Affective touch modulates the rubber hand illusion

Cognition

Volumn 131, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 147-158

  Van Stralen, Haike E ^a,b   van Zandvoort, Martine J E ^a,b   Hoppenbrouwers, Sylco S ^c   Vissers, Lidewij M G ^a   Kappelle, L Jaap ^b   Dijkerman, H Chris ^a,b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Body representation; Ct Fiber; Insula; Pleasant; Somatoparaphrenia; Touch

Indexed keywords

RUBBER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GLABROUS SKIN; HAND; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ILLUSION; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPRIOCEPTION; SENSORY STIMULATION; SKIN; SKIN TEMPERATURE; TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT; TOUCH; VELOCITY; YOUNG ADULT; AFFECT; HAND MOVEMENT; HANDEDNESS; RUBBER HAND ILLUSION; SOMATOSENSORY SYSTEM; TACTILE STIMULATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

BODY REPRESENTATION; CT-FIBER; INSULA; PLEASANT; SOMATOPARAPHRENIA; TOUCH;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BODY IMAGE; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; TOUCH PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84893360141     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.020     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Baier B., Karnath H.O. Tight link between our sense of limb ownership and self-awareness of actions. Stroke 2008, 39(2):486-488.
2. Berti A., Bottini G., Gandola M., Pia L., Smania N., Stracciari A., et al. Shared cortical anatomy for motor, awareness and motor control. Science 2005, 309(5733):488-491.
3. Botvinick M., Cohen J. Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 1998, 391(6669):756.
4. Bufalari I., Ionta S. The social and personality neuroscience of empathy for pain and touch. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2013, 7:393.
5. Cowie D., Makin T.R., Bremner A.J. Children's responses to the rubber-hand illusion reveal dissociable pathways in body representation. Psychological Science 2013, 24(5):762-769.
6. Craig A.D. How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002, 3:655-666.
7. Craig A.D. How do you feel-now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2009, 10(1):59-70.
8. Crucianelli L., Metcalf N.K., Fotopoulou A.K., Jenkinson P.M. Bodily pleasure matters: Velocity of touch modulates body ownership during the rubber hand illusion. Frontiers in Psychology 2013, 4:703.
9. Ditzen B., Neumann I.D., Bodenmann G., von Dawans B., Turner R.A., Ehlert U., et al. Effects of different kinds of couple interaction on cortisol and heart rate responses to stress in women. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2007, 32(5):565-574.
10. Ebisch S.J., Ferri F., Salone A., Perrucci M.G., D'Amico L., Ferro F.M., et al. Differential involvement of somatosensory and interoceptive cortices during the observation of affective touch. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 23(7):1808-1822.
11. Ehrsson H.H., Holmes N.P., Passingham R.E. Touching a rubber hand: Feeling of body ownership is associated with activity in multisensory brain areas. Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25(45):10564-10573.
12. Ehrsson H.H., Rosen B., Stockselius A., Ragno C., Kohler P., Lundborg G. Upper limb amputees can be induced to experience a rubber hand as their own. Brain 2008, 131(Pt 12):3443-3452.
13. Ehrsson H.H., Spence C., Passingham R.E. That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science 2004, 305(5685):875-877.
14. Ehrsson H.H., Wiech K., Weiskopf N., Dolan R.J., Passingham R.E. Threatening a rubber hand that you feel is yours elicits a cortical anxiety response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2007, 104(23):9828-9833.
15. Farrell M.J., Laird A.R., Egan G.F. Brain activity associated with painfully hot stimuli applied to the upper limb: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping 2005, 25(1):129-139.
16. Gallace A., Spence C. The science of interpersonal touch: An overview. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2010, 34(2):246-259.
17. Gazzola V., Spezio M.L., Etzel J.A., Castelli F., Adolphs R., Keysers C. Primary somatosensory cortex discriminates affective significance in social touch. PNAS, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2012, 109(25).
18. Germine L., Benson T.L., Cohen F., Hooker C.I. Psychosis-proneness and the rubber hand illusion of body ownership. Psychiatry Research 2013, 207(1-2):45-52.
19. Gordon I., Voos A.C., Bennett R.H., Bolling D.Z., Pelphrey K.A., Kaiser M.D. Brain mechanisms for processing affective touch. Human Brain Mapping 2011.
20. Graziano M.S. Where is my arm? The relative role of vision and proprioception in the neuronal representation of limb position. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1999, 96(18):10418-10421.
21. Grewen K.M., Anderson B.J., Girdler S.S., Light K.C. Warm partner contact is related to lower cardiovascular reactivity. Behavioral Medicine 2003, 29(3):123-130.
22. Guterstam A., Gentile G., Ehrsson H.H. The invisible hand illusion: Multisensory integration leads to the embodiment of a discrete volume of empty space. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2013, 25(7):1078-1099.
23. Hohwy J., Paton B. Explaining away the body: Experiences of supernaturally caused touch and touch on non-hand objects within the rubber hand illusion. PLoS ONE 2010, 5(2):e9416.
24. Holmes N.P., Calvert G.A., Spence C. Tool use changes multisensory interactions in seconds: Evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. Experimental Brain Research 2007, 183(4):465-476.
25. Holmes N.P., Snijders H.J., Spence C. Reaching with alien limbs: Visual exposure to prosthetic hands in a mirror biases proprioception without accompanying illusions of ownership. Perception & Psychophysics 2006, 68(4):685-701.
26. Kammers M.P., de Vignemont F., Verhagen L., Dijkerman H.C. The rubber hand illusion in action. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47(1):204-211.
27. Kammers M.P., Rose K., Haggard P. Feeling numb: Temperature, but not thermal pain, modulates feeling of body ownership. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49(5):1316-1321.
28. Kress I.U., Minati L., Ferraro S., Critchley H.D. Direct skin-to-skin versus indirect touch modulates neural responses to stroking versus tapping. NeuroReport 2011, 22(13):646-651.
29. Lloyd D.M., Shore D.I., Spence C., Calvert G.A. Multisensory representation of limb position in human premotor cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 6(1):17-18.
30. Loken L.S., Wessberg J., Morrison I., McGlone F., Olausson H. Coding of pleasant touch by unmyelinated afferents in humans. Nature Neuroscience 2009, 12(5):547-548.
31. Macaluso E., Driver J. Multisensory spatial interactions: A window onto functional integration in the human brain. Trends in Neurosciences 2005, 28(5):264-271.
32. Makin T.R., Holmes N.P., Ehrsson H.H. On the other hand: dummy hands and peripersonal space. Behavioural Brain Research 2008, 191(1):1-10.
33. McGlone F., Vallbo A.B., Olausson H., Loken L., Wessberg J. Discriminative touch and emotional touch. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007, 61(3):173-183.
34. Montoya P., Sitges C. Affective modulation of somatosensory-evoked potentials elicited by tactile stimulation. Brain Research 2006, 1068(1):205-212.
35. Morrison I., Bjornsdotter M., Olausson H. Vicarious responses to social touch in posterior insular cortex are tuned to pleasant caressing speeds. Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31(26):9554-9562.
36. Morrison I., Loken L.S., Olausson H. The skin as a social organ. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 204(3):305-314.
37. Moseley G.L., Olthof N., Venema A., Don S., Wijers M., Gallace A., et al. Psychologically induced cooling of a specific body part caused by the illusory ownership of an artificial counterpart. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2008, 105(35):13169-13173.
38. Olausson H., Cole J., Rylander K., McGlone F., Lamarre Y., Wallin B.G., et al. Functional role of unmyelinated tactile afferents in human hairy skin: Sympathetic response and perceptual localization. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 184(1):135-140.
39. Olausson H., Lamarre Y., Backlund H., Morin C., Wallin B.G., Starck G., et al. Unmyelinated tactile afferents signal touch and project to insular cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5(9):900-904.
40. Olausson H., Wessberg J., Morrison I., McGlone F., Vallbo A. The neurophysiology of unmyelinated tactile afferents. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2010, 34(2):185-191.
41. Rohde M., Di Luca M., Ernst M.O. The Rubber Hand Illusion: Feeling of ownership and proprioceptive drift do not go hand in hand. PLoS ONE 2011, 6(6):e21659.
42. Rolls E.T. The affective and cognitive processing of touch, oral texture, and temperature in the brain. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2010, 34(2):237-245.
43. Schutz-Bosbach S., Tausche P., Weiss C. Roughness perception during the rubber hand illusion. Brain and Cognition 2009, 70(1):136-144.
44. Taylor K.S., Seminowicz D.A., Davis K.D. Two systems of resting state connectivity between the insula and cingulate cortex. Human Brain Mapping 2009, 30(9):2731-2745.
45. Tsakiris M. My body in the brain: A neurocognitive model of body-ownership. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48(3):703-712.
46. Tsakiris M., Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31(1):80-91.
47. Tsakiris M., Hesse M.D., Boy C., Haggard P., Fink G.R. Neural signatures of body ownership: A sensory network for bodily self-consciousness. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 17(10):2235-2244.
48. Tsakiris M., Tajadura-Jimenez A., Costantini M. Just a heartbeat away from one's body: Interoceptive sensitivity predicts malleability of body-representations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2011, 278(1717):2470-2476.
49. van Stralen H.E., van Zandvoort M.J., Dijkerman H.C. The role of self-touch in somatosensory and body representation disorders after stroke. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences 2011, 366(1581):3142-3152.
50. Van Strien J.W. Classification of left-handed and right-handed test subjects. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie en haar Grensgebieden 1992, 27(2):88-92.
51. Weiss S.J., Wilson P., Morrison D. Maternal tactile stimulation and the neurodevelopment of low birth weight infants. Infancy 2004, 5(1):85-107.