Action and perception in the rubber hand illusion

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 229, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 383-393

  Riemer, Martin ^a   Kleinböhl, Dieter ^a   Hölzl, Rupert ^a   Trojan, Jörg ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Agency; Body image; Body schema; Ownership; Rubber hand illusion; Volition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY IMAGE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HAND PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ILLUSION; MALE; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF REPORT; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOUCH; VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; BODY IMAGE; HAND; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; MOVEMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84892811956     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: 14321106     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3374-3     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Aimola Davies AM, White RC, Thew G, Aimola NM, Davies M (2010) Visual capture of action, experience of ownership, and the illusion of self-touch: A new rubber hand paradigm. Perception 39:830-838
2. Azañón E, Soto-Faraco S (2007) Alleviating the 'crossed-hands' deficit by seeing uncrossed rubber hands. Exp Brain Res 182:537-548
3. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Statist Soc B 57:289-300
4. Bertamini M, Berselli N, Bode C, Lawson R, Wong LT (2011) The rubber hand illusion in a mirror. Conscious Cogn 20:1108-1119
5. Botvinick M, Cohen J (1998) Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 391:756
6. Brass M, Haggard P (2008) The what, when, whether model of intentional action. Neuroscientist 14:319-325
7. Buxbaum LJ, Coslett HB (2001) Specialised structural descriptions for human body parts: evidence from autotopagnosia. Cogn Neuropsychol 18:289-306
8. Cardinali L, Brozzoli C, Urquizar C, Salemme R, Roy AC, Farne A (2011) When action is not enough: Tool-use reveals tactile-dependent access to body schema. Neuropsychologia 49:3750-3757
9. Decety J, Sommerville JA (2003) Shared representations between self and other: A social cognitive neuroscience view. Trends Cogn Sci 7:527-533
10. Deiber MP, Honda M, Ibanez V, Sadato N, Hallett M (1999) Mesial motor areas in self-initiated versus externally triggered movements examined with fMRI: effect of movement type and rate. J Neurophysiol 81:3065-3077
11. Dijkerman HC, de Haan EH (2007) Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action. Behav Brain Sci 30:189-201
12. Dummer T, Picot-Annand A, Neal T, Moore C (2009) Movement and the rubber hand illusion. Perception 38:271-280
13. Ehrsson HH, Spence C, Passingham RE (2004) That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science 305:875-877
14. Franck N, Farrer C, Georgieff N, Marie-Cardine M, Dalery J, d'Amato T, Jeannerod M (2001) Defective recognition of one's own actions in patients with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 158:454-459
15. Gallagher S (2005) How the body shapes the mind. Oxford University Press Inc., New York
16. Gallese V, Sinigaglia C (2010) The bodily self as power for action. Neuropsychologia 48:746-755
17. Georgieff N, Jeannerod M (1998) Beyond consciousness of external reality: A "who" system for consciousness of action and self-consciousness. Conscious Cogn 7:465-477
18. Goldberg G, Bloom KK (1990) The alien hand sign. Localization, lateralization and recovery. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 69:228-238
19. Haggard P (2005) Conscious intention and motor cognition. Trends Cogn Sci 9:290-295
20. Haggard P (2008) Human volition: Towards a neuroscience of will. Nat Rev Neurosci 9:934-946
21. Haggard P, Clark S, Kalogeras J (2002) Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nat Neurosci 5:382-385
22. Head H, Holmes G (1911) Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions. Brain 34:102-254
23. Heed T, Grundler M, Rinkleib J, Rudzik FH, Collins T, Cooke E, O'Regan JK (2011) Visual information and rubber hand embodiment differentially affect reach-to-grasp actions. Acta Psychol (Amst) 138:263-271
24. Holle H, McLatchie N, Maurer S, Ward J (2011) Proprioceptive drift without illusions of ownership for rotated hands in the "rubber hand illusion" paradigm. Cogn Neurosci 2:171-178
25. Holmes NP, Spence C (2005) Visual bias of unseen hand position with a mirror: Spatial and temporal factors. Exp Brain Res 166:489-497
26. Holmes NP, Crozier G, Spence C (2004) When mirrors lie: "Visual capture" of arm position impairs reaching performance. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 4:193-200
27. Holmes NP, Snijders HJ, Spence C (2006) Reaching with alien limbs: visual exposure to prosthetic hands in a mirror biases proprioception without accompanying illusions of ownership. Percept Psychophys 68:685-701
28. Ijsselsteijn WA, de Kort YAW, Haans A (2006) Is this my hand I see before me? The rubber hand illusion in reality, virtual reality, and mixed reality. Presence: Teleop Virt 15:455-464
29. Jenkins IH, Jahanshahi M, Jueptner M, Passingham RE, Brooks DJ (2000) Self-initiated versus externally triggered movements. II. The effect of movement predictability on regional cerebral blood flow. Brain 123(6):1216-1228
30. Kalckert A, Ehrsson HH (2012) Moving a rubber hand that feels like your own: A dissociation of ownership and agency. Front Hum Neurosci 6:40
31. Kammers MP, van der Ham IJ, Dijkerman HC (2006) Dissociating body representations in healthy individuals: differential effects of a kinaesthetic illusion on perception and action. Neuropsychologia 44:2430-2436
32. Kammers MP, de Vignemont F, Verhagen L, Dijkerman HC (2009a) The rubber hand illusion in action. Neuropsychologia 47:204-211
33. Kammers MP, Longo MR, Tsakiris M, Dijkerman HC, Haggard P (2009b) Specificity and coherence of body representations. Perception 38:1804-1820
34. Kammers MP, Kootker JA, Hogendoorn H, Dijkerman HC (2010) How many motoric body representations can we grasp? Exp Brain Res 202:203-212
35. Longo MR, Haggard P (2009) Sense of agency primes manual motor responses. Perception 38:69-78
36. Longo MR, Schüür F, Kammers MP, Tsakiris M, Haggard P (2008) What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition 107:978-998
37. Merleau-Ponty M (1962) The phenomenology of perception. Routledge, London
38. Newport R, Pearce R, Preston C (2010) Fake hands in action: embodiment and control of supernumerary limbs. Exp Brain Res 204:385-395
39. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97-113
40. Paillard J (1999) Body schema and body image: A double dissociation in deafferented patients. In: Gantchev GN, Mori S, Massion J (ed) Motor control, today and tomorrow. Sofia: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Academic Publishing House, pp. 197-214
41. Pavani F, Spence C, Driver J (2000) Visual capture of touch: out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychol Sci 11:353-359
42. Raz L, Weiss PL, Reiner M (2008) The virtual hand illusion and body ownership. LNCS 5024:367-372
43. Rohde M, Di Luca M, Ernst MO (2011) The rubber hand illusion: feeling of ownership and proprioceptive drift do not go hand in hand. PLoS ONE 6:e21659
44. Rossetti Y (1998) Implicit short-lived motor representations of space in brain damaged and healthy subjects. Conscious Cogn 7:520-558
45. Sanchez-Vives MV, Spanlang B, Frisoli A, Bergamasco M, Slater M (2010) Virtual hand illusion induced by visuomotor correlations. PLoS ONE 5:e10381
46. Slater M, Perez-Marcos D, Ehrsson HH, Sanchez-Vives MV (2009) Inducing illusory ownership of a virtual body. Front Neurosci 3:214-220
47. Trojan J, Kleinböhl D, Stolle AM, Andersen OK, Hölzl R, Arendt- Nielsen L (2006) Psychophysical 'perceptual maps' of heat and pain sensations by direct localization of CO2 laser stimuli on the skin. Brain Res 1120:106-113
48. Tsakiris M, Haggard P (2005) The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self-attribution. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 31:80-91
49. Tsakiris M, Prabhu G, Haggard P (2006) Having a body versus moving your body: how agency structures body-ownership. Conscious Cogn 15:423-432
50. Tsakiris M, Schütz-Bosbach S, Gallagher S (2007) On agency and body-ownership: phenomenological and neurocognitive reflections. Conscious Cogn 16:645-660
51. Tsakiris M, Longo MR, Haggard P (2010) Having a body versus moving your body: neural signatures of agency and body-ownership. Neuropsychologia 48:2740-2749
52. Walsh LD, Moseley GL, Taylor JL, Gandevia SC (2011) Proprioceptive signals contribute to the sense of body ownership. J Physiol 589:3009-3021
53. Wegner DM, Wheatley T (1999) Apparent mental causation: Sources of the experience of will. Am Psychol 54:480-492