The Rubber Hand Illusion: Two's a company, but three's a crowd

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 799-812

  Folegatti, A ^a,b   Farne A ^a,c,d   Salemme, R ^a,c,d   de Vignemont, F ^e  

^a LYON NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH CENTER   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^d HÔPITAL NEUROLOGIQUE   (France)

^e CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Body boundaries; Body model; Body ownership; Embodiment; Limb duplication; Rubber Hand Illusion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FEMALE; HAND; HUMAN; ILLUSION; MALE; PROPRIOCEPTION; RUBBER HAND ILLUSION; SENSORY STIMULATION; TACTILE STIMULATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; PROPRIOCEPTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; TOUCH; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84860525660     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.02.008     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Armel K.C., Ramachandran V.S. Projecting sensations to external objects: Evidence from skin conductance response. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2003, 270(1523):1499-1506.
2. Austen E.L., Soto-Faraco S., Enns J.T., Kingstone A. Mislocalizations of touch to a fake hand. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience 2004, 4(2):170-181.
3. Botvinick M., Cohen J. Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 1998, 391(6669):756.
4. Brewer B. Bodily awareness and the self. The body and the self 1995, MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass.). J.L. Bermudez, T. Marcel, N. Eilan (Eds.).
5. Brozzoli C., Gentile G., Petkova VI., Ehrsson HH. FMRI adaptation reveals a cortical mechanism for the coding of space near the hand. Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31(24):9023-9031.
6. Cardinali L., Brozzoli C., Farnè A. Peripersonal space and body schema: Two labels for the same concept?. Brain Topography 2009, 21(3-4):252-260.
7. Carruthers G. Types of body representation and the sense of embodiment. Consciousness and Cognition 2008, 17(4):1302-1316.
8. Costantini M., Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion: Sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership. Consciousness and Cognition 2007, 16(2):229-240.
9. de Vignemont F. Habeas corpus: The sense of ownership of one's own body. Mind & Language 2007, 22(4):427-449.
10. de Vignemont F. Embodiment, ownership and disownership. Consciousness and Cognition 2011, 20(1):82-93.
11. de Vignemont F., Farnè A. Incorporer objets et membres factices: Quelle différence? Widening the body to rubber hands and tools: What's the difference?. Revue de Neuropsychologie 2010, 2(3):203-211.
12. Ehrsson H.H. How many arms make a pair? Perceptual illusion of having an additional limb. Perception 2009, 38(2):310-312.
13. Ehrsson H.H., Holmes N.P., Passingham R.E. Touching a rubber hand: Feeling of body ownership is associated with activity in multisensory brain areas. The Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25(45):10564-10573.
14. Folegatti A., de Vignemont F., Pavani F., Rossetti Y., Farnè A. Losing one's hand: Visual-proprioceptive conflict affects touch perception. PLoS One 2009, 4(9):e6920.
15. Guterstam A., Petkova V.I., Ehrsson H.H. The illusion of owning a third arm. PLoS One 2011, 6(2):e17208.
16. Haans A., Ijsselsteijn W.A., de Kort I.A. The effect of similarities in skin texture and hand shape on perceived ownership of a fake limb. Body Image 2008, 5(4):389-394.
17. Halligan P., Marshall J.M. Left neglect for near but not for far space in man. Nature 1991, 350:498-500.
18. Hohwy J., Paton B. Explaining away the body: Experiences of supernaturally caused touch and touch on non-hand objects within the rubber hand illusion. PLoS One 2010, 5(2):e9416.
19. Holmes N.P., Snijders H.J., Spence C. Reaching with alien limbs: Visual exposure to prosthetic hands in a mirror biases proprioception without accompanying illusions of ownership. Perception and Psychophysics 2006, 68(4):685-701.
20. Holmes N.P., Spence C. The body schema and the multisensory representation(s) of peripersonal space. Cognitive Processing 2004, 5:94-105.
21. Holmes N.P., Spence C. Dissociating body image and body schema with rubber hands. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2007, 30:189-239.
22. Körding K.P., Beierholm U., Ma W.J., Quartz S., Tenenbaum J.B., Shams L. Causal inference in multisensory perception. PLoS One 2007, 2(9):e943.
23. Làdavas E., di Pellegrino G., Farnè A., Zeloni G. Neuropsychological evidence of an integrated visuotactile representation of peripersonal space in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1998, 10:1-24.
24. Làdavas E., Farnè A. Visuo-tactile representation of near-the-body space. Journal of Physiology, Paris 2004, 98(1-3):161-170.
25. Lloyd D.M. Spatial limits on referred touch to an alien limb may reflect boundaries of visuo-tactile peripersonal space surrounding the hand. Brain and Cognition 2007, 64(1):104-109.
26. Longo M.R., Cardozo S., Haggard P. Visual enhancement of touch and the bodily self. Consciousness and Cognition 2008, 17(4):1181-1191.
27. Makin T.R., Holmes N.P., Ehrsson H.H. On the other hand: Dummy hands and peripersonal space. Behavioural Brain Research 2008, 191(1):1-10.
28. Martin M. Bodily awareness: A sense of ownership. The body and the self 1995, MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass.). J.L. Bermudez, T. Marcel, N. Eilan (Eds.).
29. Morgan R., Rochat P. Intermodal calibration of the body in early infancy. Ecological Psychology 1997, 9:1-24.
30. Moseley G.L., Olthof N., Venema A., Don S., Wijers M., Gallace A., et al. Psychologically induced cooling of a specific body part caused by the illusory ownership of an artificial counterpart. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 2008, 105(35):13169-13173.
31. Newport R., Gilpin H.R. Multisensory disintegration and the disappearing hand trick. Current Biology 2011, 21(19):R804-R805.
32. Newport R., Pearce R., Preston C. Fake hands in action: Embodiment and control of supernumerary limbs. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 204(3):385-395.
33. Pavani F., Spence C., Driver J. Visual capture of touch: Out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychological Science 2000, 11(5):353-359.
34. Pavani F., Zampini M. The role of hand size in the fake-hand illusion paradigm. Perception 2007, 36(10):1547-1554.
35. Petkova V.I., Ehrsson H.H. When right feels left: Referral of touch and ownership between the hands. PLoS One 2009, 4(9):e6933.
36. Rochat P. Self-perception and action in infancy. Experimental Brain Research 1998, 123:102-109.
37. Rohde M., Di Luca M., Ernst M.O. The rubber hand illusion: Feeling of ownership and proprioceptive drift do not go hand in hand. PLoS One 2011, 6(6):e21659.
38. Tsakiris M. My body in the brain: A neurocognitive model of body-ownership. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48(3):703-712.
39. Tsakiris M., Carpenter L., James D., Fotopoulou A. Hands only illusion: Multisensory integration elicits sense of ownership for body parts but not for non-corporeal objects. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 204:343-352.
40. Tsakiris M., Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuo-tactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:80-91.
41. Vallar G., Ronchi R. Somatoparaphrenia: A body delusion. A review of the neuropsychological literature. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 192(3):533-551.