The external validity of giving in the dictator game: A field experiment using the misdirected letter technique

Experimental Economics

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 155-169

  Franzen, Axel ^a   Pointner, Sonja ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Behavioral game theory; Dictator game; External validity; Fairness; Field experiment; Misdirected letter technique; Other regarding preferences

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876927085     PISSN: 13864157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10683-012-9337-5     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Andreoni, J., & Bernheim, B. D. (2009). Social image and the 50-50 norm: a theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects. Econometrica, 77(5), 1607-1636.
2. Andreoni, J., Justin, M. R., & Trachtmann, H. (2011). Avoiding the ask: a field experiment on altruism, empathy, and charitable giving. Nber Working Paper Series (Working Paper 17648).
3. Baran, N., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2009). Can we infer social preferences from the lab? Evidence from the trust game. NBER Working Paper Series (Working Paper 15654).
4. Bardsley, N. (2008). Dictator game giving: altruism or artefact? Experimental Economics, 11(2), 122-133.
5. Barr, A., & Zeitlin, A. (2010). Dictator games in the lab and in nature: external validity tested and investigated in Ugandan primary schools. CSAE Working Paper.
6. Benz, M., & Meier, S. (2008). Do people behave in experiments as in the field?-Evidence from donations. Experimental Economics, 11(3), 268-283.
7. Blanco, M., Engelmann, D., & Normann, H. T. (2011). A within-subject analysis of other-regarding preferences. Games and Economic Behavior, 72(3), 321-338.
8. Bridges, F. S., Thompson, P. C., & Coady, N. P. (2001). Homeless affiliation, location, and sender address in return of lost letters. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 10(3), 235-242.
9. Camerer, C. F. (2003). Behavioral game theory: experiments in strategic interaction. New York: University Presses CA.
10. Camerer, C. F. (2011). The promise and success of lab-field generalizability in experimental economics: a critical reply to Levitt and List. SSRN Working Paper.
11. Card, D., DellaVigna, S., & Malmendier, U. (2011). The role of theory in field experiments. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(3), 39-62.
12. Carpenter, J., & Meyers, C. K. (2010). Why volunteer? Evidence on the role of altruism, image, and incentives. Journal of Public Economics, 94, 911-920.
13. Cherry, T. L., Frykblom, P., & Shogren, J. F. (2002). Hardnose the dictator. The American Economic Review, 92(4), 1218-1221.
14. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349-354.
15. Dana, J., Weber, R. A., & Kuang, J. X. (2007). Exploiting moral wiggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Economic Theory, 33(1), 67-80.
16. Engel, C. (2011). Dictator games: A meta study. Experimental Economics, 14(4), 583-610.
17. Englmaier, F., & Gebhardt, G. (2010). Free riding in the lab and in the field. Governance and the efficiency of social systems (GESY), CESifo Working Paper No. 344.
18. Fehr, E., & Leibbrandt, A. (2008). Cooperativeness and impatience in the tragedy of the commons. Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich Working Paper No. 378.
19. Franzen, A., & Pointner, S. (2012). Anonymity in the dictator game revisited. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(1), 74-81.
20. Frey, B. S., & Meier, S. (2004). Pro-social behavior in a natural setting. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organisation, 54(1), 65-88.
21. Gurven, M., & Winking, J. (2008). Collective action in action: prosocial behavior in and out of the laboratory. American Anthropologist, 110(2), 179-190.
22. Harrison, G. W., & List, J. A. (2004). Field experiments. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(4), 1009-1055.
23. Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. (1996). Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 653-660.
24. Howitt, D., & McCabe, J. (1978). Attitudes do predict behaviour-in mails at least. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17(3), 285-286.
25. Howitt, D., Craven, G., Iveson, C., Kremer, J., McCabe, J., & Rolph, T. (1977). The misdirected letter. The British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16, 285-286.
26. Karlan, D. S. (2005). Using experimental economics to measure social capital and predict financial decisions. The American Economic Review, 95(5), 1688-1699.
27. Kremer, J., Barry, R., & McNally, A. (1986). The misdirected letter and the quasi-questionnaire: unobtrusive measures of prejudice in Northern Ireland. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16(4), 303-309.
28. Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 153-174.
29. Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2009). Field experiments in economics: the past, the present, and the future. European Economic Review, 53(1), 1-18.
30. List, J. A. (2007). On the interpretation of giving in dictator games. Journal of Political Economy, 115(3), 482-493.
31. List, J. A. (2011). Why economists should conduct field experiments and 14 tips for pulling one off. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(3), 3-16.
32. Merritt, C. B., & Fowler, R. G. (1948). The pecuniary honesty of the public at large. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 43(1), 90-93.
33. Milgram, S. (1969). The lost letter technique. Psychology Today, 3(1), 30-33, 66-68.
34. Milgram, S., Mann, L., & Harter, S. (1965). The lost letter-technique: a tool of social research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 29(3), 437-438.
35. Sechrest, L., & Belew, J. (1983). Nonreactive measures of social attitudes. In L. Bickman (Ed.), Applied social psychology annual (Vol. 4, pp. 23-64). Beverly Hills: Sage.
36. Stoop, J. (2012). From the lab to the field: envelopes, dictators and manners. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, MPRA Paper No. 37048.
37. Wilson, D. S., O'Brien, D. T., & Sesma, A. (2009). Human prosociality from an evolutionary perspective: variation and correlations at a city-wide scale. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(3), 190-200.