Relationship between sensitivity to visuotactile temporal discrepancy and the rubber hand illusion

Neuroscience Research

Volumn 85, Issue , 2014, Pages 33-38

  Shimada, Sotaro ^a   Suzuki, Tatsuya ^a   Yoda, Naohiko ^a   Hayashi, Tomoya ^a  

^a MEIJI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Delayed visual feedback; Rubber hand illusion; Sense of self ownership; Temporal discrepancy

Indexed keywords

RUBBER;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY IMAGE; DECISION MAKING; HAND; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ILLUSION; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; TACTILE STIMULATION; TOUCH; VISUAL FEEDBACK; PHYSIOLOGY; STIMULATION; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

BODY IMAGE; HAND; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; RUBBER; TOUCH; TOUCH PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84908555241     PISSN: 01680102     EISSN: 18728111     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2014.04.009     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Blakemore S.-J., Wolpert D., Frith C. Why can't you tickle yourself?. NeuroReport 2000, 11:R11-R16.
2. Botvinick M., Cohen J. Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 1998, 391:756.
3. Ehrsson H.H., Spence C., Passingham R.E. That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science 2004, 305:875-877.
4. Folegatti A., Farnè A., Salemme R., de Vignemont F. The rubber hand illusion: two's a company, but three's a crowd. Conscious. Cogn. 2012, 21:799-812.
5. Gallagher S. How the Body Shapes the Mind 2005, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
6. Kawabe T., Roseboom W., Nishida S. The sense of agency is action-effect causality perception based on cross-modal grouping. Proc. R. Soc. B 2013, 280:20130991.
7. Longo M.R., Schuur F., Kammers M.P.M., Tsakiris M., Haggard P. What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition 2008, 107:978-998.
8. Makin T.R., Holmes N.P., Ehrsson H.H. On the other hand: dummy hands and peripersonal space. Behav. Brain Res. 2008, 191:1-10.
9. Moizumi S., Yamamoto S., Kitazawa S. Referral of tactile stimuli to action points in virtual reality with reaction force. Neurosci. Res. 2007, 59:60-67.
10. Rohde M., Di Luca M., Ernst M.O. The rubber hand illusion: feeling of ownership and proprioceptive drift do not go hand in hand. PLoS ONE 2011, 6(6):e21659.
11. Sanchez-Vives M.V., Spanlang B., Frisoli A., Bergamasco M., Slater M. Virtual hand illusion induced by visuomotor correlations. PLoS ONE 2010, 5(4):e10381.
12. Shimada S., Fukuda K., Hiraki K. Rubber hand illusion under delayed visual feedback. PLoS ONE 2009, 4(7):e6185.
13. Shimada S., Qi Y., Hiraki K. Detection of visual feedback delay in active and passive self-body movements. Exp. Brain Res. 2010, 201:359-364.
14. Shokur S., O'Doherty J.E., Winans J.A., Bleuler H., Leedey M.A. Expanding the primate body schema in sensorimotor cortex by virtual touches of an avatar. Proc. Natal. Acad. Sic. U. S. A. 2013, 110:15121-15126.
15. Tsakiris M., Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self-attribution. J. Exp. Psychol. 2005, 31:80-91.
16. Tsakiris M., Hesse M.D., Boy C., Haggard P., Fink G.R. Neural signatures of body ownership: a sensory network for bodily self-consciousness. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17:2235-2244.
17. Yamamoto S., Kitazawa S. Reversal of subjective temporal order due to arm crossing. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4:759-765.