Correction: Rubber hand illusion affects joint angle perception (PLoS ONE (2014) 9, 3, (e92854) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092854);Rubber hand illusion affects joint angle perception

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2014, Pages

  Butz, Martin V ^a   Kutter, Esther F ^a   Lorenz, Corinna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; BODY IMAGE; BODY REGIONS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELBOW; FEMALE; HAND; HAND MOVEMENT; HAND PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINEMATICS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; ORIENTATION; ADOLESCENT; BIOMECHANICS; ILLUSION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROPRIOCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

RUBBER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; ELBOW JOINT; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; PROPRIOCEPTION; RUBBER; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84899802120     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102852     Document Type: Erratum

References (31)

1. Kammers MP, Kootker JA, Hogendoorn H, Dijkerman HC (2010) How many motoric body representations can we grasp? Experimental Brain Research 202: 203-212.
2. Ehrsson HH, Spence C, Passingham RE (2004) That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science 305: 875-877. (Pubitemid 39038424)
3. Gallagher S (2005) How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
4. Paillard J (1999) Body schema and body image: a double dissociation in deafferented patients. In: Gantchev GN, Mori S, Massion J, editors, Motor control, today and tomorrow, Moscow: Izdatelstvo. pp. 197-214.
5. Haggard P, Wolpert DM (2005) Disorders of body schema. In: Freund HJ, Jeannerod M, Hallett M, Leiguarda R, editors, Higher-order motor disorders: From neuroanatomy and neurobiology to clinical neurology, Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 261-271.
6. Botvinick M, Cohen J (1998) Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 391: 756. (Pubitemid 28099666)
7. Farnè A, Pavani F, Meneghello F, Làdavas E (2000) Left tactile extinction following visual stimulation of a rubber hand. Brain 123: 2350-2360.
8. Armel KC, Ramachandran VS (2003) Projecting sensations to external objects: evidence from skin conductance response. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 270: 1499-1506. (Pubitemid 36851274)
9. Ehrsson HH, Wiech K, Weiskopf N, Dolan RJ, Passingham RE (2007) Threatening a rubber hand that you feel is yours elicits a cortical anxiety response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 9828-9833. (Pubitemid 47175351)
10. Tsakiris M, Haggard P (2005) The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31: 80-91. (Pubitemid 40306514)
11. Folegatti A, de Vignemont F, Pavani F, Rossetti Y, Farnè A (2009) Losing one's hand: visual-proprioceptive conflict affects touch perception. PLoS One 4: e6920.
12. Holmes NP, Spence C (2004) The body schema and multisensory representation(s) of peripersonal space. Cognitive Processing 5: 94-105.
13. Kalckert A, Ehrsson HH (2012). Moving a rubber hand that feels like your own: dissociation of ownership and agency. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6: 40.
14. Makin TR, Holmes NP, Ehrsson HH (2008) On the other hand: Dummy hands and peripersonal space. Behavioural Brain Research 191: 1-10.
15. Pavani F, Zampini M (2007) The role of hand size in the fake-hand illusion paradigm. Perception-London 36: 1547.
16. Rohde M, Di Luca M, Ernst MO (2011) The rubber hand illusion: Feeling of ownership and proprioceptive drift do not go hand in hand. PloS one 6: e21659.
17. Austen EL, Soto-Faraco S, Enns JT, Kingstone A (2004) Mislocalizations of touch to a fake hand. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 4: 170-181. (Pubitemid 39167159)
18. Pavani F, Spence C, Driver J (2000) Visual capture of touch: Out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychological Science 11: 353-359.
19. Lloyd D, Morrison I, Roberts N (2006) Role for human posterior parietal cortex in visual processing of aversive objects in peripersonal space. Journal of Neurophysiology 95: 205-214. (Pubitemid 44698929)
20. Preston C (2013) The role of distance from the body and distance from the real hand in ownership and disownership during the rubber hand illusion. Acta psychologica 142: 177-183.
21. Ide M (2013) The effect of "anatomical plausibility" of hand angle on the rubber hand illusion. Percept 42: 103-111.
22. Costantini M, Haggard P (2007) The rubber hand illusion: Sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership. Consciousness and Cognition 16: 229-240. (Pubitemid 46874218)
23. Zopf R, Truong S, Finkbeiner M, Friedman J, Williams MA (2011). Viewing and feeling touch modulates hand position for reaching. Neuropsychologia 49: 1287-1293.
24. Graziano MS, Botvinick MM (2002) How the brain represents the body: Insights from neurophysiology and psychology. In Prinz W, Hommel B, editors, Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX, Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp 136-157.
25. Ernst MO, Banks MS (2002) Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415: 429-433. (Pubitemid 34100953)
26. Ehrenfeld S, Butz MV (2013) The modular modality frame model: Continuous body state estimation and plausibility-weighted information fusion. Biological Cybernetics 107: 61-82.
27. Ehrenfeld S, Herbort O, Butz MV (2013) Modular neuron-based body estimation: maintaining consistency over different limbs, modalities, and frames of reference. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 7.
28. Lackner JR (1988) Some proprioceptive influences on the perceptual representation of the body shape and orientation. Brain 111: 281-297.
29. Heed T, Gründler M, Rinkleib J, Rudzik FH, Collins T, et al. (2011) Visual information and rubber hand embodiment differentially affect reach-to-grasp actions. Acta psychologica 138: 263-271.
30. Snijders HJ, Holmes NP, Spence C (2007) Direction-dependent integration of vision and proprioception in reaching under the influence of the mirror illusion. Neuropsychologia 45: 496-505. (Pubitemid 44914001)
31. Riemer M, Kleinböhl D, Hölzl R, Trojan J (2013) Action and perception in the rubber hand illusion. Experimental Brain Research 229: 383-393.