The penetration of technocratic logic into the educational field: Rationalizing schooling from the progressives to the present

Teachers College Record

Volumn 115, Issue 5, 2013, Pages

  Mehta, Jal ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890572806     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Beland, D., & Hacker, J. S. (2004). Ideas, private institutions, and American welfare state 'Exceptionalism': The case of health and old-age insurance in the United States, 1915- 1965. International Journal of Social Welfare, 13(1), 42-54.
4. Booher-Jennings, J. 2005. Below the bubble: 'Educational Triage' and the Texas accountability system. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 231-268.
5. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
6. Bowers, C. A. (1972). Accountability from a humanist point of view. In F. Sciara & R. Jantz (Eds.), Accountability in American education (pp. 25-32). Boston: Allyn and Beacon.
7. Browder, L. (1971). Emerging patterns of administrative accountability. Berkeley: McCutchan.
8. Browder, L. (1975). Who's afraid of educational accountability?. Denver: Cooperative Accountability Project.
9. Callahan, R. 1962. Education and the cult of efficiency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10. Campbell, J. L. (2002). Ideas, politics, and public policy. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 21-38.
11. Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy, Task Force on Teaching as a Profession. (1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century. New York: Carnegie Forum.
12. Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America's schools. Washington DC: Brookings
13. Citizens' Commission on Civil Rights. (1998). Title I in midstream: The fight to improve schools for poor kids. Washington, DC: Author.
14. Cohen, D. K., & Moffitt, S. L. (2009). The ordeal of equality: Did federal regulation fix the schools? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Coleman, J. (1972). The evaluation of equality of educational opportunity. In F. Mosteller & D, P. Moynihan (Eds.), On equality of educational opportunity. New York: Basic Books.
16. Cubberley, E. P. (1916). Public school administration. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
17. Davies, S. (1999). From moral duty to cultural rights: A case study of political framing in education. Sociology of Education, 72(1), 1-21.
18. Davies, S. (2002). The paradox of progressive education: A frame analysis. Sociology of Education, 75(4), 269-286.
19. Educational Testing Service. (1973). State testing programs. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
20. Elmore, R. F. (2004). School reform from the inside out. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
21. Etzioni, A. (1969). The semi-professions and their organization: Teachers, nurses, and social workers. New York: Free Press.
22. Ferree, M. M., Gamson, W. A., Gerhards J., & Rucht, D. (2002). Shaping abortion discourse: Democracy and the public sphere in Germany and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Finn, C. (1991). We must take charge: Our schools and our future. New York: Free Press.
24. Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational theory (pp. 232-266). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Giordano, G. (2005). How testing came to dominate schools. New York: Peter Lang.
26. Gordon, D. T. (Ed.) (2003). A nation reformed? American education 20 years after a nation at risk. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
27. Guthrie, J. W., & Springer, M. G. (2004). A nation at risk revisited: Did 'wrong' reasoning result in 'right' results? At what cost?. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(1), 7-35.
28. Hall, P. A. (1989). Conclusion: The politics of Keynesian ideas. In Peter Hall (Ed.), The political power of economic ideas: Keynesianism across nations (pp. 361-391). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29. Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the State: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 29, 275-296.
30. Hawke, S., et al. (1975). State accountability activities and the social studies: A nationwide survey, a proposed general accountability model and some guidelines. Boulder, CO: ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science Education and Social Science Education Consortium.
31. Hawthorne, P. (1974). Legislation by the states: Accountability and assessment in education. Report Number 2. Denver, CO: Cooperative Accountability Project.
32. Hofstadter, R. (1955). The age of reform. New York: Knopf.
33. Hofstadter, R. (1963). Anti-intellectualism in American life. New York: Knopf.
34. Holmes Group. (1986). Tomorrow's teachers: The report of the Holmes Group.
35. Huberman, M. (1993). The model of the independent artisan in teachers' professional relations. In J. Little & M. McLaughlin (Eds.), Teacher's work: Individuals, colleagues, and contexts. New York: Teachers College Press.
36. James, T. (1971). The new cult of efficiency and education. In Browder, L.H. (Ed.), Emerging patterns of administrative accountability (pp. 39-46). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
37. Joncich, G., & Guthrie, J. W. (1988). Ed school: a brief for professional education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38. Kliebard, H. M. (1995). The struggle for the American curriculum, 1893-1958. New York, NY: Routledge.
39. Kozol, J. (2005). The shame of the nation: The restoration of apartheid schooling in America. New York, NY: Crown.
40. Krause, E. A. (1996). Death of the guilds: professions, states, and the advance of capitalism, 1930 to the present. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41. Labaree, D. F. (1997). Public good, private goods: the American struggle over educational goals. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 39-81.
42. Lagemann, E. (2000). An elusive science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43. Light, D. (1995). Countervailing powers: A framework for professions in transition. In T. Johnson, G. Larkin, & M. Saks (Eds.), Health professions and the State in Europe (pp. 25-44). London: Routledge.
44. Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher; A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45. MacIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue: A study in moral theory (2nd ed.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. (Original work published 1981)
46. Manna, P. (2006). Schools in: Federalism and the national education agenda. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
47. McGuinn, P. J. (2006). No Child Left Behind and the transformation of federal education policy, 1965-2005. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
48. Mehta, J. (2006). The transformation of American educational policy, 1980-2001: Ideas and the rise of accountability politics (Doctoral dissertation.) Harvard, Cambridge, MA.
49. Mehta, J. (2010). From 'whether' to 'how': The varied roles of ideas in politics. In D. Beland & B. Cox (Eds.), How ideas matter: Reframing political research. Oxford: Oxford, England University Press.
50. Mehta, J. (2012a). How paradigms create politics: The transformation of American educational policy, 1980-2001. Working paper, Harvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, MA.
51. Mehta, J. (2012b). When professions shape politics: the case of accountability in K-12 and higher education. Working paper, Harvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, MA.
52. Mehta, J., Gomez L., & Bryk, A. S. (2012). Building on practical knowledge: The key to a stronger profession is learning from the field. In The futures of school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
53. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
54. Murphy, J., & Cohen, D. (1974). Accountability in education: The Michigan experience. Public Interest, 36, 53-81.
55. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: the imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: The Commission.
56. National Governors' Association. (1986). Time for results: The governors' 1991 report on education. Washington, DC: Author.
57. Orfield, G., & Yun, J. (1999). Resegregation in American schools. Cambridge, MA: Civil Rights Project.
58. Osborne, D., & Gabler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
59. Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
60. Rochefort, D. A., & Cobb, R. W. (1994). The politics of problem definition: Shaping the policy agenda. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas.
61. Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semi-sovereign people: A realist's guide to democracy in America. New York: Holt.
62. Smith, M. S., & O'Day, J. (1991). Systemic school reform. In S. H. Fuhrman & B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing (pp. 233-267). Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.
63. Tucker, M., & Schleicher, A. (2010). Lessons for the United States. In Strong performer and successful reformers in education: Lessons from PISA for the United States. OECD.
64. Tyack, D. (1974). The one best system. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
65. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66. Weick, K. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1-9 (part).
67. Wise, A. (1979). Legislated learning: The bureaucratization of the American classroom. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.