Visual information and rubber hand embodiment differentially affect reach-to-grasp actions

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 138, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 263-271

  Heed, Tobias ^a   Gründler, Michael ^a   Rinkleib, Jennifer ^a   Rudzik, Franziska H ^a   Collins, Thérèse ^b   Cooke, Edward ^b,c   O'regan, J Kevin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Aperture; Body schema; Pointing; Sensorimotor processing; Size perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMAN; ILLUSION; LEARNING; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; MOVEMENT; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 80052891187     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Armel K.C., Ramachandran V.S. Projecting sensations to external objects: Evidence from skin conductance response. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, containing papers of a biological character. Royal Society (Great Britain) 2003, 270:1499-1506.
2. Botvinick M., Cohen J. Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 1998, 391:756.
3. Bruno N. When does action resist visual illusions?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2001, 5:379-382.
4. Bruno N., Bertamini M. Haptic perception after a change in hand size. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:1853-1856.
5. Cardinali L., Frassinetti F., Brozzoli C., Urquizar C., Roy A.C., Farne A. Tool-use induces morphological updating of the body schema. Current Biology 2009, 19:R478-R479.
6. de Vignemont F. Body schema and body image - Pros and cons. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:669-680.
7. de Vignemont F., Ehrsson H.H., Haggard P. Bodily illusions modulate tactile perception. Current Biology 2005, 15:1286-1290.
8. Franz V.H. Action does not resist visual illusions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2001, 5:457-459.
9. Franz V.H., Gegenfurtner K.R., Bulthoff H.H., Fahle M. Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychological Science 2000, 11:20-25.
10. Franz V.H., Hesse C., Kollath S. Visual illusions, delayed grasping, and memory: No shift from dorsal to ventral control. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:1518-1531.
11. Goodale M.A., Milner A.D. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences 1992, 15:20-25.
12. Goodale M.A., Westwood D.A. An evolving view of duplex vision: Separate but interacting cortical pathways for perception and action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2004, 14:203-211.
13. Haggard P., Jundi S. Rubber hand illusions and size-weight illusions: Self-representation modulates representation of external objects. Perception 2009, 38:1796-1803.
14. Holmes N.P., Snijders H.J., Spence C. Reaching with alien limbs: visual exposure to prosthetic hands in a mirror biases proprioception without accompanying illusions of ownership. Perception & Psychophysics 2006, 68:685-701.
15. Jeannerod M. The timing of natural prehension movements. Journal of Motor Behavior 1984, 16:235-254.
16. Kammers M.P., van der Ham I.J., Dijkerman H.C. Dissociating body representations in healthy individuals: Differential effects of a kinaesthetic illusion on perception and action. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:2430-2436.
17. Kammers M.P., de Vignemont F., Verhagen L., Dijkerman H.C. The rubber hand illusion in action. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:204-211.
18. Kammers M.P., Verhagen L., Dijkerman H.C., Hogendoorn H., De Vignemont F., Schutter D.J. Is this hand for real? Attenuation of the rubber hand illusion by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the inferior parietal lobule. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 21:1311-1320.
19. Kammers M.P., Kootker J.A., Hogendoorn H., Dijkerman H.C. How many motoric body representations can we grasp?. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 202:203-212.
20. Lackner J.R. Some proprioceptive influences on the perceptual representation of body shape and orientation. Brain 1988, 111(Pt 2):281-297.
21. Linkenauger S.A., Ramenzoni V., Proffitt D.R. Illusory shrinkage and growth: Body-based rescaling affects the perception of size. Psychological Science 2010, 21:1318-1325.
22. Longo M.R., Schüür F., Kammers M.P., Tsakiris M., Haggard P. What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition 2008, 107:978-998.
23. Longo M.R., Kammers M.P.M., Gomi H., Tsakiris M., Haggard P. Contraction of body representation induced by proprioceptive conflict. Current Biology 2009, 19:R727-R728.
24. Longo M.R., Schüür F., Kammers M.P., Tsakiris M., Haggard P. Self awareness and the body image. Acta Psychologica 2009, 132:166-172.
25. Marino B.F., Stucchi N., Nava E., Haggard P., Maravita A. Distorting the visual size of the hand affects hand pre-shaping during grasping. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 202:499-505.
26. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. Two visual systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:774-785.
27. Newport R., Pearce R., Preston C. Fake hands in action: embodiment and control of supernumerary limbs. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 204:385-395.
28. Pavani F., Zampini M. The role of hand size in the fake-hand illusion paradigm. Perception 2007, 36:1547-1554.
29. Pavani F., Spence C., Driver J. Visual capture of touch: out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychological Science 2000, 11:353-359.
30. Smeets J.B., Brenner E. A new view on grasping. Motor Control 1999, 3:237-271.
31. Taylor-Clarke M., Jacobsen P., Haggard P. Keeping the world a constant size: Object constancy in human touch. Nature Neuroscience 2004, 7:219-220.
32. Tsakiris M. My body in the brain: A neurocognitive model of body-ownership. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:703-712.
33. Tsakiris M., Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:80-91.
34. Tsakiris M., Prabhu G., Haggard P. Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership. Consciousness and Cognition 2006, 15:423-432.
35. Ungerleider L.G., Mishkin M. Two cortical systems. Analysis of visual behaviour 1982, 549-586. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. D.J. Ingle, M. Goodale, R.J.W. Mansfield (Eds.).
36. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (revised) 2008, http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html.