Impact of sensory differences on consumer acceptability of yoghurt and yoghurt-like products

International Dairy Journal

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 111-118

  Bayarri, S ^a   Carbonell, I ^a   Barrios, E X ^a   Costell, E ^a  

^a INSTITUTO DE AGROQUÍMICA Y TECNOLOGÍA DE ALIMENTOS CSIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMERCIAL SAMPLE; CONSUMER ACCEPTABILITY; FERMENTED MILK; MARKET RESPONSE; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES REGRESSION; SECOND GROUP; SENSORY ATTRIBUTES; SENSORY PROFILES;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS;

GROUP TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 78549245466     PISSN: 09586946     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2010.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Allgeyer L.C., Miller M.J., Lee S.-Y. Drivers of liking for yogurt drinks with prebiotics and probiotics. Journal of Food Science 2010, 75:S212-S219.
2. Barrios E.X., Bayarri S., Carbonell I., Izquierdo L., Costell E. Consumer attitudes and opinions toward functional foods: a focus group study. Journal of Sensory Studies 2008, 23:514-525.
3. Bayarri S., Carbonell I., Barrios E.X., Costell E. Acceptability of yoghurt and yoghurt-like products. Influence of product information and consumer characteristics and preferences. Journal of Sensory Studies 2010, 25:171-189.
4. Behrens J.H., Villanueva N.D.M., Da Silva M.A.A.P. Effect of nutrition and health claims on the acceptability of soyamilk beverages. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 2007, 42:50-56.
5. Carbonell L., Bayarri S., Navarro J.L., Carbonell I., Izquierdo L. Sensory profile and acceptability of juices from mandarin varieties and hybrids. Food Science and Technology International 2009, 15:375-385.
6. Carlucci A., Monteleone E. Statistical validation of sensory data: a study on wine. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2001, 81:751-758.
7. Childs J.L., Yates M.D., Drake M.A. Sensory properties and consumer perception of wet and dry cheese sauces. Journal of Food Science 2009, 74:205-218.
8. Civille G.V., Lyon B.G. Aroma and flavor. Lexicon for sensory evaluation. Terms, definitions, references, and examples 1996, American Society for Testing and Materials DS 66 (158 pp.). West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
9. Costell E. A comparison of sensory methods in quality control. Food Quality and Preference 2002, 13:341-353.
10. Costell E., Pastor M.V., Izquierdo L., Duran L. Relationships between acceptability and sensory attributes of peach nectars using internal preference mapping. European Food Research and Technology 2000, 211:199-204.
11. Costell E., Tárrega A., Bayarri S. Food acceptance: the role of consumer perception and attitudes. Chemosensory Perception 2010, 3:42-50.
12. Damasio M.H., Costell E. Análisis sensorial descriptivo: Generación de descriptores y selección de catadores. Revista de Agroquímica y Tecnología de Alimentos 1991, 31:165-178.
13. Dello Staffolo M., Bertola N., Martino M., Bevilacqua A. Influence of dietary fiber addition on sensory and rheological properties of yogurt. International Dairy Journal 2004, 14:783-789.
14. Drake S.L., Lopetcharat K., Drake M.A. Comparison of two methods to explore consumer preferences for cottage cheese. Journal of Dairy Science 2009, 92:5883-5897.
15. González-Tomás L.M., Bayarri S., Costell E. Inulin-enriched dairy desserts. Physicochemical and sensory aspects. Journal of Dairy Science 2009, 92:4188-4199.
16. Greenhoff K., MacFie H.J.H. Preference mapping in practice. Measurements of food preferences 1994, 137-166. Blackie Academic and Professional, Glasgow, UK. 1st ed. H.J.H. MacFie, D.M.H. Thompson (Eds.).
17. Guggisberg D., Cuthbert-Steven J., Piccinali P., Bütikofer U., Eberhard P. Rheological, microstructural and sensory characterization of low-fat and whole milk set yoghurt as influenced by inulin addition. International Dairy Journal 2009, 19:107-115.
18. Hunter E.A., Muir D.D. Sensory properties of fermented milks: objective reduction of an extensive sensory vocabulary. Journal of Sensory Studies 1993, 8:213-227.
19. ISO 8586-1 Sensory analysis. General guidance for the selection, training and monitoring of assessors. Part I. Selected assessors 1993, Geneva. Switzerland.
20. ISO 8589 Sensory Analysis. General guidance for the design of test rooms 2007, Geneva. Switzerland.
21. Jacobsen T., Gunderson R.W. Applied clusters analysis. Statistical procedures in food research 1986, 361-408. Elsevier, Glasgow, UK. J.R. Piggot (Ed.).
22. Kähkönen P., Tuorila H., Lawless H.T. Lack of effect of taste and nutrition claims on sensory and hedonic responses to a fat-free yogurt. Food Quality and Preference 1997, 8:125-130.
23. Ligget R.E., Drake M.A., Delwiche J.F. Impact of flavor attributes on consumer liking of Swiss cheese. Journal of Dairy Science 2008, 91:466-476.
24. MacFie H.J., Bratchell N., Greenhoff K., Vallis L.V. Designs to balance the effect of order of presentation and first-order carry-over effects in Hall tests. Journal of Sensory Studies 1989, 4:129-148.
25. Moskowitz, H. R. (1994). Sensory segmentation and product design Food concepts and products. Just-in-time development (pp. 233-291). Trumbull, CO, USA: Food and Nutrition Press.
26. Newsholme H.C. Consumer awareness of and attitudes towards functional foods 2002, (45 pp.). R & D No. 162, Campden and Chorleywood Food Research Association Group.
27. O'Mahony M. Some assumptions and difficulties with common statistics. Food Technology 1982, 36:75-82.
28. Pohjanheimo T., Sandell M. Explaining the liking for drinking yoghurt: the role of sensory quality, food choice motives, health concern and product information. International Dairy Journal 2009, 19:459-466.
29. Shepherd R., Sparks P., Bellier S., Raats M.M. The effects of information on sensory ratings and preferences: the importance of attitudes. Food Quality and Preference 1991-1992, 3:147-155.
30. Siró I., Kàpolna E., Kàpolna B., Lugasi A. Functional food. Product development, marketing and consumer acceptance. A review. Appetite 2008, 51:456-457.
31. Tárrega A., Costell E. Effect of inulin addition on rheological and sensory properties of fat-free starch-based dairy desserts. International Dairy Journal 2006, 16:1104-1112.
32. Tenenhaus M., Pages J., Ambroisine L., Guinot C. PLS methodology to study relationships between hedonic judgements and product characteristics. Food Quality and Preference 2005, 16:315-325.
33. Tomic O., Nilsen A., Martens M., Naes T. Visualization of sensory profiling data for performance monitoring. LWT - Food Science and Technology 2007, 40:262-269.
34. Van Kleef E., Van Trijp H.C.M., Luning P. Consumer research in the early stages of new product development: a critical review of methods and techniques. Food Quality and Preference 2005, 16:181-201.
35. Vie A., Gulli D., O'Mahony M. Alternative hedonic measures. Journal of Food Science 1991, 56:1-5.
36. Vigneau E., Qannari E.M. Segmentation of consumers taking account external data. A clustering of variables approach. Food Quality and Preference 2002, 13:515-521.
37. Vigneau E., Qannari E.M., Punter P.H., Knoops S. Segmentation of a panel of consumers using clustering of variables around latent directions of preference. Food Quality and Preference 2001, 12:359-363.
38. Villanueva N.D.M., Petenate A.J., Da Silva M.A.A.P. Performance of three affective methods and diagnosis of the ANOVA model. Food Quality and Preference 2000, 11:363-370.
39. Villegas B., Tárrega A., Carbonell I., Costell E. Optimising acceptability of new prebiotic low-fat milk beverages. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:234-242.
40. Wold S., Sjöstrom M., Eriksson L. PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2001, 58:109-130.
41. Young N.D., Drake M., Lopetcharat K., McDaniel M.R. Preference mapping of cheddar cheese with varying maturity levels. Journal of Dairy Science 2004, 87:11-19.