Magic traits in speciation: 'magic' but not rare?

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 389-397

  Servedio, Maria R ^a   Doorn, G Sander Van ^b   Kopp, Michael ^c   Frame, Alicia M ^b   Nosil, Patrik ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE RADIATION; ASSORTATIVE MATING; DIVERGENCE; GENE FLOW; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; NATURAL SELECTION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENE FLOW; GENETIC SELECTION; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCTION; REVIEW; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ANIMALS; GENE FLOW; GENETIC SPECIATION; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCTION; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 79960213694     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.04.005     Document Type: Review

References (92)

1. Maynard-Smith J. Sympatric speciation. Am. Nat. 1966, 100:637-650.
2. Kirkpatrick M., Ravigné V. Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. Am. Nat. 2002, 159:S22-S35.
3. Gavrilets S. Perspective: models of speciation: what have we learned in 40 years?. Evolution 2003, 57:2197-2215.
4. Gavrilets S. Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species 2004, Princeton University Press.
5. Felsenstein J. Skepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals?. Evolution 1981, 35:124-138.
6. Bolnick D.I., Fitzpatrick B.M. Sympatric speciation: models and empirical evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2007, 38:459-487.
7. van Doorn G.S., et al. On the origin of species by natural and sexual selection. Science 2009, 326:1704-1707.
8. Nosil P., Schluter D. The genes underlying the process of speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26:160-167.
9. Jiggins C.D., et al. Assortative mating and speciation as pleiotropic effects of ecological adaptation: examples in moths and butterflies. Insect Evolutionary Ecology: Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society's 22nd Symposium 2006, 451-473. CABI. M.D.E. Fellowes (Ed.).
10. Lowry D.B., et al. The strength and genetic basis of reproductive isolating barriers in flowering plants. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2008, 363:3009-3021.
11. Dambroski H.R., Feder J.L. Host plant and latitude-related diapause variation in Rhagoletis pomonella: a test for multifaceted life history adaptation on different stages of diapause development. J. Evol. Biol. 2007, 20:2101-2112.
12. Filchak K.E., et al. Natural selection and sympatric divergence in the apple maggot Rhagoletis pomonella. Nature 2000, 407:739-742.
13. Bradshaw H.D., Schemske D.W. Allele substitution at a flower colour locus produces a pollinator shift in monkeyflowers. Nature 2003, 426:176-178.
14. Bush G.L. Sympatric host race formation and speciation in frugivorous flies of genus Rhagoletis (Diptera Tephritidae). Evolution 1969, 23:237-251.
15. Rice W.R. Disruptive selection on habitat preference and the evolution of reproductive isolation - a simulation study. Evolution 1984, 38:1251-1260.
16. Rice W.R., Salt G.W. The evolution of reproductive isolation as a correlated character under sympatric conditions - experimental evidence. Evolution 1990, 44:1140-1152.
17. Nosil P., et al. Perspective: Reproductive isolation caused by natural selection against immigrants from divergent habitats. Evolution 2005, 59:705-719.
18. Giraud T., et al. Linking the emergence of fungal plant diseases with ecological speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010, 25:387-395.
19. Johnson P.A., et al. Conditions for sympatric speciation: a diploid model incorporating habitat fidelity and non-habitat assortative mating. Evol. Ecol. 1996, 10:187-205.
20. Berlocher S.H., Feder J.L. Sympatric speciation in phytophagous insects: moving beyond controversy?. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2002, 47:773-815.
21. Lande R., Arnold S.J. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 1983, 37:1210-1226.
22. Jiggins C.D., et al. Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature 2001, 411:302-305.
23. Mallet J., Barton N.H. Strong natural selection in a warning color hybrid zone. Evolution 1989, 43:421-431.
24. Boughman J.W. How sensory drive can promote speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002, 17:571-577.
25. Boncoraglio G., Saino N. Habitat structure and the evolution of bird song: a meta-analysis of the evidence for the acoustic adaptation hypothesis. Funct. Ecol. 2007, 21:134-142.
26. Dolgin E.S., et al. Male Drosophila melanogaster have higher mating success when adapted to their thermal environment. J. Evol. Biol. 2006, 19:1894-1900.
27. Seehausen O., et al. Speciation through sensory drive in cichlid fish. Nature 2008, 455:620-626.
28. Coyne J.A., Orr H.A. Speciation 2004, Sinauer Associates Inc.
29. Rundle H.D., Nosil P. Ecological speciation. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:336-352.
30. McKinnon J.S., Pierotti M.E.R. Colour polymorphism and correlated characters: genetic mechanisms and evolution. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:5101-5125.
31. Servedio M.R. The role of linkage disequilibrium in the evolution of premating isolation. Heredity 2009, 102:51-56.
32. Kronforst M.R., et al. Linkage of butterfly mate preference and wing color preference cue at the genomic location of wingless. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:6575-6580.
33. Hawthorne D.J., Via S. Genetic linkage of ecological specialization and reproductive isolation in pea aphids. Nature 2001, 412:904-907.
34. Via S., West J. The genetic mosaic suggests a new role for hitchhiking in ecological speciation. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:4334-4345.
35. van Doorn G.S., Weissing F.J. Ecological versus sexual models of sympatric speciation: a synthesis. Selection 2001, 2:17-40.
36. Feder J.L., Nosil P. The efficacy of divergence hitchhiking in generating genomic islands during ecological speciation. Evolution 2010, 64:1729-1747.
37. Michel A.P., et al. Widespread genomic divergence during sympatric speciation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:9724-9729.
38. Nosil P., Crespi B.J. Does gene flow constrain adaptive divergence or vice versa? A test using ecomorphology and sexual isolation in Timema cristinae walking-sticks. Evolution 2004, 58:102-112.
39. Matessi C., et al. Long term buildup of reproductive isolation promoted by disruptive selection: how far does it go?. Selection 2001, 2:41-64.
40. Kirkpatrick M., Nuismer S.L. Sexual selection can constrain sympatric speciation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 2004, 271:687-693.
41. Verzijden M.N., et al. Female mate-choice behavior and sympatric speciation. Evolution 2005, 59:2097-2108.
42. Pennings P.S., et al. An analytically tractable model for competitive speciation. Am. Nat. 2008, 171:E44-E71.
43. Dieckmann U., Doebeli M. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 1999, 400:354-357.
44. Kondrashov A.S., Kondrashov F.A. Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation. Nature 1999, 400:351-354.
45. Bolnick D.I. Multi-species outcomes in a common model of sympatric speciation. J. Theor. Biol. 2006, 241:734-744.
46. Liou L.W., Price T.D. Speciation by reinforcement of premating isolation. Evolution 1994, 48:1451-1459.
47. Servedio M.R. Reinforcement and the genetics of nonrandom mating. Evolution 2000, 54:21-29.
48. Servedio M.R. The evolution of premating isolation: local adaptation and natural and sexual selection against hybrids. Evolution 2004, 58:913-924.
49. Lemmon A.R., et al. Reproductive character displacement is not the only possible outcome of reinforcement. J. Evol. Biol. 2004, 17:177-183.
50. Bush G.L. Models of animal speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1975, 6:339-364.
51. Maan M.E., Seehausen O. Ecology, sexual selection and speciation. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14:591-602.
52. Butlin R.K. Recombination and speciation. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14:2621-2635.
53. Feder J.L., Nosil P. Chromosomal inversions and species differences: when are genes affecting adaptive divergence and reproductive isolation expected to reside within inversions?. Evolution 2009, 63:3061-3075.
54. Hoffmann A.A., Rieseberg L.H. Revisiting the impact of inversions in evolution: from population genetic markers to drivers of adaptive shifts and speciation?. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2008, 39:21-42.
55. Faria R., Navarro A. Chromosomal speciation revisited: rearranging theory with pieces of evidence. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010, 25:660-669.
56. Rieseberg L.H. Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2001, 16:351-358.
57. Noor M.A.F., et al. Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98:12084-12088.
58. Feder J.L., et al. Evidence for inversion polymorphism related to sympatric host race formation in the apple maggot fly Rhagoletis pomonella. Genetics 2003, 163:939-953.
59. Geraldes A., et al. Contrasting patterns of introgression at X-linked loci across the hybrid zone between subspecies of the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Genetics 2006, 173:919-933.
60. Nosil P., et al. Divergent selection and heterogeneous genomic divergence. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18:375-402.
61. Strasburg J.L., et al. Genomic patterns of adaptive divergence between chromosomally differentiated sunflower species. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2009, 26:1341-1355.
62. Turner T.L., et al. Genomic islands of speciation in Anopheles gambiae. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3:1572-1578.
63. Noor M.A.F., et al. Divergence between the Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis genome sequences in relation to chromosomal inversions. Genetics 2007, 177:1417-1428.
64. Machado C.A., et al. Evaluation of the genomic extent of effects of fixed inversion differences on intraspecific variation and interspecific gene flow in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Genetics 2007, 175:1289-1306.
65. Nagel L., Schluter D. Body size, natural selection, and speciation in sticklebacks. Evolution 1998, 52:209-218.
66. Boughman J.W., et al. Parallel evolution of sexual isolation in sticklebacks. Evolution 2005, 59:361-373.
67. Snyder R.J., Dingle H. Adaptive, genetically based differences in life-history between estuary and fresh-water threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus, L.). Can. J. Zool. Rev. Can. Zool. 1989, 67:2448-2454.
68. McKinnon J.S., et al. Evidence for ecology's role in speciation. Nature 2004, 429:294-298.
69. Langerhans R.B., et al. Ecological speciation in Gambusia fishes. Evolution 2007, 61:2056-2074.
70. Rolan-Alvarez E. Sympatric speciation as a by-product of ecological adaptation in the galician Littorina saxatilis hybrid zone. J. Molluscan Stud. 2007, 73:1-10.
71. Rolan-Alvarez E., et al. The maintenance of a cline in the marine snail Littorina saxatilis: the role of home site advantage and hybrid fitness. Evolution 1997, 51:1838-1847.
72. Summers K., et al. Visual mate choice in poison frogs. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 1999, 266:2141-2145.
73. Reynolds R.G., Fitzpatrick B.M. Assortative mating in poison-dart frogs based on an ecologically important trait. Evolution 2007, 61:2253-2259.
74. Maan M.E., Cummings M.E. Female preferences for aposematic signal components in a polymorphic poison frog. Evolution 2008, 62:2334-2345.
75. Schemske D.W., Bradshaw H.D. Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96:11910-11915.
76. Ratcliffe L.M., Grant P.R. Species recognition in Darwins finches (Geospiza Gould). 1. Discrimination by morphological cues. Anim. Behav. 1983, 31:1139-1153.
77. Podos J. Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin's finches. Nature 2001, 409:185-188.
78. Huber S.K., et al. Reproductive isolation of sympatric morphs in a population of Darwin's finches. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2007, 274:1709-1714.
79. Grant B.R., Grant P.R. Fission and fusion of Darwin's finches populations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2008, 363:2821-2829.
80. Hendry A.P., et al. Disruptive selection in a bimodal population of Darwin's finches. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2009, 276:753-759.
81. Puebla O., et al. Colour pattern as a single trait driving speciation in Hypoplectrus coral reef fishes?. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2007, 274:1265-1271.
82. Fordyce J.A., et al. The significance of wing pattern diversity in the Lycaenidae: mate discrimination by two recently diverged species. J. Evol. Biol. 2002, 15:871-879.
83. Snowberg L.K., Bolnick D.I. Assortative mating by diet in a phenotypically unimodal but ecologically variable population of stickleback. Am. Nat. 2008, 172:733-739.
84. Snowberg L.K., Benkman C.W. Mate choice based on a key ecological performance trait. J. Evol. Biol. 2009, 22:762-769.
85. Benkman C.W. Divergent selection drives the adaptive radiation of crossbills. Evolution 2003, 57:1176-1181.
86. Badyaev A.V., et al. Evolution on a local scale: developmental, functional, and genetic bases of divergence in bill form and associated changes in song structure between adjacent habitats. Evolution 2008, 62:1951-1964.
87. Jones A.G., et al. Sympatric speciation as a consequence of male pregnancy in seahorses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100:6598-6603.
88. Feulner P.G.D., et al. Electrifying love: electric fish use species-specific discharge for mate recognition. Biol. Lett. 2009, 5:225-228.
89. Hoso M., et al. Right-handed snakes: convergent evolution of asymmetry for functional specialization. Biol. Lett. 2007, 3:169-173.
90. Hoso M., Hori M. Divergent shell shape as an antipredator adaptation in tropical land snails. Am. Nat. 2008, 172:726-732.
91. McPeek M.A., Wellborn G.A. Genetic variation and reproductive isolation among phenotypically divergent amphipod populations. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1998, 43:1162-1169.
92. Kingston T., Rossiter S.J. Harmonic-hopping in Wallacea's bats. Nature 2004, 429:654-657.