Mimicry: Developmental genes that contribute to speciation

Evolution and Development

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 269-280

  Naisbit, Russell E ^a   Jiggins, Chris D ^b   Mallet, James ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL   (Switzerland)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; GENETICS; MIMICRY; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANIMALS; BUTTERFLIES; CROSSES, GENETIC; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; EVOLUTION; LINKAGE (GENETICS); MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PANAMA; PHENOTYPE; PIGMENTATION; SELECTION (GENETICS); SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

HELICONIUS; HELICONIUS CYDNO; HELICONIUS MELPOMENE; HEXAPODA; INVERTEBRATA; LEPIDOPTERA; NYMPHALIDAE;

EID: 0038581541     PISSN: 1520541X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-142X.2003.03034.x     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Arthur, W. 2000. The concept of developmental reprogramming and the quest for an inclusive theory of evolutionary mechanisms. Evol. Dev. 2: 49-57.
2. Arthur, W. 2001. Development drive: an important determinant of the direction of phenotypic evolution. Evol. Dev. 3: 271-278.
3. Barton, N. H. 1979. Gene flow past a cline. Heredity 43: 333-339.
4. Bates, H. W. 1862. Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon valley. Lepidoptera: Heliconidae. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. 23: 495-566.
5. Beldade, P., Brakefield, P. M., and Long, A. D. 2002. Contribution of Distal-less to quantitative variation in butterfly eyespots. Nature 415: 315-318.
6. Bleiweiss, R. 2001. Mimicry on the QT(L): genetics of speciation in Mimulus. Evolution 55: 1706-1709.
7. Bradshaw, H. D., Otto, K. G., Frewen, B. E., McKay, J. K., and Schemske, D. W. 1998. Quantitative trait loci affecting differences in floral morphology between two species of monkeyflower (Mimulus). Genetics 149: 367-382.
8. Brown, K. S. 1979. Ecologia Geográfica e Evolução nas Florestas Neotropicais. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, São Paulo, Brasil.
9. Brown, K. S., Emmel, T. C., Eliazar, P. J., and Suomalainen, E. 1992. Evolutionary patterns in chromosome numbers in neotropical Lepidoptera. I. Chromosomes of the Heliconiini (Family Nymphalidae: Subfamily Nymphalinae). Hereditas 117: 109-125.
10. Brunetti, C. R., Selegue, J. E., Monteiro, A., French, V., Brakefield, P. M., and Carroll, S. B. 2001. The generation and diversification of butterfly eyespot color patterns. Curr. Biol. 11: 1578-1585.
11. Carroll, S. B., Gates, J., Keys, D. N., Paddock, S. W., Panganiban, G. E. F., Selegue, J. E., and Williams, J. A. 1994. Pattern formation and eyespot determination in butterfly wings. Science 265: 109-114.
12. Charlesworth, D., and Charlesworth, B. 1975. Theoretical genetics of Batesian mimicry. II. Evolution of supergenes. J. Theor. Biol. 55: 305-324.
13. Clarke, C. A., and Sheppard, P. M. 1960. The evolution of mimicry in the butterfly Papilio dardanus. Heredity 14: 163-173.
14. Clarke, C. A., and Sheppard, P. M. 1971. Further studies on the genetics of the mimetic butterfly Papilio memnon L. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 263: 35-70.
15. Clarke, C. A., Sheppard, P. M., and Thornton, I. W. B. 1968. The genetics of the mimetic butterfly Papilio memnon L. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 254: 37-89.
16. Coyne, J. A., and Orr, H. A. 1998. The evolutionary genetics of speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353: 287-305.
17. Crane, J. 1955. Imaginal behavior of a Trinidad butterfly, Heliconius erato hydara Hewitson, with special reference to the social use of color. Zoologica 40: 167-196.
18. Darwin, C. 1863. A review of H. W. Bates' paper on "Mimetic Butterflies." In P. H. Barrett (ed.). The Collected Papers of Charles Darwin. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 87-92.
19. Doebley, J., Stec, A., and Gustus, C. 1995. teosinte branched1 and the origin of maize: evidence for epistasis and the evolution of dominance. Genetics 141: 333-346.
20. Filchak, K. E., Roethele, J. B., and Feder, J. L. 2000. Natural selection and sympatric divergence in the apple maggot Rhagoletis pomonella. Nature 407: 739-742.
21. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
22. Force, A., Lynch, M., Pickett, F. B., Amores, A., Yan, Y.-L., and Postlethwait, J. 1999. Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151: 1531-1545.
23. Gilbert, L. E. 2003. Adaptive novelty through introgression in Heliconius wing patterns: evidence for a shared genetic "tool box" from synthetic hybrid zones and a theory of diversification. In C. L. Boggs, W. B. Watt, and P. R. Ehrlich (eds.). Butterflies: Ecology and Evolution Taking Flight. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
24. Gilbert, L. E., Forrest, H. S., Schultz, T. D., and Harvey, D. J. 1988. Correlations of ultrastructure and pigmentation suggest how genes control development of wing scales of Heliconius butterflies. J. Res. Lepid. 26: 141-160.
25. Goldschmidt, R. 1940. The Material Basis of Evolution. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
26. Goldschmidt, R. B. 1945. Mimetic polymorphism, a controversial chapter of Darwinism (concluded). Q. Rev. Biol. 20: 205-230.
27. Hawthorne, D. J., and Via, S. 2001. Genetic linkage of ecological specialization and reproductive isolation in pea aphids. Nature 412: 904-907.
28. Holland, L. Z. 2000. Body-plan evolution in the Bilateria: early antero-posterior patterning and the deuterostome-protostome dichotomy. Curr. Opin. Gen. Dev. 10: 434-442.
29. Janssen, J. M., Monteiro, A., and Brakefield, P. M. 2001. Correlations between scale structure and pigmentation in butterfly wings. Evol. Dev. 3: 415-423.
30. Jiggins, C. D., and McMillan, W. O. 1997. The genetic basis of an adaptive radiation: warning colour in two Heliconius species. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264: 1167-1175.
31. Jiggins, C. D., Naisbit, R. E., Coe, R. L., and Mallet, J. 2001. Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature 411: 302-305.
32. Joron, M., Wynne, I. R., Lamas, G., and Mallet, J. 2001. Variable selection and the coexistence of multiple mimetic forms of the butterfly Heliconius numata. Evol. Ecol. 13: 721-754.
33. Kapan, D. D. 1998. Divergent natural selection and Müllerian mimicry in polymorphic Heliconius cydno (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia.
34. Kapan, D. D. 2001. Three-butterfly system provides a field test of Müllerian mimicry. Nature 409: 338-340.
35. Kimura, M. 1983. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
36. Koch, P. B., Keys, D. N., Rocheleau, T., Aronstein, K., Blackburn, M., Carroll, S. B., and Ffrench-Constant, R. H. 1998. Regulation of dopa decarboxylase expression during colour pattern formation in wild-type and melanic tiger swallowtail butterflies. Development 125: 2303-2313.
37. Leroi, A. M. 2000. The scale independence of evolution. Evol. Dev. 2: 67-77.
38. Linares, M. 1989. Adaptive microevolution through hybridization and biotic destruction in the Neotropics. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, TX.
39. Linares, M. 1996. The genetics of the mimetic coloration in the butterfly Heliconius cydno weymeri. J. Hered. 87: 142-149.
40. Linares, M. 1997. Origin of neotropical mimetic biodiversity from a three-way hybrid zone of Heliconius cydno butterflies. In H. Ulrich (ed.). Tropical Biodiversity and Systematics. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Biodiversity and Systematics in Tropical Ecosystems. Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, pp. 93-108.
41. Mallet, J. 1986. Hybrid zones of Heliconius butterflies in Panama and the stability and movement of warning colour clines. Heredity 56: 191-202.
42. Mallet, J. 1989. The genetics of warning colour in Peruvian hybrid zones of Heliconius erato and H. melpomene. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 236: 163-185.
43. Mallet, J. 1993. Speciation, raciation, and color pattern evolution in Heliconius butterflies: evidence from hybrid zones. In R. G. Harrison (ed.). Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 226-260.
44. Mallet, J. 2001. Causes and consequences of a lack of coevolution in Müllerian mimicry. Evol. Ecol. 13: 777-806.
45. Mallet, J., and Barton, N. H. 1989. Strong natural selection in a warning-color hybrid zone. Evolution 43: 421-431.
46. Mallet, J., and Gilbert, L. E. 1995. Why are there so many mimicry rings? Correlations between habitat, behaviour and mimicry in Heliconius butterflies. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 55: 159-180.
47. Mallet, J., and Joron, M. 1999. Evolution of diversity in warning color and mimicry: polymorphisms, shifting balance, and speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30: 201-233.
48. Mallet, J., McMillan, W. O., and Jiggins, C. D. 1998. Mimicry and warning color at the boundary between races and species. In D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher (eds.). Endless Forms: Species and Speciation. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 390-403.
49. Mallet, J., Neukirchen, W., and Linares, M. 2001. Hybrids between species of Heliconius and Eueides butterflies: a database, www.ucl.ac.uk/taxome/hyb/
50. McMillan, W. O., Monteiro, A., and Kapan, D. D. 2002. Development and evolution on the wing. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 125-133.
51. Naisbit, R. E., Jiggins, C. D., and Mallet, J. 2001. Disruptive sexual selection against hybrids contributes to speciation between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 1849-1854.
52. Naisbit, R. E., Jiggins, C. D., Linares, M., Salazar, C., and Mallet, J. 2002. Hybrid sterility, Haldane's rule, and speciation in Heliconius cydno and H. melpomene. Genetics 161: 1517-1526.
53. Nijhout, H. F. 1991. The Development and Evolution of Butterfly Wing Patterns. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
54. Noor, M. A. F., Grams, K. L., Bertucci, L. A., and Reiland, J. 2001. Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 12084-12088.
55. Orr, H. A. 1998. The population genetics of adaptation: the distribution of factors fixed during adaptive evolution. Evolution 52: 935-949.
56. Orr, H. A. 1999. The evolutionary genetics of adaptation: a simulation study. Genet. Res. 74: 207-214.
57. Orr, H. A. 2001. The genetics of species differences. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 343-350.
58. Orr, H. A., and Coyne, J. A. 1992. The genetics of adaptation: a reassessment. Am. Nat. 140: 725-742.
59. Orr, H. A., and Presgraves, D. C. 2000. Speciation by postzygotic isolation: forces, genes and molecules. BioEssays 22: 1085-1094.
60. Peichel, C. L., Nereng, K. S., Ohgi, K. A., Cole, B. L. E., Colosimo, P. F., Buerkle, C. A., Schluter, D., and Kingsley, D. M. 2001. The genetic architecture of divergence between threespine stickleback species. Nature 414: 901-905.
61. Podos, J. 2001. Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin's finches. Nature 409: 185-188.
62. Rice, W. R., and Hostert, E. E. 1993. Laboratory experiments on speciation: what have we learned in 40 years? Evolution 47: 1637-1653.
63. Rieseberg, L. H. 2001. Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 351-358.
64. Rundle, H. D., Nagel, L., Boughman, J. W., and Schluter, D. 2000. Natural selection and parallel speciation in sympatric sticklebacks. Science 287: 306-308.
65. Schemske, D. W., and Bradshaw, H. D. 1999. Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 11910-11915.
66. Shankland, M., and Seaver, E. C. 2000. Evolution of the bilaterian body plan: what have we learned from annelids? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 4434-4437.
67. Sheppard, P. M., Turner, J. R. G., Brown, K. S., Benson, W. W., and Singer, M. C. 1985. Genetics and the evolution of muellerian mimicry in Heliconius butterflies. Philos. Trans. R. Lond. B 308: 433-610.
68. Smiley, J. 1978. Plant chemistry and the evolution of host specificity: new evidence from Heliconius and Passiflora. Science 201: 745-747.
69. Stern, D. L. 1998. A role of Ultrabithorax in morphological differences between Drosophila species. Nature 396: 463-466.
70. Ting, C.-T., Tsaur, S.-C., and Wu, C.-I. 2000. The phylogeny of closely related species as revealed by the genealogy of a speciation gene, Odysseus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 5313-5316.
71. True, J. R., Liu, J., Stam, L. F., Zeng, Z.-B., and Laurie, C. C. 1997. Quantitative genetic analysis of divergence in male secondary sexual traits between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila mauritiana. Evolution 51: 816-832.
72. Turelli, M., and Orr, H. A. 2000. Dominance, epistasis and the genetics of postzygotic isolation. Genetics 154: 1663-1679.
73. Turner, J. R. G. 1972. The genetics of some polymorphic forms of the butterflies Heliconius melpomene (Linnaeus) and H. erato. (Linnaeus). II. The hybridization of subspecies of H. melpomene from Surinam and Trinidad. Zoologica 56: 125-157.
74. Turner, J. R. G. 1976. Adaptive radiation and convergence in subdivisions of the butterfly genus Heliconius (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 58: 297-308.
75. Turner, J. R. G. 1977. Butterfly mimicry: the genetical evolution of an adaptation. Evolut. Biol. 10: 163-206.
76. Turner, J. R. G. 1981. Adaptation and evolution in Heliconius: a defense of NeoDarwinism. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12: 99-121.
77. Turner, J. R. G. 1983. Mimetic butterflies and punctuated equilibria: some old light on a new paradigm. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 20: 277-300.
78. Turner, J. R. G. 1984. Mimicry: the palatability spectrum and its consequences. In R. I. Vane-Wright and P. R. Ackery (eds.). The Biology of Butterflies. Academic Press, London, pp. 141-161.
79. Turner, J. R. G., and Crane, J. 1962. The genetics of some polymorphic forms of the butterflies Heliconius melpomene (Linnaeus) and H. erato (Linnaeus). I. Major genes. Zoologica 47: 141-152.
80. Turner, J. R. G., and Sheppard, P. M. 1975. Absence of crossing-over in female butterflies (Heliconius). Heredity 34: 265-269.
81. Vane-Wright, R. I. 1978. Ecological and behavioural origins of diversity in butterflies. In L. A. Mound and N. Waloff (eds.). Diversity of Insect Faunas. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 56-70.
82. Whitlock, M. C., Phillips, P. C., Moore, F. B.-G., and Tonsor, S. J. 1995. Multiple fitness peaks and epistasis. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26: 601-629.