Evolution of dominance mechanisms at a butterfly mimicry supergene

Nature Communications

Volumn 5, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Le Poul, Yann ^a   Whibley, Annabel ^a   Chouteau, Mathieu ^a   Prunier, Florence ^a   Llaurens, Violaine ^a   Joron, Mathieu ^a  

^a MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; BUTTERFLY; GENE EXPRESSION; HERITABILITY; HETEROZYGOSITY; MIMICRY; NATURAL SELECTION; POLYMORPHISM; WING;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; BUTTERFLY; CHROMOSOME INVERSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COORDINATION; FORELIMB; GENE; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; HELICONIUS NUMATA; HETEROZYGOTE; LOCAL ADAPTATION; NONHUMAN; P SUPERGENE; PHENOTYPE; SYMPATRY; ANIMAL; DOMINANT GENE; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PIGMENTATION;

HELICONIUS NUMATA;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; BUTTERFLIES; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENES, DOMINANT; GENES, INSECT; PHENOTYPE; PIGMENTATION; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; WINGS, ANIMAL;

EID: 84923356627     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6644     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Bagheri, H. C. Unresolved boundaries of evolutionary theory and the question of how inheritance systems evolve: 75 years of debate on the evolution of dominance. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 306B, 329-359 (2006).
2. Kacser, H. & Burns, J. A. The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics 97, 639-666 (1981).
3. Bourguet, D. et al. Variation of dominance of newly arisen adaptive genes. Genetics 147, 1225-1234 (1997).
4. Otto, S. P. & Bourguet, D. Balanced polymorphisms and the evolution of dominance. Am. Nat. 153, 561-574 (1999).
5. Charlesworth, B. Evolutionary rates in partially self-fertilizing species. Am. Nat. 140, 126-148 (1992).
6. Haldane, J. B. S. A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection, part v: selection and mutation. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 23, 838-844 (1927).
7. Turner, J. R. G. Adaptation and evolution in heliconius: a defense of NeoDarwinism. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12, 99-121 (1981).
8. Thompson, M. J. & Jiggins, C. D. Supergenes and their role in evolution. Heredity 113, 1-8 (2014).
9. Kunte, K. et al. doublesex is a mimicry supergene. Nature 507, 229-232 (2014).
10. Timmermans, M. J. T. N. et al. Comparative genomics of the mimicry switch in Papilio dardanus. Proc. R Soc. B Biol. Sci. 281, 20140465-20140465 (2014).
11. Joron, M. et al. Chromosomal rearrangements maintain a polymorphic supergene controlling butterfly mimicry. Nature 477, 203-206 (2011).
12. Wang, J. et al. A Y-like social chromosome causes alternative colony organization in fire ants. Nature 493, 664-668 (2013).
13. Davis, J. K. et al. Haplotype-based genomic sequencing of a chromosomal polymorphism in the white-throated sparrow (Zonotrichia albicollis). J. Hered. 102, 380-390 (2011).
14. Schwander, T., Libbrecht, R. & Keller, L. Supergenes and complex phenotypes. Curr. Biol. 24, R288-R294 (2014).
15. Kapan, D. D. Three-butterfly system provides a field test of Müllerian mimicry. Nature 409, 338-340 (2001).
16. Lindström, L., Alatalo, R. V., Lyytinen, A. & Mappes, J. Strong antiapostatic selection against novel rare aposematic prey. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 9181-9184 (2001).
17. Llaurens, V., Billiard, S. & Joron, M. The effect of dominance on polymorphism in Müllerian mimic species. J. Theor. Biol. 337, 101-110 (2013).
18. Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. Theoretical genetics of batesian mimicry III. Evolution of dominance. J. Theor. Biol. 55, 325-337 (1975).
19. Clarke, C. A. & Sheppard, P. M. The evolution of dominance under disruptive selection. Heredity 14, 73-87 (1960).
20. Clarke, C. A. & Sheppard, P. M. Super-genes and mimicry. Heredity 14, 175-185 (1960).
21. Nijhout, H. F. Polymorphic mimicry in Papilio dardanus: mosaic dominance, big effects, and origins. Evol. Dev. 5, 579-592 (2003).
22. Mallet, J., McMillan, W. O. & Jiggins, C. D. in Endless Forms: Species and Specitation. (eds D. J. Howard, S. H. Berlocher) 390-403 (Oxford University Press, 1998).
23. Mallet, J. & Barton, N. Inference from clines stabilized by frequency-dependent selection. Genetics 122, 967-976 (1989).
24. Brown, K. S. The biology of Heliconius and related genera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 26, 427-457 (1981).
25. Joron, M. et al. A conserved supergene locus controls colour pattern diversity in Heliconius butterflies. PLoS Biol. 4, e303 (2006).
26. Dasmahapatra, K. K. et al. Butterfly genome reveals promiscuous exchange of mimicry adaptations among species. Nature 487, 94-98 (2012).
27. Martin, A. et al. Diversification of complex butterfly wing patterns by repeated regulatory evolution of a Wnt ligand. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 12632-12637 (2012).
28. Gilchrist, M. A. & Nijhout, H. F. Nonlinear developmental processes as sources of dominance. Genetics 159, 423-432 (2001).
29. Nijhout, H. F. The Development and Evolution of Butterfly Wing Patterns (Smithsonian Series in Comparative Evolutionary Biology) (Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press, 1991).
30. Gilbert, L. E., Forrest, H. S., Schultz, T. D. & Harvey, D. J. Correlations of ultrastructure and pigmentation suggest how genes control development of wing scales of Heliconius butterflies. J. Res. Lepid 26, 141-160 (1988).
31. Linares, M. The genetics of the mimetic coloration in the butterfly Heliconius cydno weymeri. J. Hered. 87, 142-149 (1996).
32. Joron, M., Wynne, I. R., Lamas, G. & Mallet, J. Variable selection and the coexistence of multiple mimetic forms of the butterfly Heliconius numata. Evol. Ecol. 13, 721-754 (1999).
33. Brown, K. S. & Benson, W. W. Adaptive polymorphism associated with multiple Müllerian mimicry in Heliconius numata (Lepid. Nymph.). Biotropica 205-228 (1974).
34. Brown, Jr K. S. An illustrated key to the silvaniform Heliconius (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) with descriptions of new subspecies. Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc. 1890102, 373-484 (1976).
35. Clark, R. et al. Colour pattern specification in the Mocker swallowtail Papilio dardanus: the transcription factor invected is a candidate for the mimicry locus H. Proc. R Soc. B Biol. Sci. 275, 1181-1188 (2008).
36. Kondo, S. & Miura, T. Reaction-diffusion model as a framework for understanding biological pattern formation. Science 329, 1616-1620 (2010).
37. Tarutani, Y. et al. Trans-acting small RNA determines dominance relationships in Brassica self-incompatibility. Nature 466, 983-986 (2010).
38. Meyer, F. & Beucher, S. Morphological segmentation. J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. 1, 21-46 (1990).
39. Meyer, F. in Color image segmentation (International Conference on Image Processing and its Applications) 303-306 (Maastricht, 1992).
40. Cheng, H.-D. & Sun, Y. A hierarchical approach to color image segmentation using homogeneity. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 9, 2071-2082 (2000).
41. Kurugollu, F., Sankur, B. & Harmanci, A. E. Color image segmentation using histogram multithresholding and fusion. Image Vis. Comput. 19, 915-928 (2001).
42. Shafarenko, L., Petrou, H. & Kittler, J. Histogram-based segmentation in a perceptually uniform color space. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 7, 1354-1358 (1998).
43. Nikolaev, D. P. & Nikolayev, P. P. Linear color segmentation and its implementation. Comput. Vis. Image Und. 94, 115-139 (2004).
44. Taylor, C. H., Gilbert, F. & Reader, T. Distance transform: a tool for the study of animal colour patterns. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4, 771-781 (2013).
45. Mattes, D., Haynor, D. R., Vesselle, H., Lewellen, T. K. & Eubank, W. Nonrigid multimodality image registration. Med. Imaging 4322, 1609-1620 (2001).
46. Thévenaz, P. & Unser, M. Optimization of mutual information for multiresolution image registration. IEEE Trans. Image Process 9, 2083-2099 (2000).
47. Mattes, D., Haynor, D. R., Vesselle, H., Lewellen, T. K. & Eubank, W. PET-CT image registration in the chest using free-form deformations. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 22, 120-128 (2003).
48. Ibanez, L. & Insight Software Consortium. The ITK Software Guide (Kitware, 2003).
49. Martin, K. & Hoffman, B. Mastering CMake: a Cross-Platform Build System (Kitware Inc., 2003).
50. Yoo, T. S. et al. Engineering and algorithm design for an image processing api: a technical report on itk-the insight toolkit. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 85, 586-592 (2002).
51. Martin, S. & Guido, G. Evaluation of 2D/3D bias correction with 1+1ESoptimization, 1997, TR 179, Technical Report Image Science Lab, ETH Zürich, October 1997.
52. Ibanez, L., Schroeder, W., Ng, L. & Cates, J. The ITK Software Guide 2nd edn (Kitware Inc., ISBN: 1-930934-15-7, 2005).
53. Styner, M., Brechbuhler, C., Szckely, G. & Gerig, G. Parametric estimate of intensity inhomogeneities applied to MRI. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 19, 153-165 (2000).
54. Turk, M. & Pentland, A. Eigenfaces for recognition. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 3, 71-86 (1991).
55. Langlade, N. B. et al. Evolution through genetically controlled allometry space. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.SA 102, 10221-10226 (2005).