To compete or to cooperate? Values' impact on perception and action in social dilemma games

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 64-77

  Sagiv, Lilach ^a   Sverdlik, Noga ^b   Schwarz, Norbert ^c  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF ISRAEL   (Israel)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78751618653     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: 10990992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.729     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Assor, A. (1998). Value accessibility and teachers' ability to encourage independent and critical thought in students. Social Psychology of Education, 2, 1-24.
2. Bardi, A. (1998). January The relations between values and behaviors in daily situations: A construct accessibility perspective. Paper presented at the International Research Workshop on Values: Psychological Structure, Behavioral Outcomes, and Intergenerational Transmission. Maale-Hahamisha, Israel.
3. Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1207-1220.
4. Barry, B., & Stewart, G. L. (1997). Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 62-78.
5. Biel, A., & Thøgersen, J. (2007). Activation of social norms in social dilemmas: A review of the evidence and reflections on the implications for environmental behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 93-112.
6. Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L Berkowitz. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1-62). New York: Academic Press.
7. Bilsky, W., & Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Values and personality. European Journal of Personality, 8, 163-181.
8. Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 543-549.
9. Camerer, C. F., & Fehr, E. (2006). When does "economic man" dominate social behavior? Science, 311, 47-52.
10. De Cremer, D., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2003). Cooperation in social dilemmas and the need to belong: The moderatin effect of group size. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7, 168-174.
11. Feather, N. T. (1995). Values, valences, and choice: The influence of values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1135-1151.
12. Gandal, N., Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2005). Personal value priorities of economists. Human Relations, 58, 1227-1252.
13. Garling, T. (1999). Value priorities, social value orientations and cooperation in social dilemmas. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 397-408.
14. Goldberg, L. (1992). The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Personality Assessments, 4, 26-42.
15. Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Hair, E. C. (1996). Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: The case for agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 820-835.
16. Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability and salience. In E. T. Higgins, & E. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. New York: The Gilford Press.
17. Hitlin, S., & Piliavin, J. A. (2004). Values: Reviving a dormant concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 359-393.
18. Joireman, J., & Duell, B. (2005). Mother Theresa vs. Ebenezer Scrooge: Mortality salience leads proselfs to endorse self-transcendent values (unless proselfs are reassured). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 307-320.
19. Joireman, J., & Duell, B. (2007). Self-transcendent values moderate the impact of mortality salience on support for charities. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 779-789.
20. Karremans, J. C. (2007). Considering reasons for a value influences behavior that expresses related values: An extension of the value-as-truisms hypothesis. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 508-523.
21. Kluckhohn, C. (1951). Values and value orientations in the theory of action: An exploration in definition and classification. In T. Parsons, & E. Shils (Eds.), Toward a general theory of action (pp. 388-433). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Koole, S. L., Jager, W., Van den Berg, A. E., Vlek, C. A. J., & Hofstee, W. K. B. (2001). On the social nature of personality: Effects of extraversion, agreeableness, and feedback about collective resource use on cooperation in a resource dilemma. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 289-301.
23. Lönnqvist, J.-E., Leikas, S., Paunonen, S. V., Nissinen, V., & Verkasalo, M. (2006). Conformism moderates the relations between values, anticipated regret, and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1469-1481.
24. Maio, G. R., & Olson, J. M. (1995). Relations between values, attitudes, and behavioral intentions: The moderating role of attitude function. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 266-285.
25. Maio, G. R., Olson, J. M., Allen, L., & Bernard, M. M. (2001). Addressing discrepancies between values and behavior: The motivating effect of reasons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 104-117.
26. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1990). Personality in adulthood. New York: Guilford.
27. Probst, T. M., Carnevale, P. J., & Triandis, H. C. (1999). Cultural values in intergroup and single-group social dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77, 171-191.
28. Regnerus, M. D., Smith, C., & Sikkink, D. (1998). Who Gives to the Poor? The influence of religious tradition and political location on the personal generosity of Americans toward the poor. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37, 481-493.
29. Roccas, S. (2003). Identification and status revisited: The moderating role of self-enhancement and self-transcendence values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 726-736.
30. Roccas, S., & Sagiv, L. (in press) Personal values and behavior: Taking the cultural context into account. Social and Personality Psychology Compass.
31. Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S. H., & Knafo, A. (2002). Basic values and the five factor model of personality traits. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 789-801.
32. Roccas, S., Schwartz, S. H., & Amit, A. (in press) Personal value priorities and national identification. Political Psychology.
33. Rohan, M. (2000). A rose by any name? The value construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 255-277.
34. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
35. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Sagiv, L. (2002). Vocational interests & basic values. Journal of Career Assessment, 10, 233-257.
37. Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (1995). Value priorities and readiness for out-group social contact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 437-448.
38. Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S.H. (2000). Values priorities and subjective well-being: Direct relations and congruity effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 177-198.
39. Salancik, G. G., & Conway, M. (1975). Attitude inferences from salient and relevant cognitive content about behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 829-840.
40. Samuelson, C. D. (1993). A multi-attribute approach to structural change in resource dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 298-324.
41. Sattler, D., & Kerr, N. L. (1991). Might vs. morality explored: Motivational and cognitive bases for social motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 756-765.
42. Saucier, G. (1994). Mini markers: A brief version of Goldberg's unipolar big five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506-516.
43. Schmitt, M. J., Schwartz, S. H., Steyer, R., & Schmitt, T. (1993). Measurement models for the Schwartz Values Inventory. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 9, 107-121.
44. Schwarz, N. (1987). Geschlechtsrollenorientierung und die Einstellung zu Gewalt gegen Frauen: Informationsaktivierung als Alternative zu ex post facto - Versuchsplnen. [Gender role orientation and attitudes toward violence against women: Priming procedures as an alternative to ex post facto - designs]. Psychologische Rundschau, 38, 145-154.
45. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M Zanna. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). New York: Academic Press.
46. Schwartz, S. H. (1996). Value priorities and behavior: Applying of theory of integrated value systems. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 1-24). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Schwartz, S. H. (2005). Basic human values: Their content and structure across countries. In A. Tamayo, & J. B. Porto (Eds.), Valores e comportamento nas organizações [Values and behavior in organizations] (pp. 21-55). Petrópolis, Brazil: Vozes.
48. Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (2001). Value hierarchies across culture: Taking similarities perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 268-290.
49. Schwartz, S. H., Sagiv, L., & Boehnke, K. (2000). Worries and values. Journal of Personality, 68, 309-346.
50. Sverdlik, N. (2009). Understanding internal conflicts trough a personal values perspective: The content of conflicts and conflicts intensity, Manuscript submitted for publication.
51. Tazelaar, M. J. A., Van Lange, P. A. M., & Ouwerkerk, J. W. (2004). How to cope with noise in social dilemmas: The benefits of communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 845-859.
52. Tetlock, P. E. (1986). A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 819-827.
53. Van Lange, P. A. M. (1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 337-349.
54. Van Lange, P. A. M., & Liebrand, W. B. G. (1989). On perceiving morality and potency: Social values and the effects of person perception in a give-some dilemma. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 209-225.
55. Verplanken, B., & Holland, R. W. (2002). Motivated decision making: Effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 434-447.
56. Wit, A. P., & Kerr, N. L. (2002). "Me versus just us versus us all" Categorization and cooperation in nested social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 616-637.
57. Wolfe, R. N., & Kasmer, J. A. (1988). Type versus trait: Extraversion, impulsivity, sociability, and preferences for cooperative and competitive activities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 864-871.