Challenges in identifying high-leverage practices

Teachers College Record

Volumn 117, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 1-41

  Cohen, Julie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84938229374     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Aaronson, D., Barrow, L., & Sander, W. (2007). Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago public high schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(1), 95-135.
2. Baker, E. L., Barton, P. E., Darling-Hammond, L., Haertel, E., Ladd, H. F., Linn, R. L., Shepard, L. A. (2010). Problems with the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers (Vol. 278). Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
3. Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. The Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497-511.
4. Ball, D. L., & Rowan, B. (2004). Introduction: Measuring instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 3-10.
5. Ballou, D. (2005). Value-added assessment: Lessons from Tennessee. In R. Lissetz (Ed.), Value added models in education: Theory and applications (pp. 272-297). Maple Grove, MN: Journal of Applied Measurement (JAM) Press.
6. Baroody, A. J., Feil, Y., & Johnson, A. R. (2007). An alternative reconceptualization of procedural and conceptual knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(2), 115-131.
7. Bell, C. A., Gitomer, D. H., McCaffrey, D. F., Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., & Qi, Y. (2012). An argument approach to observation protocol validity. Educational Assessment, 17(2-3), 62-87.
8. Berliner, D. C. (1986). In pursuit of the expert pedagogue. Educational Researcher, 15(7), 5-13.
9. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. (2010). Learning about teaching: Initial findings from the measures of effective teaching project. Washington, DC: Gates Foundation.
10. Boaler, J., & Staples, M. (2008). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of Railside School. Teachers College Record, 110(3), 608-645.
11. Brophy, J. (1986). Teacher influences on student achievement. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1069.
12. Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. E. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328-375). New York, NY: Macmillan.
13. Brown, M. (2012). Instruction for struggling adolescent readers and the limited influence of curriculum materials (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
14. Cazden, C. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching. New York: Heinemann. CIERA Update. Retrieved March 23, 2009 from http://www.ciera.org/index.html.
15. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications Limited.
16. Chazan, D., & Ball, D. (1999). Beyond being told not to tell. For the Learning of Mathematics, 19(2), 2-10.
17. Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., & Rockoff, J. E. (2011). The long-term impacts of teachers: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood (No. w17699). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
18. Cohen, J. (2013). Practices that cross disciplines?: A closer look at instruction in elementary math and English language arts. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
19. Cohen, J., & Grossman, P. (2011). Of cabbages and kings: Classroom observations and value-added measures. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, Louisiana.
20. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 6(11), 38-46.
21. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 454-493) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Cor, K. (2011, April). The measurement properties of the PLATO rubric. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
23. Corcoran, S., Jennings, J. J., & Beveridge, A. (2011). Teacher effectiveness on high and low stakes test. Unpublished manuscript
24. Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
25. Dunkin, M. J., & Biddle, B. J. (1974). The study of teaching. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
26. Erickson, F. (1985). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.), (pp. 119-161). New York, NY: Macmillan Press.
27. Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 1-40.
28. Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (1998). Commensuration as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 313-343.
29. th ed., pp. 3-17). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
30. Glazerman, S., Loeb, S., Goldhaber, D., Staiger, D., Raudenbush, S., & Whitehurst, G. (2010). Evaluating teachers: The important role of value-added. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.
31. Goldenberg, C. (1992). Instructional conversations: Promoting comprehension through discussion. The Reading Teacher, 46(4), 316-326.
32. Goldenberg, C. (2008). Teaching English language learners: What the research does-and does not-say. American Educator, 33(2), 8-44.
33. Good, T., Biddle, B., & Brophy, J. (1975). Teachers make a difference. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
34. Good, T., & Grouws, D. (1975). Teacher rapport: Some stability data. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(2), 179-182.
35. Good, T., & Grouws, D. (1979). The Missouri mathematics effectiveness project: An experimental study in fourth-grade classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(3), 355-362.
36. Gordon, R. J., Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. (2006). Identifying effective teachers using performance on the job. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
37. Grossman, P., Loeb, S., Cohen, J., & Wyckoff, J. (2013). Measure for measure: The relationship between measures of instructional practice in middle school English language arts and teachers' value-added scores. American Journal of Education. 119(3), 445-470.
38. Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184-205.
39. Harris, D. (2009). Teacher value-added: Don't end the search before it starts. Journal of Policy and Management, 28(4), 693-699.
40. Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students' learning. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371-404). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
41. Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 430-511.
42. Hill, H. C., Charalambous, C. Y., & Kraft, M. A. (2012). When rater reliability is not enough: Teacher observation systems and a case for the generalizability study. Educational Researcher, 41(2), 56-64.
43. Hill, H. C., Kapitula, L., & Umland, K. (2011). A validity argument approach to evaluating teacher value-added scores. American Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 794-831.
44. Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371-406.
45. Hill, H. C., Umland, K., Litke, E., & Kapitula, L. R. (2012). Teacher quality and quality teaching: Examining the relationship of a teacher assessment to practice. American Journal of Education, 118(4), 489-519.
46. Kane, T. J. & Staiger, D. O. (2012). Gathering feedback for teaching: Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains. Seattle, WA: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
47. Kane, T. J., Taylor, E. S., Tyler, J. H., & Wooten, A. L. (2011). Identifying effective classroom practices using student achievement data. Journal of Human Resources, 46(3), 587-613.
48. Kazemi, E., & Stipek, D. (2001). Promoting conceptual thinking in four upper-elementary mathematics classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 102(1), 59-80.
49. Kemper, E., & Teddlie, C. (2000). Mandated site based management in Texas: Exploring implementation in urban high schools. Teaching and Change, 7, 172-200.
50. Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
51. Koedel, C., & Betts, J. R. (2007). Re-examining the role of teacher quality in the educational production function. Nashville, TN: National Center on Performance Incentives, Peabody College of Vanderbilt University.
52. Konstantopoulos, S. (2014). Teacher effects, value-added models, and accountability. Teachers College Record, 116(1), 1-21.
53. Koretz, D. (2002). Limitations in the use of achievement tests as measures of educators' productivity. Journal of Human Resources, 37(4), 752-777.
54. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465-491.
55. LeCompte, M. D., & Schensul, J. J. (1999). Designing and conducting ethnographic research (Vol.1). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
56. Lockwood, J. R., McCaffrey, D. F., Hamilton, L. S., Stecher, B., Le, V., & Martinez, F. (2007) The sensitivity of value-added measures teacher effect estimates to different mathematics achievement measures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 44(1), 47-67.
57. Luna, C., & Turner, C. L. (2001). The impact of the MCAS: Teachers talk about high-stakes testing. The English Journal, 91(1), 79-87.
58. McCaffrey, D., Sass, T., Lockwood, J., & Mihaly, K. (2009). The intertemporal variability of teacher effect estimates. Education Finance and Policy, 4(4), 572-606.
59. McDonald, M., Kazemi, E., & Kavanagh, S. S. (2013). High leverage and pedagogies of teacher education: A call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 378-386.
60. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61. Mehta, J. (2013). The penetration of technocratic logic into the educational field: Rationalizing schooling from the progressives to the present. Teachers College Record, 115(5), 1-36.
62. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
63. Michaels, S., & O'Connor, C. (2012). Talk science primer. Cambridge: TERC.
64. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
65. Morrison, K. A., Robbins, H. H., & Rose, D. G. (2008). Operationalizing culturally relevant pedagogy: A synthesis of classroom-based research. Equity & Excellence in Education, 41(4), 433-452.
66. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2008). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
67. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards Mathematics. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.
68. Newmann, F. M., Marks, H. M., & Gamoran, A. (1996). Authentic pedagogy and student performance. American Journal of Education, 104, 280-312.
69. Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 261-290.
70. Papay, J. (2011). Different tests, different answers: The stability of teacher value-added estimates across outcomes measures. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 163-193.
71. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
72. Pianta, R. C., Belsky, J., Vandergrift, N., Houts, R., Morrison, F., & NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2008). Classroom effects on children's achievement trajectories in elementary school. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 365-397.
73. Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., Haynes, N. J., Mintz, S., & La Paro, K. M. (2006, June). CLASS Classroom Assessment Scoring System: Manual Middle Secondary Version Pilot.
74. Polikoff, M. S., & Porter, A. C. (2012). Surveys of Enacted Curriculum substudy of the Measures of Effective Teaching Project: Final report. Seattle, WA: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
75. Popham, W. J. (2003). The seductive allure of data. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 48-51.
76. Porter, A. C., Polikoff, M. S., Zeidner, T., & Smithson, J. (2008). The quality of content analyses of state student achievement tests and content standards. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27(4), 2-13.
77. Porter, T. M. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
78. Reardon, S., & Raudenbush, S. (2009). Assumptions of value-added models for estimating school effects. Education Finance and Policy, 4(4), 492-519.
79. Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211-246.
80. Resnick, L. (1989). Treating mathematics as an ill-structured discipline. In R. Charles & E. Silver (Eds.), The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving (pp. 32-60). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
81. Rohrkemper, M., & Corno, L. (1988). Success and failure on classroom tasks: Adaptive learning and classroom teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 88(3), 297-312.
82. Rothstein, J. (2009). Student sorting and bias in value-added estimation: Selection on observables and unobservables. Education Finance and Policy, 4(4), 537-571.
83. Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R. J. (2002). What large-scale survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: Insights from the "Prospects" study of elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 104, 1525-1567.
84. Rowe, M. B. (1986). Wait time: Slowing down may be a way of speeding up! Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 43-50.
85. Ruzek, E. A., Hafen, C. A., Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2014). Combining classroom observations and value-added for the evaluation and professional development of teachers. In K. Kerr, R. Pianta, & T. Kane (Eds.), Designing teacher evaluation systems: New guidance from the Measures of Effective Teaching project. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
86. Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 769-802). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
87. Sass, T. R. (2008). The stability of value-added measures of teacher quality and implications for teacher compensation policy. National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research Brief No. 4. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/1001266_stabilityofvalue.pdf
88. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334-370). New York, NY: Macmillan.
89. Shavelson, R. J., Webb, N. M., & Burstein, L. (1986). Measurement of teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 50-91). New York, NY: Macmillan.
90. Shepard, L., Hannaway, J., & Baker, E. (2009). Standards, assessments, and accountability (Education Policy White Paper). Washington, DC: National Academy of Education.
91. Small, M. L. (2009). How many cases do I need? On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography, 10(1), 5-38.
92. Stallings, J. (1980). Allocated academic learning time revisited, or beyond time on task. Educational Researcher, 9(11), 11-16.
93. Star, J. R. (2005). Reconceptualizing procedural knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), 404-411.
94. Stecher, B., Chun, T., & Barron, S. (2004). The effects of assessment-driven reform on the teaching of writing in Washington state. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp. 53-71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
95. Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455-488.
96. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers on improving education in the classroom. New York, NY: Free Press.
97. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
98. Sykes, G., Bird, T., & Kennedy, M. (2010). Teacher education: Its problems and some prospects. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(5), 464-476.
99. Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling a typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100.
100. Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
101. Timmermans, S., & Epstein, S. (2010). A world of standards but not a standard world: Toward a sociology of standards and standardization. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 69-89.
102. Tobin, K. (1987). The role of wait time in higher cognitive level learning. Review of Educational Research, 57(1), 69-95.
103. Valli, L., Croninger, R., & Buese, D. (2012). Studying high-quality teaching in a highly charged policy environment. Teachers College Record, 114(4), 33.
104. Van Maanen, J. (1995). An end to innocence: The ethnography of ethnography. In J. Van Maanen (Ed.), Representation in ethnography (pp. 1-35). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
105. Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., De, T., Chan, A. G., Freund, D., Shein, P., & Melkonian, D. K. (2009). Explain to your partner: Teachers' instructional practices and students' dialogue in small groups. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 49-70.
106. Wood, T., Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1990). The contextual nature of teaching: Mathematics and reading instruction in one second-grade classroom. The Elementary School Journal, 90(5), 497-513.