Studying high-quality teaching in a highly charged policy environment

Teachers College Record

Volumn 114, Issue 4, 2012, Pages

  Valli, Unda ^a   Croninger, Robert G ^a   Buese, Daria ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b MCDANIEL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887973631     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Alexander, P. A., & Murphy, P. K. (1998). The research base for APA's learner-centered principles. In N. M. Lambert & B. L. McCombs (Eds.), Issues in school reform: A sampler of psy-chological perspectives on learner-centered schools, (pp. 25-60). Washington DC: The American Psychological Association.
2. Allington, R., & Cunningham, P. (1996). Schools that work: Where all children read and write. New York: HarperCollins.
3. American Institutes for Research. (2005). Comprehensive School Reform Quality (CSRQ) Center report on elementary school comprehensive school reform models. Washington, DC: Author.
4. Baker, E., Barton, P., Darling-Hammond, L., Haertel, E., Ladd, H., Linn, R., et al. (2010). Problems with the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers. Washington, DC: Economic- Policy Institute.
5. Ballon, D. (2002). Sizing up test scores. Education Next, 2(2), 10-15.
6. Barr, R., & Dreeben, R. (1983). How schools work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Boser, U. (2001). Pressure without support. Education Week, 20(17), 68-71.
8. Bradley, A. (1999, January 11). Zeroing in on teachers. Education Week, 18(11), 46-47, 49-52.
9. Bruner, J. (1999). Postscript: Some reflections on education research. In E. C. Lagemann & L. S. Shulman (Eds.), Issues in education research (pp. 399-409). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Bruno, J. E. (2002, July 26). The geographical distribution of teacher absenteeism in large urban school district settings: Implications for school reform efforts aimed at promoting equity and excellence in education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(52). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/ v10n32/.
11. Bryk, A., Sebring, P., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: lessons from Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Byrnes, J. (2000). Using instructional time effectively. In L. Baker, M. J. Dreher, & J. T. Guthrie (Eds.), Engaging young readers: Promoting achievement and motivation (pp. 188-208). New York: Guilford Press.
13. Chambliss, M., & Graeber, A. (2003, April). Does subject matter matter? Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
14. Cohen, D. K. (1988). Teaching practice: Plus que ca change.. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Contributions to educational change: Perspectives on research and practice (pp. 27-84). Berkeley: McCutcheon.
15. Cohen, D. K. (1995). What is the system in systemic reform? Educational Researcher, 24(9), 11-17.
16. Cohen, D. K., & Moffitt, S. L. (2009). The ordeal of equality: Did federal regulation fix the schools? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Cohen, D. K., Moffitt, S. L., & Goldin, S. (2007). Policy and practice. In S. H. Fuhrman, D. K. Cohen, & F. Mosher (Eds.), The state of education policy research (pp. 63-86). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Cohen, D. K., & Spillane, J. P. (1992). Policy and practice: The relations between governance and instruction. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 18, pp. 3-49). Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.
19. Croninger, R., & Valli, L. (2009). "Where is the action?" Challenges to studying the teaching of reading in elementary classrooms. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 100-108.
20. Croninger, R. G., Valli, L., & Chambliss, M.J. (2012). Researching quality in teaching: Enduring and emerging challenges. Teachers College Record, 114(4), 15 pages.
21. Croninger, R., Valli, L., & Price, J. (2003, April). Mapping the policy environment for high- quality teaching: Can we get there from here? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
22. Cuban, L. (1988). A fundamental puzzle of school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 69(87/88), 341-344.
23. Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms 1880-1990 (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
24. Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25. Ehrenberg, R. G., Ehrenberg, R. A., Rees, D., & Ehrenberg, E. (1991). School district leave policies, teacher absenteeism, and student achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 26(1), 72-105.
26. Epstein, N. (2004). Who's in charge here? The tangled web of school gmiernance and policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
27. Fenstermacher, G. D., & Richardson, V. (2005). On making determinations of quality in teaching. Teachers College Record, 707(1), 186-213.
28. Firestone, W., & Riehl, C. (2005). Conclusion. In W. Firestone & C. Riehl (Eds.), A new agenda for research in educational leadership (pp. 171-184). New York: Teachers College Press.
29. Firestone, W., & Shipps, D. (2005). How do leaders interpret conflicting accountabilities to improve student learning? In W. Firestone & C. Riehl (Eds.), A new agenda for research in educational leadership (pp. 81-100). New York: Teachers College Press.
30. Floden, R. E. (2001). Research on effects of teaching: A continuing model for research on teaching. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 3-16). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
31. Floden, R. E. (2003). Policy tools for improving education. In R. E. Floden (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 27, pp. ix-xii). Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.
32. Fuhrman, S. H., Goertz, M. E., & Weinbaum, E. H. (2007). Educational governance in the United States: Where are we? How did we get there? Why should we care? In S. H. Fuhrman, D. K. Cohen, & F. Mosher (Eds.), The state of education policy research (pp. 41-62). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Goldhaber, D., & Andiony, E. (2003). Teacher quality and student achievement. New York: Teachers College Press.
34. Goldrick, L. (2002, December 9). Improving teacher evaluation to improve teaching quality (National Governors Association, NGA Center for Best Practices Issue Brief). Retrieved from http://www.nga.org/.
35. Graeber, A. O., Newton, K. J., & Chambliss, M. J. (2012). Crossing the borders again: Challenges in comparing quality instruction in mathematics and reading. Teachers College Record, 114(4), 30 pages.
36. Hannaway, J., & Woodroffe, N. (2003). Policy instruments in education. In R. E. Floden (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 27, pp. 1-24). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
37. Heilig, J. V., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Accountability Texas-style: The progress and learning of urban minority students in a high-stakes testing context. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(2), 75-110.
38. Ladd, H. (2007). Holding schools accountable revisited. Spencer Foundation lecture in education policy and management. Washington DC;: Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.
39. Little, J. W. (1999). Organizing schools for teacher learning. In I, . Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes, (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 233-262). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
40. Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41. McCaffrey, D., Lockwood, J., Koretz, D., & Hamilton, L. (2003) Evaluating value-added mod-els for teacher accountability. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
42. McNeil, L. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. New York: Routledge.
43. Miller, R., Murnane, R., & Willett, J. (2008). Do teacher absences impact student achieve-ment? longitudinal evidence from one urban school disuict. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(2), 181-200.
44. No Child Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, §115, Stat. 1425 (2002).
45. Oser, F., Dick, A., & Patry, J. (Eds.). (1992). Effectiveness and responsible teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
46. Paige, R. (2006). No Child Left Behind: The ongoing movement for public education reform. Harvard Educational Review, 76( 4), 461-473.
47. Popham, W. J. (2003). Preparing for the coming avalanche of accountability tests. In Spotlight on high-stakes testing (pp. 9-15). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
48. Porter, A., McMaken, J., Hwang, J., & Yang, R. (2011). Common Core standards: The new U.S. intended curriculum. Educational Researcher, 40(3), 103-116.
49. Raudenbush, S. (2004). What are value-added models estimating and what does this imply for statistical practice? Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(1), 121-129.
50. Rice, J. K. (2003). Teacher-quality. Understanding the effectiveness of teacher attributes. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
51. Richardson, V. (Ed.) (2001). Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed.) Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
52. Richardson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 905-947). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
53. Riehl, C., & Firestone, W. (2005). What research methods should be used to study educa-tional leadership. In W. Firestone & C. Riehl (Eds.), A new agenda for research in educational leadership (pp. 156-170). New York: Teachers College Press.
54. Rivkin, S., Hanushek, E., & Kain, J. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 75(2), 417-458.
55. Sanders, W., & Horn, S.P. (1998). Research findings from the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) database: Implications for educational evaluation and research. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
56. Schemo, D.J. (2004, May 9). When students' gains help teachers' bottom line. New York Times.
57. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A con-temporary perspective. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 3-36). New York: Macmillan.
58. Smylie, M. (1994). Redesigning teachers' work: Connections to the classroom. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 129-177). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
59. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward Utopia: A century of school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60. U.S. Department of Education. (2009a). The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of2009: Saving and creating jobs and reforming education. Retrieved July 1, 2011, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/leg/recovery/ implementation.html.
61. U.S. Department of Education. (2009b). Race to the Top Fund. Retrieved July 1, 2011, from http://www.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/index.html.
62. U.S. Department of Education. (2010). Teacher Incentive Fund. Retrieved July 1, 2011, from http://www2.ed.gov/legislation/FedRegister/finrule/2010-2/ 052110a.html.
63. Valli, L, & Buese, D. (2007). The changing roles of teachers in an era of high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 44( 3), 519-558.
64. Valli, L., & Chambliss, M. (2007). Creating classroom cultures: One teacher, two lessons, and a high-stakes test. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 38( 1), 57-75.
65. Valli, L., Croninger, R., Alexander, P., Chambliss, M., Graeber, A., & Price, J. (2004, April). A study of high-quality teaching: Mathematics and reading. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
66. Valli, L., Croninger, R., Chambliss, M., Graeber, A., & Buese, D. (2008). Test driven: High- stakes accountability in elementary schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
67. Valli, L., Oroninger, R., & Walters, K. (2007). Who [else] is the teacher? Cautionary notes on teacher accountability systems. American Educational Research Journal, 113(4), 635-662.
68. Wainer, H. (2004). Introduction to special issue on value-added assessment. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(1), 1-3.