Roughness perception during the rubber hand illusion

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 136-144

  Schütz Bosbach, Simone ^a   Tausche, Peggy ^a   Weiss, Carmen ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Body image; Roughness perception; Rubber hand illusion; Somatosensation; Tactile perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONCEPT FORMATION; EXPLICIT MEMORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMPLICIT MEMORY; MALE; NEUROMODULATION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOMATOSENSORY SYSTEM; TACTILE MEMORY; TACTILE STIMULATION; VISUAL ILLUSION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BODY IMAGE; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RUBBER; TOUCH PERCEPTION; VISION, OCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 64049101137     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Armel K.C., and Ramachandran V.S. Projecting sensations to external objects: Evidence from skin conductance response. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270 (2003) 1499-1506
2. Austen E.L., Soto-Faraco S., Enns J.T., and Kingstone A. Mislocalizations of touch to a fake hand. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience 4 (2004) 170-181
3. Bergmann Tiest W.M., and Kappers A.M.L. Haptic and visual perception of roughness. Acta Psychologica 124 (2007) 177-189
4. Björkman M. Relations between intra-modal and cross-modal matching. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 8 (1967) 65-76
5. Blakemore S.J., Bristow D., Bird G., Frith C., and Ward J. Somatosensory activations during the observation of touch and a case of vision-touch synaesthesia. Brain 128 (2005) 1571-1583
6. Botvinick M., and Cohen J. Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 391 (1998) 756
7. Costantini M., and Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion: Sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership. Consciousness and Cognition 16 (2007) 229-240
8. Durgin F.H., Evans L., Dunphy N., Klostermann S., and Simmons K. Rubber hands feel the touch of light. Psychological Science 18 (2007) 152-157
9. Ehrsson H.H., Holmes N.P., and Passingham R.E. Touching a rubber hand: Feeling of body ownership is associated with activity in multisensory brain areas. Journal of Neuroscience 25 (2005) 10564-10573
10. Ehrsson H.H., Spence C., and Passingham R.E. That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science 305 (2004) 875-877
11. Ehrsson H.H., Wiech K., Weiskopf N., Dolan R.J., and Passingham R.E. Threatening a rubber hand that you feel is yours elicits a cortical anxiety response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104 (2007) 9828-9833
12. Ernst M.O., and Banks M.S. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415 6870 (2002) 429-433
13. Farnè A., Pavani F., Meneghello F., and Làdavas E. Left tactile extinction following visual stimulation of a rubber hand. Brain 123 (2000) 2350-2360
14. Fiorio M., and Haggard P. Viewing the body prepares the brain for touch: Effects of TMS over somatosensory cortex. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 22 (2005) 773-777
15. Graziano M.S., and Botvinick M.M. How the brain represents the body: Insights from neurophysiology and psychology. In: Prinz W., and Hommel B. (Eds). Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX (2002), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England 136-157
16. Graziano M.S., Cook D.F., and Taylor C.S. Coding the location of the arm by sight. Science 290 (2000) 1782-1786
17. Guest S., and Spence C. What role does multisensory integration play in the visuotactile perception of texture?. International Journal of Psychophysiology 50 (2003) 63-80
18. Haggard P. Just seeing you makes me feel better: Interpersonal enhancement of touch. Social Neuroscience 1 (2006) 104-110
19. Haggard P., Taylor-Clarke M., and Kennett S. Tactile perception, cortical representation and the bodily self. Current Biology 13 (2003) R170-R173
20. Holmes N.P., Snijders H.J., and Spence C. Reaching with alien limbs: Visual exposure to prosthetic hands in a mirror biases proprioception without accompanying illusions of ownership. Perception and Psychophysics 68 (2006) 685-701
21. Holmes N.P., and Spence C. Dissociating body image and body schema with rubber hands. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 2 (2007) 211-212
22. Kammers M.P.M., De Vignemont F., Verhagen L., and Dijkerman H.C. The rubber hand illusion in action. Neuropsychologia 47 1 (2009) 204-211
23. Kanayama N., Sato A., and Ohira H. Crossmodal effect with rubber hand illusion and gammaband activity. Psychophysiology 44 (2007) 392-402
24. Kennett S., Taylor-Clarke M., and Haggard P. Noninformative vision improves the spatial resolution of touch in humans. Current Biology 11 (2001) 1188-1191
25. Keysers C., Wicker B., Gazzola V., Anton J.-L., Fogassi L., and Gallese V. A touching sight: SII/PV activation during the observation and experience of touch. Neuron 42 (2004) 335-346
26. Lederman S.J., and Abbott S.G. Texture perception: Studies of intersensory organization using a discrepancy paradigm, and visual versus tactual psychophysics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 70 (1981) 902-915
27. Lederman S.J., and Klatzky R.L. Multisensory texture perception. In: Calvert G., Spence C., and Stein B. (Eds). Handbook of mulitsensory processes (2004), MIT Press, Cambridge 107-122
28. Longo M.R., Schüür F., Kammers M.P.M., Tsakiris M., and Haggard P. What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition 107 (2008) 978-998
29. Makin T.R., Holmes N.P., and Ehrsson H.H. On the other hand: Dummy hands and peripersonal space. Behavioural Brain Research 191 1 (2008) 1-10
30. Maravita A., and Iriki A. Tools for the body (Schema). Trends in Cognitive Science 8 (2004) 79-86
31. McGonigle D., Hänninen R., Salenius S., Hari R., Frackowiak R.S., and Frith C.D. Whose arm is it anyway? An fMRI case study of supernumerary phantom limb. Brain 125 (2002) 1265-1274
32. Moseley G.L., Olthoff N., Venema A., et al. Psychologically cooling of a specific body part caused by the illusory ownership of an artificial counterpart. PNAS 105 35 (2008) 13169-13173
33. Pavani F., Spence C., and Driver J. Visual capture of touch: Out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychological Science 11 (2000) 353-359
34. Press C., Heyes C., Haggard P., and Eimer M. Visuotactile learning and body representation: An ERP study with rubber hands and rubber objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20 (2008) 312-323
35. Rorden C., Heutink J., Greenfield E., and Robertson I.H. When a rubber hand 'feels' what the real hand cannot. NeuroReport 10 (1999) 135-138
36. Schaefer, M., Heinze, H.-J., & Rotte, M. (in press). My third arm: Shifts in topography of the somatosensory homunculus predict feeling of an artificial supernumerary arm. Human Brain Mapping.
37. Schaefer M., Flor H., Heinze H.-J., and Rotte M. Dynamic modulation of the primary somatosensory cortex during seeing and feeling a touched hand. NeuroImage 29 (2006) 587-592
38. Taylor-Clarke M., Kennett S., and Haggard P. Vision modulates somatosensory cortical processing. Current Biology 12 (2002) 233-236
39. Tsakiris M., and Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31 (2005) 80-91
40. Tsakiris M., Hesse M.D., Boy C., Haggard P., and Fink G.R. Neural signatures of body ownership: A sensory network for bodily self-consciousness. Cerebral Cortex 17 (2007) 2235-2244
41. Tsakiris M., Prabhu G., and Haggard P. Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership. Consciousness and Cognition 15 (2006) 423-432
42. Walton M., and Spence C. Cross-modal congruency and visual capture in a visual elevation discrimination task. Experimental Brain Research 154 (2004) 113-120