydno and H. melpomene. Genetics 161:1517-1526.
45. Nosil, P., B. J. Crespi, and C. P. Sandoval 2002. Host-plant adaptation drives the parallel evolution of reproductive isolation. Nature 417:440-443.
46. Peccoud, J., A. Ollivier, M. Plantegenest, and J. Simon 2009. A continuum of genetic divergence from sympatric host races to species in the pea aphid complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106:7495-7500.
47. Presgraves, D. C. 2002. Patterns of postzygotic isolation in Lepidoptera. Evolution 56:1168-1183.
48. 1 postzygotic isolation in birds. Evolution 56:2083-2089.
49. Quek, S., B. A. Counterman, P. Albuquerque de Moura, M. Z. Cardoso, C. R. Marshall, W. O. McMillan, and M. R. Kronforst 2010. Dissecting comimetic radiations in Heliconius reveals divergent histories of convergent butterflies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107:7365-7370.
50. Rundle, H. D., and P. Nosil 2005. Ecological speciation. Ecol. Lett. 8:336-352.
51. Raychoudhury, R., C. A. Desjardins, J. Buellesbach, D. W. Loehlin, B. K. Grillenberger, L. Beukeboom, T. Schmitt, and J. H. Werren 2010. Behavioral and genetic characteristics of a new species of Nasonia. Heredity 104:278-288.
52. Seehausen, O., Y. Terai, I. S. Magalhaes, K. L. Carleton, H. D. J. Mrosso, R. Miyagi, I. Van Der Sluijs, M. V. Schneider, M. E. Maan, H. Tachida, et al. 2008. Speciation through sensory drive in cichlid fish. Nature 455:620-626.
53. Shine, R., R. N. Reed, S. Shetty, Lemaster, and R. T. Mason 2002. Reproductive isolating mechanisms between two sympatric species of sea snakes. Evolution 56:1655-1662.
54. Smiley, J. 1978. Plant chemistry and the evolution of host specificity: new evidence from heliconius and passiflora. Science 201:745-747.
55. Spiegelhalter, D. J., N. G. Best, B. P. Carlin, and A. Van Der Linde 2002. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J. R. Stat. Soc. 64:583-639.