Over my fake body: Body ownership illusions for studying the multisensory basis of own-body perception

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Volumn 9, Issue MAR, 2015, Pages

  Kilteni, Konstantina ^a   Maselli, Antonella ^a   Kording, Konrad P ^b,c,d   Slater, Mel ^a,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Body ownership; Body semantics; Causal inference; Multisensory perception; Rubber hand illusion

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY IMAGE; BODY OWNERSHIP ILLUSION; HUMAN; ILLUSION; INTEROCEPTION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PROPRIOCEPTION; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SOMATOSENSORY SYSTEM; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; TACTILE FEEDBACK; TACTILE STIMULATION; VISUAL FEEDBACK; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 84933672815     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16625161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00141     Document Type: Article

References (199)

1. Aimola Davies, A. M., White, R. C., and Davies, M. (2013). Spatial limits on the nonvisual self-touch illusion and the visual rubber hand illusion: subjective experience of the illusion and proprioceptive drift. Conscious. Cogn. 22, 613-636. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.03.006
2. Alais, D., Newell, F. N., and Mamassian, P. (2010). Multisensory processing in review: from physiology to behaviour. Seeing Perceiving 23, 3-38. doi: 10.1163/187847510X488603
3. Altschuler, E. L., and Ramachandran, V. S. (2007). A simple method to stand outside oneself. Perception 36, 632-634. doi: 10.1068/p5730
4. Apps, M. A. J., and Tsakiris, M. (2013). The free-energy self: a predictive coding account of self-recognition.Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 41, 85-97. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.01.029
5. Armel, K. C., and Ramachandran, V. S. (2003). Projecting sensations to external objects: evidence from skin conductance response. Proc. Biol. Sci. 270, 1499-1506. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2364
6. Azañón, E., and Soto-Faraco, S. (2007). Alleviating the "crossed-hands" deficit by seeing uncrossed rubber hands.Exp. Brain Res. 182, 537-548. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1011-3
7. Bagesteiro, L. B., Sarlegna, F. R., and Sainburg, R. L. (2006). Differential influence of vision and proprioception on control of movement distance. Exp. Brain Res. 171, 358-370. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0272-y
8. Bahrick, L. E., and Watson, J. S. (1985). Detection of intermodal proprioceptive-visual contingency as a potential basis of self-perception in infancy. Dev. Psychol. 21, 963-973. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.21.6.963
9. Banakou, D., Groten, R., and Slater, M. (2013). Illusory ownership of a virtual child body causes overestimation of object sizes and implicit attitude changes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 12846-12851. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1306779110
10. Battaglia-mayer, A., Ferraina, S., Mitsuda, T., Genovesio, A., Onorati, P., Lacquaniti, F., et al. (2000). Early coding of reaching in the parietooccipital cortex early coding of reaching in the parietooccipital cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 83, 2374-2391. Available online at: http://jn.physiology.org/content/83/4/2374.short
11. Bernardi, N. F., Marino, B. F., Maravita, A., Castelnuovo, G., Tebano, R., and Bricolo, E. (2013). Grasping in wonderland: altering the visual size of the body recalibrates the body schema. Exp. Brain Res. 226, 585-594. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3467-7
12. Bertamini, M., Berselli, N., Bode, C., Lawson, R., and Wong, L. T. (2011). The rubber hand illusion in a mirror.Conscious. Cogn. 20, 1108-1119. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.04.006
13. Bertamini, M., and O'Sullivan, N. (2014). The use of realistic and mechanical hands in the rubber hand illusion, and the relationship to hemispheric differences. Conscious. Cogn. 27, 89-99. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.04.010
14. Blanke, O. (2012). Multisensory brain mechanisms of bodily self-consciousness. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 556-571. doi: 10.1038/nrn3292
15. Blanke, O., and Metzinger, T. (2009). Full-body illusions and minimal phenomenal selfhood. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.10.003
16. Blanke, O., and Mohr, C. (2005). Out-of-body experience, heautoscopy, and autoscopic hallucination of neurological origin implications for neurocognitive mechanisms of corporeal awareness and self-consciousness.Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 50, 184-199. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2005.05.008
17. Bolognini, N., Ronchi, R., Casati, C., Fortis, P., and Vallar, G. (2014). Multisensory remission of somatoparaphrenic delusion: my hand is back! Neurol. Clin. Pract. 4, 216-225. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000033
18. Botvinick, M., and Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands "feel" touch that eyes see. Nature 391:756. doi: 10.1038/35784
19. Boulinguez, P., and Rouhana, J. (2008). Flexibility and individual differences in visuo-proprioceptive integration: evidence from the analysis of a morphokinetic control task. Exp. Brain Res. 185, 137-149. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1140-8
20. Bremner, A. J., Hill, E. L., Pratt, M., Rigato, S., and Spence, C. (2013). Bodily illusions in young children: developmental change in visual and proprioceptive contributions to perceived hand position. PLoS ONE 8:e51887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051887
21. Brozzoli, C., Gentile, G., and Ehrsson, H. H. (2012). That's near my hand! Parietal and premotor coding of hand-centered space contributes to localization and self-attribution of the hand. J. Neurosci. 32, 14573-14582. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2660-12.2012
22. Bruno, N., and Bertamini, M. (2010). Haptic perception after a change in hand size. Neuropsychologia 48, 1853-1856. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.01.006
23. Burke, B. Y. D., Gandevia, S. C., and Macefield, G. (1988). Responses to passive movement of receptors in joint, skin and muscle of the human hand. J. Physiol. 402, 347-361. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017208
24. Butz, M. V., Kutter, E. F., and Lorenz, C. (2014). Rubber hand illusion affects joint angle perception. PLoS ONE9:e92854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092854
25. Cadieux, M. L., Whitworth, K., and Shore, D. I. (2011). Rubber hands do not cross the midline. Neurosci. Lett. 504, 191-194. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.09.010
26. Capelari, E. D. P., Uribe, C., and Brasil-Neto, J. P. (2009). Feeling pain in the rubber hand: integration of visual, proprioceptive, and painful stimuli. Perception 38, 92-99. doi: 10.1068/p5892
27. Carruthers, G. (2008). Types of body representation and the sense of embodiment. Conscious. Cogn. 17, 1302-1316. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.02.001
28. Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behav. Brain Sci. 36, 181-204. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000477
29. Costantini, M., and Haggard, P. (2007). The rubber hand illusion: sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership. Conscious. Cogn. 16, 229-240. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.01.001
30. Crucianelli, L., Metcalf, N. K., Fotopoulou, A. K., and Jenkinson, P. M. (2013). Bodily pleasure matters: velocity of touch modulates body ownership during the rubber hand illusion. Front. Psychol. 4:703. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00703
31. Cuppini, C., Magosso, E., Bolognini, N., Vallar, G., and Ursino, M. (2014). A neurocomputational analysis of the sound-induced flash illusion. Neuroimage 92, 248-266. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.02.001
32. Cuppini, C., Magosso, E., and Ursino, M. (2011). Organization, maturation, and plasticity of multisensory integration: insights from computational modeling studies. Front. Psychol. 2:77. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00077
33. Daprati, E., Franck, N., Georgieff, N., Proust, J., Pacherie, E., Dalery, J., et al. (1997). Looking for the agent: an investigation into consciousness of action and self-consciousness in schizophrenic patients. Cognition 65, 71-86. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00039-5
34. Davies, P. (1973). Effects of movements upon the appearance and duration of a prolonged visual afterimage: 1. Changes arising from the movement of a portion of the body incorporated in the afterimaged scene. Perception 2, 147-153. doi: 10.1068/p020147
35. de Vignemont, F. (2011). Embodiment, ownership and disownership. Conscious. Cogn. 20, 82-93. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.09.004
36. de Vignemont, F., Ehrsson, H. H., and Haggard, P. (2005). Bodily illusions modulate tactile perception. Curr. Biol. 15, 1286-1290. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.067
37. di Pellegrino, G., Làdavas, E., and Farnè, A. (1997). Seeing where your hands are. Nature 388:730.
38. Doehrmann, O., and Naumer, M. J. (2008). Semantics and the multisensory brain: how meaning modulates processes of audio-visual integration. Brain Res. 1242, 136-150. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.03.071
39. Duhamel, J., Colby, C. L., and Goldberg, M. E. (1998). Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: congruent visual and somatic response properties. J. Neurophysiol. 79, 126-136.
40. Dummer, T., Picot-Annand, A., Neal, T., and Moore, C. (2009). Movement and the rubber hand illusion. Perception38, 271-280. doi: 10.1068/p5921
41. Ehrsson, H. H. (2007). The experimental induction of out-of-body experiences. Science 317, 1048. doi: 10.1126/science.1142175
42. Ehrsson, H. H. (2009). How many arms make a pair? Perceptual illusion of having an additional limb. Perception38, 310-312. doi: 10.1068/p6304
43. Ehrsson, H. H. (2011). "The concept of body ownership and its relation to multisensory integration," in The New Handbook of Multisensory Processes, ed B. E. Stein (Cambridge: MIT Press), 775-792.
44. Ehrsson, H. H., Holmes, N. P., and Passingham, R. E. (2005a). Touching a rubber hand: feeling of body ownership is associated with activity in multisensory brain areas. J. Neurosci. 25, 10564-10573. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0800-05.2005
45. Ehrsson, H. H., Kito, T., Sadato, N., Passingham, R. E., and Naito, E. (2005b). Neural substrate of body size: illusory feeling of shrinking of the waist. PLoS Biol. 3:e412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030412
46. Ehrsson, H. H., Spence, C., and Passingham, R. E. (2004). That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science 305, 875-877. doi: 10.1126/science.1097011
47. Ehrsson, H. H., Wiech, K., Weiskopf, N., Dolan, R. J., and Passingham, R. E. (2007). Threatening a rubber hand that you feel is yours elicits a cortical anxiety response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104, 9828-9833. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610011104
48. Ernst, M. O., and Banks, M. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415, 429-433. doi: 10.1038/415429a
49. Evans, N., and Blanke, O. (2013). Shared electrophysiology mechanisms of body ownership and motor imagery.Neuroimage 64, 216-228. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.027
50. Feinberg, T. E., Venneri, A., Simone, A. M., Fan, Y., and Northoff, G. (2010). The neuroanatomy of asomatognosia and somatoparaphrenia. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 81, 276-281. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.188946
51. Fernandes, H. L., and Kording, K. P. (2010). In praise of "false" models and rich data. J. Mot. Behav. 42, 343-349. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2010.526462
52. Filimon, F., Nelson, J. D., Huang, R.-S., and Sereno, M. I. (2009). Multiple parietal reach regions in humans: cortical representations for visual and proprioceptive feedback during on-line reaching. J. Neurosci. 29, 2961-2971. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3211-08.2009
53. Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Luppino, G., Matelli, M., and Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Coding of peripersonal space in inferior premotor cortex (area F4). J. Neurophysiol. 76, 141-157.
54. Folegatti, A., Farnè, A., Salemme, R., and de Vignemont, F. (2012). The rubber hand illusion: two's a company, but three's a crowd. Conscious. Cogn. 21, 799-812. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.02.008
55. Franck, N., Farrer, C., Georgieff, N., Marie-Cardine, M., Daléry, J., D'Amato, T., et al. (2001). Defective recognition of one's own actions in patients with schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry 158, 454-459. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.3.454
56. Friston, K. (2009). The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain? Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 293-301. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.005
57. Gallagher, I. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 14-21. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01417-5
58. Gentile, G., Petkova, V. I., and Ehrsson, H. H. (2011). Integration of visual and tactile signals from the hand in the human brain: an FMRI study. J. Neurophysiol. 105, 910-922. doi: 10.1152/jn.00840.2010
59. Giummarra, M. J., Georgiou-Karistianis, N., Nicholls, M. E. R., Gibson, S. J., and Bradshaw, J. L. (2010). The phantom in the mirror: a modified rubber-hand illusion in amputees and normals. Perception 39, 103-118. doi: 10.1068/p6519
60. Gliga, T., and Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (2005). Structural encoding of body and face in human infants and adults. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 1328-1340. doi: 10.1162/0898929055002481
61. Goodwin, G. M., McCloskey, D. I., and Matthews, P. B. C. (1972). Proprioceptive illusions induced by muscle vibration: contribution by muscle spindles to perception? Science 175, 1382-1384.
62. Graziano, M. S. A., and Botvinick, M. (2002). "How the brain represents the body: insights from neurophysiology and psychology," in Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and Performance, eds W. Prinz and B. Hommel (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 136-157.
63. Graziano, M. S. A., and Cooke, D. F. (2006). Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior.Neuropsychologia 44, 2621-2635. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.09.011
64. Graziano, M. S. A., Cooke, D. F., and Taylor, C. S. (2000). Coding the location of the arm by sight. Science 290, 1782-1786. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5497.1782
65. Graziano, M. S. A., and Gross, C. G. (1993). A bimodal map of space: somatosensory receptive fields in the macaque putamen with corresponding visual receptive fields. Exp. brain Res. 97, 96-109. doi: 10.1007/BF00228820
66. Graziano, M. S. A., and Gross, C. G. (1994). "The representation of extrapersonal space: a possible role for bimodal, visuo-tactile neurons," in The Cognitive Neurosciences, ed M. S. Gazzaniga (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 1021-1034.
67. Gregory, R. L., Wallace, J. G., and Campbell, F. W. (1959). Changes in the size and shape of visual after-images observed in complete darkness during changes of position in space. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 11, 54-55. doi: 10.1080/17470215908416288
68. Guterstam, A., Petkova, V. I., and Ehrsson, H. H. (2011). The illusion of owning a third arm. PLoS ONE 6:e17208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017208
69. Haans, A., Ijsselsteijn, W. A, and de Kort, Y. A. W. (2008). The effect of similarities in skin texture and hand shape on perceived ownership of a fake limb. Body Image 5, 389-394. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.04.003
70. Haggard, P., and Jundi, S. (2009). Rubber hand illusions and size - weight illusions: self-representation modulates representation of external objects. Perception 38, 1796-1803. doi: 10.1068/p6399
71. Hatfield, G. C. (1990). The Natural and the Normative: Theories of Spatial Perception from Kant to Helmholtz. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72. Haxby, J., Hoffman, E., and Gobbini, M. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 223-233. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01482-0
73. Hay, J., Pick, H., and Ikeda, K. (1965). Visual capture produced by prism spectacles. Psychon. Sci. 2, 215-216. doi: 10.3758/BF03343413
74. Heed, T., Gründler, M., Rinkleib, J., Rudzik, F. H., Collins, T., Cooke, E., et al. (2011). Visual information and rubber hand embodiment differentially affect reach-to-grasp actions. Acta Psychol. (Amst). 138, 263-271. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.07.003
75. Helbig, H. B., Ernst, M. O., Ricciardi, E., Pietrini, P., Thielscher, A., Mayer, K. M., et al. (2012). The neural mechanisms of reliability weighted integration of shape information from vision and touch. Neuroimage 60, 1063-1072. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.072
76. Hirai, M., and Hiraki, K. (2005). An event-related potentials study of biological motion perception in human infants. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 22, 301-304. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.08.008
77. Hohwy, J. (2007). The sense of self in the phenomenology of agency and perception. Psyche (Stuttg). 13, 1-20. Available online at: http://journalpsyche.org/files/0xab11.pdf
78. Hohwy, J., and Paton, B. (2010). Explaining away the body: experiences of supernaturally caused touch and touch on non-hand objects within the rubber hand illusion. PLoS ONE 5:e9416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009416
79. Holle, H., McLatchie, N., Maurer, S., and Ward, J. (2011). Proprioceptive drift without illusions of ownership for rotated hands in the "rubber hand illusion" paradigm. Cogn. Neurosci. 2, 171-178. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2011.603828
80. Holmes, N. P., Crozier, G., and Spence, C. (2004). When mirrors lie: "visual capture" of arm position impairs reaching performance. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 4, 193-200. doi: 10.3758/CABN.4.2.193
81. Ide, M. (2013). The effect of "anatomical plausibility" of hand angle on the rubber-hand illusion. Perception 42, 103-111. doi: 10.1068/p7322
82. Ijsselsteijn, W. A., de Kort, Y. A. W., and Haans, A. (2006). Is this my hand I see before me? The rubber hand illusion in reality, virtual reality, and mixed reality. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 15, 455-464. doi: 10.1162/pres.15.4.455
83. Ionta, S., Sforza, A., Funato, M., and Blanke, O. (2013). Anatomically plausible illusory posture affects mental rotation of body parts. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 13, 197-209. doi: 10.3758/s13415-012-0120-z
84. Jeannerod, M. (2003). The mechanism of self-recognition in humans. Behav. Brain Res. 142, 1-15. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4328(02)00384-4
85. Jeannerod, M. (2004). Visual and action cues contribute to the self-other distinction. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 422-423. doi: 10.1038/nn0504-422
86. Jenkinson, P. M., Haggard, P., Ferreira, N. C., and Fotopoulou, A. (2013). Body ownership and attention in the mirror: Insights from somatoparaphrenia and the rubber hand illusion. Neuropsychologia, 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.03.029
87. Kalckert, A., and Ehrsson, H. H. (2012). Moving a rubber hand that feels like your own: a dissociation of ownership and agency. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6:40. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00040
88. Kalckert, A., and Ehrsson, H. H. (2014a). The moving rubber hand illusion revisited: comparing movements and visuotactile stimulation to induce illusory ownership. Conscious. Cogn. 26, 117-132. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.02.003
89. Kalckert, A., and Ehrsson, H. H. (2014b). The spatial distance rule in the moving and classical rubber hand illusions.Conscious. Cogn. 30C, 118-132. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.08.022
90. Kammers, M. P. M., Longo, M. R., Tsakiris, M., Dijkerman, H. C., and Haggard, P. (2009). Specificity and coherence of body representations. Perception 38, 1804-1820. doi: 10.1068/p6389
91. Kilteni, K., Bergstrom, I., and Slater, M. (2013). Drumming in immersive virtual reality: the body shapes the way we play. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 19, 597-605. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2013.29
92. Kilteni, K., Normand, J.-M., Sanchez-Vives, M. V., and Slater, M. (2012). Extending body space in immersive virtual reality: a very long arm illusion. PLoS ONE 7:e40867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040867
93. Kokkinara, E., and Slater, M. (2014). Measuring the effects through time of the influence of visuomotor and visuotactile synchronous stimulation on a virtual body ownership illusion. Perception 43, 43-58. doi: 10.1068/p7545
94. Körding, K. P., Beierholm, U., Ma, W. J., Quartz, S., Tenenbaum, J. B., and Shams, L. (2007). Causal inference in multisensory perception. PLoS ONE 2:e943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000943
95. Körding, K. P., and Tenenbaum, J. B. (2006). "Causal inference in sensorimotor integration," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19, eds B. Schölkopf, J. C. Platt, and T. Hoffman (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 737-744.
96. Lacey, S., Hall, J., and Sathian, K. (2010). Are surface properties integrated into visuo-haptic object representations? Eur. J. Neurosci. 31, 1882-1888. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07204.x
97. Lackner, J. R. (1988). Some proprioceptive influences on the perceptual representation of body shape and orientation. Brain 111, 281-297. doi: 10.1093/brain/111.2.281
98. Lackner, J. R., and Levine, M. S. (1978). Visual direction depends on the opertion of spatial constancy mechanisms: the oculobrachial illusion. Neurosci. Lett. 7, 207-212. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(78)90169-6
99. Lajoie, Y., Paillard, J., Teasdale, N., Bard, C., Fleury, M., Forget, R., et al. (1992). Mirror drawing in a deafferented patient and normal subjects: visuoproprioceptive conflict. Neurology 42, 1104-1106. doi: 10.1212/WNL.42.5.1104
100. Lenggenhager, B., Tadi, T., Metzinger, T., and Blanke, O. (2007). Video ergo sum: manipulating bodily self-consciousness. Science 317, 1096-1099. doi: 10.1126/science.1143439
101. Limanowski, J., and Blankenburg, F. (2013). Minimal self-models and the free energy principle. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:547. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00547
102. Limanowski, J., Lutti, A., and Blankenburg, F. (2013). The extrastriate body area is involved in illusory limb ownership. Neuroimage 86, 514-524. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.035
103. Linkenauger, S. A., Bülthoff, H. H., and Mohler, B. J. (in press). Virtual arm's reach influences perceived distances but only after experience reaching. Neuropsychologia, 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.034
104. Linkenauger, S. A., Leyrer, M., Bülthoff, H. H., and Mohler, B. J. (2013). Welcome to wonderland: the influence of the size and shape of a virtual hand on the perceived size and shape of virtual objects. PLoS ONE 8:e68594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068594
105. Llobera, J., Sanchez-Vives, M. V., and Slater, M. (2013). The relationship between virtual body ownership and temperature sensitivity. J. R. Soc. Interface 10:20130300. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0300
106. Lloyd, D. M. (2007). Spatial limits on referred touch to an alien limb may reflect boundaries of visuo-tactile peripersonal space surrounding the hand. Brain Cogn. 64, 104-109. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2006.09.013
107. Lloyd, D. M., Gillis, V., Lewis, E., Farrell, M. J., and Morrison, I. (2013). Pleasant touch moderates the subjective but not objective aspects of body perception. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 7:207. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00207
108. Lloyd, D. M., Shore, D. I., Spence, C., and Calvert, G. A. (2003). Multisensory representation of limb position in human premotor cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 17-18. doi: 10.1038/nn991
109. Longo, M. R., Cardozo, S., and Haggard, P. (2008a). Visual enhancement of touch and the bodily self. Conscious. Cogn. 17, 1181-1191. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.01.001
110. Longo, M. R., Schüür, F., Kammers, M. P. M., Tsakiris, M., and Haggard, P. (2008b). What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition 107, 978-998. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.004
111. Longo, M. R., Schüür, F., Kammers, M. P. M., Tsakiris, M., and Haggard, P. (2009). Self awareness and the body image. Acta Psychol. (Amst). 132, 166-172. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.02.003
112. Magosso, E. (2010). Integrating information from vision and touch: a neural network modeling study. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 14, 598-612. doi: 10.1109/TITB.2010.2040750
113. Magosso, E., Cuppini, C., and Ursino, M. (2012). A neural network model of ventriloquism effect and aftereffect.PLoS ONE 7:e42503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042503
114. Magosso, E., Serino, A., di Pellegrino, G., and Ursino, M. (2010a). Crossmodal links between vision and touch in spatial attention: a computational modelling study. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2010:304941. doi: 10.1155/2010/304941
115. Magosso, E., Ursino, M., di Pellegrino, G., Làdavas, E., and Serino, A. (2010b). Neural bases of peri-hand space plasticity through tool-use: insights from a combined computational-experimental approach. Neuropsychologia48, 812-830. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.037
116. Makin, T. R., Holmes, N. P., and Ehrsson, H. H. (2008). On the other hand: dummy hands and peripersonal space.Behav. Brain Res. 191, 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.02.041
117. Makin, T. R., Holmes, N. P., and Zohary, E. (2007). Is that near my hand? Multisensory representation of peripersonal space in human intraparietal sulcus. J. Neurosci. 27, 731-740. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3653-06.2007
118. Maravita, A., and Iriki, A. (2004). Tools for the body (schema). Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.008
119. Martin, J. G., Meredith, M. A., and Ahmad, K. (2009). Modeling multisensory enhancement with self-organizing maps. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 3:8. doi: 10.3389/neuro.10.008.2009
120. Maselli, A., and Slater, M. (2013). The building blocks of the full body ownership illusion. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:83. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00083
121. Maselli, A., and Slater, M. (2014). Sliding perspectives: dissociating ownership from self-location during full body illusions in virtual reality. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:693. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00693
122. Mattingley, J. B., Driver, J., Beschin, N., and Robertson, I. H. (1997). Attentional competition between modalities: extinction between touch and vision after right hemisphere damage. Neuropsychologia 35, 867-880. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00008-0
123. Miall, R. C., and Wolpert, D. M. (1996). Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Networks 9, 1265-1979. doi: 10.1016/S0893-6080(96)00035-4
124. Moseley, G. L., Olthof, N., Venema, A., Don, S., Wijers, M., Gallace, A., et al. (2008). Psychologically induced cooling of a specific body part caused by the illusory ownership of an artificial counterpart. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 13169-13173. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803768105
125. Newport, R., Pearce, R., and Preston, C. (2010). Fake hands in action: embodiment and control of supernumerary limbs. Exp. brain Res. 204, 385-395. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2104-y
126. Niebauer, C. L., Aselage, J., and Schutte, C. (2002). Hemispheric interaction and consciousness: degree of handedness predicts the intensity of a sensory illusion. Laterality 7, 85-96. doi: 10.1080/13576500143000159
127. Normand, J.-M., Giannopoulos, E., Spanlang, B., and Slater, M. (2011). Multisensory stimulation can induce an illusion of larger belly size in immersive virtual reality. PLoS ONE 6:e16128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016128
128. Pabon, S., Padilla, M. A., Frisoli, A., Greco, G., and Bergamasco, M. (2010). Ownership illusion of the hand/arm through dynamic VR interactions and automatic vibrotactile stimulation (Viareggio: RO-MAN, 2010 IEEE), 715-720. doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2010.5654669
129. Patton, P. E., and Anastasio, T. J. (2003). Modeling cross-modal enhancement and modality-specific suppression in multisensory neurons. Neural Comput. 15, 783-810. doi: 10.1162/08997660360581903
130. Pavani, F., Spence, C., and Driver, J. (2000). Visual capture of touch: out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychol. Sci. 11, 353-359. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00270
131. Pavani, F., and Zampini, M. (2007). The role of hand size in the fake-hand illusion paradigm. Perception 36, 1547-1554. doi: 10.1068/p5853
132. Peck, T. C., Seinfeld, S., Aglioti, S. M., and Slater, M. (2013). Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias. Conscious. Cogn. 22, 779-787. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.016
133. Peelen, M. V., and Downing, P. E. (2007). The neural basis of visual body perception. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 636-648. doi: 10.1038/nrn2195
134. Peled, A., Ritsner, M., Hirschmann, S., Geva, A. B., and Modai, I. (2000). Touch feel illusion in schizophrenic patients. Biol. Psychiatry 48, 1105-1108. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(00)00947-1
135. Perez-Marcos, D., Sanchez-Vives, M. V., and Slater, M. (2012). Is my hand connected to my body? The impact of body continuity and arm alignment on the virtual hand illusion. Cogn. Neurodyn. 6, 295-305. doi: 10.1007/s11571-011-9178-5
136. Petkova, V. I., Björnsdotter, M., Gentile, G., Jonsson, T., Li, T.-Q., and Ehrsson, H. H. (2011a). From part- to whole-body ownership in the multisensory brain. Curr. Biol. 21, 1118-1122. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.022
137. Petkova, V. I., and Ehrsson, H. H. (2008). If I were you: perceptual illusion of body swapping. PLoS ONE 3:e3832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003832
138. Petkova, V. I., and Ehrsson, H. H. (2009). When right feels left: referral of touch and ownership between the hands.PLoS ONE 4:e6933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006933
139. Petkova, V. I., Khoshnevis, M., and Ehrsson, H. H. (2011b). The perspective matters! Multisensory integration in ego-centric reference frames determines full-body ownership. Front. Psychol. 2:35. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00035
140. Pick, H. L., Hay, J. C., and College, S. (1969). Sensory conflict in judgments of spatial direction. Percept. Psychophys. 6, 203-205. doi: 10.3758/BF03207017
141. Preston, C. (2013). The role of distance from the body and distance from the real hand in ownership and disownership during the rubber hand illusion. Acta Psychol. (Amst). 142, 177-183. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.12.005
142. Ramachandran, V. S., and Hirstein, W. (1998). The perception of phantom limbs. Brain 121, 1603-1630. doi: 10.1093/brain/121.9.1603
143. Rao, R. P., and Ballard, D. H. (1999). Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 79-87. doi: 10.1038/4580
144. Reid, V. M., Hoehl, S., and Striano, T. (2006). The perception of biological motion by infants: an event-related potential study. Neurosci. Lett. 395, 211-214. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.10.080
145. Riemer, M., Fuchs, X., Bublatzky, F., Kleinböhl, D., Hölzl, R., and Trojan, J. (2014). The rubber hand illusion depends on a congruent mapping between real and artificial fingers. Acta Psychol. (Amst). 152, 34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.07.012
146. Riemer, M., Kleinböhl, D., Hölzl, R., and Trojan, J. (2013). Action and perception in the rubber hand illusion. Exp. brain Res. 229, 383-393. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3374-3
147. Rizzolatti, G., Scandarola, C., Matelli, M., and Gentilucci, M. (1981). Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys. II. Visual responses. Behav. Brain Res. 2, 147-163. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(81)90053-X
148. Rochat, P., and Morgan, R. (1995). Spatial determinants in the perception of self-produced leg movements by 3- to 5-month-old infants. Dev. Psychobiol. 31, 626-636. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.31.4.626
149. Rohde, M., Di Luca, M., and Ernst, M. O. (2011). The rubber hand illusion: feeling of ownership and proprioceptive drift do not go hand in hand. PLoS ONE 6:e21659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021659
150. Rossetti, Y., Desmurget, M., and Prablanc, C. (1995). Vectorial coding of movement: vision, proprioception, or both? J. Neuropsysiology 74, 457-463.
151. Rowland, B. A., Stanford, T. R., and Stein, B. E. (2007). A model of the neural mechanisms underlying multisensory integration in the superior colliculus. Perception 36, 1431-1443. doi: 10.1068/p5842
152. Sacks, O. (1985). The Man Who Mistook His Wife for A Hat and Other Clinical Tales. New York, NY: Summit Books.
153. Sanchez-Vives, M. V., Spanlang, B., Frisoli, A., Bergamasco, M., and Slater, M. (2010). Virtual hand illusion induced by visuomotor correlations. PLoS ONE 5:e10381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010381
154. Schmuckler, M. A. (1996). Visual-proprioceptive intermodal perception in infancy. Infant Behav. Dev. 19, 221-232. doi: 10.1016/S0163-6383(96)90021-1
155. Schütz-Bosbach, S., Tausche, P., and Weiss, C. (2009). Roughness perception during the rubber hand illusion. Brain Cogn. 70, 136-144. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.01.006
156. Sereno, M. I., and Huang, R.-S. (2014). Multisensory maps in parietal cortex. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 24, 39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2013.08.014
157. Seth, A. K. (2013). Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17, 565-573. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.007
158. Shams, L., and Beierholm, U. R. (2010). Causal inference in perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 14, 425-432. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.07.001
159. Shams, L., Ma, W. J., and Beierholm, U. (2005). Sound-induced flash illusion as an optimal percept. Neuroreport16, 1923-1927. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000187634.68504.bb
160. Shimada, S., Fukuda, K., and Hiraki, K. (2009). Rubber hand illusion under delayed visual feedback. PLoS ONE4:e6185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006185
161. Shimada, S., Qi, Y., and Hiraki, K. (2010). Detection of visual feedback delay in active and passive self-body movements. Exp. brain Res. 201, 359-364. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2028-6
162. Shimada, S., Suzuki, T., Yoda, N., and Hayashi, T. (2014). Relationship between sensitivity to visuotactile temporal discrepancy and the rubber hand illusion. Neurosci. Res. 85, 33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2014.04.009
163. Simion, F., Regolin, L., and Bulf, H. (2008). A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 809-813. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707021105
164. Slater, M., Perez-Marcos, D., Ehrsson, H. H., and Sanchez-Vives, M. V (2008). Towards a digital body: the virtual arm illusion. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2:6. doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.006.2008
165. Slater, M., Spanlang, B., Sanchez-Vives, M. V., and Blanke, O. (2010). First person experience of body transfer in virtual reality. PLoS ONE 5:e10564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010564
166. Sober, S. J., and Sabes, P. N. (2003). Multisensory integration during motor planning. J. Neurosci. 23, 6982-6992.
167. Sober, S. J., and Sabes, P. N. (2005). Flexible strategies for sensory integration during motor planning. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 490-497. doi: 10.1038/nn1427
168. Spence, C., Pavani, F., Maravita, A., and Holmes, N. P. (2004). Multisensory contributions to the 3-D representation of visuotactile peripersonal space in humans: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. J. Physiol. Paris 98, 171-189. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2004.03.008
169. Srinivasan, M. V., Laughlin, S. B., and Dubs, A. (1982). Predictive coding: a fresh view of inhibition in the retina.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 216, 427-259. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1982.0085
170. Stratton, G. M. (1896). The spatial harmony of touch and sight. Psychol. Rev. iii, 611. doi: 10.1037/h0072918
171. Tajadura-Jiménez, A., Väljamäe, A., Toshima, I., Kimura, T., Tsakiris, M., and Kitagawa, N. (2012). Action sounds recalibrate perceived tactile distance. Curr. Biol. 22, R516-R517. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.04.028
172. Tastevin, J. (1937). En partant de l'experience d'Aristotle [Starting from Aristotle's experience]. L'Encephale 1, 140-158.
173. Todorov, E., and Jordan, M. I. (2002). Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 1226-1235. doi: 10.1038/nn963
174. Tsakiris, M. (2010). My body in the brain: a neurocognitive model of body-ownership. Neuropsychologia 48, 703-712. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.034
175. Tsakiris, M., Carpenter, L., James, D., and Fotopoulou, A. (2010a). Hands only illusion: multisensory integration elicits sense of ownership for body parts but not for non-corporeal objects. Exp. Brain Res. 204, 343-352. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2039-3
176. Tsakiris, M., Costantini, M., and Haggard, P. (2008). The role of the right temporo-parietal junction in maintaining a coherent sense of one's body. Neuropsychologia 46, 3014-3018. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.06.004
177. Tsakiris, M., and Haggard, P. (2005). The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self-attribution. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 31, 80-91. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.80
178. Tsakiris, M., Longo, M. R., and Haggard, P. (2010b). Having a body versus moving your body: neural signatures of agency and. Neuropsychologia 48, 2740-2749. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.05.021
179. Tsakiris, M., Prabhu, G., and Haggard, P. (2006). Having a body versus moving your body: how agency structures body-ownership. Conscious. Cogn. 15, 423-432. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2005.09.004
180. Tsakiris, M., Schütz-Bosbach, S., and Gallagher, S. (2007). On agency and body-ownership: phenomenological and neurocognitive reflections. Conscious. Cogn. 16, 645-660. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.05.012
181. Ursino, M., Cuppini, C., and Magosso, E. (2014). Neurocomputational approaches to modelling multisensory integration in the brain: a review. Neural Networks 60, 141-165. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2014.08.003
182. Ursino, M., Zavaglia, M., Magosso, E., Serino, A., and di Pellegrino, G. (2007). "A neural network model of multisensory representation of peripersonal space: effect of tool use," in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2007. EMBS 2007. 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE (Lyon), 2735-2739. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4352894
183. Vallar, G., and Ronchi, R. (2009). Somatoparaphrenia: a body delusion. A review of the neuropsychological literature. Exp. Brain Res. 192, 533-551. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1562-y
184. van Beers, R. J., Sittig, A. C., Gon, J. J., and van Der, D. (1999). Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: an experimentally supported model. J. Neurophysiol. 81, 1355-1364.
185. van Beers, R. J., van Mierlo, C. M., and Brenner, E. (2011). Reweighting visual cues by touch. J. Vis. 11, 1-16. doi: 10.1167/11.10.20
186. van den Bos, E., and Jeannerod, M. (2002). Sense of body and sense of action both contribute to self-recognition.Cognition 85, 177-187. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00100-2
187. van der Hoort, B., Guterstam, A., and Ehrsson, H. H. (2011). Being Barbie: the size of one's own body determines the perceived size of the world. PLoS ONE 6:e20195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020195
188. van Stralen, H. E., van Zandvoort, M. J. E., Hoppenbrouwers, S. S., Vissers, L. M. G., Kappelle, L. J., and Dijkerman, H. C. (2014). Affective touch modulates the rubber hand illusion. Cognition 131, 147-158. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.020
189. van Stralen, H. E., van Zandvoort, M. J. E., Kappelle, L. J., and Dijkerman, H. C. (2013). The rubber hand illusion in a patient with hand disownership. Perception 42, 991-993. doi: 10.1068/p7583
190. Walsh, L. D., Moseley, G. L., Taylor, J. L., and Gandevia, S. C. (2011). Proprioceptive signals contribute to the sense of body ownership. J. Physiol. 589, 3009-3021. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.204941
191. Warren, D. H. (1980). Response factors in intermodality localization under conflict conditions. Percept. Psychophys. 27, 28-32. doi: 10.3758/BF03199902
192. Wei, K., and Körding, K. (2009). Relevance of error: what drives motor adaptation? J. Neurophysiol. 101, 655-664. doi: 10.1152/jn.90545.2008
193. White, R. C., Aimola Davies, A. M., Halleen, T. J., and Davies, M. (2010). Tactile expectations and the perception of self-touch: an investigation using the rubber hand paradigm. Conscious. Cogn. 19, 505-519. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.08.003
194. Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., and Jordan, M. I. (1995). An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science269, 1880-1882. doi: 10.1126/science.7569931
195. Wozny, D. R., Beierholm, U. R., and Shams, L. (2010). Probability matching as a computational strategy used in perception. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6:e1000871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000871
196. Yuan, Y., and Steed, A. (2010). Is the rubber hand illusion induced by immersive virtual reality? 2010 IEEE Virtual Real. Conf. 95-102. doi: 10.1109/VR.2010.5444807
197. Zeller, D., Litvak, V., Friston, K. J., and Classen, J. (2014). Sensory processing and the rubber hand illusion - an evoked potential study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 27, 573-582. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00705
198. Zopf, R., Harris, J. A., and Williams, M. A. (2011). The influence of body-ownership cues on tactile sensitivity. Cogn. Neurosci. 2, 147-154. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2011.578208
199. Zopf, R., Savage, G., and Williams, M. A. (2010). Crossmodal congruency measures of lateral distance effects on the rubber hand illusion. Neuropsychologia 48, 713-725. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.10.028