Personality dimensions explaining relationships between integrity tests and counterproductive behavior: Big five, or one in addition?

Personnel Psychology

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-34

  Marcus, Bernd ^a   Lee, Kibeom ^b   Ashton, Michael C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^c BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847096436     PISSN: 00315826     EISSN: 17446570     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00063.x     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Alliger GM, Dwight SA. (2000). A meta-analytic investigation of the susceptibility of integrity tests to faking and coaching. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 59-72.
2. Ashton MC. (1998). Personality and job performance: The importance of narrow traits. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 289-303.
3. Ashton MC, Lee K. (in press). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review.
4. Ashton MC, Lee K, Goldberg LR. (2004). A hierarchical analysis of 1,710 English personality-descriptive adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 707-721.
5. Ashton MC, Lee K, Morrison DL, Cordery J, Dunlop P. (2006). An overview of the HEXACO Model of Personality Structure and the HEXACO Personality Inventory. In Lee K, Ashton MC (Chairs), Revising the five-factor model: a new six-dimensional model of personality. Symposium at the 21st Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas, TX.
6. Ashton MC, Lee K, Perugini M, Szarota P, De Vries RE, Di Blas L, et al. (2004).Asix-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 356-366.
7. Barrick MR, Mount MK, Judge TA. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millenium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9-30.
8. Becker TE. (1998). Integrity in organizations: Beyond honesty and conscientiousness. Academy of Management Review, 23, 154-161.
9. Berry CM, Ones DS, Sackett PR. (in press). Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates:Areviewand meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology.
10. Brooks P, Arnold DW. (1989). Reid Report examiner's manual. Chicago: Reid Psychological Systems.
11. Cohen J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Costa PT, McCrae RR. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
13. Costa PT, McCrae RR. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 21-50.
14. Cunningham MR, Wong DT, Barbee AP. (1994). Self-presentation dynamics on overt integrity tests: Experimental studies of the Reid Report. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 643-658.
15. Digman JM. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
16. Digman JM. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246-1256.
17. Fortmann K, Leslie C, Cunningham M. (2002). Cross-cultural comparisons of the Reid Integrity Scale in Latin America and South Africa. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 98-108.
18. Gough HG. (1971). The assessment of wayward impulse by means of the Personnel Reaction Blank. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 24, 669-677.
19. Hakstian AR, Farrell S, Tweed RG. (2002). The assessment of counterproductive tendencies by means of the California Psychological Inventory. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 58-86.
20. Hough LM. (1992). The "Big Five" personality variables-construct confusion: Description versus prediction. Human Performance, 5, 139-155.
21. Hu L, Bentler PM. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
22. Hunter JE, Schmidt FL. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Jones JW. (1991). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical and empirical analysis of preemployment integrity tests. In Jones JW (Ed.), Preemployment honesty testing: Current research and future directions (pp. 89-98). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
24. Lee K, Ashton MC. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329-358.
25. Lee K, Ashton MC. (2006). Further assessment of the HEXACO Personality Inventory: Two new facet scales and an observer report form. Psychological Assessment, 18, 182-191.
26. Lee K, Ashton MC, de Vries RE. (2005). Predicting workplace delinquency and integrity with the HEXACO and five-factor models of personality structure. Human Performance, 18, 179-197.
27. Lee K, Ashton MC, Shin KH. (2005). Personality correlates of workplace anti-social behavior. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 81-98.
28. Lee K, Ogunfowora B, Ashton MC. (2005). Personality traits beyond the Big Five: Are they within the HEXACO space? Journal of Personality, 73, 1437-1463.
29. Marcus B. (2000). Kontraproduktives Verhalten im Betrieb: Eine individuumsbezogene Perspektive [Counterproductive behavior in organizations: An interindividual perspective]. Göttingen, Germany: Verlag für Angewandte Psychologie.
30. Marcus B. (2003). Attitudes toward personnel selection methods: A partial replication and extension in a German sample. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 52, 515-532.
31. Marcus B. (2006a). Inventar berufsbezogener Einstellungen und Selbsteinschätzungen [Job-Related attitudes and self-evaluations inventory]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
32. Marcus B. (2006b). Relationships between faking, validity, and decision criteria in personnel selection. Psychology Science, 48, 226-246.
33. Marcus B, Funke U, Schuler H. (1997). Integrity Tests als spezielle Gruppe eignungsdiagnostischer Verfahren: Literaturüberblick und metaanalytische Befunde zur Konstruktvalidität [Integrity tests as a specific group of instruments in personnel selection: A literature review and meta-analytic findings on construct validity]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 41, 2-15.
34. Marcus B, Höft S, Riediger M. (2006). Integrity tests and the five-factor model of personality: A review and empirical test of two alternative positions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 113-130.
35. Marcus B, Schuler H. (2004). Antecedents of counterproductive behavior at work: A general perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 647-660.
36. Marcus B, Schuler H, Quell P, Hümpfner G. (2002). Measuring counterproductivity: Development and initial validation of a German self-report questionnaire. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 18-35.
37. McCrae RR, Costa PT, Piedmont RL. (1993). Folk concepts, natural language, and psychological constructs: The California Psychological Inventory and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 61, 1-26.
38. McFall L. (1987). Integrity. Ethics, 98, 5-20.
39. Mikulay SM, Goffin RD. (1998). Measuring and predicting counterproductivity in the laboratory setting using integrity and personality testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 768-790.
40. Murphy KR, Lee SL. (1994a). Does conscientiousness explain the relationship between integrity and job performance? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2, 226-233.
41. Murphy KR, Lee SL. (1994b). Personality variables related to integrity test scores: The role of conscientiousness. Journal of Business and Psychology, 8, 413-424.
42. Nicol AAM, Paunonen SV. (2002). Overt honesty measures predicting admissions: An index of validity or reliability? Psychological Reports, 90, 105-115.
43. Ones DS. (1993). The construct validity of integrity tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Iowa, Iowa City, IO.
44. Ones DS, Viswesvaran C. (1996). Bandwidth-fidelity dilemma in personality measurement for personnel selection. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 609-626.
45. Ones DS Viswesvaran C. (1998). The effects of social desirability and faking on personality and integrity assessment for personnel selection. Human Performance, 11, 245-269.
46. Ones DS, Viswesvaran C. (2001). Integrity test and other Criterion-Focused Occupational Personality Scales (COPS) used in personnel selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 31-39.
47. Ones DS, Viswesvaran C, Schmidt FL. (1993). Meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance [monograph]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 679-703.
48. Paunonen SV, Ashton MC. (2001). Big Five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 524-539.
49. Paunonen SV, Jackson DN. (2000). What is beyond the Big Five? Plenty! Journal of Personality, 68, 821-835.
50. Robinson SL, Bennett RJ. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555-572.
51. Rotundo M, Sackett PR. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 66-80.
52. Ryan AM, Sackett PR. (1987). Pre-employment honesty testing: Fakability, reactions of test taker, and company image. Journal of Business and Psychology, 1, 248-256.
53. Sackett PR, Burris LR, Callahan C. (1989). Integrity testing for personnel selection: An update. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 42, 491-529.
54. Sackett PR, Wanek JE. (1996). New developments in the use of measures of honesty, integrity, conscientiousness, dependability, trustworthiness, and reliability for personnel selection. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 49, 787-829.
55. Salgado JF. (2002). The Big Five personality dimensions and counterproductive behaviors. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 117-125.
56. Salgado JF, Moscoso S, Lado M. (2001, May). Big Five, integrity and the prediction of self-reported counterproductivity and performance. Paper presented at the Congress of the European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology, Prague, Czech Republic.
57. Saucier G, Goldberg LR. (1998). What is beyond the Big Five? Journal of Personality, 66, 495-524.
58. Schmidt FL, Hunter JE. (1998). The validity and utility of personnel selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262-274.
59. Schneider RJ, Hough LM, Dunnette MD. (1996). Broadsided by broad traits: How to sink science in five dimensions or less. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 639-655.
60. Wanek JE. (1995). The construct of integrity: Item level factor analysis of the dimensions underlying honesty testing and Big-Five measures of personality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
61. Wanek JE, Sackett PR, Ones DS. (2003). Towards and understanding of integrity test similarities and differences: An item-level analysis of seven tests. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 56, 873-894.
62. Woolley RM, Hakstian AR. (1993). A comparative study of integrity tests: The criterion-related validity of personality-based and over measures of integrity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 1, 27-40.