Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: An experimentally supported model

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 81, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 1355-1364

  Van Beers, Robert J ^a,b   Sittig, Anne C ^a   Denier Van Der Gon, Jan J ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; VISION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL ORIENTATION;

EID: 0033017590     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1999.81.3.1355     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. ANDERSON, C. H. Basic elements of biological computational systems. Int. J. Modern Phys. C 5: 313-315, 1994.
2. CANON, L. K. Intermodality inconsistency of input and directed attention as determinants of the nature of adaptation. J. Exp. Psychol. 84: 141-147, 1970.
3. CANON, L. K. Directed attention and maladaptive "adaptation" to displacement of the visual field. J. Exp. Psychol. 88: 403-408, 1971.
4. COHEN, M. M. Continuous versus terminal visual feedback in prism aftereffects. Percept. Mot. Skills 24: 1295-1302, 1967.
5. CHOWE, A., KEESSEN, W., KUUS, W., VAN VLIET, R., AND ZEGELING, A. Proprioceptive accuracy in two dimensions. Percept. Mot. Skills 64: 831-846, 1987.
6. DE GRAAF, J. B., VAN DEN BROEK, J.F.M., BEKKERINO, H., AND SITTIG, A. C. The visual estimation of the felt hand position is shifted towards the body midline. In: Vision et Adaptation, edited by Y. Christen, M. Doly, and M. T. Droy-Lefaix. Paris: Elsevier, 1995, p. 183-192.
7. DIZIO, P., LATHAN, C. E., AND LACKNER, J. R. The role of brachial muscle spindle signals in assignment of visual direction. J. Neurophysiol. 70: 1578-1584, 1993.
8. FISHER, R. A. The Design of Experiments (8th ed.). London: Oliver and Boyd, 1966.
9. FOLEY, J. M., AND HELD, R. Visually directed pointing as a function of target distance, direction and available cues. Percept. Psychophys. 12: 263-268, 1972.
10. GEORGOPOULOS, A. P., CAMINITI, R., AND KALASKA, J. F. Static spatial effects in motor cortex and area 5: quantitative relations in a two-dimensional space. Exp. Brain Res. 54: 446-454, 1984.
11. GEORGOPOULOS, A. P., SCHWARTZ, A. B., AND KETTNER, R. E. Neuronal population coding of movement direction. Science 233: 1416-1419, 1986.
12. GHAHRAMANI, Z., WOLPERT, D. M., AND JORDAN, M. I. Computational models of sensorimotor integration. In: Self-organization, Computational Maps, and Motor Control, edited by P. Morasso, and V. Sanguineti. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1997.
13. HAMILTON, C. R. Intermanual transfer of adaptation to prisms. Am. J. Psychol. 77: 457-462, 1964.
14. HARRIS, C. M. AND WOLPERT, D. M. Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 394: 780-784, 1998.
15. HAY, J. C., PICK, H. L., JR., AND IKEDA, K. Visual capture produced by prism spectacles. Psychon. Sci. 2: 215-216, 1965.
16. HELMS TILLERY, S. I., SOECHTING, J. F., AND EBNER, T. J. Somatosensory cortical activity in relation to arm posture: nonuniform spatial tuning. J. Neurophysiol. 76: 2423-2438, 1996.
17. KALASKA, J. F. AND CRAMMOND, D. J. Cerebral cortical mechanisms of reaching movements. Science 255: 1517-1523, 1992.
18. KELSO, J. A. S., COOK, E., OLSON, M. E., AND EPSTEIN, W. Allocation of attention and the locus of adaptation to displaced vision. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1: 237-245, 1975.
19. LACKNER, J. R. AND LEVINE, M. S. Visual direction depends on the operation of spatial constancy mechanisms: the oculobrachial illusion. Neurosci. Lett 7: 207-212, 1978.
20. PICK, H. L., JR., WARREN, D. H., AND HAY, J. C. Sensory conflict in judgments of spatial direction. Percept. Psychophys. 6: 203-205, 1969.
21. REDDING, G. M. AND WALLACE, B. Adaptive spatial alignment and strategic perceptual-motor control. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 22: 379-394, 1996.
22. ROSSETTI, Y., DESMURGET, M., AND PRABLANC, C. Vectorial coding of movement: vision, proprioception, or both? J. Neurophysiol. 74: 457-463, 1995.
23. SANGER, T. D. Probability density estimation for the interpretation of neural population codes. J. Neurophysiol. 76: 2790-2793, 1996.
24. SLINGER, R. T. AND HORSLEY, V. Upon the orientation of points in space by the muscular, arthrodial, and tactile senses of the upper limbs in normal individuals and in blind persons. Brain 29: 1-27, 1906.
25. STEINMAN, R. M., KOWLER, E., AND COLLEWIJN, H. New directions for oculomotor research. Vision Res. 30: 1845-1864, 1990.
26. UHLARIK, J. J. AND CANON, L. K. Influence of concurrent and terminal exposure conditions on the nature of perceptual adaptation. J. Exp. Psychol. 91: 233-239, 1971.
27. VAN BEEKUM, W. T. The Participation of Muscle Spindles in Human Position Sense Studied by Mechanical Vibration of Muscles (PhD thesis). The Netherlands: Utrecht University, 1980.
28. VAN BEERS, R. J., SITTIG, A. C., AND DENIER VAN DER GON, J. J. How humans combine simultaneous proprioceptive and visual position information. Exp. Brain Res. 111: 253-261, 1996.
29. VAN BEERS, R. J., SITTIG, A. C., AND DENIER VAN DER GON, J. J. The precision of proprioceptive position sense. Exp. Brain Res. 122: 367-377, 1998.
30. VON HELMHOLTZ, H. Treatise on Physiological Optics. New York: Optical Society of America, 1925, vol. 3.
31. WARREN, D. H. Response factors in intermodality localization under conflict conditions. Percept. Psychophys 27: 28-32, 1980.
32. WARREN, D. H. AND CLEAVES, W. T. Visual-proprioceptive interaction under large amounts of conflict. J. Exp. Psychol. 90: 206-214, 1971.
33. WARREN, D. H. AND PICK, H. L., JR. Intermodalily relations in localization in blind and sighted people. Percept. Psychophys. 8: 430-432, 1970.
34. WARREN, D. H. AND SCHMITT, T. L. On the plasticity of visual-proprioceptive bias effects. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 4: 302-310, 1978.
35. WELCH, R. B. Perceptual Modification. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
36. WELCH, R. B., WIDAWSKI, M. H., HARRINGTON, J., AND WARREN, D. H. An examination of the relationship between visual capture and prism adaptation. Percept. Psychophys. 25: 126-132, 1979.
37. WINER, B. J., BROWN, D. R., AND MICHELS, K. M. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991.
38. ZEMEL, R. S., DAYAN, P., AND POUGET, A. Probabilistic interpretation of population codes. Neural Computat. 10: 403-430, 1998.