Sugar reduction in probiotic chocolate-flavored milk: Impact on dynamic sensory profile and liking

Food Research International

Volumn 75, Issue , 2015, Pages 148-156

  Oliveira, Denize ^a   Antúnez, Lucía ^b   Giménez, Ana ^b   Castura, John C ^c   Deliza, Rosires ^d   Ares, Gastón ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE LA REPÚBLICA   (Uruguay)

^c Compusense Inc ^*  (Canada)

^d EMBRAPA AGROINDÚSTRIA DE ALIMENTOS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Check all that apply; Cross modal interaction; Thaumatin; Vanilla flavor

Indexed keywords

FOOD PRODUCTS;

CHECK-ALL-THAT-APPLY; CROSS-MODAL INTERACTION; EFFICIENT STRATEGY; FEASIBLE ALTERNATIVES; PROCESSED PRODUCTS; PRODUCT CATEGORIES; SENSORY PROFILES; THAUMATIN;

SENSORY PERCEPTION;

EID: 84938098850     PISSN: 09639969     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.05.050     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Ares G., Barreiro C., Deliza R., Giménez A., Gámbaro A. Application of a check-all-that-apply question to the development of chocolate milk desserts. Journal of Sensory Studies 2010, 25:67-87.
2. Ares G., Giménez A., Barreiro C., Gámbaro A. Use of an open-ended question to identify drivers of liking of milk desserts. Comparison with preference mapping techniques. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:286-294.
3. Bayarri S., Carbonell I., Barrios E.X., Costell E. Impact of sensory differences on consumer acceptability of yoghurt and yoghurt-like products. International Dairy Journal 2011, 21:111-118.
4. Biguzzi C., Schlich P., Lange C. The impact of sugar and fat reduction on perception and liking of biscuits. Food Quality and Preference 2014, 35:41-47.
5. Birch L.L. Development of food preferences. Annual Review of Nutrition 1999, 19:41-62.
6. Boakes R.A., Hemberger H. Odour-modulation of taste ratings by chefs. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 25:81-86.
7. Caballero B. Sucrose: dietary sucrose and disease. Encyclopedia of human nutrition 2013, 231-233. Academic Press, Waltham. Third edition. B. Caballero (Ed.).
8. Cadena R.S., Bolini H.M.A. Ideal and relative sweetness of high intensity sweeteners in mango nectar. International Journal of Food Science & Technology 2012, 47:991-996.
9. Cadena R.S., Vidal L., Ares G., Varela P. Dynamic sensory descriptive methodologies. Time-intensity and temporal dominance of sensations. Novel techniques in sensory characterization and consumer profiling 2014, 333-364. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. P. Varela, G. Ares (Eds.).
10. Castura J.C., Antúnez L., Giménez A., Ares G. Temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA): A novel dynamic method for characterizing products. Sensometrics 2014, 29th July-August 1st 2014, Chicago, USA 2014.
11. Castura J.C., Antúnez L., Giménez A., Ares G. Temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA): a novel dynamic method for characterizing products. Food Quality and Preference 2015, (submitted for publication).
12. Chollet M., Gille D., Schmid A., Walther B., Piccinali P. Acceptance of sugar reduction in flavored yogurt. Journal of Dairy Science 2013, 96:5501-5511.
13. Civille C.V., Oftedal K.N. Sensory evaluation techniques - make "good for you" taste "good". Physiology & Behavior 2012, 107:598-605.
14. Cleveland S.W., Grosse E., Shyu W.M. Local regression models. Statistical Models in S 1992, 309-376. Chapman and Hall, New York. J.M. Chambers, T.J. Hastie (Eds.).
15. Crammer B. Recent trends in some natural sweet substances from plants. Selected topics in the chemistry of natural products 2008, 189-208. World Scientific, Singapore. R. Ikan (Ed.).
16. De Souza V.R., Pinheiro A.C.M., Carneiro J.D.D.S., Pinto S.M., Abreu L.R., Menezes C.C. Analysis of various sweeteners in petit suisse cheese: Determination of the ideal and equivalent sweetness. Journal of Sensory Studies 2011, 26:339-345.
17. Delwiche J. The impact of perceptual interactions on perceived flavor. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15:137-146.
18. Galland L. Functional foods. Health effects and clinical applications. Encyclopedia of human nutrition 2013, volume 2:366-371. Academic Press, Waltham, MA. L.H. Allen, A. Prentice, B. Caballero (Eds.).
19. Gibbs B.F., Alli I., Mulligan C. Sweet and taste-modifying proteins: a review. Nutrition Research 1996, 16:1619-1630.
20. Glória M.B.A. Sweeteners | Others. Encyclopedia of food sciences and nutrition 2003, 5695-5702. Academic Press, Oxford. Second edition. B. Caballero (Ed.).
21. Gower J.C., Lubbe S.G., Le Roux N.J. Understanding biplots 2011, 119. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Singapore.
22. Greenacre M. Tying up the loose ends in simple correspondence analysis. Economics Working Papers 940 2006, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
23. Greenacre M., Nenadic O., Friendly M. ca: simple, multiple and joint correspondence analysis. R package version 0.55 (Last accessed February 12th, 2015). http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ca.
24. Grygorczyk A., Lesschaeve I., Corredig M., Duizer L. Extraction of consumer texture preferences for yogurt: Comparison of the preferred attribute elicitation method to conventional profiling. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 27:215-222.
25. Guarner F., Schaafsma G.J. Probiotics. International Journal of Food Microbiology 1998, 39:237-238.
26. Hagiwara A., Yoshino H., Sano M., Kawabe M., Tamano S., Sakaue K., et al. Thirteen-week feeding study of thaumatin (a natural proteinaceous sweetener), sterilized by electron beam irradiation, in Sprague-Dawley rats. Food Chemistry & Toxicology 2005, 43:1297-1302.
27. Havey R.E. How sweet it is: Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption, obesity and cardiovascular risk in childhood. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2010, 110:1456-1460.
28. ISO Sensory analysis: General guidance for the design of test rooms, ISO Standard 8589 2007, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
29. ISO Sensory analysis-General guidance for the selection, training, and monitoring of selected assessors and expert sensory assessors. ISO Standard 8586:2012 2012, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
30. Koivistoinen P., Hyvönen L. The use of sugar in foods. International Dental Journal 1985, 35:175-179.
31. Köster E.P., Couronne T., Léon F., Lévy C., Marcelino A.S. Repeatability in hedonic sensory measurements: A conceptual exploration. Food Quality and Preference 2002, 14:165-176.
32. Labbe D., Martin N. Impact of novel olfactory stimuli at supra and subthreshold concentrations on the perceived sweetness of sucrose after associative learning. Chemical Senses 2009, 34:645-651.
33. Labbe D., Rytz A., Morgenegg C., Ali S., Martin N. Subthreshold olfactory stimulation can enhance sweetness. Chemical Senses 2007, 34:645-651.
34. Lahtinen S.J., Ouwehand A.C., Salminen S.J., Forssell P., Myllärinen P. Effect of starch- and lipid-based encapsulation on the culturability of two Bifidobacterium longum strains. Letters in Applied Microbiology 2007, 44:500-505.
35. Lavin J.G., Lawless H.T. Effects of color and odor on judgments of sweetness among children and adults. Food Quality and Preference 1998, 9:283-289.
36. Lawless H.T., Heymann H. Sensory evaluation of food: Principles and practices 2010, Springer, New York. 2nd edition.
37. Lustig R.H., Schmidt L.A., Brindis C.D. The toxic truth about sugar. Nature 2012, 482:27-29.
38. MacGregor G.A., Hashem K.M. Action on sugar-lessons from UK salt reduction programme. Lancet 2014, 383:929-931.
39. Meyners M., Castura J.C. Check-all-that apply questions. Novel Techniques in Sensory Characterization and Consumer Profiling 2014, 271-305. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. P. Varela, G. Ares (Eds.).
40. Morenga L., Mallard S., Mann J. Dietary sugars and body weight: Systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies. BMJ 2013, 346:e7492.
41. Mortazavian A.M., Ehsani M.R., Sohrabvandi S., Reiheimer J.A. MRS-Bile agar: Its suitability for the enumeration of mixed probiotic in cultured dairy products. Milchwissenschaft 2007, 62:270-272.
42. Nenadic O., Greenacre M. Correspondence analysis in R, with two- and three-dimensional graphics: The ca package. Journal of Statistical Software 2007, 20(3):1-13.
43. Paixão J.A., Rodrigues J.B., Esmerino E.A., Cruz A.G., Bolini H.M.A. Influence of temperature and fat content on ideal sucrose concentration, sweetening power, and sweetness equivalence of different sweeteners in chocolate milk beverage. Journal of Dairy Science 2014, 97:7344-7353.
44. Pineau N., Schlich P., Cordelle S., Mathonnière C., Issanchou S., Imbert A., et al. Temporal dominance of sensations: construction of the TDS curves and comparison with time-intensity. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:450-455.
45. Poinot P., Arvisenet G., Ledauphin J., Gaillard J.-L., Prost C. How can aroma-related cross-modal interactions be analysed? A review of current methodologies. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 28:304-316.
46. Popa D., Ustunol Z. Sensory attributes of low-fat strawberry yoghurt as influenced by honey from different floral sources, sucrose and high-fructose corn sweetener. International Journal of Dairy Technology 2011, 64:451-454.
47. Possemiers S., Marzorati M., Verstraete W., Van de Wiele T. Bacteria and chocolate: A successful combination for probiotic delivery. International Journal of Food Microbiology 2010, 141:97-103.
48. R Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing 2014, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, (URL http://www.R-project.org/).
49. Stein L.G., Nagai H., Nakagawa M., Beauchamp G.K. Effects of repeated exposure and health-related information on hedonic evaluation and acceptance of a bitter beverage. Appetite 2003, 40:119-129.
50. Sudre J., Pineau N., Loret C., Martin N. Comparison of methods to monitor liking of food during consumption. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 24:179-189.
51. Thompson J.L., Lopetcharat K., Drake M.A. Preferences for commercial strawberry drinkable yogurts among African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic consumers in the United States. Journal of Dairy Science 2007, 90:4974-4987.
52. Tukey J. Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics 1949, 5(2):99-114.
53. Yebra-Biurrun M.C. Sweeteners. Encyclopedia of analytical science 2005, 562-572. Elsevier, Oxford. Second edition. P. Worsfold, A. Townshend, C. Poole (Eds.).
54. Zorn S., Alcaire F., Vidal L., Giménez A., Ares G. Application of multiple-sip temporal dominance of sensations to the evaluation of sweeteners. Food Quality and Preference 2014, 36:135-143.