Share and share alike? Gender-pairing, personality, and cognitive ability as determinants of giving

Journal of Economic Psychology

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 581-589

  Ben Ner, Avner ^a   Kong, Fanmin ^b   Putterman, Louis ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b Peking University   (China)

^c BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Altruism; Dictator game; Gender; Giving

Indexed keywords

EID: 4444324685     PISSN: 01674870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-4870(03)00065-5     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Andreoni J. Vesterlund L. Which is the fair sex? Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 1 2001 293-312
2. Ben-Ner A. Putterman L. Kong F. & Magan D. (forthcoming). Reciprocity in a two part dictator game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
3. Bolton G. Katok E. Zwick R. Dictator game giving: Rules of fairness versus acts of kindness International Journal of Game Theory 27 1998 269-299
4. Boone C. De Brabander B. van Witteloostuijn A. The impact of personality on behavior in five prisoner's dilemma games Journal of Economic Psychology 20 1999 343-377
5. Briggs S.R. Assessing the five-factor model of personality description Journal of Personality 60 1992 253-293
6. Buss D. Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind 1998 Allyn and Bacon Boston
7. Camerer C. Thaler R. Ultimatums, dictators and manners Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 2 1995 209-219
8. Campbell A. Staying alive: Evolution, culture, and women's intrasexual aggression Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 1999 203-252
9. Eagly A.H. Crowley M. Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature Psychological Bulletin 100 1986 283-308
10. Eckel C. Grossman P. Altruism in anonymous dictator games Games and Economic Behavior 16 1996 181-191
11. Eckel C. Grossman P. Are women less selfish than men?: Evidence from dictator games The Economic Journal 108 1998 726-735
12. Eckel C. & Grossman P. (forthcoming). Differences in the economic decisions of men and women: Experimental evidence. In C. Plott, V. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of results in experimental economics
13. Forsythe R. Horowitz J.L. Savin N.E. Sefton M. Fairness in simple bargaining experiments Games and Economic Behavior 6 1994 347-369
14. Hawkins K. Faraone S. Pepple J. Seidman L. WAIS-R validation of the Wonderlic personnel test as a brief intelligence measure in a psychiatric sample Psychological Assessment 2 1990 198-201
15. Hoffman E. McCabe K. Shachat K. Smith V. Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games Games and Economic Behavior 7 1994 346-380
16. Kanazawa S. (2002). Is discrimination necessary to explain the sex gap in earnings? Unpublished, Department of Psychology, University of Canterburya
17. Koole S. Jager W. van den Berg A. Vlek C. Hofstee W. On the social nature of personality: Effects of extraversion, agreeableness, and feedback about collective resource use on cooperation in a resource dilemma Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27 3 2001 289-301
18. LePine J. Van Dyne L. Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability Journal of Applied Psychology 86 2 2001 326-336
19. McKelvie S. The Wonderlic personnel test: Reliability and validity in an academic setting Psychological Reports 65 1989 161-162
20. Tajfel H. Human groups and social categories 1981 Cambridge University Press Cambridge