The Role of Interpersonal Traits in Social Decision Making: Exploring Sources of Behavioral Heterogeneity in Economic Games

Personality and Social Psychology Review

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 277-302

  Zhao, Kun ^a   Smillie, Luke D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

agreeableness; bargaining games; economic games; extraversion; HEXACO; honesty humility; social dilemmas

Indexed keywords

ALTRUISM; BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS; DECISION MAKING; EXTRAVERSION; GAME; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; PERSONALITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ALTRUISM; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS, BEHAVIORAL; EXTRAVERSION (PSYCHOLOGY); GAMES, EXPERIMENTAL; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NEGOTIATING; PERSONALITY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84936853978     PISSN: 10888683     EISSN: 15327957     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1088868314553709     Document Type: Article

References (223)

1. M.AlmlundA.L.DuckworthJ.J.HeckmanT.D.Kautz (2011). Personality psychology and economics. In E.HanushekS.MachinL.Woessman (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (pp. 1-181). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
2. M.C.AshtonK.Lee (2001). A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15, 327-353.
3. M.C.AshtonK.Lee (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150-166. doi:10.1177/1088868306294907
4. M.C.AshtonK.Lee (2008). The prediction of honesty-humility-related criteria by the HEXACO and Five-Factor Models of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1216-1228. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.03.006
5. M.C.AshtonK.LeeR.E.de Vries (2014). The HEXACO honesty-humility, agreeableness, and emotionality factors: A review of research and theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 139-152. doi:10.1177/1088868-314523838
6. M.C.AshtonK.LeeS.V.Paunonen (2002). What is the central feature of extraversion? Social attention versus reward sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 245-251. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.83.1.245
7. M.C.AshtonK.LeeM.PeruginiP.SzarotaR.E.de VriesL.Di BlasB.. De Raad (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 356-366. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.356
8. M.C.AshtonS.V.PaunonenE.HelmesD.N.Jackson (1998). Kin altruism, reciprocal altruism, and the Big Five personality factors. Evolution & Human Behavior, 19, 243-255. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00009-9
9. W.AuJ.Kwong (2004). Measurement and effects of social value orientation in social dilemmas: A review. In R.SuleimanD.BudescuI.FischerD.Messick (Eds.), Contemporary psychological research on social dilemmas (pp. 71-98). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
10. D.BallietC.ParksJ.Joireman (2009). Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 533-547. doi:10.1177/1368430209105040
11. D.BallietP.A.M.van Lange (2013). Trust, conflict, and cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 1090-1112. doi:10.1037/a0030939
12. C.D.Batson (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. C.D.BatsonN.Ahmad (2001). Empathy-induced altruism in a prisoner’s dilemma II: What if the target of empathy has defected?European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 25-36.
14. C.D.BatsonT.Moran (1999). Empathy-induced altruism in a prisoner’s dilemma. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 909-924.
15. A.BaumertT.SchlösserM.Schmitt (2013). Economic games: A performance-based assessment of fairness and altruism. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 178-192. doi:10.1027/1015–5759/a000183
16. A.BeckerT.DeckersT.DohmenA.FalkF.Kosse (2012). The relationship between economic preferences and psychological personality measures. Annual Review of Economics, 4, 453-478. doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-110922
17. R.Bekkers (2005). Participation in voluntary associations: Relations with resources, personality, and political values. Political Psychology, 26, 439-454.
18. R.Bekkers (2006). Traditional and health-related philanthropy: The role of resources and personality. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69, 349-366.
19. R.Bekkers (2010). Who gives what and when? A scenario study of intentions to give time and money. Social Science Research, 39, 369-381. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.08.008
20. A.Ben-NerF.Halldorsson (2010). Trusting and trust-worthiness: What are they, how to measure them, and what affects them. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31, 64-79. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2009.10.001
21. A.Ben-NerF.KongL.Putterman (2004). Share and share alike? Gender-pairing, personality, and cognitive ability as determinants of giving. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25, 581-589. doi:10.1016/S0167-4870(03)00065-5
22. A.Ben-NerA.Kramer (2011). Personality and altruism in the dictator game: Relationship to giving to kin, collaborators, competitors, and neutrals. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 216-221. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.04.024
23. A.Ben-NerA.KramerO.Levy (2008). Economic and hypothetical dictator game experiments: Incentive effects at the individual level. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37, 1775-1784. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2007.11.004
24. A.Ben-NerL.PuttermanF.KongD.Magan (2004). Reciprocity in a two-part dictator game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 53, 333-352. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2002.12.001
25. J.BergJ.DickhautK.McCabe (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 122-142.
26. J.M.BergS.O.LilienfeldI.D.Waldman (2013). Bargaining with the devil: Using economic decision-making tasks to examine the heterogeneity of psychopathic traits. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 472-482. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.04.003
27. J.W.BerryE.L.WorthingtonL.E.O’ConnorL.ParrottN.G.Wade (2005). Forgivingness, vengeful rumination, and affective traits. Journal of Personality, 73, 183-225. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00308.x
28. B.A.BettencourtA.TalleyA.J.BenjaminJ.Valentine (2006). Personality and aggressive behavior under provoking and neutral conditions: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 751-777. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.751
29. S.BogaertC.BooneC.Declerck (2008). Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A review and conceptual model. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 453-480. doi:10.1348/014466607X244970
30. G.E.BoltonR.Zwick (1995). Anonymity versus punishment in ultimatum bargaining. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 95-121.
31. C.BooneB.De BrabanderA.van Witteloostuijn (1999b). The impact of personality on behavior in five prisoner’s dilemma games. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20, 343-377.
32. L.BorghansA.L.DuckworthJ.J.HeckmanB.ter Weel (2008). The economics and psychology of personality traits. Journal of Human Resources, 43, 972-1059.
33. T.J.BouchardJ.C.Loehlin (2001). Genes, evolution, and personality. Behavior Genetics, 31, 243-273.
34. H.BrandstätterW.Güth (2002). Personality in dictator and ultimatum games. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 10, 191-215.
35. H.BrandstätterM.Königstein (2001). Personality influences on ultimatum bargaining decisions. European Journal of Personality, 15, S53-S70.
36. J.BrandtsG.Charness (2000). Hot vs. cold: Sequential responses and preference stability in experimental games. Experimental Economics, 2, 227-238.
37. S.BrocklebankG.J.LewisT.C.Bates (2011). Personality accounts for stable preferences and expectations across a range of simple games. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 881-886. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.007
38. R.M.BurlandoF.Guala (2005). Heterogeneous agents in public goods experiments. Experimental Economics, 8, 35-54. doi:10.1007/s10683-005-0436-4
39. D.M.Buss (1991). Evolutionary personality psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 459-491. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.42.020191.002331
40. C.F.Camerer (2003). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton, NJ: Russell Sage.
41. C.F.CamererE.Fehr (2004). Measuring social norms and preferences using experimental games: A guide for social scientists. In J.HeinrichR.BoydS.BowlesC.CamererE.FehrH.Gintis (Eds.), Foundations of human sociality: Economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small-scale societies (pp. 55-95). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
42. C.F.Camerer (in press). The promise and success of lab-field generalizability in experimental economics: A critical reply to Levitt and List. In G.FrechetteA.Schotter (Eds.), The methods of modern experimental economics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
43. G.CarloM.A.OkunG.P.KnightM.R.T.de Guzman (2005). The interplay of traits and motives on volunteering: Agreeableness, extraversion and prosocial value motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1293-1305. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.08.012
44. D.R.CarneyJ.T.JostS.D.GoslingJ.Potter (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29, 807-840.
45. J.CarpenterE.VerhoogenS.Burks (2005). The effect of stakes in distribution experiments. Economics Letters, 86, 393-398. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2004.08.007
46. C.S.CarverT.L.White (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319-333. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.67.2.319
47. M.CasariT.N.Cason (2009). The strategy method lowers measured trustworthy behavior. Economics Letters, 103, 157-159. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2009.03.012
48. H.E.P.Cattell (1995). Some comments on a factor analysis of the 16PF and the NE Personality Inventory-Revised. Psychological Reports, 77, 1307-1311.
49. R.CattellA.CattellH.E.P.Cattell (1993). 16PF Fifth Edition Questionnaire. Champaign, IL: Institute for Persona-lity and Ability Testing.
50. R.CattellH.W.EberM.M.Tatsuoka (1964). Handbook for the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire,“The 16 PF Text,” Forms A, B, and C. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
51. D.CesariniC.T.DawesJ.H.FowlerM.JohannessonP.LichtensteinB.Wallace (2008). Heritability of cooperative behavior in the trust game. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 3721-3726.
52. G.CharnessM.Rabin (2002). Understanding social preferences with simple tests. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 817-869.
53. X.-P.ChenD.G.Bachrach (2003). Tolerance of free-riding: The effects of defection size, defection pattern, and social orientation in a repeated public goods dilemma. Organiza-tional Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90, 139-147. doi:10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00511-3
54. A.ChirumboloL.Leone (2010). Personality and politics: The role of the HEXACO model of personality in predicting ideology and voting. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 43-48.
55. M.X.CohenJ.YoungJ.-M.BaekC.KesslerC.Ranganath (2005). Individual differences in extraversion and dopamine genetics predict neural reward responses. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 851-861.
56. P.F.CollinsR.A.Depue (1992). A neurobehavioural systems approach to developmental psychopathology: Implications for disorders of affect. In D.CicchettiS.L.Toth (Eds.), Developmental perspectives on depression (Vol. 4, pp. 29-101). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
57. C.H.Coombs (1973). A reparameterization of the prisoner’s dilemma game. Behavioral Science, 18, 424-428.
58. W.H.CooperM.J.Withey (2009). The strong situation hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 279-284. doi:10.1177/1088868308329378
59. P.J.CorrN.McNaughton (2012). Neuroscience and approach/avoidance personality traits: A two stage (valuation-motivation) approach. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 2339-2354.
60. P.T.CostaR.R.McCrae (1989). NEO PI/FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
61. P.T.CostaR.R.McCrae (1992a). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 653-665. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I
62. P.T.CostaR.R.McCrae (1992b). NEO-PI-R professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
63. P.T.CostaR.R.McCrae (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 21-50.
64. P.T.CostaR.R.McCraeD.A.Dye (1991). Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 887-898. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(91)90177-D
65. D.Daruvala (2010). Would the right social preference model please stand up!Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 73, 197-221.
66. R.Dawes (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169-193.
67. R.DawesJ.M.OrbellR.T.SimmonsA.J.C.Van De Kragt (1986). Organizing groups for collective action. The American Political Science Review, 80, 1171-1185.
68. R.A.Depue (2006). Interpersonal behavior and the structure of personality: Neurobehavioral foundation of agentic extra-version and affiliation. In T.Canli (Ed.), Biology of personality and individual differences (pp. 60-92). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
69. R.A.DepueP.F.Collins (1999). Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 491-517.
70. R.A.DepueW.G.Iacono (1989). Neurobehavioral aspects of affective disorders. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 457-492.
71. R.A.DepueJ.V.Morrone-Strupinsky (2005). A neurobehavioral model of affiliative bonding: Implications for conceptualizing a human trait of affiliation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 313-349.
72. M.Deutsch (1960). The effect of motivational orientation upon trust and suspicion. Human Relations, 13, 123-139.
73. R.E.de Vries (2013). The 24-item Brief HEXACO Inventory (BHI). Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 871-880. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.003
74. C.G.DeYoung (2006). Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1138-1151. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1138
75. C.G.DeYoung (2010). Toward a theory of the Big Five. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 26-33.
76. C.G.DeYoung (2013). The neuromodulator of exploration: A unifying theory of the role of dopamine in personality. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, Article 762. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00762
77. C.G.DeYoung (2014). Openness/Intellect: A dimension of personality reflecting cognitive exploration. In M.L.CooperR.J.Larsen (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Personality processes and individual differences (Vol 4, pp. 369-399). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
78. C.G.DeYoungJ.R.Gray (2009). Personality neuroscience: Explaining individual differences in affect, behavior, and cognition. In P.J.CorrG.Matthews (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 323-346). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
79. C.G.DeYoungJ.B.HirshM.S.ShaneX.PapademetrisN.RajeevanJ.R.Gray (2010). Testing predictions from personality neuroscience: Brain structure and the Big Five. Psychological Science, 21, 820-828.
80. C.G.DeYoungJ.B.PetersonD.M.Higgins (2002). Higher-order factors of the Big Five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health?Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 533-552.
81. C.G.DeYoungL.C.QuiltyJ.B.Peterson (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880-896. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.880
82. C.G.DeYoungY.J.WeisbergL.C.QuiltyJ.B.Peterson (2013). Unifying the aspects of the Big Five, the interpersonal circumplex, and trait affiliation. Journal of Personality, 81, 465-475. doi:10.1111/jopy.12020
83. J.M.Digman (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
84. J.M.Digman (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246-1256.
85. M.DufwenbergU.Gneezy (2000). Measuring beliefs in an experimental lost wallet game. Games and Economic Behavior, 30, 163-182.
86. P.D.DunlopD.L.MorrisonJ.KoenigB.Silcox (2012). Comparing the Eysenck and HEXACO models of personality in the prediction of adult delinquency. European Journal of Personality, 26, 194-202. doi:10.1002/per.824
87. C.ElshaugJ.Metzer (2001). Personality attributes of volunteers and paid workers engaged in similar occupational tasks. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 752-763. doi:10.1080/00224540109600586
88. C.Engel (2011). Dictator games: A meta study. Experimental Economics, 14, 583-610.
89. S.Epstein (1979). The stability of behavior: I. On predicting most of the people much of the time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1097-1126.
90. A.M.EvansW.Revelle (2008). Survey and behavioral measurements of interpersonal trust. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1585-1593. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.07.011
91. H.J.Eysenck (1947). Dimensions of personality. New York, NY: Praefer.
92. H.J.Eysenck (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
93. H.J.EysenckS.B.G.Eysenck (1964). Eysenck Personality Inventory. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing.
94. H.J.EysenckS.B.G.Eysenck (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. London, England: Hodder & Stoughton.
95. R.FahrB.Irlenbusch (2008). Identifying personality traits to enhance trust between organisations: An experimental approach. Managerial and Decision Economics, 29, 469-487. doi:10.1002/mde
96. E.FehrS.Gächter (2000). Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. American Economic Review, 90, 980-994.
97. E.FehrK.Schmidt (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817-868.
98. E.FergusonJ.J.HeckmanP.Corr (2011a). Personality and economics: Overview and proposed framework. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 201-209. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.030
99. E.FergusonJ.J.HeckmanP.Corr (Eds). (2011b). Special issue on personality and economics. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(3).
100. M.Flood (1958). Some experimental games. Management Science, 5, 5-26.
101. R.ForsytheJ.L.HorowitzN.E.SavinM.Sefton (1994). Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 6, 347-369.
102. R.FoschiM.Lauriola (2014). Does sociability predict civic involvement and political participation?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 339-357. doi:10.1037/a0035331
103. D.C.Fowles (1980). The three arousal model: Implications of Gray’s two-factor learning theory for heart rate, electrodermal activity, and psychopathy. Psychophysiology, 17, 87-104.
104. A.FranzenS.Pointner (2012). The external validity of giving in the dictator game. Experimental Economics, 16, 155-169. doi:10.1007/s10683-012-9337-5
105. J.S.GillisG.T.Woods (1971). The 16PF as an indicator of performance in the prisoner’s dilemma game. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 15(3), 393-402.
106. A.GlöcknerB.E.Hilbig (2012). Risk is relative: Risk aversion yields cooperation rather than defection in cooperation-friendly environments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 546-553. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0224-z
107. L.R.Goldberg (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 2(1), 141-165.
108. L.R.Goldberg (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26-34.
109. I.GómezJ.M.GonzálezT.Cardona (1976). Relationship between cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma game and the E (Extraversion), N (Neuroticism) and P (Psychoticism) scales. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 8(1), 25-29.
110. J.A.Gray (1973). Causal models of personality and how to test them. In J.Royce (Ed.), Multivariate analysis and psychological theory (pp. 409-463). London, England: Academic Press.
111. W.G.GrazianoN.Eisenberg (1997). Agreeableness: A dimension of personality. In R.HoganJ.JohnstonS.Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 795-824). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
112. W.G.GrazianoM.M.HabashiB.E.SheeseR.M.Tobin (2007). Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: A person × situation perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 583-599. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.583
113. W.G.GrazianoL.A.Jensen-CampbellE.C.Hair (1996). Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: The case for agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 820-835.
114. W.G.GrazianoR.M.Tobin (2009). Agreeableness. In M.LearyR.Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 46-61). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
115. W.Güth (2010). The generosity game and calibration of inequity aversion. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 39, 155-157. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2009.10.012
116. W.GüthM.LevatiM.Ploner (2009, September). Making the world a better place: Experimental evidence from the generosity game (Jena Economic Research Paper, No. 2009-071). Jena, Germany: Friedrich Schiller University and Max Planck Institute of Economics.
117. W.GüthR.SchmittbergerB.Schwarze (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3, 367-388.
118. B.W.HaasK.OmuraR.T.ConstableT.Canli (2007). Is automatic emotion regulation associated with agreeableness? A perspective using a social neuroscience approach. Psychological Science, 18, 130-132.
119. J.Heckman (2011, August). Integrating personality psychology into economics (NBER Working Paper Series, No. 17378). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
120. J.F.Hemphill (2003). Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. American Psychologist, 58, 78-79. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.1.78
121. M.HermesD.HagemannE.NaumannC.Walter (2011). Extraversion and its positive emotional core—Further evidence from neuroscience. Emotion, 11, 367-378.
122. B.E.HilbigA.GlöcknerI.Zettler (2014). Personality and pro-social behavior: Linking basic traits and social value orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 529-539. doi:10.1037/a0036074
123. B.E.HilbigI.Zettler (2009). Pillars of cooperation: Honesty-Humility, social value orientations, and economic behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 516-519. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.003
124. B.E.HilbigI.ZettlerT.Heydasch (2012). Personality, punishment and public goods: Strategic shifts towards cooperation as a matter of dispositional Honesty-Humility. European Journal of Personality, 26, 245-254. doi:10.1002/per.830
125. B.E.HilbigI.ZettlerF.LeistT.Heydasch (2013). It takes two: Honesty-Humility and agreeableness differentially predict active versus reactive cooperation. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 598-603. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.008
126. J.B.HirshC.G.DeYoungX.XuJ.B.Peterson (2010). Compassionate liberals and polite conservatives: Associations of agreeableness with political ideology and moral values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 655-664. doi:10.1177/0146167210366854
127. J.B.HirshJ.B.Peterson (2009). Extraversion, neuroticism, and the prisoner’s dilemma. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 254-256. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.10.006
128. W.K.HofsteeB.De RaadL.R.Goldberg (1992). Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 146-163.
129. L.A.Jensen-CampbellW.G.Graziano (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69, 323-362.
130. O.P.John (1990). The “Big Five” factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and questionnaires. In L.Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 66-100). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
131. O.P.JohnE.M.DonahueR.L.Kentle (1991). The Big Five Inventory: Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
132. O.P.JohnL.P.NaumannC.J.Soto (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O.P.JohnW.RobinsL.A.Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (Vol. 3, pp. 114-158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
133. O.P.JohnS.Srivastava (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L.PervinO.John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 102-138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
134. N.D.JohnsonA.A.Mislin (2011). Trust games: A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 865-889. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2011.05.007
135. J.KagelP.McGee (2014). Personality and cooperation in finitely repeated prisoner’s dilemma games. Economics Letters, 124, 274-277. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2014.05.034
136. D.KahnemanJ.L.KnetschR.H.Thaler (1986). Fairness and the assumptions of economics. Journal of Business, 59, S285-S300.
137. K.KalshovenD.N.Den HartogA.H.B.De Hoogh (2010). Ethical leader behavior and Big Five factors of personality. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 349-366. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0685-9
138. G.KaragonlarD.M.Kuhlman (2013). The role of social value orientation in response to an unfair offer in the ultimatum game. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 228-239. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.07.006
139. B.King-CasasC.SharpL.Lomax-BreamT.LohrenzP.FonagyP.R.Montague (2008). The rupture and repair of cooperation in borderline personality disorder. Science, 321, 806-810. doi:10.1126/science.1156902
140. A.KirmanM.Teschl (2010). Selfish or selfless? The role of empathy in economics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365, 303-317. doi:10.10-98/rstb.2009.0192
141. S.L.KooleW.JagerA.E.van den BergC.A.J.VlekW.K.B.Hofstee (2001). On the social nature of personality: Effects of extraversion, agreeableness, and feedback about collective resource use on cooperation in a resource dilemma. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 289-301. doi:10.1177/0146167201273003
142. R.KurzbanD.Houser (2001). Individual differences in cooperation in a circular public goods game. European Journal of Personality, 52, S37-S52.
143. M.LauriolaI.P.Levin (2001). Personality traits and risky decision-making in a controlled experimental task: An exploratory study. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 215-226. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00130-6
144. J.Ledyard (1995). Public goods: A survey of experimental research. In J.KagelA.Roth (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economics (pp. 111-194). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
145. K.LeeM.C.Ashton (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329-358. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8
146. K.LeeM.C.Ashton (2006). Further assessment of the HEXACO Personality Inventory: Two new facet scales and an observer report form. Psychological Assessment, 18, 182-191. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.182
147. K.LeeM.C.Ashton (2013). Prediction of self- and observer report scores on HEXACO-60 and NEO-FFI scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 668-675. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.06.002
148. K.LeeM.C.AshtonK.Shin (2005). Personality correlates of workplace anti-social behavior. Applied Psychology, 54, 81-98.
149. K.LeeB.OgunfoworaM.C.Ashton (2005). Personality traits beyond the Big Five: Are they within the HEXACO space?Journal of Personality, 73, 1437-1463. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00354.x
150. S.D.LevittJ.A.List (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21, 153-174.
151. J.A.LiY.Chen (2012, June). Personality, affects, and forgiving behavior in games (RAND Labor and Population Working Paper, No. WR-952). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
152. W.B.G.LiebrandR.W.T.L.JansenV.M.RijkenC.J.M.Suhre (1986). Might over morality: Social values and the perception of other players in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 203-215.
153. J.-E.LönnqvistM.VerkasaloG.Walkowitz (2011). It pays to pay—Big Five personality influences on co-operative behaviour in an incentivized and hypothetical prisoner’s dilemma game. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 300-304. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.009
154. J.-E.LönnqvistM.VerkasaloP.C.WichardtG.Walkowitz (2012). Personality disorder categories as combinations of dimensions: Translating cooperative behavior in borderline personality disorder into the Five-Factor framework. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 298-304. doi:10.1521/pedi.2012.26.2.298
155. L.LuM.Argyle (1991). Happiness and cooperation. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 1019-1030.
156. R.E.LucasE.DienerA.GrobE.M.SuhL.Shao (2000). Cross-cultural evidence for the fundamental features of extraversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 452-468.
157. N.MaN.LiX.-S.HeD.-L.SunX.ZhangD.-R.Zhang (2012). Rejection of unfair offers can be driven by negative emotions, evidence from modified ultimatum games with anonymity. PLoS ONE, 7(6), e39619. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039619
158. A.MachinR.Dunbar (2011). The brain opioid theory of social attachment: A review of the evidence. Behaviour, 148, 985-1025. doi:10.1163/000579511X596624
159. B.MarcusK.LeeM.C.Ashton (2007). Personality dimensions explaining relationships between integrity tests and counterproductive behavior: Big Five, or one in addition?Personnel Psychology, 60, 1-34. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00063.x
160. C.G.McClintock (1972). Social motivation: A set of pro-positions. Behavioral Science, 5, 438-455.
161. R.R.McCraeP.T.Costa (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81-90.
162. R.R.McCraeP.T.Costa (2004). A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 587-596. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00118-1
163. R.R.McCraeP.T.Costa (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O.JohnR.RobinsL.Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 159-181). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
164. M.E.McCullough (2001). Forgiveness: Who does it and how do they do it?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(6), 194-197.
165. M.E.McCulloughR.A.EmmonsJ.-A.Tsang (2002). The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 112-127. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.82.1.112
166. P.Mehta (2007). The endocrinology of personality, leadership, and economic decision making (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin). Retrieved from http://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/
167. D.M.MessickC.G.McClintock (1968). Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1-25.
168. W.Mischel (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In D.MagnussonN.Endler (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology (pp. 333-352). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
169. J.MüllerC.Schwieren (2012, March). What can the Big Five personality factors contribute to explain small-scale economic behavior? (Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, No. TI 2012-028/1). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Tinbergen Institute.
170. R.O.MurphyK.A.Ackermann (2014). Social value orientation: Theoretical and measurement issues in the study of social preferences. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 123-139. doi:10.1177/1088868313501745
171. C.M.NguyenM.KoenigsT.H.YamadaS.H.TeoJ.E.CavenaughD.TranelD.L.Denburg (2011). Trustworthiness and negative affect predict economic decision-making. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 748-759. doi:10.1080/20445911.2011.575773
172. N.NicholsonE.SoaneM.Fenton-O’CreevyP.Willman (2005). Personality and domain-specific risk taking. Journal of Risk Research, 8, 157-176. doi:10.1080/1366987032000-123856
173. I.-S.OhK.LeeM.C.AshtonR.E.de Vries (2011). Are dishonest extraverts more harmful than dishonest introverts? The interaction effects of honesty-humility and extraversion in predicting workplace deviance. Applied Psychology, 60, 496-516. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00445.x
174. M.A.OkunJ.PuglieseK.S.Rook (2007). Unpacking the relation between extraversion and volunteering in later life: The role of social capital. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1467-1477. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.020
175. D.J.OzerV.Benet-Martínez (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401-421. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102-904.190127
176. M.PeruginiJ.H.W.TanD.J.Zizzo (2010). Which is the more predictable gender? Public good contribution and personality. Economic Issues, 15, 83-110.
177. A.PickeringJ.Gray (1999). The neuroscience of personality. In L.PervinO.John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 277-299). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
178. E.M.PothosG.PerryP.J.CorrM.R.MatthewJ.R.Busemeyer (2011). Understanding cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma game. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 210-215. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.002
179. L.C.QuiltyC.G.DeYoungJ.M.OakmanR.M.Bagby (2014). Extraversion and behavioral activation: Integrating the components of approach. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 87-94. doi:10.1080/00223891.2013.834440
180. N.J.RaihaniR.MaceS.Lamba (2013). The effect of $1, $5 and $10 stakes in an online dictator game. PLoS ONE, 8(8), e73131. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073131
181. A.Rapoport (1967). A note on the “index of cooperation” for prisoner’s dilemma. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 11, 100-103.
182. M.ReuterA.FeltenS.PenzA.MainzerS.MarkettC.Montag (2013). The influence of dopaminergic gene variants on decision making in the ultimatum game. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, Article 242. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00242
183. F.D.RichardC.F.BondJ.J.Stokes-Zoota (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7, 331-363. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331
184. J.K.RillingA.G.Sanfey (2011). The neuroscience of social decision-making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 23-48. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131647
185. T.RocklinW.Revelle (1981). The measurement of extroversion: A comparison of the Eysenck Personality Inventory and the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 279-284.
186. J.RossierF.M.de StadelhofenS.Berthoud (2004). The hierarchical structures of the NEO PI-R and the 16 PF 5. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 27-38. doi:10.1027//1015-5759.20.1.27
187. A.RustichiniC.G.DeYoungJ.AndersonS.Burks (2012, July). Toward the integration of personality theory and decision theory in the explanation of economic and health behavior (IZA Discussion Paper, No. 6750). Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor.
188. L.SagivN.SverdlikN.Schwarz (2011). To compete or to cooperate? Values’ impact on perception and action in social dilemma games. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 64-77.
189. D.Sally (1995). Conversation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis of experiments from 1958 to 1992. Rationality and Society, 7, 58-92. doi:10.1177/104346319500-7001004
190. A.ScheresA.G.Sanfey (2006). Individual differences in decision making: Drive and reward responsiveness affect strategic bargaining in economic games. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 2, 1-8. doi:10.1186/1744-9081-2-35
191. K.A.SchneewindG.SchröderR.Cattell (1983). Der 16-Persönlichkeits-Faktoren-Test (16 PF) [The 16-Personality-Factor-Test]. Bern, Switzerland: Huber.
192. D.SchweigerG.StemmlerC.BurgdorfJ.Wacker (2013). Opioid receptor blockade and warmth-liking: Effects on interpersonal trust and frontal asymmetry. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. Advance online publication. doi:10.1093/scan/nst152
193. S.ShepherdK.Belicki (2008). Trait forgiveness and traitedness within the HEXACO model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 389-394.
194. D.P.SkarlickiR.FolgerP.Tesluk (1999). Personality as a moderator in the relationship between fairness and retaliation. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 100-108.
195. A.SkatovaE.Ferguson (2011). What makes people cooperate? Individual differences in BAS/BIS predict strategic reciprocation in a public goods game. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 237-241. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.013
196. A.SkatovaE.Ferguson (2013). Individual differences in behavioural inhibition explain free riding in public good games when punishment is expected but not implemented. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 9, Article 3. doi:10.1186/1744-9081-9-3
197. L.D.Smillie (2013). Extraversion and reward processing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 167-172.
198. L.D.SmillieA.J.CooperA.D.Pickering (2011). Individual differences in reward-prediction-error: Extraversion and feedback-related negativity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6, 646-652. doi:10.1093/scan/nsq078
199. L.D.SmillieA.J.CooperJ.WiltW.Revelle (2012). Do extraverts get more bang for the buck? Refining the affective-reactivity hypothesis of extraversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 306-326.
200. L.D.SmillieL.I.DalgleishC.J.Jackson (2007). Distinguishing between learning and motivation in behavioral tests of the reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 476-489.
201. M.StallenA.G.Sanfey (2013). The cooperative brain. The Neuroscientist, 19, 292-303. doi:10.1177/1073858412469728
202. P.Strelan (2007). Who forgives others, themselves, and situations? The roles of narcissism, guilt, self-esteem, and agreeableness. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 259-269. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.06.017
203. H.TakagishiT.TakahashiA.ToyomuraN.TakashinoM.KoizumiT.Yamagishi (2009). Neural correlates of the rejection of unfair offers in the impunity game. Neuro-endocrinology Letters, 30, 496-500.
204. J.P.TangneyR.F.BaumeisterA.L.Boone (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271-324.
205. A.Tellegen (1985). Structure of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety, with an emphasis on self-report. In A.TumaJ.Maser (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders (pp. 681-706). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
206. I.ThielmannB.E.Hilbig (2014). Trust in me, trust in you: A social projection account of the link between personality, cooperativeness, and trustworthiness expectations. Journal of Research in Personality, 50, 61-65. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.03.006
207. R.M.TobinW.GrazianoE.VanmanL.Tassinary (2000). Personality, emotional experience, and efforts to control emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 656-669.
208. R.L.Trivers (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35-57.
209. R.L.Trivers (2006). Reciprocal altruism: 30 years later. In P.KappelerC.van Schaik (Eds.), Cooperation in primates and humans: Mechanisms and evolution (pp. 67-83). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
210. A.Tucker (1980). A two-person dilemma. UMAP Journal, 1, 101-103.
211. D.van Kampen (2012). The 5-Dimensional Personality Test (5DPT): Relationships with two lexically based instruments and the validation of the absorption scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 92-101. doi:10.1080/00223891.2011.627966
212. P.A.M.Van Lange (1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 337-349.
213. S.VolkC.ThöniW.Ruigrok (2011). Personality, personal values and cooperation preferences in public goods games: A longitudinal study. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 810-815. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.001
214. S.VolkC.ThöniW.Ruigrok (2012). Temporal stability and psychological foundations of cooperation preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81, 664-676. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.10.006
215. J.von NeumannO.Morgenstern (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
216. D.F.WalkerR.L.Gorsuch (2002). Forgiveness within the Big Five personality model. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1127-1137. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00185-9
217. D.WatsonL.A.Clark (1997). Extraversion and its positive emotional core. In R.HoganJ.JohnsonS.Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 767-793). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
218. J.A.WellerE.W.Thulin (2012). Do honest people take fewer risks? Personality correlates of risk-taking to achieve gains and avoid losses in HEXACO space. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 923-926.
219. J.WiltW.Revelle (2009). Extraversion. In M.LearyR.Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 27-45). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
220. T.YamagishiY.HoritaH.TakagishiM.ShinadaS.TanidaK.S.Cook (2009). The private rejection of unfair offers and emotional commitment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 11520-11523.
221. T.YamagishiN.MifuneY.LiM.ShinadaH.HashimotoY.HoritaD.. Simunovic (2013). Is behavioral pro-sociality game-specific? Pro-social preference and expectations of pro-sociality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 260-271. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.06.002
222. J.M.ZelenskiR.J.Larsen (1999). Susceptibility to affect: A comparison of three personality taxonomies. Journal of Personality, 67, 761-791. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00072
223. I.ZettlerB.E.HilbigT.Heydasch (2013). Two sides of one coin: Honesty-Humility and situational factors mutually shape social dilemma decision making. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 286-295. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.01.012