Tools for the body (schema)

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 79-86

  Maravita, Angelo ^a   Iriki, Atsushi ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

^b TOKYO MEDICAL AND DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; NEURAL NETWORKS; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY;

NEURONS;

BRAIN;

BEHAVIOR; BODY BUILD; BODY POSTURE; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN INJURY; COGNITION; HUMAN; MONKEY; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; REVIEW;

EID: 0842326542     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.008     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Head H., Holmes G. Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions. Brain. 34:1911;102-254.
2. Bonnier P. L'aschématie. Rev. Neurol. 13:1905;605-609.
3. Gallagher S. Body schema and intentionality. Bermudez J.L., et al. The Body and The Self. 1998;225-244 MIT Press.
4. Berlucchi G., Aglioti S. The body in the brain: neural bases of corporeal awareness. Trends Neurosci. 20:1997;560-564.
5. Maravita A., et al. Multisensory integration and the body schema: close to hand and within reach. Curr. Biol. 13:2003;R531-R539.
6. Pavani F., et al. Visual capture of touch: out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychol. Sci. 11:2000;353-359.
7. Farnè A., et al. Left tactile extinction following visual stimulation of a rubber hand. Brain. 123:2000;2350-2360.
8. Graziano M.S.A., Botvinick M.M. How the brain represents the body: insights neurophysiology and psychology. Prinz W., Hommel B. Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and Performance XIX. 2002;136-157 Oxford University Press.
9. Botvinick M., Cohen J. Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature. 391:1998;756.
10. Armel K.C., Ramachandran V.S. Projecting sensations to external objects: evidence from skin conductance response. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 270:2003;1499-1506.
11. Maravita A., et al. Seeing your own touched hands in a mirror modulates cross-modal interactions. Psychol. Sci. 13:2002;350-355.
12. Schilder P. The Image and Appearance of the Human Body: Studies in the Constructive Energies of the Psyche. 1935;Kegan Paul.
13. Colby C.L. Action-oriented spatial reference frames in cortex. Neuron. 20:1998;15-24.
14. Rizzolatti G., et al. The organization of the cortical motor system: new concepts. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 106:1998;283-296.
15. Rizzolatti G., et al. The space around us. Science. 277:1997;190-191.
16. Graziano M.S., Gross C.G. Spatial maps for the control of movement. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 8:1998;195-201.
17. Jeannerod M., et al. Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation. Trends Neurosci. 18:1995;314-320.
18. Graziano M.S., et al. Coding of visual space by premotor neurons. Science. 266:1994;1054-1057.
19. Fogassi L., et al. Coding of peripersonal space in inferior premotor cortex (area f4). J. Neurophysiol. 76:1996;141-157.
20. Duhamel J.-R., et al. Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: congruent visual and somatic response properties. J. Neurophysiol. 79:1998;126-136.
21. Làdavas E. Functional and dynamic properties of visual peripersonal space. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6:2002;17-22.
22. Critchley M. Disorders of the body-image. Critchley M. The Parietal Lobe. 1953;225-255 Hafner Press.
23. Coslett H.B. Evidence for a disturbance of the body schema in neglect. Brain Cogn. 37:1998;527-544.
24. Cumming W.J. The neurobiology of the body schema. Br. J. Psychiatry Suppl. 1988;7-11.
25. Denes G. Disorders of body awareness and body knowledge. Boller F., Grafman J. Handbook of Neuropsychology. Vol. 2:1990;207-228 Elsevier.
26. Poeck K., Orgass B. The concept of the body schema: a critical review and some experimental results. Cortex. 7:1971;254-277.
27. Critchley M. The Divine Banquet of the Brain and Other Essays. 1979;Raven Press.
28. Aglioti S., et al. Disownership of left hand and objects related to it in a patient with right brain damage. Neuroreport. 8:1996;293-296.
29. Iriki A., et al. Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. Neuroreport. 7:1996;2325-2330.
30. Ishibashi H., et al. Acquisition and development of monkey tool-use: behavioural and kinematic analyses. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 78:2000;1-9.
31. Yamamoto S., Kitazawa S. Sensation at the tips of invisible tools. Nat. Neurosci. 4:2001;979-980.
32. Riggio L., et al. What is crossed in crossed-hand effects? Acta Psychol. (Amst.). 62:1986;89-100.
33. Maravita A., et al. Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition. 83:2002;B25-B34.
34. Driver J., Spence C. Attention and the crossmodal construction of space. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2:1998;254-262.
35. Spence, C. et al. Multisensory contributions to the 3-D representation of visuotactile peripersonal space in humans: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. J. Physiol. (Paris) (in press).
36. Inoue K., et al. Activation in the ipsilateral posterior parietal cortex during tool use: a pet study. Neuroimage. 14:2001;1469-1475.
37. Bisiach E., Vallar G. Unilateral neglect in humans. Boller F., Grafman J. Handbook of Neuropsychology. 2000;459-502 Elsevier.
38. Driver J., et al. Extinction as a paradigm measure of attentional bias and restricted capacity following brain injury. Thier P., Karnath H.O. Parietal Lobe Contributions to Orientation in 3d Space. 1997;401-429 Springer Verlag.
39. Berti A., Frassinetti F. When far becomes near: re-mapping of space by tool use. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12:2000;415-420.
40. Rizzolatti G., et al. Deficits in attention and movement following the removal of postarcuate (area 6) and prearcuate (area 8) cortex in macaque monkeys. Brain. 106:1983;655-673.
41. Ackroyd K., et al. Widening the sphere of influence: using a tool to extend extrapersonal visual space in a patient with severe neglect. Neurocase. 8:2002;1-12.
42. Pegna A.J., et al. So near yet so far: neglect in far or near space depends on tool use. Ann. Neurol. 50:2001;820-822.
43. Mattingley J.B., et al. Attentional competition between modalities: extinction between touch and vision after right hemisphere damage. Neuropsychologia. 35:1997;867-880.
44. di Pellegrino G., et al. Seeing where your hands are. Nature. 388:1997;730.
45. Maravita A., et al. Reaching with a tool extends visual-tactile interactions into far space: evidence from cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia. 39:2001;580-585.
46. Farnè A., Làdavas E. Dynamic size-change of hand peripersonal space following tool use. Neuroreport. 11:2000;1645-1649.
47. Maravita A., et al. Active tool-use with contralesional hand can reduce crossmodal extinction of touch on that hand. Neurocase. 8:2002;411-416.
48. Johnson-Frey S.H. What's so special about human tool use? Neuron. 39:2003;201-204.
49. Cooke D.F., et al. Complex movements evoked by microstimulation of the ventral intraparietal area. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100:2003;6163-6168.
50. Ishibashi H., et al. Immediate-early-gene-expression by the training of tool-use in the monkey intraparietal cortex. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 25:1999;889.
51. Ishibashi H., et al. Tool-use learning induces BDNF expression in a selective portion of monkey anterior parietal cortex. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 102:2002;110-112.
52. Ishibashi H., et al. Tool-use learning selectively induces expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor, its receptor trkB, and neurotrophin 3 in the intraparietal multisensory cortex of monkeys. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 14:2002;3-9.
53. Imamizu H., et al. Human cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool. Nature. 403:2000;192-195.
54. Obayashi S., et al. Functional brain mapping of monkey tool use. Neuroimage. 14:2001;853-861.
55. Johnson-Frey S.H. The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8:2004;71-78.
56. Moll J., et al. Functional MRI correlates of real and imagined tool-use pantomimes. Neurology. 54:2000;1331-1336.
57. Goldenberg G., Hagmann S. Tool use and mechanical problem solving in apraxia. Neuropsychologia. 36:1998;581-589.
58. Paillard J. The hand and the tool: the functional architecture of human technical skills. Berthelet A., Chavaillon J. The Use of Tools by Human and Non-Human Primates. 1993;36-46 Oxford University Press.
59. Kohler W. The Mentality of Apes. 1927;Humanities Press.
60. Tomasello M., Call J. Primate Cognition. 1997;Oxford University Press.
61. Hihara S., et al. Cortical connections of monkey intraparietal cortex representing modified body-images during tool-use. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 2002;28219.
62. Hihara S., et al. Sprouting of terminal arborizations of the temporoparietal afferents by tool-use learning in adult monkeys. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 2003;93915.
63. Matsuzawa T. Primate Origins of Human Cognition and Behaviour. 2001;Springer.
64. Iriki A., et al. Self-images in the video monitor coded by monkey intraparietal neurons. Neurosci. Res. 40:2001;163-173.
65. Loomis J. Distal attribution and presence. Presence. 1:1992;113-119.
66. Povinelli D. Folk Physics for Apes. 2000;Oxford University Press.
67. Wolpert L. Causal belief and the origins of technology. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 361:2003;1709-1719.
68. Hihara S., et al. Rapid learning of sequential tool use by macaque monkeys. Physiol. Behav. 78:2003;427-434.
69. Obayashi S., et al. Macaque prefrontal activity associated with extensive tool use. Neuroreport. 13:2002;2349-2354.
70. Obayashi, S. et al. (2003) Monkey brain areas underlying remote-controlled operations. Eur. J. Neurosci. (in press).
71. Hunt G.R., Gray R.D. Diversification and cumulative evolution in new caledonian crow tool manufacture. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 270:2003;867-874.
72. Chappell J., Kacelnik A. Tool selectivity in a non-primate, the new caledonian crow (corvus moneduloides). Anim. Cogn. 5:2002;71-78.
73. Anderson J.R. Gone fishing: tool use in animals. Biologist (London). 49:2002;15-18.
74. Farnè A., et al. Tool use modifies the multisensory coding of peripersonal space. 6th IBRO World Congress of Neuroscience. 2003;IBRO. p. 23.